[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing: Age URL 10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-b31211e2ce apptainer-1.1.8-1.el9 3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-b59aa78f7e vtk-9.1.0-18.el9 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-5114b71516 rust-below-0.6.3-4.el9 rust-cargo-c-0.9.12-4.el9 rust-pore-0.1.8-3.el9 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing chromium-113.0.5672.63-1.el9 engrampa-1.26.1-1.el9 mate-session-manager-1.26.1-1.el9 Details about builds: chromium-113.0.5672.63-1.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-83071f7bea) A WebKit (Blink) powered web browser that Google doesn't want you to use Update Information: update to 113.0.5672.64. Fixes the following security issues: CVE-2023-2459 CVE-2023-2460 CVE-2023-2461 CVE-2023-2462 CVE-2023-2463 CVE-2023-2464 CVE-2023-2465 CVE-2023-2466 CVE-2023-2467 CVE-2023-2468 ChangeLog: * Wed May 3 2023 Than Ngo - 113.0.5672.63-1 - update to 113.0.5672.63 * Sun Apr 23 2023 Than Ngo - 112.0.5615.165-2 - make --use-gl=egl default for x11/wayland - enable WebUIDarkMode References: [ 1 ] Bug #2192762 - CVE-2023-2459 chromium-browser: Inappropriate implementation in Prompts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192762 [ 2 ] Bug #2192763 - CVE-2023-2460 chromium-browser: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Extensions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192763 [ 3 ] Bug #2192764 - CVE-2023-2461 chromium-browser: Use after free in OS Inputs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192764 [ 4 ] Bug #2192765 - CVE-2023-2462 chromium-browser: Inappropriate implementation in Prompts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192765 [ 5 ] Bug #2192766 - CVE-2023-2463 chromium-browser: Inappropriate implementation in Full Screen Mode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192766 [ 6 ] Bug #2192767 - CVE-2023-2464 chromium-browser: Inappropriate implementation in PictureInPicture https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192767 [ 7 ] Bug #2192768 - CVE-2023-2465 chromium-browser: Inappropriate implementation in CORS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192768 [ 8 ] Bug #2192769 - CVE-2023-2466 chromium-browser: Inappropriate implementation in Prompts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192769 [ 9 ] Bug #2192770 - CVE-2023-2467 chromium-browser: Inappropriate implementation in Prompts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192770 [ 10 ] Bug #2192771 - CVE-2023-2468 chromium-browser: Inappropriate implementation in PictureInPicture https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192771 engrampa-1.26.1-1.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-8d71c1f742) MATE Desktop file archiver Update Information: - update to 1.26.1 release ChangeLog: * Thu May 4 2023 Wolfgang Ulbrich - 1.26.1-1 - update to 1.26.1 mate-session-manager-1.26.1-1.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-4e15b23a64) MATE Desktop session manager Update Information: - update to 1.26.1 ChangeLog: * Fri May 5 2023 Wolfgang Ulbrich - 1.26.1-1 - update to 1.26.1 ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-18a0e3fa23 apptainer-1.1.8-1.el7 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-342b96903b zarafa-7.1.14-6.el7 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-c1088e0644 tinyproxy-1.8.4-2.el7 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing chromium-113.0.5672.63-1.el7 Details about builds: chromium-113.0.5672.63-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-0989e83e8a) A WebKit (Blink) powered web browser that Google doesn't want you to use Update Information: update to 113.0.5672.64. Fixes the following security issues: CVE-2023-2459 CVE-2023-2460 CVE-2023-2461 CVE-2023-2462 CVE-2023-2463 CVE-2023-2464 CVE-2023-2465 CVE-2023-2466 CVE-2023-2467 CVE-2023-2468 ChangeLog: * Wed May 3 2023 Than Ngo - 113.0.5672.63-1 - update to 113.0.5672.63 * Sun Apr 23 2023 Than Ngo - 112.0.5615.165-2 - make --use-gl=egl default for x11/wayland - enable WebUIDarkMode References: [ 1 ] Bug #2192762 - CVE-2023-2459 chromium-browser: Inappropriate implementation in Prompts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192762 [ 2 ] Bug #2192763 - CVE-2023-2460 chromium-browser: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Extensions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192763 [ 3 ] Bug #2192764 - CVE-2023-2461 chromium-browser: Use after free in OS Inputs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192764 [ 4 ] Bug #2192765 - CVE-2023-2462 chromium-browser: Inappropriate implementation in Prompts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192765 [ 5 ] Bug #2192766 - CVE-2023-2463 chromium-browser: Inappropriate implementation in Full Screen Mode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192766 [ 6 ] Bug #2192767 - CVE-2023-2464 chromium-browser: Inappropriate implementation in PictureInPicture https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192767 [ 7 ] Bug #2192768 - CVE-2023-2465 chromium-browser: Inappropriate implementation in CORS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192768 [ 8 ] Bug #2192769 - CVE-2023-2466 chromium-browser: Inappropriate implementation in Prompts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192769 [ 9 ] Bug #2192770 - CVE-2023-2467 chromium-browser: Inappropriate implementation in Prompts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192770 [ 10 ] Bug #2192771 - CVE-2023-2468 chromium-browser: Inappropriate implementation in PictureInPicture https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192771 ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 50 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1e00c3d01e cutter-re-2.2.0-1.el8 rizin-0.5.1-1.el8 10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-44ff2475c4 apptainer-1.1.8-1.el8 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-ae97901b58 vtk-9.0.1-10.el8 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing chromium-113.0.5672.63-1.el8 engrampa-1.26.1-1.el8 mate-session-manager-1.26.1-1.el8 scorep-6.0-18.el8 Details about builds: chromium-113.0.5672.63-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-f44d817bc9) A WebKit (Blink) powered web browser that Google doesn't want you to use Update Information: update to 113.0.5672.64. Fixes the following security issues: CVE-2023-2459 CVE-2023-2460 CVE-2023-2461 CVE-2023-2462 CVE-2023-2463 CVE-2023-2464 CVE-2023-2465 CVE-2023-2466 CVE-2023-2467 CVE-2023-2468 ChangeLog: * Wed May 3 2023 Than Ngo - 113.0.5672.63-1 - update to 113.0.5672.63 * Sun Apr 23 2023 Than Ngo - 112.0.5615.165-2 - make --use-gl=egl default for x11/wayland - enable WebUIDarkMode References: [ 1 ] Bug #2192762 - CVE-2023-2459 chromium-browser: Inappropriate implementation in Prompts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192762 [ 2 ] Bug #2192763 - CVE-2023-2460 chromium-browser: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Extensions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192763 [ 3 ] Bug #2192764 - CVE-2023-2461 chromium-browser: Use after free in OS Inputs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192764 [ 4 ] Bug #2192765 - CVE-2023-2462 chromium-browser: Inappropriate implementation in Prompts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192765 [ 5 ] Bug #2192766 - CVE-2023-2463 chromium-browser: Inappropriate implementation in Full Screen Mode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192766 [ 6 ] Bug #2192767 - CVE-2023-2464 chromium-browser: Inappropriate implementation in PictureInPicture https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192767 [ 7 ] Bug #2192768 - CVE-2023-2465 chromium-browser: Inappropriate implementation in CORS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192768 [ 8 ] Bug #2192769 - CVE-2023-2466 chromium-browser: Inappropriate implementation in Prompts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192769 [ 9 ] Bug #2192770 - CVE-2023-2467 chromium-browser: Inappropriate implementation in Prompts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192770 [ 10 ] Bug #2192771 - CVE-2023-2468 chromium-browser: Inappropriate implementation in PictureInPicture https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2192771 engrampa-1.26.1-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-72c1526931) MATE Desktop file archiver Update Information: - update to 1.26.1 release ChangeLog: * Thu May 4 2023 Wolfgang Ulbrich - 1.26.1-1 - update to 1.26.1 mate-session-manager-1.26.1-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-8a49a490ef) MATE Desktop session manager Update Information: - update to 1.26.1 ChangeLog: * Fri May 5 2023 Wolfgang Ulbrich - 1.26.1-1 - update to 1.26.1 scorep-6.0-18.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-219b058a50) Scalable Performance Measurement Infrastructure for Parallel Codes Update Information: Fix building from source. ChangeLog: * Fri May 5 2023 - 6.0-18 - Add patch to fix FTBFS with current opari2 ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora
[EPEL-devel] Re: apptainer 1.1.8-1 has an incompatible change for apptainer-suid users
The NVD analysis at https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-30549 is now finished and they agreed with the impact score that I gave it. They ended up with an even higher rating because they said the attack complexity was low. I think the complexity is high, but in either case the overall severity is rated High. Dave On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 10:17:42AM -0500, Dave Dykstra wrote: > DT, > > I am not all arguing that CVE-2022-1184 impact score was incorrect. I can't > imagine why you think that. > > By itself, CVE-2022-1184 is not a privilege escalation, because it can > normally only be exploited by someone with write access to the filesystem > boots, that is, root. Only with setuid-root apptainer/singularity does it > become a privilege escalation. > > I have said that I think that CVE-2022-1184's "Privileges Required" was > incorrect. It was you who suggested USB automounts being available to users > may have been their reason for setting it to "low". If that's what they > meant, then I think it makes perfect sense that they don't count that as a > privilege escalation because physical access already gives privilege > escalation in much easier ways. I said that that's probably why they only > counted it as denial of service since that was the only thing new. > > Dave > > On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 02:14:08PM +0100, David Trudgian wrote: > > Dave, > > > > On Wed, May 3, 2023, at 10:31 PM, Dave Dykstra via epel-devel wrote: > > > On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 02:59:42PM -0500, Carl George wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 10:20 AM Dave Dykstra via epel-devel > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 02:11:46AM -0500, Carl George wrote: > > > ... > > > > > > The Red Hat CVSS score for CVE-2022-1184 has the same breakdown as > > > > > > the > > > > > > NVD CVSS score. Both rate the "privileges required" property as > > > > > > low. > > > > > > From what I can tell that property would be rated high if they > > > > > > considered root privileges to be required. How does apptainer's use > > > > > > of setuid change anything here? > > > > > > > > > > According to the explanation I received from the ext4 kernel > > > > > developer, > > > > > Red Hat's CVSS rating was incorrect on that property. Without > > > > > singularity > > > > > or apptainer it does require high privileges to exploit. > > > > > > > > Red Hat's CVSS score breakdown for CVE-2022-1184 is: > > > > > > > > CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H > > > > > > > > You're suggesting that Red Hat's rating should have been higher > > > > because they didn't factor in low privileges, but that is objectively > > > > false because they did score it with low privileges. If they had > > > > scored it for high privileges, that would have dropped the rating down > > > > from 5.5 to 4.4. > > > > > > As DT pointed out, perhaps Red Hat was thinking that low privileges could > > > have been used by automounts of a USB device, but since that requires > > > physical access and there are much easier ways to get privilege escalation > > > with physical access, the only additional capability that would give to > > > a user is a crash, a denial of service. > > > > Impact scoring for a CVE doesn't depend on how it is triggered, though. If > > CVE-2022-1184 can provably give privilege escalation then it should be > > scored high on the impact (confidentiality/integrity/availability) metrics. > > It is not relevant to the impact whether I need physical access. The ease > > of the exploit is covered by the exploitability metrics, not the impact > > metrics. > > > > https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln-metrics/cvss/v3-calculator > > > > My comment about automounts etc. was only related to why Red Hat might hve > > set the 'Privileges Required' property to low, even though `mount` is > > usually a root-only operation. Here you are arguing that CVE-2022-1184 was > > mis-scored on impact (confidentiality/integrity/availability). This is not > > related to my point about privileges required. > > > > > > There is no reason to believe that CVE-2022-1184 > > > > should have been marked as higher impact than it was, and thus I see > > > > no reason to justify the likely duplicate CVE-2023-30549 as high. > > > > > > Now you seem to be missing the point of CVE-2023-30549. I agree that > > > there's no reason to believe that CVE-2022-1184 should have been marked > > > as higher impact than it was, but CVE-2023-30549 is about the extra > > > impact that setuid-root apptainer (prior to 1.1.8) gives to users. > > > It gives any user with a local account write access to the underlying > > > bits of a filesystem, and since the filesystem can be easily corrupted > > > by the user, and since CVE-2022-1184 is a memory corruption bug and not > > > a simple panic, it potentially allows privilege escalation. That's why > > > CVE-2023-30549 is high severity. > > > > Again, this is conflating scoring how difficult it is to
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-18a0e3fa23 apptainer-1.1.8-1.el7 5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-342b96903b zarafa-7.1.14-6.el7 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-c1088e0644 tinyproxy-1.8.4-2.el7 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing singularity-ce-3.11.3-1.el7 Details about builds: singularity-ce-3.11.3-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-3b5f9c33da) Application and environment virtualization Update Information: Upgrade to 3.11.3 upstream version. This is a compatible upgrade to a new upstream patch version. Upgrade to 3.11.2 upstream version. This is a compatible upgrade to a new upstream patch version. ChangeLog: * Fri May 5 2023 David Trudgian - 3.11.3-1 - Upgrade to 3.11.3 upstream version. - This is a compatible upgrade to a new upstream patch version. * Tue May 2 2023 David Trudgian - 3.11.2-1 - Upgrade to 3.11.2 upstream version. - This is a compatible upgrade to a new upstream patch version. ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 49 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1e00c3d01e cutter-re-2.2.0-1.el8 rizin-0.5.1-1.el8 9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-44ff2475c4 apptainer-1.1.8-1.el8 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-ae97901b58 vtk-9.0.1-10.el8 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing singularity-ce-3.11.3-1.el8 Details about builds: singularity-ce-3.11.3-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-a9b52cfd9f) Application and environment virtualization Update Information: Upgrade to 3.11.3 upstream version. This is a compatible upgrade to a new upstream patch version. Upgrade to 3.11.2 upstream version. This is a compatible upgrade to a new upstream patch version. ChangeLog: * Fri May 5 2023 David Trudgian - 3.11.3-1 - Upgrade to 3.11.3 upstream version. - This is a compatible upgrade to a new upstream patch version. * Tue May 2 2023 David Trudgian - 3.11.2-1 - Upgrade to 3.11.2 upstream version. - This is a compatible upgrade to a new upstream patch version. ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing: Age URL 9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-b31211e2ce apptainer-1.1.8-1.el9 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-b59aa78f7e vtk-9.1.0-18.el9 0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-5114b71516 rust-below-0.6.3-4.el9 rust-cargo-c-0.9.12-4.el9 rust-pore-0.1.8-3.el9 0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-b40368566f libheif-1.15.2-1.el9 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing hcxtools-6.3.0-1.el9 nfdump-1.7.2-1.el9 rttr-0.9.7-0.1git7edbd58.el9 singularity-ce-3.11.3-1.el9 Details about builds: hcxtools-6.3.0-1.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-fb7763cc25) Portable solution for conversion WiFi dump files to hashcat formats Update Information: Update to latest version ChangeLog: * Fri May 5 2023 Artem Polishchuk - 6.3.0-1 - chore: Update to 6.3.0 nfdump-1.7.2-1.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-5d3e6de9ed) NetFlow collecting and processing tools Update Information: nfdump-1.7.2 --- Nfdump-1.7.2 removes old code, and got some new features. It fixes a few bugs and improves stability. As of nfdump-1.7.2, it is now the recommended version in production. For the full list of changes, see the ChangeLog file. ChangeLog: * Thu May 4 2023 Denis Fateyev - 1.7.2-1 - Update to version 1.7.2 * Thu Jan 19 2023 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.7.1-2 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_38_Mass_Rebuild References: [ 1 ] Bug #2189254 - nfdump-1.7.2 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189254 rttr-0.9.7-0.1git7edbd58.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-96c24eb4d2) Run Time Type Reflection Update Information: Introduce for epel9 ChangeLog: * Mon Aug 16 2021 Nicolas Chauvet - 0.9.7-0.1git7edbd58 - Update to pre 0.9.7 * Fri Jul 23 2021 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.9.6-4 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Mass_Rebuild * Thu Feb 25 2021 Nicolas Chauvet - 0.9.6-3 - Drop main package - Split docs * Wed Feb 24 2021 Nicolas Chauvet - 0.9.6-2 - Backport patch for aarch64 * Mon Feb 8 2021 Nicolas Chauvet - 0.9.6-1 - Initial spec file References: [ 1 ] Bug #2163575 - Please branch and build rttr in EPEL 9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2163575 singularity-ce-3.11.3-1.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-ec7f73ecd7) Application and environment virtualization Update Information: Upgrade to 3.11.3 upstream version. This is a compatible upgrade to a new upstream patch version. Upgrade to 3.11.2 upstream version. This is a compatible upgrade to a new upstream patch version. ChangeLog: * Fri May 5 2023 David Trudgian - 3.11.3-1 - Upgrade to 3.11.3 upstream version. - This is a compatible upgrade to a new upstream patch version. * Tue May 2 2023 David Trudgian - 3.11.2-1 - Upgrade to 3.11.2 upstream version. - This is a compatible upgrade to a new upstream patch version. ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[EPEL-devel] KDE on CentOS Stream 9
There is a new qt5 update in CentOS Stream 9. This update will be going out when RHEL 9.3 is released six months from now. Again, that is RHEL 9.3, NOT 9.2. I am currently rebuilding KDE for CentOS Stream 9. This will take some time to rebuild and make it through testing. I am suspecting it will not be in stable until May 18. It is a known issue that is being resolved. No need for further bugs. If you have already created a bug, please cc me (tdaw...@redhat.com) on it, because most of the bugs do not get assigned to me. Thank You Troy ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[EPEL-devel] Re: A CenOS Stream package missing during EPEL9 build: unresponsive CentOS Stream @redhat maintainers
On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 12:57 PM Marcin Dulak wrote: > Hi, > > I have a bugzilla opened about a CenOS Stream package missing during EPEL9 > builds > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182460, for over a month > with no response. > > Can something be done about this, apart from trying to reach the > maintainers on their corporate emails? > Please do not try to contact the maintainers on their corporate emails. If you are in a rush, then consider creating an -epel package. Details are here. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-policy-missing-sub-packages/ Troy ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
