EPEL texlive in 7

2014-04-01 Thread Simone Caronni
Hello,

is there any plan to have texlive in EPEL 7?

I need it but wouldn't dare asking for the branch myself... looks
complicated and I don't have any direct experience with it.

Thanks  regards,
--Simone

-- 
You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of
the shore (R. W. Emerson).

http://xkcd.com/229/
http://negativo17.org/
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel


Re: EPEL texlive in 7

2014-04-01 Thread पराग़
Hi,


On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hello,

 is there any plan to have texlive in EPEL 7?

The texlive package already exists in RHEL7.  See
http://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/rhel/beta/7/x86_64/os/Packages/

Regards,
Parag.
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel


Re: EPEL texlive in 7

2014-04-01 Thread पराग़
Hi,

On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Susi Lehtola
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
 On Tue, 1 Apr 2014 11:39:05 +0200
 Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 1 April 2014 11:26, Parag N(पराग़) panem...@gmail.com wrote:

  On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com
  wrote:
   Hello,
  
   is there any plan to have texlive in EPEL 7?
 
  The texlive package already exists in RHEL7.  See
  http://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/rhel/beta/7/x86_64/os/Packages/
 

 Ok, I found the issue. The texlive in EPEL 7 is too old and does not
 contain the sub-packages I'm using.
 I hope they will update it before release; texlive 2013 was released mid
 2013 and we're now in 2014.

 You can probably forget about that hope - they're not going to do a
 major update, certainly not after the beta release.


True. Generally there are no major updates after beta release. For the
subpackages which are missing try filing a bug against texlive in
RHEL7 and request to include needed packages.

Regards,
Parag.
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel


Re: EPEL texlive in 7

2014-04-01 Thread Susi Lehtola
On Tue, 1 Apr 2014 12:52:17 +0200
Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 1 April 2014 11:42, Susi Lehtola jussileht...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
 
   Ok, I found the issue. The texlive in EPEL 7 is too old and does not
   contain the sub-packages I'm using.
   I hope they will update it before release; texlive 2013 was released mid
   2013 and we're now in 2014.
 
  You can probably forget about that hope - they're not going to do a
  major update, certainly not after the beta release.
 
 
 Yeah, definitely. RHEL 6 was providing tetex/tetex-latex, Fedora ships
 texlive that provides them, and RHEL 7 sits in the middle, there is no
 tetex/tetex-latex and texlive does not provide them. Sigh.

Uhm, so this is just about a virtual Provides?

TeXLive *does* have latex. Just install texlive-latex.
-- 
Susi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel


Re: EPEL texlive in 7

2014-04-01 Thread Simone Caronni
On 1 April 2014 12:58, Susi Lehtola jussileht...@fedoraproject.org wrote:

 Uhm, so this is just about a virtual Provides?

 TeXLive *does* have latex. Just install texlive-latex.


Ok, I confirm is related to the texlive version in RHEL 7.
I reworked all the BuildRequires in the SPEC file with the new texlive
syntax (i.e. tex(xcolor.sty)) but the RHEL 7 packages do not contain all
the required files; I'm missing tex(keyva.sty).

Regards,
--Simone

-- 
You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of
the shore (R. W. Emerson).

http://xkcd.com/229/
http://negativo17.org/
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel


Re: EPEL texlive in 7

2014-04-01 Thread Simone Caronni
On 1 April 2014 13:55, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 1 April 2014 12:58, Susi Lehtola jussileht...@fedoraproject.orgwrote:

 Uhm, so this is just about a virtual Provides?

 TeXLive *does* have latex. Just install texlive-latex.


 Ok, I confirm is related to the texlive version in RHEL 7.
 I reworked all the BuildRequires in the SPEC file with the new texlive
 syntax (i.e. tex(xcolor.sty)) but the RHEL 7 packages do not contain all
 the required files; I'm missing tex(keyva.sty).


keyval.sty, not keyva.sty damn typo.
Ok, it's now working, I simply had to adjust the spec file to two separate
build requirements, one for Fedora and RHEL 7 with the new texlive syntax,
one with RHEL 5/ that simply requires tetex/tetex-latex.

Regards,
--Simone


-- 
You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of
the shore (R. W. Emerson).

http://xkcd.com/229/
http://negativo17.org/
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel


Re: EPEL Clang package doesn't work on Amazon Linux

2014-04-01 Thread Dave Johansen
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Anssi Johansson e...@miuku.net wrote:

 1.4.2014 23.11, Tyler Brock kirjoitti:

  Thanks so much for looking into this Dave. Yes, libstdc++ was installed.


 It might be worth mentioning that the Amazon-provided libstdc++-devel is
 4.6.3-3.10.amzn1, and it doesn't seem to provide
 /usr/include/c++/4.4.4/iostream like the CentOS version does.


What does running yum provides /usr/include/c++/4.4.4/iostream on one of
these Amazon boxes output?
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel