Re: [E-devel] Re: E CVS: e kwo
JC Wong wrote: Log Message: >> A pseudo-transparency support hack. Any idea how to test out this thing? I can't see any window Menu's setting for that. Thanks. OK, a few notes on this: Pseudo-transparent items must be configured in the theme files. So, first of all, everything should work as usual if the theme does not contain transparent items. To configure an item (ImageClass) to have transparency, it must have the __TRANSPARENT option set, e.g. __ICLASS __BGN __NAME TT_MAIN __NORMAL "images/image-with-alpha.png" __TRANSPARENT __EDGE_SCALING ... __PADDING ... __END : 0x01: Blend the image onto current desktop background 0x02: Blend the image onto the root window (overrides 0x01) 0x04: Do *not* apply the image mask to the blended pixmap The image class must have an image with an alpha channel. The image class must not use tiling. As I understand the opacity in relation to the image clip mask, the mask will have bits set where the opacity is > 50%. Hence the 0x04 flag, which will cause images with areas with opacity < 50% not to be shaped accordingly. Please correct me if I'm wrong. For PT to work, it is also required that - E is compiled to use imlib2 - The desktop background is internally rendered as a full size pixmap (i.e. not tiled or a single color). NB! I implemented the pseudo-transparency support mostly to find out how it could be done, how it would look, and because it was possible. There are a number of bugs, and the implementation could most likely be improved. /Kim --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: [E-devel] E16.6 and Eterm transparency
On Saturday, 22 November 2003, at 20:17:34 (-0500), Laurence J. Lane wrote: > A user mentioned this a while ago. The fix works for me and > backported quite easily. > > Release 0.9.3 when you get a chance. > > Thanks. Have a nice day. That should happen fairly soon. The sooner I get opinions on the new backgrounds, the sooner I release. :) http://www.kainx.org/gallery/?view=Original_Art http://www.kainx.org/misc/Eterm-bg-0.9.2.tar.gz Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/ Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org) --- "It is strange to be known so universally and yet be so lonely." -- Albert Einstein --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: [E-devel] E16.6 and Eterm transparency
> That should happen fairly soon. The sooner I get opinions on the new > backgrounds, the sooner I release. :) they look great to me. will those be in addition to the current set of backgrounds or as a replacement? the reason i ask is, if they're additions, the tiled pix submenu will get way too long unless subgroups are created. -- trey --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: [E-devel] E16.6 and Eterm transparency
On Monday, 29 December 2003, at 13:45:51 (-0500), Trey Gruel wrote: > they look great to me. will those be in addition to the current set > of backgrounds or as a replacement? the reason i ask is, if they're > additions, the tiled pix submenu will get way too long unless > subgroups are created. I haven't entirely decided. The 0*.jpg ones are definitely gone. I'll probably also remove "Blood Spilt," "One If By Land," "Two If By Sea," and possibly "Firestorm" as well. Any others I should nuke? Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/ Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org) --- "No one can see their reflection in running water. It is only in still water that we can see." -- Taoist Proverb --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: [E-devel] E16.6 and Eterm transparency
Michael Jennings wrote: >On Saturday, 22 November 2003, at 20:17:34 (-0500), >Laurence J. Lane wrote: > > > >>A user mentioned this a while ago. The fix works for me and >>backported quite easily. >> >>Release 0.9.3 when you get a chance. >> >>Thanks. Have a nice day. >> >> > >That should happen fairly soon. The sooner I get opinions on the new >backgrounds, the sooner I release. :) > > Backgrounds for Eterm ?? What's that ?? I always use transparency :-) Hall --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: [E-devel] E16.6 and Eterm transparency
On Monday, 29 December 2003, at 14:45:55 (-0500), Hall Stevenson wrote: > Backgrounds for Eterm ?? What's that ?? I always use > transparency :-) Then see how they look as desktop backgrounds. :P Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/ Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org) --- "That's who I am. I'm a positive person." "No, *I'm* a positive person. You are like Santa Claus on Prozac...at Disneyland... getting laid!"-- Alec Baldwin and Lisa Kudrow, "Friends" --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: Re: [E-devel] E16.6 and Eterm transparency
* Trey Gruel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > That should happen fairly soon. The sooner I get opinions on the new > > backgrounds, the sooner I release. :) > > they look great to me. will those be in addition to the current set of > backgrounds or as a replacement? the reason i ask is, if they're > additions, the tiled pix submenu will get way too long unless > subgroups are created. This submenu is generated how? I added a ton of images and I still get the old menus. Could this be dynamically generated from our pixmaps.list ? Just a thought, or a complete misunderstanding of how those menus work. > > -- > trey > > __ Corey Donohoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: Re: [E-devel] E16.6 and Eterm transparency
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 01:53:18PM -0600, Corey Donohoe wrote: > This submenu is generated how? Maybe Etbg_update_list. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: [E-devel] E16.6 and Eterm transparency
> > they look great to me. will those be in addition to the current set > > of backgrounds or as a replacement? the reason i ask is, if they're > > additions, the tiled pix submenu will get way too long unless > > subgroups are created. > > I haven't entirely decided. The 0*.jpg ones are definitely gone. > I'll probably also remove "Blood Spilt," "One If By Land," "Two If By > Sea," and possibly "Firestorm" as well. Any others I should nuke? personally, i nuke about half of them from the default install. mainly the ones that i consider too bright or too busy (i seem to recal one with a ship in a previous release). my concern about the size of the submenus was mostly for those who don't. -- trey --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: [E-devel] E16.6 and Eterm transparency
On Monday, 29 December 2003, at 15:01:26 (-0500), Trey Gruel wrote: > personally, i nuke about half of them from the default install. > mainly the ones that i consider too bright or too busy (i seem to > recal one with a ship in a previous release). my concern about the > size of the submenus was mostly for those who don't. I was hoping for some specific examples of images that you find "too bright" or "too busy." :) Thanks, Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/ Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org) --- "I am I myself alone. I realize I never need [anyone]. Money, power, holy roads...Freedom puts my faith in none of the above." -- Duran Duran, "None of the Above" --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: Re: [E-devel] E16.6 and Eterm transparency
> > they look great to me. will those be in addition to the current set of > > backgrounds or as a replacement? the reason i ask is, if they're > > additions, the tiled pix submenu will get way too long unless > > subgroups are created. > This submenu is generated how? I added a ton of images and I still get > the old menus. Could this be dynamically generated from our pixmaps.list > ? Just a thought, or a complete misunderstanding of how those menus > work. the random bg image at start is from the pixmaps.list, but the menus themselves are in the menu.cfg file from your theme which is not dynamic. -- trey --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: [E-devel] E16.6 and Eterm transparency
> > personally, i nuke about half of them from the default install. > > mainly the ones that i consider too bright or too busy (i seem to > > recal one with a ship in a previous release). my concern about the > > size of the submenus was mostly for those who don't. > > I was hoping for some specific examples of images that you find "too > bright" or "too busy." :) um.. as i no longer have them on my system (they were nuked after all..) i can't say which specific ones i got rid of. in place of that, here's a list of the ones i kept from the 0.9.2 install: scale: Neopolis-horizon.jpg day-night.jpg nebula.jpg ripple.jpg wasteland.jpg wintertree.jpg tile: 004.jpg blackstone.jpg blue_marble.jpg cyber_bg.jpg lightb1.jpg ripple.jpg shale.jpg space.png starry.jpg steel1.jpg twisted.jpg also, i moved nebula from tile to scale (makes more sense to me that way). these are of course chosen due to my particular tastes, so i'd expect others would prolly keep some i got rid of and nuke some i kept.. -- trey --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
Re: [E-devel] things to fix, for a successful from scratch build (so far...) :)
On Mon 29 Dec 2003, Nathan Sullivan wrote: > first note - my PATH contains /usr/local/e17/bin, and all libs are built > with ./autogen.sh --prefix=/usr/local/e17. if rebuilding a lib, just > make uninstall, make distclean, and ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/e17 > > according to cvsnotes.html, all up till ecore is fine currently. > > ecore: > > checking whether ecore_config module is to be built... yes > checking for edb-config... (cached) /usr/local/e17/bin/evas-config > checking for e_db_open in -ledb... no > I can't find Edb, so I won't build ecore_config. > configure: creating ./config.status > > whats wrong with this picture :) > Did you try using --with-edb=$prefix? Did you try running ldconfig before, just to be sure? -- Ibukun Olumuyiwa http://xcomputerman.com "Wisdom is the principal thing; therefore get wisdom: and with all thy getting get understanding." - Proverbs 4:7 --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click ___ enlightenment-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
