Re: EPEL RHEL 7 Workstation optional channel in Fedora's Koji
On Tue, 3 Jun 2014 21:29:19 +0200 Simone Caronni wrote: > On 2 June 2014 16:46, T.C. Hollingsworth > wrote: > > > I'd suggest filing a bug in bugzilla first, explaining the pain this > > causes downstream addon repositories like EPEL. For all we know the > > -devel subpackage is only missing in Server due to some oversight. > > > > Apparently Redhat does not like this, the bug was quickly closed: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104099#c2 I'm not sure what the real problem is, there is http://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/rhel/rc/7/Server/x86_64/os/Packages/jansson-2.4-6.el7.x86_64.rpm and http://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/rhel/rc/7/Server-optional/x86_64/os/Packages/jansson-devel-2.4-6.el7.x86_64.rpm so there should not be any problem with a package in EPEL-7 depending on jansson as EPEL uses both Server and Server-optional channels for the buildroots. Do you have a link for the failed build? Dan ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
Re: EPEL RHEL 7 Workstation optional channel in Fedora's Koji
On 2 June 2014 16:46, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: > I'd suggest filing a bug in bugzilla first, explaining the pain this > causes downstream addon repositories like EPEL. For all we know the > -devel subpackage is only missing in Server due to some oversight. > Apparently Redhat does not like this, the bug was quickly closed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104099#c2 -- You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson). http://xkcd.com/229/ http://negativo17.org/ ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
Re: EPEL RHEL 7 Workstation optional channel in Fedora's Koji
On 3 June 2014 11:29, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: > You can file a bug with RHEL rel-eng here: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Red%20Hat%20Enterprise%20Linux%207&component=releng&version=7.0 > > Of course, supporting Workstation in general would be very nice, so > your other ticket is warranted, but I think getting this particular > problem fixed on the RHEL side would still be a good idea regardless > of the outcome of that. > Bug filed with an edited text from the releng one. Regards, --Simone -- You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson). http://xkcd.com/229/ http://negativo17.org/ ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
Re: EPEL RHEL 7 Workstation optional channel in Fedora's Koji
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 1:29 AM, Simone Caronni wrote: > On 2 June 2014 16:46, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: >> I'd suggest filing a bug in bugzilla first, explaining the pain this >> causes downstream addon repositories like EPEL. For all we know the >> -devel subpackage is only missing in Server due to some oversight. > > Opened this one, hope it's correct: > > https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5915 Well actually I meant to ask RHEL release engineering to add jansson-devel to the Server repository along with the main jansson package. It seems kind of silly to have the main package in Server and the -devel package in Workstation. You can file a bug with RHEL rel-eng here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Red%20Hat%20Enterprise%20Linux%207&component=releng&version=7.0 Of course, supporting Workstation in general would be very nice, so your other ticket is warranted, but I think getting this particular problem fixed on the RHEL side would still be a good idea regardless of the outcome of that. -T.C. ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
Re: EPEL RHEL 7 Workstation optional channel in Fedora's Koji
On 2 June 2014 16:46, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: > On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 1:59 AM, Simone Caronni > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I was looking to build a package on epel7 that is relying on > jansson-devel. > > > > The -devel subpackage is generated as normally from the main jansson > > package, but in case of epel7 the resulting rpm is included in the > > Workstation-optional channel: > > > > > http://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/rhel/rc/7/Workstation-optional/x86_64/os/Packages/ > > > > Have these packages being left out intentionally or not? > > Is there any chance to see these packages added in Koji? Otherwise > building > > for epel7 can get really complicated. > > I'd suggest filing a bug in bugzilla first, explaining the pain this > causes downstream addon repositories like EPEL. For all we know the > -devel subpackage is only missing in Server due to some oversight. Opened this one, hope it's correct: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5915 Thanks & regards, --Simone -- You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson). http://xkcd.com/229/ http://negativo17.org/ ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
Re: EPEL RHEL 7 Workstation optional channel in Fedora's Koji
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 1:59 AM, Simone Caronni wrote: > Hello, > > I was looking to build a package on epel7 that is relying on jansson-devel. > > The -devel subpackage is generated as normally from the main jansson > package, but in case of epel7 the resulting rpm is included in the > Workstation-optional channel: > > http://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/rhel/rc/7/Workstation-optional/x86_64/os/Packages/ > > Have these packages being left out intentionally or not? > Is there any chance to see these packages added in Koji? Otherwise building > for epel7 can get really complicated. I'd suggest filing a bug in bugzilla first, explaining the pain this causes downstream addon repositories like EPEL. For all we know the -devel subpackage is only missing in Server due to some oversight. -T.C. ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
Re: EPEL RHEL 7 Workstation optional channel in Fedora's Koji
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 11:14:52AM +0200, Simone Caronni wrote: > It is quite strange actually. Normally, if a package is not included in the > base distribution, we can add it. If it is already included we never > replace the upstream package. > > By using only server and server-optional we have the weird case where only > half of the package can be used. Jansson specific, I cannot add jansson to > epel because it is already included, but I cannot use it because the > jansson-devel is omitted and only half of the resulting binary rpms are > used. > > I hope this gets reviewed in the future. You can propose to do something like this: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL:Packaging#Limited_Arch_Packages Regards Till ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
Re: EPEL RHEL 7 Workstation optional channel in Fedora's Koji
On 2 June 2014 11:09, Simone Caronni wrote: > On 2 June 2014 11:04, Dan Horák wrote: > >> EPEL builds against the Server + Server-optional variant of RHEL - >> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taginfo?tagID=258 >> > > Is this the final "setup" of EPEL for RHEL 7 that will be available for > all the time the distribution is supported by Redhat? > It is quite strange actually. Normally, if a package is not included in the base distribution, we can add it. If it is already included we never replace the upstream package. By using only server and server-optional we have the weird case where only half of the package can be used. Jansson specific, I cannot add jansson to epel because it is already included, but I cannot use it because the jansson-devel is omitted and only half of the resulting binary rpms are used. I hope this gets reviewed in the future. --Simone -- You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson). http://xkcd.com/229/ http://negativo17.org/ ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
Re: EPEL RHEL 7 Workstation optional channel in Fedora's Koji
On 2 June 2014 11:04, Dan Horák wrote: > EPEL builds against the Server + Server-optional variant of RHEL - > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taginfo?tagID=258 > Is this the final "setup" of EPEL for RHEL 7 that will be available for all the time the distribution is supported by Redhat? Thanks, --Simone -- You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson). http://xkcd.com/229/ http://negativo17.org/ ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
Re: EPEL RHEL 7 Workstation optional channel in Fedora's Koji
On Mon, 2 Jun 2014 10:59:48 +0200 Simone Caronni wrote: > Hello, > > I was looking to build a package on epel7 that is relying on > jansson-devel. > > The -devel subpackage is generated as normally from the main jansson > package, but in case of epel7 the resulting rpm is included in the > Workstation-optional channel: > > http://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/rhel/rc/7/Workstation-optional/x86_64/os/Packages/ > > Have these packages being left out intentionally or not? > Is there any chance to see these packages added in Koji? Otherwise > building for epel7 can get really complicated. EPEL builds against the Server + Server-optional variant of RHEL - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taginfo?tagID=258 Dan ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
EPEL RHEL 7 Workstation optional channel in Fedora's Koji
Hello, I was looking to build a package on epel7 that is relying on jansson-devel. The -devel subpackage is generated as normally from the main jansson package, but in case of epel7 the resulting rpm is included in the Workstation-optional channel: http://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/rhel/rc/7/Workstation-optional/x86_64/os/Packages/ Have these packages being left out intentionally or not? Is there any chance to see these packages added in Koji? Otherwise building for epel7 can get really complicated. Thanks & regards, --Simone -- You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson). http://xkcd.com/229/ http://negativo17.org/ ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel