[EPEL-devel] Re: Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

2019-08-17 Thread Phil Wyett
On Sun, 2019-08-18 at 01:27 +, upda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-
> testing
> 
> 



> wxGTK3-3.0.4-10.el8.1
> 

In spec changelog version is: Sat Aug 17 2019 Scott Talbert <
s...@techie.net> - 3.0.4-10.1

The '.1' should go before the %{?dist} tag in this case so to not
confuse as the outputted 'el8.1' does.

Regards

Phil

-- 
*** Playing the game for the games sake. ***

IRC: kathenas
Twitter: kathenasorg
Website: https://kathenas.org


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

2019-08-17 Thread updates
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing

blis-0.6.0-2.el8
jcuber-4.4.2-1.el8
procenv-0.51-1.el8
tcping-1.3.5-19.el8
wxGTK3-3.0.4-10.el8.1

Details about builds:



 blis-0.6.0-2.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2019-97b140d86c)
 BLAS-like Library Instantiation Software Framework

Update Information:

Build for EPEL8




 jcuber-4.4.2-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2019-16ffc65d4b)
 CUBE reader for Java

Update Information:

Build for EPEL8




 procenv-0.51-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2019-84253cff6d)
 Utility to show process environment

Update Information:

Build for EPEL8




 tcping-1.3.5-19.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2019-23b428606e)
 Check of TCP connection to a given IP/Port

Update Information:

Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Mass_Rebuild

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1741772 - Request to build tcping for EPEL 8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741772




 wxGTK3-3.0.4-10.el8.1 (FEDORA-EPEL-2019-a44a523f63)
 GTK port of the wxWidgets GUI library

Update Information:

Avoid building webview on aarch64 and s390x on epel8

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1741699 - Build wxGTK 3.0 for EPEL8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741699


___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


[EPEL-devel] Re: Getting packages into EPEL-8

2019-08-17 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 at 02:17, willi.feh...@t-online.de
 wrote:
>
> Dear EPEL developers,
>

>
> Nagios Plugins:
> There is already a Nagios Package in EPEL-8 but without having the Nagios 
> Plugins it's almost worthless to run Nagios.
>
>

No matching package to install: '/usr/sbin/fping'
No matching package to install: 'freeradius-client-devel'
No matching package to install: 'libdbi-devel'
No matching package to install: 'ntp'
No matching package to install: 'perl(Net::SNMP)'
No matching package to install: 'qstat'

Basically I need to look at getting some backfilled packages to get
nagios-plugins in.



-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


[EPEL-devel] Re: What to do about missing gcc-objc from RHEL8?

2019-08-17 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 at 11:18, Björn Persson  wrote:
>
> Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > gcc-objc will need someone to make a module or SCL for it. The GCC
> > src.rpm seems to be patched out to not make any of the alternative
> > compilers that gcc normally makes.
>
> In that case I guess there is no gcc-gnat either? :-(
>

As far as I know, the only artifacts which come out of the gcc src.rpm
are the ones which are shipped.. everything else is removed to make
the build process simpler and less prone to 'oh gcc-gnat enabled
something which made gcc-g++ do X when it should have done Y. [Not
that happens a lot.. but this is meant to be a process where even 1 in
a million problems aren't wanted by enterprise customers]

> > So someone will need to take this on as a major project to form.
>
> I have little experience with building GCC, and none at all with
> modules or SCLs. I think this would be too big a project for me to
> handle in my scarce free time, but if a team would form to build a GCC
> with more languages enabled, then maybe I could help to some small
> degree.
>

Me either. This is going to be a learning process !

> Björn Persson
> ___
> epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org



-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


[EPEL-devel] Re: What to do about missing gcc-objc from RHEL8?

2019-08-17 Thread Björn Persson
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> gcc-objc will need someone to make a module or SCL for it. The GCC
> src.rpm seems to be patched out to not make any of the alternative
> compilers that gcc normally makes.

In that case I guess there is no gcc-gnat either? :-(

> So someone will need to take this on as a major project to form.

I have little experience with building GCC, and none at all with
modules or SCLs. I think this would be too big a project for me to
handle in my scarce free time, but if a team would form to build a GCC
with more languages enabled, then maybe I could help to some small
degree.

Björn Persson


pgpSdMxQshB3h.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signatur
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org