[EPEL-devel] Re: Mass rebuild of EPEL6 (2016-01-19)

[Parag Nemade]

Hi,

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III  wrote:
> After spending far too much time playing with my mass rebuild script,
> and a whole lot of CPU time building packages, I've done another mass
> rebuild of EPEL6.  This involves an initial build of EPEL6 (with
> testing), another three builds of any failing packages, and then a final
> build of the current git of each failed package.  Packages which are
> excluded on x86_64 were skipped.
>
> The following packages are skipped because they take absolutely forever
> to build:
>
> elpa - Still building after two days on a rather fast machine!
> nwchem
> pypy
>
> This one's test suite appears to simply hang forever:
>
> rubygem-eventmachine
>
> Missing dependencies:
>
> dinotrace
> erlang-erlsom
> erlang-ibrowse
> freecad
> golang-github-endophage-gotuf
> golang-github-go-ldap-ldap
> golang-github-gonum-blas
> golang-github-gonum-floats
> golang-github-gorilla-sessions
> golang-github-hashicorp-serf
> golang-github-lsegal-gucumber
> golang-github-prometheus-client_golang
> golang-github-spf13-cast
> golang-github-spf13-viper
> gpredict
> jmtpfs
> nodejs-ascii-tree
> nodejs-duplexify
> nodejs-nsp-audit-shrinkwrap
> nodejs-nth-check
> nodejs-rc
> nodejs-registry-url
> nodejs-seq
> nodejs-silent-npm-registry-client
> nodejs-stream-spigot
> nodejs-test

I checked all above nodejs packages. I have already pushed
(epel-testing) most of them by replacing %{nodejs_arches} with its
actual definition and they are working fine. The only remaining
problematic package is nodejs-nsp-audit-shrinkwrap which I will get
fixed today. I am not sure about nodejs-nth-check which package needs
it.

Regards,
Parag.
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Re: Mass rebuild of EPEL6

[Petr Šabata]

On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 02:13:09PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> perl-HTML-Mason-1.42-2.el6.src.rpm

Should be fixed in perl-HTML-Mason-1.42-3.el6.

P


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Re: Mass rebuild of EPEL6

[Jason L Tibbitts III]

> "AT" == Antonio Trande  writes:

AT> This is not current tktable release.

Well, it's what is currently on the master mirror.  I'm not building
from git; I'm taking the current set of released SRPMs.  I could take
them from testing instead if that's thought to be generally useful.

 - J<
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Re: Mass rebuild of EPEL6

[Ville Skyttä]

On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 10:27 PM, Antonio Trande  wrote:
> On 12/23/2015 09:13 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>
>> tktable-2.9-13.el6.src.rpm
>
> This is not current tktable release.

It is what's in EPEL 6 at the moment. There are some newer koji
builds, but apparently they haven't been submitted as updates.
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/6/SRPMS/

FWIW, there are also some EPEL7 builds in koji, but doesn't look like
this package is in EPEL7 at all.
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org