[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

2022-01-21 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
   5  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-f37ca1b24a   
guacamole-server-1.4.0-1.el7
   4  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-92a697e332   
zabbix40-4.0.37-1.el7
   4  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-c99f63fce9   
zabbix50-5.0.19-1.el7
   1  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e18dcf2d58   
uglify-js-3.14.5-2.el7
   0  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-246382d5dc   
golang-1.16.13-2.el7


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing

monit-5.30.0-1.el7

Details about builds:



 monit-5.30.0-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-603933287c)
 Manages and monitors processes, files, directories and devices

Update Information:

Update to 5.30.0 (various bugfixes and improvements).

ChangeLog:

* Thu Jan 20 2022 Stewart Adam  - 5.30.0-1
- Update to 5.30.0

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1874909 - Missing option in monit.service
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1874909
  [ 2 ] Bug #2039927 - monit-5.30.0 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039927


___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

2022-01-21 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
   6  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-806b3f5921   
guacamole-server-1.4.0-1.el8


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing

fcitx-qt5-1.2.4-4.el8
monit-5.30.0-1.el8
packit-0.44.0-1.el8

Details about builds:



 fcitx-qt5-1.2.4-4.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-64dc24f255)
 Fcitx IM module for Qt5

Update Information:

rebuild

ChangeLog:

* Fri Jan 21 2022 Qiyu Yan  - 1.2.4-4
- rebuild to qt5 5.15.2 #(2043318)

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #2043318 - fcitx-qt5 is not installable in RHEL 8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2043318




 monit-5.30.0-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-854fb5fe62)
 Manages and monitors processes, files, directories and devices

Update Information:

Update to 5.30.0 (various bugfixes and improvements).

ChangeLog:

* Thu Jan 20 2022 Stewart Adam  - 5.30.0-1
- Update to 5.30.0

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1874909 - Missing option in monit.service
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1874909
  [ 2 ] Bug #2039927 - monit-5.30.0 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039927




 packit-0.44.0-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a12f6e5d1c)
 A tool for integrating upstream projects with Fedora operating system

Update Information:

0.44.0 upstream release

ChangeLog:

* Thu Jan 20 2022 Packit Service  - 
0.44.0-1
- Packit now correctly finds the release, even if you don't use the version as
  the title of the release on GitHub. 
([packit#1437](https://github.com/packit/packit/pull/1437))
- Local branches are now named as `pr/{pr_id}` when checking out a PR, even
  when it's not being merged with the target branch. This results in the NVR
  of the build containing `pr{pr_id}` instead of `pr.changes{pr_id}`. 
([packit#1445](https://github.com/packit/packit/pull/1445))
- A bug which caused ignoring the `--no-bump` and `--release-suffix` options
  when creating an SRPMs from source-git repositories has been fixed. Packit
  also doesn't touch the `Release` field in the specfile unless it needs to be
  changed (the macros are not expanded that way when not necessary). 
([packit#1452](https://github.com/packit/packit/pull/1452))
- When checking if directories hold a Git-tree, Packit now also allows `.git`
  to be a file with a `gitdir` reference, not only a directory. 
([packit#1458](https://github.com/packit/packit/pull/1458))


___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


[EPEL-devel] question about review process excemptions for Python 3

2022-01-21 Thread Felix Schwarz


Hi,

the packaging guidelines have a few excemptions for the package review process 
[1]. I'm working on updating certbot to Python 3 in EPEL 7 (rhbz 1797129, 
[2]). I need some additional Python 3 packages in EPEL 7 to achieve that and 
my question is which of these packages should get a proper review.



A) python3-augeas
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2043744

This is mostly the Fedora spec with just on additional bugfix (already 
upstream).


B) python3-josepy
intended spec file: 
https://github.com/FelixSchwarz/certbot-epel7-python3/blob/rawhide/python3-josepy/python-josepy.spec


I did not want to upgrade the existing EPEL 7 package as the required version 
is Python 3 only. We can not use some newer macros like %pytest but otherwise 
the spec is the same as in Fedora.



C) python3-boto3
python-boto3 (Python 2) version is in RHEL and won't get a Python3 package.
intended spec file: 
https://github.com/FelixSchwarz/certbot-epel7-python3/blob/rawhide/python3-boto3/python3-boto3.spec


The spec file is very close to the RHEL spec file just with some 
customizations removed.


Should I try to get reviews for each of the three packages or can I skip some 
of these according to the Fedora review policy?


Felix



[1] 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ReviewGuidelines/#_package_review_process

[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797129
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure