Re: [EPEL-devel] EPEL Cloud-init in -7

2014-10-22 Thread Jim Perrin


On 10/11/2014 04:13 PM, Sam Kottler wrote:

> 
> I’m the primary maintainer in EPEL + Fedora. Would certainly be able to help 
> on the CentOS side as well and apply patches as needed.


While some of the patches have different names, it looks like we
(CentOS) have 4 patches that are not included in the epel cloud-init.
Everything else is (other than the configured username).

These add support for cloudstack and opennebula as providers, as well as
fixing a hostname issue for centos 7 users.

Sam, would you review the linked patches and commit them into the epel7
cloud-init?

https://git.centos.org/blob/rpms!cloud-init.git/fdbbe746b0838a8957c8dbd1971d1a29a29532a7/SOURCES!cloud-init-centos-hostnamefix.patch

https://git.centos.org/blob/rpms!cloud-init.git/fdbbe746b0838a8957c8dbd1971d1a29a29532a7/SOURCES!cloud-init-centos-opennebula.patch

https://git.centos.org/blob/rpms!cloud-init.git/fdbbe746b0838a8957c8dbd1971d1a29a29532a7/SOURCES!cloud-init-centos-opennebula-requiretty.patch

 
https://git.centos.org/blob/rpms!cloud-init.git/fdbbe746b0838a8957c8dbd1971d1a29a29532a7/SOURCES!cloud-init-centos-cloudstack-urlhandling.patch



-- 
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel


Re: [EPEL-devel] EPEL Cloud-init in -7

2014-10-11 Thread Sam Kottler
On Friday, September 12, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 09:27:32 +0100
> Karanbir Singh mailto:mail-li...@karan.org)> wrote:
>  
> > that would work. There is the whole fundamental issue to then work
> > through as to how far the epel branch's can diverge from the fedora
> > codebase ? Secondly, could we find a mechanism that takes this model
> > and applies it across the board on both sides.
> >  
>  
>  
> Sure. I would hope that maintainers could come to some common agreement
> on patches, etc. I am hard pressed to think of cases where something
> wouldn't just be good for both EPEL and CentOS.
>  
>  


I’m the primary maintainer in EPEL + Fedora. Would certainly be able to help on 
the CentOS side as well and apply patches as needed.
  
> >  
> > that would also make it easier for this use case : Some of the SIG's
> > might end up needing to carry the epel configs, not just the -release
> > rpm, but the yum config, enabled already, in their own release files
> > to satisfy deps.
> >  
>  
>  
> So, we can get the maintainers of the epel package out of pkgdb. Is
> there a way to get a list of the CentOS maintainers?
>  
> kevin
> ___
> epel-devel mailing list
> epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org (mailto:epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org)
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
>  
>  


___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel