Re: EPEL [Package Request] Thunar rpm for EL7 not ready.
Thanks, currently I just install the -basic one, just for dependency solving. I agree with nonamedotc that we can change the dependency here, onto existing pkg gnome-backgrounds, which doesn't require other sources. maybe we can then add pkg gnome-backgrounds onto dependency @xfce. -- Regards, -suse ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
Re: EPEL [Package Request] Thunar rpm for EL7 not ready.
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 21:24:20 -0500 nonamedotc nonamed...@gmail.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 07/15/2014 10:02 AM, Martin Sourada wrote: If I recall correctly (it's been a while since I last touched this package), the -gnome and -compat packages are used to provide default desktop backgrounds for Fedora's Gnome (-gnome one) and XFCE, LXDE a others (the -compat one, via /usr/share/backgrounds/default.png). I don't think this package is desirable on EPEL. -basic (this or it's equivalent should be in RHEL already) and -waves are both old and rusty, there's no need for them either. Regards, Martin Yup! That's the purpose of -compat packages. I have not had the chance to start a discussion on that - but I guess here we go. There are two *backgrounds packages in EPEL/EL stream as far as I can tell. * gnome-backgrounds * mate-backgrounds I suppose we could use gnome-backgrounds ... Kevin? Using gnome-backgrounds seems fine to me. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
Re: EPEL [Package Request] Thunar rpm for EL7 not ready.
Thanks, nonamedotc, Kevin, It's very nice to get a quick response. I was using xfce for years, on Fedora, EL, FreeBSD it's so good news you are adding support pkgs to EL7. I'm freshman here, anything I could help work or test the project, I d like to. -- Regards, -suse ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
Re: EPEL [Package Request] Thunar rpm for EL7 not ready.
Hi, On Mon, 14 Jul 2014 17:06:20 +0800 Suse Shi wrote: thanks, I tried to build pkgs manually, yes the desktop-background may not be a must option for EL, (I think we can just safely ignore it when hit dep. warning.) I compiled the package into 4 RPMs, just install the basic one to fulfill RPM deps. by xfdesktop. desktop-backgrounds-basic-20.0.0-1.el7.centos.noarch.rpm desktop-backgrounds-gnome-20.0.0-1.el7.centos.noarch.rpm desktop-backgrounds-compat-20.0.0-1.el7.centos.noarch.rpm desktop-backgrounds-waves-20.0.0-1.el7.centos.noarch.rpm If I recall correctly (it's been a while since I last touched this package), the -gnome and -compat packages are used to provide default desktop backgrounds for Fedora's Gnome (-gnome one) and XFCE, LXDE a others (the -compat one, via /usr/share/backgrounds/default.png). I don't think this package is desirable on EPEL. -basic (this or it's equivalent should be in RHEL already) and -waves are both old and rusty, there's no need for them either. Regards, Martin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
Re: EPEL [Package Request] Thunar rpm for EL7 not ready.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 07/15/2014 10:02 AM, Martin Sourada wrote: If I recall correctly (it's been a while since I last touched this package), the -gnome and -compat packages are used to provide default desktop backgrounds for Fedora's Gnome (-gnome one) and XFCE, LXDE a others (the -compat one, via /usr/share/backgrounds/default.png). I don't think this package is desirable on EPEL. -basic (this or it's equivalent should be in RHEL already) and -waves are both old and rusty, there's no need for them either. Regards, Martin Yup! That's the purpose of -compat packages. I have not had the chance to start a discussion on that - but I guess here we go. There are two *backgrounds packages in EPEL/EL stream as far as I can tell. * gnome-backgrounds * mate-backgrounds I suppose we could use gnome-backgrounds ... Kevin? - -- GPG key-ID: 00E8658D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTxeJUAAoJEIfjPv0A6GWN+KEP/2MXmsL5RvXSwMAkKX/LWEDi AseNYT8HPQHlYzn8YHTwN/ck0FFsU9DIKr7KgXzS5hkPB5tWwcCiyZ7JBrGjClPk rF+dk1l/CmVUqo6cwO4E3tT2xjbt/hN58MMWwsx1cxbX1TDviBeubqrNdnZ08iXh bHlEcvdY/16Qiy0NnH4mUcJryajOldVE+GIqLy/M4AeZBPUhDZNCjBSRMXgoSy7x DploNCUD4q315qqHtIS+3sGbyPD9ScC1DLSBXvfcAsiCojfVnJf9U7OIYd4W/rkQ 8fmE0n1yHCAMt/0mpZEWxYCAy4Bzs76YHFjcEI9amgF3j8gBR6hvWOwiHz9FArjn Ufq0K9JPBKXpWD/aMf+X6cXQP6ITPUNBGb9RKlhTI+gDg2Ngr+tPlAjw6MJqTaJT OmIKk1sjASkx6syroyk7ZQ63dxOsBY+ILsaiKz4sdQqhlu+pL/h5wSutUTMD0XKB YhPw562y5Kgm2ZiEW+sxVJOfIZeuX82Scq93hi5eW7YIYOiPH+7M24TIpDzxBjkj WBtzgN4NYm+brP5KhJ73PCfocmV2EiSoxZFKHQStQlo6TjMuPiPxCtdj7L/YqOov QBsu27EoK1xPUfKxFbz3u6tnqQZtOGQfqhyt4mKHnhrocdYwXjjnV3PAri4F+WIB n9Q/QLf3x87QSkU0jVwJ =Zn8I -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
Re: EPEL [Package Request] Thunar rpm for EL7 not ready.
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Suse Shi sinos...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Guru, I was tring to inst xfce on CentOS 7 release. (via epel repo) #yum install @xfce it works without package Thunar, I checked following build stats that EL7 rpm is not ready yet, would you help to add this rpm to repo line. thanks, Have you checked? http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=543666 Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://cicku.me ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
Re: EPEL [Package Request] Thunar rpm for EL7 not ready.
thanks Christopher, yes the links works fine, also the xfdesktop package: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=543669 thanks a lot for the link, I just saw it. well, I cost some time to build manually based on following RPMs. Thunar-1.6.3-2.fc20.src.rpm xfdesktop-4.10.2-2.fc20.src.rpm into following RPMs, simply it works, too. [root@localhost ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64]$ls -altr total 3920 drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 19 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1290680 Thunar-1.6.3-2.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 167856 Thunar-devel-1.6.3-2.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1384024 Thunar-debuginfo-1.6.3-2.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 712116xfdesktop-4.10.2-2.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 448924 xfdesktop-debuginfo-4.10.2-2.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm I think Devs may need some extra work to build dependencies of these package onto @xfce. Thanks, suse QUOTE: Message: 6 Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 14:17:23 +0800 From: Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com To: EPEL Development List epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: EPEL [Package Request] Thunar rpm for EL7 not ready. Message-ID: CAHcXnBFdQvos=rq5jvxlflzpqhf7lxpwjivfcnwhwptm9c8...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Suse Shi sinos...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Guru, I was tring to inst xfce on CentOS 7 release. (via epel repo) #yum install @xfce it works without package Thunar, I checked following build stats that EL7 rpm is not ready yet, would you help to add this rpm to repo line. thanks, Have you checked? http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=543666 Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://cicku.me -- Regards, -suse ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
Re: EPEL [Package Request] Thunar rpm for EL7 not ready.
Deps are satisfied already based on the successful build of the thunar. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=543669 Thanks for the report. ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
Re: EPEL [Package Request] Thunar rpm for EL7 not ready.
Hi Christopher, another tiny issue, link of buildID=543669 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=543669 will generate package that depend on pkg:desktop-backgrounds but I dont find this package built yet: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/desktop-backgrounds I manually build this package based on fc20, too. # wget http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org//packages/desktop-backgrounds/20.0.0/1.fc20/src/desktop-backgrounds-20.0.0-1.fc20.src.rpm is there any issue on this package that we dont get it into EL release? http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=543669 2014-07-14 14:38 GMT+08:00 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com: Deps are satisfied already based on the successful build of the thunar. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=543669 Thanks for the report. -- Regards, -suse ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
Re: EPEL [Package Request] Thunar rpm for EL7 not ready.
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Suse Shi sinos...@gmail.com wrote: desktop-backgrounds I'm not sure. This package has been split up into 4 packages, and I doubt if RHEL really needs them. The package owners will decide what they want. Anyway he will receive the broken deps report if he really makes the broken xfdesktop in the EPEL7, so he will fix it soon. There are some xfce guys in this list, you can await their answers. Thanks. Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://cicku.me ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
Re: EPEL [Package Request] Thunar rpm for EL7 not ready.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 07/14/2014 01:34 AM, Suse Shi wrote: thanks Christopher, yes the links works fine, also the xfdesktop package: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=543669 thanks a lot for the link, I just saw it. well, I cost some time to build manually based on following RPMs. Thunar-1.6.3-2.fc20.src.rpm xfdesktop-4.10.2-2.fc20.src.rpm into following RPMs, simply it works, too. [root@localhost ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64]$ls -altr total 3920 drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 19 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1290680 Thunar-1.6.3-2.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 167856 Thunar-devel-1.6.3-2.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1384024 Thunar-debuginfo-1.6.3-2.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 712116 xfdesktop-4.10.2-2.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 448924 xfdesktop-debuginfo-4.10.2-2.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm I think Devs may need some extra work to build dependencies of these package onto @xfce. Thanks, suse Thank you for testing out the Xfce packages on EPEL-7. As Kevin mentioned, not everything for Xfce is built yet. I have only built some of the packages belonging to Xfce DE and I intend to add more soon. As you can probably see from pkgdb, not all packages have epel-7 branches yet and I have already contacted the owner(s) of the said packages in this regard. I will setup a COPR repo for some packages as soon as I have them ready. It's not difficult but just that I have to get around to setting them up (which will happen this week). Thanks! Mukundan. - -- GPG key-ID: 00E8658D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTxHWQAAoJEIfjPv0A6GWNkB0QAKrrHKzwAYW91SKgUBC5tM8Q X56Iz1tbXWMIah19gPNUd2Oel9lGBv/iFZvwKQAZDQPc6aE4gEPPRdR0xKFkbd8k Eof2JYgTsDdesLq5qB3sQTH7g9O/EpuMLtS8mBt8BuRduutOjnK4m9qPJGGO8sJm /NHrlLdNUK50Px4TGSOoi1OsZsYbDfBFpLiO01cNT/N+i4/5V769F+KoffZ4AgNh lfTsqMKjJhxPXRl48XmNjAul1xfBj1dCwkb5PZ7tII+Mj682ZS14d+sPNsreB9AZ lS78x6WLhGJwjXQIlGWVmCx1HF9+ySWYU6IdlOcnhbAhqeeD3ExxFmjMiR8LJd2l zX6XQYsB/WhKrN7IU6N2d4mja9xZvIb3jUW3NG8pNtvmQZdVTthlcy56pcRhIUOU qj7N8+2xk66ae9/JsOQqr3nsYRHVowepQM0yZiGsDzVLAztNxXmHinE/ZFlQ30E/ 8P+tytAPRsToMdr1Q9IkCBN7XR1G9hMtv/jnjUuvloJG6ND+qAJpp/6keGQdRl3i xiFnAc64U1cev963jO7QUBIX3HdZET0ofM5Pm/2FLoxXtbQiZBucLuByJTbSIGCs Ayx+FTIkI32MPcKpDN4O1ee+pxCHE2PYkJDIwj2+LQhSsY8HpBcd1BavOqzKXfWG E9adhLdRHY41krogA2Hm =UXwx -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
