[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

2021-10-05 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
   4  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-a50497600b   
chromium-94.0.4606.61-1.el8
   2  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-d146456623   
dr_libs-0-0.7.20211002gitf13cbcf.el8


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing

jaxb-api-2.3.3-5.el8
mxparser-1.2.1-2.el8
mxparser-1.2.2-1.el8
python-fiona-1.8.20-3.el8
xstream-1.4.18-3.el8

Details about builds:



 jaxb-api-2.3.3-5.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-b1ab26dec0)
 Jakarta XML Binding API

Update Information:

Modified for RHEL.

ChangeLog:


References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #2010316 - Provide jaxb-api for EPEL-8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2010316




 mxparser-1.2.1-2.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-ff6316436e)
 Parser of xpp3_min 1.1.7 with merged changes of the Plexus fork

Update Information:

Adapted for RHEL builds.

ChangeLog:





 mxparser-1.2.2-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-31014fd52c)
 Parser of xpp3_min 1.1.7 with merged changes of the Plexus fork

Update Information:

Update to version 1.2.2    Adapted for RHEL builds.

ChangeLog:





 python-fiona-1.8.20-3.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-9d84d78e92)
 Fiona reads and writes spatial data files

Update Information:

Introduce python-fiona package for EPEL 8.

ChangeLog:


References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #2009910 - Please build python-fiona for EPEL 8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009910




 xstream-1.4.18-3.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-b2cd60438b)
 Java XML serialization library

Update Information:

Added build on RHEL.

ChangeLog:


References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1990050 - Provide xstream for EPEL-8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1990050


___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Committee

2021-10-05 Thread tdawson
Dear all,

You are kindly invited to the meeting:
   EPEL Steering Committee on 2021-10-06 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern
   At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat

The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting.

A general agenda is the following:

#meetingname EPEL
#topic Intros
#topic Old Business
#topic EPEL-7
#topic EPEL-8
#topic EPEL-9
#topic Openfloor
#endmeeting




Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/9854/

___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL package and Java 11 requirement.

2021-10-05 Thread Stefan Bluhm
When opening a Buzilla, these common issues popped up:

java-11-openjdk-headless RPM does not provide java-headless capability
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797054
- "Hi. This is intentional. It will be added once jdk8 will stop to be the 
system JDK."

javapackages-tools: wrong generated Requires: `java-headless >= 11`
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1993879
- "The culprint *may* be xmvn, as there is (at least) one pkg in rhel8 which is 
jdk11 based but is build by Makefile, and do not suffer the issue."
- "A proper long-term fix would mean redesigning how provides and auto-requires 
are supposed to work. There are several possibilities."
- "Another possibility is removing auto-requires on java-headless altogether - 
they add little value and cause much trouble."

Is it possible to disable the auto-require generation in xmvn?
Otherwise it seems I have to skip usage of xmvn just for that.

Best wishes,

Stefan


- Ursprüngliche Mail -
Von: "fedoraproject org" 
An: "epel-devel" 
Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. Oktober 2021 09:05:13
Betreff: [EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL package and Java 11 requirement.

Hello Mike,

I thought (!) I read somewhere that this difference between java-headless and 
java-11-headless was intentional (or at least I understood it that way).
Let me open a Bugzilla against Java 11.



How did others tackle this issue in the past/currently though? I can't be the 
first one creating an rpm with an autogenerated java-headless >= 1:9 tag.

Is there a way to disable/remove this autogeneration or force it to be 
something different?
Also I noticed some packages where the headless tag was not generated at all. 
So maybe I could just remove the trigger for that.

I tried removing maven-compiler-plugin from the pom and adding the 
compiler.target=11 line in the build section but that gave the same result.

Thanks and best wishes,

Stefan

- Ursprüngliche Mail -
Von: "Mike Rochefort" 
An: "epel-devel" 
Gesendet: Montag, 4. Oktober 2021 22:57:09
Betreff: [EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL package and Java 11 requirement.

On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 3:50 PM Stefan Bluhm
 wrote:
>
> it provides "java-11-headless". Not "java-headless". At least not on my 
> machine

Doing my own checks on CentOS Stream 8 and RHEL 8.4, this sounds like a Fedora
change that didn't make its way back to RHEL. Worth opening a Bugzilla
report on?

For posterity, only java-1.8.0 returns when checking for java-headless
on EL8 (latest
versions on RHEL for 1.8 and 11 as of writing).

$ rpm -qp --provides
java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless-1.8.0.302.b08-0.el8_4.x86_64.rpm
/usr/bin/jjs
config(java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless) = 1:1.8.0.302.b08-0.el8_4
java-1.8.0-headless = 1:1.8.0.302.b08-0.el8_4
java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless = 1:1.8.0.302.b08-0.el8_4
java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless(x86-64) = 1:1.8.0.302.b08-0.el8_4
java-headless = 1:1.8.0
java-openjdk-headless = 1:1.8.0.302.b08-0.el8_4
jre-1.8.0-headless = 1:1.8.0.302.b08-0.el8_4
jre-1.8.0-openjdk-headless = 1:1.8.0.302.b08-0.el8_4
jre-headless = 1:1.8.0
jre-openjdk-headless = 1:1.8.0.302.b08-0.el8_4
libjava.so()(64bit)
libjava.so(SUNWprivate_1.1)(64bit)
libjsig.so()(64bit)
libjvm.so()(64bit)
libjvm.so(SUNWprivate_1.1)(64bit)
libverify.so()(64bit)
libverify.so(SUNWprivate_1.1)(64bit)

$ rpm -qp --provides java-11-openjdk-headless-11.0.12.0.7-0.el8_4.x86_64.rpm
config(java-11-openjdk-headless) = 1:11.0.12.0.7-0.el8_4
java-11-headless = 1:11.0.12.0.7-0.el8_4
java-11-openjdk-headless = 1:11.0.12.0.7-0.el8_4
java-11-openjdk-headless(x86-64) = 1:11.0.12.0.7-0.el8_4
jre-11-headless = 1:11.0.12.0.7-0.el8_4
jre-11-openjdk-headless = 1:11.0.12.0.7-0.el8_4

-- 
Mike
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: 

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL package and Java 11 requirement.

2021-10-05 Thread Stefan Bluhm
Hello Mike,

I thought (!) I read somewhere that this difference between java-headless and 
java-11-headless was intentional (or at least I understood it that way).
Let me open a Bugzilla against Java 11.



How did others tackle this issue in the past/currently though? I can't be the 
first one creating an rpm with an autogenerated java-headless >= 1:9 tag.

Is there a way to disable/remove this autogeneration or force it to be 
something different?
Also I noticed some packages where the headless tag was not generated at all. 
So maybe I could just remove the trigger for that.

I tried removing maven-compiler-plugin from the pom and adding the 
compiler.target=11 line in the build section but that gave the same result.

Thanks and best wishes,

Stefan

- Ursprüngliche Mail -
Von: "Mike Rochefort" 
An: "epel-devel" 
Gesendet: Montag, 4. Oktober 2021 22:57:09
Betreff: [EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL package and Java 11 requirement.

On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 3:50 PM Stefan Bluhm
 wrote:
>
> it provides "java-11-headless". Not "java-headless". At least not on my 
> machine

Doing my own checks on CentOS Stream 8 and RHEL 8.4, this sounds like a Fedora
change that didn't make its way back to RHEL. Worth opening a Bugzilla
report on?

For posterity, only java-1.8.0 returns when checking for java-headless
on EL8 (latest
versions on RHEL for 1.8 and 11 as of writing).

$ rpm -qp --provides
java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless-1.8.0.302.b08-0.el8_4.x86_64.rpm
/usr/bin/jjs
config(java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless) = 1:1.8.0.302.b08-0.el8_4
java-1.8.0-headless = 1:1.8.0.302.b08-0.el8_4
java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless = 1:1.8.0.302.b08-0.el8_4
java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless(x86-64) = 1:1.8.0.302.b08-0.el8_4
java-headless = 1:1.8.0
java-openjdk-headless = 1:1.8.0.302.b08-0.el8_4
jre-1.8.0-headless = 1:1.8.0.302.b08-0.el8_4
jre-1.8.0-openjdk-headless = 1:1.8.0.302.b08-0.el8_4
jre-headless = 1:1.8.0
jre-openjdk-headless = 1:1.8.0.302.b08-0.el8_4
libjava.so()(64bit)
libjava.so(SUNWprivate_1.1)(64bit)
libjsig.so()(64bit)
libjvm.so()(64bit)
libjvm.so(SUNWprivate_1.1)(64bit)
libverify.so()(64bit)
libverify.so(SUNWprivate_1.1)(64bit)

$ rpm -qp --provides java-11-openjdk-headless-11.0.12.0.7-0.el8_4.x86_64.rpm
config(java-11-openjdk-headless) = 1:11.0.12.0.7-0.el8_4
java-11-headless = 1:11.0.12.0.7-0.el8_4
java-11-openjdk-headless = 1:11.0.12.0.7-0.el8_4
java-11-openjdk-headless(x86-64) = 1:11.0.12.0.7-0.el8_4
jre-11-headless = 1:11.0.12.0.7-0.el8_4
jre-11-openjdk-headless = 1:11.0.12.0.7-0.el8_4

-- 
Mike
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure