[EPEL-devel] Re: EL selinux policy

[Mukundan Ragavan]

On 9/15/22 21:47, Carl George wrote:

On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 8:46 PM Mukundan Ragavan  wrote:



I have a packaging question -

One of the packages I maintain, nextcloud-client, fails to execute in
EPEL-9. It is being blocked by SELinux policy.

getsebool selinuxuser_execmod is off in EL9.

Is it even allowed to change SELinux rule in, for example, %post?

I suspect the correct way to do this is to file a bug, correct?

Thanks.

--
GPG Key: E5C8BC67
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


I've never seen anything prohibiting it.  In the caddy package I set
some SELinux booleans, fcontexts, and ports in %post.  To avoid hard
dependencies on the tools I wrap the commands in an if statement that
checks for the relevant binary.

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/caddy/blob/rawhide/f/caddy.spec#_232-250

Grepping through other spec files I see a quite a few other examples
of setsebool and semanage commands in scriptlets.



Great. This is exactly the advise I was looking for.

Thank you very much.

--
GPG Key: E5C8BC67


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[EPEL-devel] EL selinux policy

[Mukundan Ragavan]

I have a packaging question -

One of the packages I maintain, nextcloud-client, fails to execute in 
EPEL-9. It is being blocked by SELinux policy.


getsebool selinuxuser_execmod is off in EL9.

Is it even allowed to change SELinux rule in, for example, %post?

I suspect the correct way to do this is to file a bug, correct?

Thanks.

--
GPG Key: E5C8BC67


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[EPEL-devel] Re: Xfce 4.16 on EPEL-8

[Mukundan Ragavan]

I forgot to email about this. Here are official buils of Xfce 4.16 on EPEL8

https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-3f7925eb01

I am hoping to push this to stable in about a week. Please test.

--
GPG Key: E5C8BC67



OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[EPEL-devel] Re: Xfce 4.16 on EPEL-8

[Mukundan Ragavan]

On 2/15/21 7:02 PM, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:



Mukundan -

   Just a note that as mentioned on the CentOS list here:
https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2021-February/353317.html

# dnf group install Xfce
Last metadata expiration check: 0:02:24 ago on Mon 15 Feb 2021 
03:41:53 PM MST.

No match for group package "NetworkManager-gnome"
No match for group package "thunar-archive-plugin"

So perhaps the comps file needs to get cleaned up?



Indeed. I just forgot to build thunar-archive-plugin. :(

NetworkManager-gnome just needs to be removed from comps. I will do this.

I need to update a bunch of packages on EPEL-8 anyway.



Took me a while to get to this but this is done now.

thunar-archive-plugin in built on epel8/copr
I have submitted a pull request to get rid of nm-gnome from xfce group.

Testing and feedback is appreciated.

Best,
Mukundan.

--
GPG Key: E5C8BC67



OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[EPEL-devel] Re: Xfce 4.16 on EPEL-8

[Mukundan Ragavan]

On 2/15/21 5:50 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:

On 2/7/21 8:56 AM, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:


Hi all,

I have a COPR containing xfce 4.16 packages for EPEL-8 packages [0]. I 
would like to get some testing done using this COPR before getting 
into EPEL-8.


Please email if and when you notice problems and I will try to fix it 
as soon as possible.


As a reminder - xfce 4.16 will be available in F34.


Mukundan -

   Just a note that as mentioned on the CentOS list here:
https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2021-February/353317.html

# dnf group install Xfce
Last metadata expiration check: 0:02:24 ago on Mon 15 Feb 2021 03:41:53 
PM MST.

No match for group package "NetworkManager-gnome"
No match for group package "thunar-archive-plugin"

So perhaps the comps file needs to get cleaned up?



Indeed. I just forgot to build thunar-archive-plugin. :(

NetworkManager-gnome just needs to be removed from comps. I will do this.

I need to update a bunch of packages on EPEL-8 anyway.



And then possibly new with the copr seems to be:

  Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
   - nothing provides pulseaudio-daemon needed by 
xfce4-pulseaudio-plugin-0.4.3-5.el8.x86_64


Thanks for working on Xfce for EPEL, much appreciated.





Ah, this I noticed. Hopefully, this will be fixed on pulseaudio (based 
on Neal's email).


--
GPG Key: E5C8BC67



OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[EPEL-devel] Xfce 4.16 on EPEL-8

[Mukundan Ragavan]

Hi all,

I have a COPR containing xfce 4.16 packages for EPEL-8 packages [0]. I 
would like to get some testing done using this COPR before getting into 
EPEL-8.


Please email if and when you notice problems and I will try to fix it as 
soon as possible.


As a reminder - xfce 4.16 will be available in F34.

Thanks,
Mukundan.


[0] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/nonamedotc/xfce416-epel8/
--
GPG Key: E5C8BC67


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Re: Soname bump of libb2 on F31/EPEL7

[Mukundan Ragavan]

On 5/26/20 1:49 PM, Antonio T. sagitter wrote:
> Mukundan, your package misses.
> Please, rebuild `gtkhash` against `libb2-0.98.1` or let me commit
> changes to it.
> 

Hi Antonio,

This is done. Please add gtkhash to your update as well.

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45107523

Thanks,
Mukundan.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Re: Soname bump of libb2 on F31/EPEL7

[Mukundan Ragavan]

On 5/28/20 2:25 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:

> How is it possible? What happened with the libb2-0.98.1-2.fc31 build:
> 
> $ koji list-history --build libb2-0.98.1-2.fc31
> Fri May 22 20:48:12 2020 libb2-0.98.1-2.fc31 tagged into 
> f31-updates-candidate by sagitter
> Fri May 22 20:54:19 2020 libb2-0.98.1-2.fc31 tagged into f31-signing-pending 
> by bodhi
> Fri May 22 20:54:36 2020 libb2-0.98.1-2.fc31 untagged from 
> f31-signing-pending by autopen
> Fri May 22 20:54:36 2020 libb2-0.98.1-2.fc31 tagged into 
> f31-updates-testing-pending by autopen
> Fri May 22 23:00:35 2020 libb2-0.98.1-2.fc31 tagged into f31-override by bodhi
> Sat May 23 04:51:56 2020 libb2-0.98.1-2.fc31 untagged from 
> f31-updates-candidate by bodhi
> Sat May 23 04:51:56 2020 libb2-0.98.1-2.fc31 tagged into f31-updates-testing 
> by bodhi
> Sat May 23 04:52:04 2020 libb2-0.98.1-2.fc31 untagged from 
> f31-updates-testing-pending by bodhi
> Tue May 26 15:15:47 2020 libb2-0.98.1-2.fc31 untagged from 
> f31-updates-testing by bodhi
> Tue May 26 15:15:47 2020 libb2-0.98.1-2.fc31 untagged from f31-override by 
> bodhi
> Tue May 26 15:15:48 2020 libb2-0.98.1-2.fc31 tagged into 
> f31-updates-candidate by bodhi [still active]
> 
> It was untagged from override by bodhi user on 2020-05-26. That's 3 days 
> before the
> expiration. It looks like a bug in Bodhi service.
> 
> You can try to submit it into override again.
> 
> -- Petr


I have submitted the BR again but no use so far. I noticed that kojira
ran a f31-infra-build task.

$ koji wait-repo f31-infra-build --build=libb2-0.98.1-2.fc31
Successfully waited 0:00 for libb2-0.98.1-2.fc31 to appear in the
f31-infra-build repo

$ koji wait-repo f31-build --build=libb2-0.98.1-2.fc31

It has been at least 1 hour since I submitted the BR.

$ koji list-history --build libb2-0.98.1-2.fc31


Tue May 26 09:15:47 2020 libb2-0.98.1-2.fc31 untagged from
f31-updates-testing by bodhi
Tue May 26 09:15:47 2020 libb2-0.98.1-2.fc31 untagged from f31-override
by bodhi
Tue May 26 09:15:48 2020 libb2-0.98.1-2.fc31 tagged into
f31-updates-candidate by bodhi [still active]
Thu May 28 07:39:43 2020 libb2-0.98.1-2.fc31 tagged into f31-override by
bodhi [still active]

Scratch build still does not pull in 0.98.1 [1]. From the build log,


DEBUG util.py:602:   intltool  noarch  0.51.0-15.fc31
build  55 k
DEBUG util.py:602:   libappstream-glib aarch64 0.7.17-1.fc31
build 316 k
DEBUG util.py:602:   libb2-devel   aarch64
0.98-4.20171225git60ea749.fc31   build 8.8 k


:(


[1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45100671




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Re: Soname bump of libb2 on F31/EPEL7

[Mukundan Ragavan]

Scratch build of gtkhash does not appear to pull in libb2-0.98.1. Has
the buildroot override expired?

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45077601

On 5/26/20 1:49 PM, Antonio T. sagitter wrote:
> Mukundan, your package misses.
> Please, rebuild `gtkhash` against `libb2-0.98.1` or let me commit
> changes to it.
>
> On 25/05/20 19:18, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
>> I made builds for R-argon2 last night as well, which you can
>> include in your update.
>>
>> - R-argon2-0.2.0-7.fc31
>>
>> Actually, there's no need for a _new_ update; you can just edit
>> the existing one.
>>
>> On Mon, 25 May 2020 at 08:41, Felix Schwarz
>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> builds for borgbackup done (finally): - borgbackup-1.1.11-3.el7 -
>>> borgbackup-1.1.11-5.fc31
>>>
>>> Please add these once you submit the final update.
>>>
>>> Felix
>>>

-- 
GPG Key: E5C8BC67



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Re: upower in RHEL-8/EPEL-8

[Mukundan Ragavan]

On 12/16/19 9:37 AM, Troy Dawson wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 10:31 AM Kevin Fenzi  wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 09:19:16PM -0500, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
>>> It appears that upower is in RHEL-8 but only in x86_64 and powerpc 64
>>> architectures. Due to this, some of my builds fail. This one for example
>>> - https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=39545162
>>>
>>> Is using excludearch my only option? How can I get this built?
>>
>> I think there's work or at least attempts to ask for these deps on all
>> arches, but I think for now you just need to exclude them.
>>
> 
> Yep, this is a known issue
> https://pagure.io/epel/issue/66
> 
> Currently, exludearch is the best option.
> 
> Troy

Thanks Kevin and Troy for the responses.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] upower in RHEL-8/EPEL-8

[Mukundan Ragavan]

It appears that upower is in RHEL-8 but only in x86_64 and powerpc 64
architectures. Due to this, some of my builds fail. This one for example
- https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=39545162

Is using excludearch my only option? How can I get this built?

Thanks,
Mukundan.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] itstool missing in aarch64 and s390x

[Mukundan Ragavan]

The package "itstool" seems to be missing in some architectures (s390x
and aarch64) although it should be provided by RHEL server rpms. It
appears to be available in x86_64 and ppc64le.

I noticed this when building gparted. See the failed build here -
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37269134

Can someone please take a look? Thanks.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] updating superlu to 5.x (soname update)

[Mukundan Ragavan]

We would like to update SuperLU to version 5.x in EPEL 7. This would
introduce a soname change for libsuperlu. The packages that depend on
SuperLU are armadillo and hypre.

I have created a COPR [1] where we have built all three packages. They
seem to build fine. If they are issues that others expect due to the
soname bump, please let me know.

Assuming no issues, we are looking to build in the next couple of days.
I will rebuild all the dependent packages.

Thanks,
Mukundan.


[1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/nonamedotc/superlu_5_epel/




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Reminder: please test Xfce 4.12 packages on EL-7

[Mukundan Ragavan]

I had written earlier [0] about the availability of Xfce 4.12 packages
in EPEL testing repositories. This is a reminder for the same.

Link to update -

https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-262a3f39e1


Some notes from [0] are worth repeating here -

- libxfce4ui obsoletes libxfcegui4
  (plugins using libxfcegui4 were never built for EL-7)

- xfce4-pulseaudio-plugin obsoletes xfce4-mixer and xfce4-volumed
  (xfce4-volumed is not even in the repos)

- xfce4-pulseaudio-plugin uses pavucontrol as sound mixer which is
unavailable in EL-7 at the moment.


Additionally, if you have any xfce plugin installed that is not from
EPEL repo, it is likely that the plugin will conflict with newer
libraries provided by the update. This would need to resolved manually.


Mukundan.


[0]
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MMNQALBRN76F4KBXUISEC5ACQLQ7X4J7/

-- 
GPG Key - E5C8BC67
---





signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Re: Xfce 4.12 mega update coming to EL-7

[Mukundan Ragavan]

On 04/28/2016 08:47 PM, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
>>
>> Hi Mukundan,
>>
>> Dependencies for you to fix.
>>
>> -T
>>
>>
>>
>> Scientific Linux 7.2, x64
>>
>> yum --enablerepo=* update
>> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
>> Error: Package: xfce4-notes-plugin-1.7.7-8.el7.x86_64
>> (@/xfce4-notes-plugin-1.7.7-8.el7.x86_64)
>>Requires: libxfcegui4.so.4()(64bit)
>>Removing: libxfcegui4-4.10.0-5.el7.x86_64 (@epel)
>>libxfcegui4.so.4()(64bit)
>>Obsoleted By: libxfce4ui-4.12.1-3.el7.x86_64 (epel-testing)
>>Not found
>> Error: Package: xfce4-notes-plugin-1.7.7-8.el7.x86_64
>> (@/xfce4-notes-plugin-1.7.7-8.el7.x86_64)
>>Requires: libxfce4util.so.6()(64bit)
>>Removing: libxfce4util-4.10.1-2.el7.x86_64 (@epel)
>>libxfce4util.so.6()(64bit)
>>Updated By: libxfce4util-4.12.1-2.el7.x86_64 (epel-testing)
>>   ~libxfce4util.so.7()(64bit)
>>  You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
>>
> 
> 
> Yeah, see, xfce4-notes-plugin was never built for EL-7.
> 
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=4189
> 
> So, I am not where that even came from ... :(
> 
> But. you bring a valid point. The latest version of notes does not need
> libxfcegui4 (we got rid of on Fedora already). I will build this after I
> come back (I am heading out now) and edit the update.
> 
> Thanks for testing.
> Mukundan.
> 
> 

Now that I think about it, I am not sure I want to edit that update. I
would rather add new packages to EPEL after this one goes through
succesfully.

Can you update without notes plugin?

-- 
GPG Key - E5C8BC67
---





signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Re: Xfce 4.12 mega update coming to EL-7

[Mukundan Ragavan]

On 04/28/2016 01:05 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
> On 04/18/2016 04:10 PM, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
>>
>>
>> All,
>>
>> After a trial run involving a COPR repo [1], I had written earlier
>> indicating that I started doing real builds of Xfce 4.12 packages for
>> EL-7 [2]. This is now complete and I have now submitted a update - a
>> mega update containing 53 packages total.
>>
>> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-262a3f39e1
>>
>>
>> Three points about the update -
>>
>> - libxfce4ui obsoletes libxfcegui4
>> (plugins using libxfcegui4 were never built for EL-7)
>>
>> - xfce4-pulseaudio-plugin obsoletes xfce4-mixer and xfce4-volumed
>> (xfce4-volumed is not even in the repos)
>>
>> - xfce4-pulseaudio-plugin uses pavucontrol as sound mixer which is
>> unavailable in EL-7 at the moment.
>>
>>
>> I have tested both upgrading a user configured Xfce 4.10 install and by
>> creating a new user. I did not notice any issues so far.
>>
>> Please enable epel-testing repo on a test machine, test these packages
>> and give karma on bodhi. I have set the stable karma to 12. Unless the
>> karma reaches 12, I intend to leave the update in testing for **three
>> weeks**.
>>
>>
>> Mukundan.
> 
> Hi Mukundan,
> 
> Dependencies for you to fix.
> 
> -T
> 
> 
> 
> Scientific Linux 7.2, x64
> 
> yum --enablerepo=* update
> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> Error: Package: xfce4-notes-plugin-1.7.7-8.el7.x86_64
> (@/xfce4-notes-plugin-1.7.7-8.el7.x86_64)
>Requires: libxfcegui4.so.4()(64bit)
>Removing: libxfcegui4-4.10.0-5.el7.x86_64 (@epel)
>libxfcegui4.so.4()(64bit)
>Obsoleted By: libxfce4ui-4.12.1-3.el7.x86_64 (epel-testing)
>Not found
> Error: Package: xfce4-notes-plugin-1.7.7-8.el7.x86_64
> (@/xfce4-notes-plugin-1.7.7-8.el7.x86_64)
>Requires: libxfce4util.so.6()(64bit)
>Removing: libxfce4util-4.10.1-2.el7.x86_64 (@epel)
>libxfce4util.so.6()(64bit)
>Updated By: libxfce4util-4.12.1-2.el7.x86_64 (epel-testing)
>   ~libxfce4util.so.7()(64bit)
>  You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
> 


Yeah, see, xfce4-notes-plugin was never built for EL-7.

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=4189

So, I am not where that even came from ... :(

But. you bring a valid point. The latest version of notes does not need
libxfcegui4 (we got rid of on Fedora already). I will build this after I
come back (I am heading out now) and edit the update.

Thanks for testing.
Mukundan.


-- 
GPG Key - E5C8BC67
---





signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Xfce 4.12 mega update coming to EL-7

[Mukundan Ragavan]

All,

After a trial run involving a COPR repo [1], I had written earlier
indicating that I started doing real builds of Xfce 4.12 packages for
EL-7 [2]. This is now complete and I have now submitted a update - a
mega update containing 53 packages total.

https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-262a3f39e1


Three points about the update -

- libxfce4ui obsoletes libxfcegui4
(plugins using libxfcegui4 were never built for EL-7)

- xfce4-pulseaudio-plugin obsoletes xfce4-mixer and xfce4-volumed
(xfce4-volumed is not even in the repos)

- xfce4-pulseaudio-plugin uses pavucontrol as sound mixer which is
unavailable in EL-7 at the moment.


I have tested both upgrading a user configured Xfce 4.10 install and by
creating a new user. I did not notice any issues so far.

Please enable epel-testing repo on a test machine, test these packages
and give karma on bodhi. I have set the stable karma to 12. Unless the
karma reaches 12, I intend to leave the update in testing for **three
weeks**.


Mukundan.



[1]
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/NCCH5INLQM6J2VGFOTLGQZTKNG7Y3OOQ/


[2]
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/XQNR2S7SYWSVRQBOPOGMU5MLMHKO6TAQ/



-- 
GPG Key - E5C8BC67
---





signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Xfce-4.12 packages are being built for EPEL-7

[Mukundan Ragavan]

It has been while since I sent an email[1] about testing Xfce
4.12 packages on EL-7. I have seen a few emails with requests for
packages but no emails about issues that folks had in using the same on
EL-7.

I had sent out an earlier email about the official packages [2] but got
side tracked. I am, now, starting to build Xfce 4.12 packages (including
plugins).


We will have the packages on testing for an extended period just so that
we identify any potential problems. I will send out an email after I
finish building everything, This is going to take some time. :)


Mukundan.


[1]
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/NCCH5INLQM6J2VGFOTLGQZTKNG7Y3OOQ/

[2]
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MLYN4VNMLTKMA4CZT6J45ZBOE45XN4BL/




-- 
GPG Key - E5C8BC67
---





signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Xfce 4.12 coming to EPEL-7 (official repo) in the next few days

[Mukundan Ragavan]

It has been almost a month since I sent an email[1] about testing Xfce
4.12 packages on EL-7. I have seen a few emails with requests for
packages but no emails about issues that folks had in using the same on
EL-7.


Given this scenario, I am encouraged to do the official builds. Towards
that, I will starting Xfce 4.12 package builds very soon (perhaps today
or tomorrow) and anticipate finishing in the next few days. I am
planning to leave the packages in testing for an extended period (longer
than the usual 14 days).

Thanks to everyone who tested and replied to previous emails.

Mukundan.

[1]
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/NCCH5INLQM6J2VGFOTLGQZTKNG7Y3OOQ/


-- 
GPG Key - E5C8BC67
---





signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Reminder to test Xfce 4.12 packages for EPEL-7

[Mukundan Ragavan]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512


Reminder to test Xfce 4.12 packages for EPEL-7.


Hello all,

Just wanted to send out a reminder to test Xfce 4.12 packages from
COPR for EPEL-7. You will need to have updated to EL-7.2 before
installing the packages from this COPR.

Specifically, I would be interested to know any issues with respect to
upgrading from Xfce 4.10 - currently available in EPEL repos.


Link to COPR -
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/nonamedotc/xfce412-epel7/


Thanks,
Mukundan.


- -- 
GPG Key - E5C8BC67
- ---


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=iTlO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Re: Please test Xfce 4.12 for inclusion in EPEL - 7

[Mukundan Ragavan]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 11:17:11 +0800
Suse Shi  wrote:

> well I was also working on XFCE@EL7
> 
> compiling rpms by myself, with xfce 4.10
> 
> but having a small bug on latest networkmanager package.(crashed
> net-access)
> Im still using old :
> NetworkManager-1.0.0-14.git20150121.b4ea599c.el7.x86_64
> libnm-gtk-1.0.0-2.git20150122.76569a46.el7.x86_64
> 
> 
> 
> please add:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> *xarchiver-0.5.2-21.el7.centos.x86_64xscreensaver-5.29-1.el7.centos.x86_64xfce4-battery-plugin-1.0.5-5.el7.centos.x86_64xfce4-mixer-4.10.0-4.el7.centos.x86_64*
> 
> 
>


I can add xarchiver and xscreensaver (although I trust I or the
respective package managers would need to req epel7 branches).

as for 

battery plugin - please take a look at power manager plugin that is
part of xfpm

xfce4-mixer - please look at xfce4-pulseaudio-plugin.


- 

GPG Key-ID: E5C8BC67
FAS: nonamedotc
https://nonamedotclinux.blogspot.com/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=UfAb
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Re: Please test Xfce 4.12 for inclusion in EPEL - 7

[Mukundan Ragavan]

On 02/28/2016 02:35 AM, john tatt wrote:
> Ok
> 
> I tried a yum grouplist and didn't see any xfce4-desktop
> 
> So I'll try again asap.
> 
> 


That should be xfce-desktop (notice it's xfce not xfce4).

See example below -

$ yum groups info xfce-desktop
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
 * base: centos-mirror.jchost.net
 * epel: archive.linux.duke.edu
 * extras: bay.uchicago.edu
 * updates: centos.hostingxtreme.com

Group: Xfce
 Group-Id: xfce-desktop
 Description: A lightweight desktop environment that works well on low
end machines.
 Mandatory Packages:
   =Thunar
   -xfce-utils
   =xfce4-panel
   =xfce4-session
   =xfce4-settings
   =xfconf
   =xfdesktop
   =xfwm4
 Default Packages:
   -NetworkManager-gnome
   =gdm
   -leafpad
   =openssh-askpass
   =orage
   =polkit-gnome
   =thunar-archive-plugin
   =thunar-volman
   =tumbler
   =xfce4-appfinder
   -xfce4-icon-theme
   -xfce4-mixer
   =xfce4-power-manager
   =xfce4-session-engines
   =xfce4-terminal
   -xfwm4-theme-nodoka
 Optional Packages:
   xfwm4-themes
 Conditional Packages:
pinentry-gtk



-- 
GPG Key - E5C8BC67
---





signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Re: Please test Xfce 4.12 for inclusion in EPEL - 7

[Mukundan Ragavan]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

On 02/28/2016 07:34 AM, LOEFFLER Peter wrote:
> hi,
> 
> xfce 4.12 in epel 7 would be perfect! i set up a fresh centos 7
> and did a "yum groups install xfce-desktop" even with a "yum
> install gnome-icon-theme gnome-icon-theme-symbolic
> gnome-icon-theme-extras gnome-icon-theme-legacy" many icons are
> missing. when i click on "Audio mixer..." in the PulesAudio plugin
> it cannot find pavucontrol. Looks like it is not available in
> centos7.
> 
> thanks for doing this, peter
> 


Thanks for testing.

I now realize pavucontrol is not available in Centos 7. But, the
volume adjustment itself does work with the plugin, correct?

As for the icons, can you go into Settings -> Appearance -> Icons and
check if one of the complete icon themes is selected?

Thanks again,
Mukundan.

- -- 
GPG Key - E5C8BC67
- ---


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=KXQU
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Re: Please test Xfce 4.12 for inclusion in EPEL - 7

[Mukundan Ragavan]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

On 02/26/2016 05:01 AM, john tatt wrote:
> Hi
> 
> Do you think you will build it also for i386 arch ?
> 
> Thx
> 
> 


I don't think COPR supports 32-bit for EPEL-7 ... So, no plans at the
moment.


- -- 
GPG Key - E5C8BC67
- ---


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=vFIo
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Re: Please test Xfce 4.12 for inclusion in EPEL - 7

[Mukundan Ragavan]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

On 02/27/2016 03:47 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 20:17:39 + (UTC) john tatt
>  wrote:
> 
>> Hi I sis a yum install xfce4* . Maybe xfwm4 was not in the
>> dependencies ?
> 
> Thats not going to work. Xfce has many components that don't start
> with xfce4.
> 
> You could try 'yum groupinstall xfce-desktop' but I am not sure
> the comps are setup right for that in epel7. So, instead just list
> all the packages in the copr...
> 
> yum install xfwm4 xfdesktop xfdashboard xfconf
> xfce4-weather-plugin xfce4-verve-plugin xfce4-time-out-plugin
> xfce4-terminal xfce4-systemload-plugin xfce4-settings
> xfce4-session xfce4-sensors-plugin xfce4-screenshooter
> xfce4-pulseaudio-plugin xfce4-power-manager xfce4-panel
> xfce4-notifyd xfce4-netload-plugin xfce4-mount-plugin
> xfce4-mailwatch-plugin xfce4-genmon-plugin xfce4-eyes-plugin
> xfce4-diskperf-plugin xfce4-dict xfce4-dev-tools 
> xfce4-cpugraph-plugin xfce4-clipman-plugin xfce4-appfinder
> xfce-polkit xfburn tumbler thunar-volman thunar-vfs
> thunar-media-tags-plugin thunar-archive-plugin Thunar ristretto
> parole orage libxfce4util libxfce4ui gtk-xfce-engine garcon exo
> 
> (or remove plugins you don't want).
> 
> kevin
> 
> 


yum groups install xfce-desktop should also work on EPEL-7. Just did
that yesterday.

One potential issue is - xfce4-mixer might complain. It should be
replaced by xfce4-pulseaudio-plugin.


- -- 
GPG Key - E5C8BC67
- ---


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=Ml2P
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Re: Please test Xfce 4.12 for inclusion in EPEL - 7

[Mukundan Ragavan]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

On 02/24/2016 11:58 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 02/24/2016 06:35 PM, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> All,
>> 
>> I have built Xfce 4.12 packages for EL-7 on COPR. The link for
>> the repo is
>> 
>> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/nonamedotc/xfce412-epel7/
>>
>>
>> 
I would appreciate it if people can install the packages and give it a
>> spin. Please report any issues directly to  me (and not in
>> bugzilla) as these are not official packages.
> 
> Can you add parole?  It built fine for me.
> 
> 

parole is also done.

I have to request the epel-7 branch though.

- -- 
GPG Key - E5C8BC67
- ---


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=xrxx
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Please test Xfce 4.12 for inclusion in EPEL - 7

[Mukundan Ragavan]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512



All,

I have built Xfce 4.12 packages for EL-7 on COPR. The link for the
repo is

https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/nonamedotc/xfce412-epel7/

I would appreciate it if people can install the packages and give it a
spin. Please report any issues directly to  me (and not in bugzilla)
as these are not official packages.

Many thanks for testing.
Mukundan.

- -- 
GPG Key - E5C8BC67
- ---


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=5sOk
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] clarification about updates in EPEL

[Mukundan Ragavan]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512


Hi All,

I would like some clarification from folks here regarding updating
gparted on EPEL-5 and EPEL-6.

The version of gparted shipped in EPEl-5 is 0.4.8 and EPEL-6 is 0.6.0
while the current upstream version is 0.19.1 (which I recently built
in EPEL-7).

Mike Fleetwood, who is a gparted developer, has opened a bug
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1133315) suggesting that
gparted be updated in both EPEL-5 and EPEL-6 since the current version
fixes lot of major bugs. As I understand it, major versions updates
are permitted if such an update fixes major issues. In this case, the
update would fix a big list of problem.

I tend to agree with Mike on updating but I would appreciate if people
on comment on this.

Thanks!
Mukundan.

- -- 
GPG key-ID: 00E8658D

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=nqPe
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel

Re: EPEL 7 broken deps and beta status update

[Mukundan Ragavan]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

On 07/19/2014 12:08 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
 xfdesktop-4.10.2-2.el7.src.rpm

 package: xfdesktop-4.10.2-2.el7.x86_64 from epel unresolved deps: 
 desktop-backgrounds-basic
 

Sorry! I got delayed with this. I will take care of this today.

Mukundan.


- -- 
GPG key-ID: 00E8658D

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=vcoR
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel