[EPEL-devel] Re: Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

2019-08-17 Thread Phil Wyett
On Sun, 2019-08-18 at 01:27 +, upda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-
> testing
> 
> 



> wxGTK3-3.0.4-10.el8.1
> 

In spec changelog version is: Sat Aug 17 2019 Scott Talbert <
s...@techie.net> - 3.0.4-10.1

The '.1' should go before the %{?dist} tag in this case so to not
confuse as the outputted 'el8.1' does.

Regards

Phil

-- 
*** Playing the game for the games sake. ***

IRC: kathenas
Twitter: kathenasorg
Website: https://kathenas.org


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL 8 on RHEL 8.1 Beta

2019-08-02 Thread Phil Wyett
On Thu, 2019-08-01 at 13:23 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> 
> 
> On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 at 06:31, Phil Wyett 
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2019-08-01 at 11:16 +0530, Thomas Stephen Lee wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > Trying to install EPEL 8 on RHEL 8.1 Beta.
> > > 
> > > I did
> > > 
> > > $ yum install 
> > > 
> > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/8/Everything/x86_64/Packages/e/epel-release-8-1.noarch.rpm
> > > 
> > > and doing
> > > 
> > > $ yum update 
> > > 
> > > gives the error
> > > 
> > > failed to open: /var/cache/dnf/epel-
> > >
> > 7223eb0d0c06d046/repodata/78c05abe94a83354e9759eacd446d11a44df882d8
> > c4
> > > 5fbf74b147b09a7fd6c83-updateinfo.xml.zck
> > > 
> > > Tried changing baseurl in /etc/yum.repos.d/epel.repo to
> > > 
> > > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/8/Everything/x86_64
> > > 
> > > and
> > > 
> > > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/testing/8/Everything/x86_64
> > > 
> > > both give the same error
> > > 
> > > Kindly check.
> > > 
> > > thanks
> > > 
> > > --
> > > Lee
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I get errors also.
> > 
> > I would also query why the EPEL-7 gpg key is in the package and a
> > new
> > one for 8 has not been used?
> > 
> 
> OK i have gone over the keys and there is a new key for EPEL-8 and
> the packages are being signed by that key. What errors were you
> getting to say it was using the old one?
> 
>  
> -- 
> Stephen J Smoogen.
> 

I stated the EPEL-7 key was in the package.

If you download the 'epel-release-8-1.noarch.rpm' and have a look in
'/etc/pki/rpm-gpg/' you will find 'RPM-GPG-KEY-EPEL-7'.

Either this is the 7 key or it is named wrongly.

Regards

Phil

-- 
*** Playing the game for the games sake. ***

IRC: kathenas
Twitter: kathenasorg
Website: https://kathenas.org


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL 8 on RHEL 8.1 Beta

2019-08-01 Thread Phil Wyett
On Thu, 2019-08-01 at 11:16 +0530, Thomas Stephen Lee wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Trying to install EPEL 8 on RHEL 8.1 Beta.
> 
> I did
> 
> $ yum install 
> https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/8/Everything/x86_64/Packages/e/epel-release-8-1.noarch.rpm
> 
> and doing
> 
> $ yum update 
> 
> gives the error
> 
> failed to open: /var/cache/dnf/epel-
> 7223eb0d0c06d046/repodata/78c05abe94a83354e9759eacd446d11a44df882d8c4
> 5fbf74b147b09a7fd6c83-updateinfo.xml.zck
> 
> Tried changing baseurl in /etc/yum.repos.d/epel.repo to
> 
> https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/8/Everything/x86_64
> 
> and
> 
> https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/testing/8/Everything/x86_64
> 
> both give the same error
> 
> Kindly check.
> 
> thanks
> 
> --
> Lee

Hi,

I get errors also.

I would also query why the EPEL-7 gpg key is in the package and a new
one for 8 has not been used?

Regards

Phil

-- 
*** Playing the game for the games sake. ***

IRC: kathenas
Twitter: kathenasorg
Website: https://kathenas.org


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL: Python34 moving to Python36

2019-04-04 Thread Phil Wyett
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 2019-04-02 at 07:18 -0700, Troy Dawson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 7:31 AM Stephen John Smoogen  wrote:
> > 
> > Over the last 5 days, Troy Dawson, Jeroen van Meeuwen, Carl W George,
> > and several helpers have gotten nearly all of the python34 packages
> > moves over to python36 in EPEL-7.  They are being included in 6 Bodhi
> > pushes because of a limitation in Bodhi for the text size of packages
> > in an include.
> > 
> > The current day for these package groups to move into EPEL regular is
> > April 2nd. We would like to have all tests we find in the next week or
> > so also added so that the updates can occur in a large group without
> > too much breakage.
> > 
> > 
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-f2d195dada
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-9e9f81e581
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-0d62608bce
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-5be892b745
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-0f4cca7837
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-ed3564d906
> > 
> > Please heavily test them by doing the following:
> > Stage 1 Testing
> > Install RHEL, CentOS, or Scientific Linux 7 onto a TEST system.
> > Install or enable the EPEL repository for this system
> > Install various packages you would normally use
> > yum --enablerepo=epel-testing update
> > Report problems to epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Stage 2 Testing
> > Check for any updated testing instructions on this blog or EPEL-devel list.
> > Install RHEL, CentOS, or Scientific Linux 7 onto a TEST system.
> > Install or enable the EPEL repository for this system
> > yum install python34
> > yum --enablerepo=epel-testing update
> > Report problems to epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Stage 3 Testing
> > Check for any updated testing instructions on this blog or EPEL-devel list.
> > Install RHEL, CentOS, or Scientific Linux 7 onto a TEST system.
> > Install or enable the EPEL repository for this system
> > yum install python36
> > yum --enablerepo=epel-testing update
> > Report problems to epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > This should cover the three most common scenarios. Other scenarios
> > exist and will require some sort of intervention to work around. We
> > will outline them as they come up.
> > 
> > Many Many Thanks go to Troy, Jeroen, Carl, and the many people on the
> > python team who made a copr and did many of the initial patches to
> > make this possible.
> > --
> > Stephen J Smoogen
> 
> Thank you to everyone for all the feedback, testing, fixes and discussion.
> I believe all of the blocking problems have been worked out and that
> we are ready to push these to stable.
> 
> I will be doing the push to stable in 4 hours.
> If you have something you think is a blocker, please let me know before then.
> 
> We have found that there were some packages left off the list of
> packages to rebuild.  This is not a blocker, but please let me know
> and I will get them rebuilt and they will have their own smaller bodhi
> update.
> 
> Troy Dawson
> ___
> epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Hi,

Just performed migration from 34 to 36. After yum update to pull all packages
and install, I proceeded to install 36 packages to match my current 34 install
before removing 34 packages. The only issue in the whole process was the one
below that required python34-pylint be removed before installing the 36 version.

[philwyett@ks-kenobi ~]$ sudo yum install python36-pylint
[sudo] password for philwyett: 
Loaded plugins: langpacks, product-id, search-disabled-repos, subscription-
  : manager
Resolving Dependencies
- --> Running transaction check
- ---> Package python36-pylint.noarch 0:1.6.5-5.el7 will be installed
- --> Processing Dependency: python36-setuptools for package: python36-pylint-
1.6.5-5.el7.noarch
- --> Running transaction check
- ---> Package python36-setuptools.noarch 0:39.2.0-3.el7 will be installed
- --> Finished Dependency Resolution

Dependencies Resolved


 PackageArch  Version Repository   Size

Installing:
 python36-pylintnoarch1.6.5-5.el7 epel437 k
Installing for dependencies:
 python36-setuptoolsnoarch39.2.0-3.el7epel631 k

Transaction Summary