[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing report

2014-12-10 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
 963  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
 417  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893/libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5
 182  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1626/puppet-2.7.26-1.el5
  36  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3784/mantis-1.2.17-3.el5
  31  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3849/sblim-sfcb-1.3.8-2.el5
   7  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-4408/libyaml-0.1.2-8.el5
   7  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-4402/antiword-0.37-17.el5
   7  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-4403/pkcs11-helper-1.11-3.el5,openvpn-2.3.6-1.el5
   6  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-4430/phpMyAdmin4-4.0.10.7-1.el5
   6  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-4441/icecast-2.4.1-1.el5
   4  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-4475/pwgen-2.07-1.el5
   0  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-4527/xrdp-0.6.1-1.el5
   0  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-4520/firebird-2.1.5.18496.0-5.el5
   0  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-4620/pywebdav-0.9.4.1-1.el5


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing

cmake-fedora-2.3.4-1.el5
davix-0.4.0-1.el5
firebird-2.1.5.18496.0-5.el5
gfal2-2.7.8-2.el5
perl-Getopt-GUI-Long-0.91-8.el5
perl-QWizard-3.15-10.el5
perl-Text-Unidecode-1.23-1.el5
pywebdav-0.9.4.1-1.el5
srcpd-2.1.2-6.el5
xrdp-0.6.1-1.el5

Details about builds:



 cmake-fedora-2.3.4-1.el5 (FEDORA-EPEL-2014-4567)
 CMake helper modules for fedora developers

Update Information:

- Fixed RHBZ 1144906 - cmake-fedora failed to build target pot_files if the 
.pot file not exists.
- ManageDependency: Now able to assign multiple PKG_CONFIG files.
- ManageGConf: Added "Variables to cache".
- cmake-fedora.conf: el7 and fc21 is now available in bodhi.
- ManageRPMScript: Fixed the mo file handling.
- ManageZanata: Use /usr/share/locale as SYSTEM_LOCALE source instead.
- Fixed RHBZ 1144906 - cmake-fedora failed to build target pot_files if the 
.pot file not exists.
- ManageDependency: var_CFLAGS and var_LIBS are also cached.
- ManageDependency: var_INCLUDEDIR also includes directories from var_CFLAGS.
- ManageGConf: Added "Variables to cache".
- cmake-fedora.conf: el7 and fc21 is now available in bodhi.
- Fixed RHBZ 1144906 - cmake-fedora failed to build target pot_files if the 
.pot file not exists.
- ManageDependency: var_CFLAGS and var_LIBS are also cached.
- ManageDependency: var_INCLUDEDIR also includes directories from var_CFLAGS.
- ManageGConf: Added "Variables to cache".
- cmake-fedora.conf: el7 and fc21 is now available in bodhi.
- Fixed RHBZ 1144906 - cmake-fedora failed to build target pot_files if the 
.pot file not exists.
- ManageDependency: var_CFLAGS and var_LIBS are also cached.
- ManageDependency: var_INCLUDEDIR also includes directories from var_CFLAGS.
- ManageGConf: Added "Variables to cache".
- cmake-fedora.conf: el7 and fc21 is now available in bodhi.
- Fixed RHBZ 1144906 - cmake-fedora failed to build target pot_files if the 
.pot file not exists.
- ManageDependency: var_CFLAGS and var_LIBS are also cached.
- ManageDependency: var_INCLUDEDIR also includes directories from var_CFLAGS.
- ManageGConf: Added "Variables to cache".
- cmake-fedora.conf: el7 and fc21 is now available in bodhi.

ChangeLog:

* Wed Dec 10 2014 Ding-Yi Chen  - 2.3.4-1
- Fixed RHBZ 1144906 - cmake-fedora failed to build target pot_files if the 
.pot file not exists.
- ManageDependency: Now able to assign multiple PKG_CONFIG files.
- ManageGConf: Added "Variables to cache".
- cmake-fedora.conf: el7 and fc21 is now available in bodhi.
- ManageRPMScript: Fixed the mo file handling.
- ManageZanata: Use /usr/share/locale as SYSTEM_LOCALE source instead.

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1144906 - cmake-fedora failed to build target pot_files if the 
.pot file not exists
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144906




 davix-0.4.0-1.el5 (FEDORA-EPEL-2014-4614)
 Toolkit for Http-based file management

Update Information:

davix 0.4.0 release, see RELEASE-NOTES for changes
-

Re: [EPEL-devel] Proposal for Python 3 packaging in EPEL 7

2014-12-10 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On 10 December 2014 at 03:48, Bohuslav Kabrda  wrote:

> Hi all,
> I know I've been promising this for quite some time to several people, so
> I finally managed to put together a proposal for packaging Python 3 in EPEL
> 7 (it'd also scale to EPEL 6 for that matter).
> I've created a wiki page [1] with the proposal and I'd like to hear
> comments and thoughts on it. There are some TODOs and variants in few
> places - I'd like to hear your opinions on these, or perhaps suggestions on
> better approaches.
> I'll create new documents with the updated proposal at some points during
> the discussion, so that people can easily see where the proposal is going
> without having to compare wiki revisions.
>
> Is there any other list/interested parties that should be put in CC of
> this mail? If so, please feel free to respond and do that yourself.
>
>
THis proposal looks good at first blush. I think the time for retirement of
python3X to python3(X+1) can be anywhere from 6 weeks to 2 months (if that
isn't too long).



> Thanks!
>
> --
> Regards,
> Slavek Kabrda
>
> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bkabrda/EPEL7_Python3
> ___
> epel-devel mailing list
> epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
>



-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel


Re: [EPEL-devel] Proposal for Python 3 packaging in EPEL 7

2014-12-10 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 12/10/2014 03:48 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> Hi all,
> I know I've been promising this for quite some time to several people, so I 
> finally managed to put together a proposal for packaging Python 3 in EPEL 7 
> (it'd also scale to EPEL 6 for that matter).
> I've created a wiki page [1] with the proposal and I'd like to hear comments 
> and thoughts on it. There are some TODOs and variants in few places - I'd 
> like to hear your opinions on these, or perhaps suggestions on better 
> approaches.
> I'll create new documents with the updated proposal at some points during the 
> discussion, so that people can easily see where the proposal is going without 
> having to compare wiki revisions.
> 
> Is there any other list/interested parties that should be put in CC of this 
> mail? If so, please feel free to respond and do that yourself.
> 
> Thanks!
> 

Nice to see some progress on this.  Some comments:

- We should have /usr/bin/python3, if only for end user convenience.
- I want to be able to build my EPEL python3X packages out of my existing
python dist-git packages' epel7 branch.

-- 
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane   or...@nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301   http://www.nwra.com
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel


[EPEL-devel] Proposal for Python 3 packaging in EPEL 7

2014-12-10 Thread Bohuslav Kabrda
Hi all,
I know I've been promising this for quite some time to several people, so I 
finally managed to put together a proposal for packaging Python 3 in EPEL 7 
(it'd also scale to EPEL 6 for that matter).
I've created a wiki page [1] with the proposal and I'd like to hear comments 
and thoughts on it. There are some TODOs and variants in few places - I'd like 
to hear your opinions on these, or perhaps suggestions on better approaches.
I'll create new documents with the updated proposal at some points during the 
discussion, so that people can easily see where the proposal is going without 
having to compare wiki revisions.

Is there any other list/interested parties that should be put in CC of this 
mail? If so, please feel free to respond and do that yourself.

Thanks!

-- 
Regards,
Slavek Kabrda

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bkabrda/EPEL7_Python3
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel