Re: Set functions

[Jordan Harband]

Sets already have forEach.

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 9:06 AM, Peter Jaszkowiak 
wrote:

> There is already a proposal for this.
>
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018, 10:00 Mark Miller  wrote:
>
>> Yes, please do!
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 8:45 AM, Sebastian Malton 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I know that this has been brought up before but nothing seems to have
>>> come up with it. It also has had a lot of enthusiasm about it. Would me
>>> writing up a new proposal for adding the following functions to sets be
>>> useful? I would really like to see this through and would be willing to
>>> work for it too.
>>>
>>> The following functions I propose adding to Sets.
>>>
>>> 1. Union
>>> 2. Intersection
>>> 3. Difference
>>> 4. Symmetric Difference
>>> 5. ForEach
>>> 6. Map
>>> 7. Every
>>> 8. Filter
>>> 9. Find
>>> 10. Some
>>>
>>> Sebastian Malton
>>>
>>> ___
>>> es-discuss mailing list
>>> es-discuss@mozilla.org
>>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>   Cheers,
>>   --MarkM
>> ___
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss@mozilla.org
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>
>
> ___
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss@mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>
>
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Re: Set functions

[Isiah Meadows]

For posterity, here's the link: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-set-methods
-

Isiah Meadows
m...@isiahmeadows.com

Looking for web consulting? Or a new website?
Send me an email and we can get started.
www.isiahmeadows.com


On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 12:06 PM, Peter Jaszkowiak  wrote:
> There is already a proposal for this.
>
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018, 10:00 Mark Miller  wrote:
>>
>> Yes, please do!
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 8:45 AM, Sebastian Malton 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I know that this has been brought up before but nothing seems to have
>>> come up with it. It also has had a lot of enthusiasm about it. Would me
>>> writing up a new proposal for adding the following functions to sets be
>>> useful? I would really like to see this through and would be willing to work
>>> for it too.
>>>
>>> The following functions I propose adding to Sets.
>>>
>>> 1. Union
>>> 2. Intersection
>>> 3. Difference
>>> 4. Symmetric Difference
>>> 5. ForEach
>>> 6. Map
>>> 7. Every
>>> 8. Filter
>>> 9. Find
>>> 10. Some
>>>
>>> Sebastian Malton
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> es-discuss mailing list
>>> es-discuss@mozilla.org
>>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>   Cheers,
>>   --MarkM
>> ___
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss@mozilla.org
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>
>
> ___
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss@mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Re: Set functions

[Peter Jaszkowiak]

There is already a proposal for this.

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018, 10:00 Mark Miller  wrote:

> Yes, please do!
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 8:45 AM, Sebastian Malton 
> wrote:
>
>> I know that this has been brought up before but nothing seems to have
>> come up with it. It also has had a lot of enthusiasm about it. Would me
>> writing up a new proposal for adding the following functions to sets be
>> useful? I would really like to see this through and would be willing to
>> work for it too.
>>
>> The following functions I propose adding to Sets.
>>
>> 1. Union
>> 2. Intersection
>> 3. Difference
>> 4. Symmetric Difference
>> 5. ForEach
>> 6. Map
>> 7. Every
>> 8. Filter
>> 9. Find
>> 10. Some
>>
>> Sebastian Malton
>>
>> ___
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss@mozilla.org
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>   Cheers,
>   --MarkM
> ___
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss@mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Re: Set functions

[Mark Miller]

Yes, please do!


On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 8:45 AM, Sebastian Malton 
wrote:

> I know that this has been brought up before but nothing seems to have come
> up with it. It also has had a lot of enthusiasm about it. Would me writing
> up a new proposal for adding the following functions to sets be useful? I
> would really like to see this through and would be willing to work for it
> too.
>
> The following functions I propose adding to Sets.
>
> 1. Union
> 2. Intersection
> 3. Difference
> 4. Symmetric Difference
> 5. ForEach
> 6. Map
> 7. Every
> 8. Filter
> 9. Find
> 10. Some
>
> Sebastian Malton
>
> ___
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss@mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>
>


-- 
  Cheers,
  --MarkM
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Set functions

[Sebastian Malton]

  I know that this has been brought up before but nothing seems to have come up with it. It also has had a lot of enthusiasm about it. Would me writing up a new proposal for adding the following functions to sets be useful? I would really like to see this through and would be willing to work for it too.The following functions I propose adding to Sets.1. Union2. Intersection 3. Difference 4. Symmetric Difference 5. ForEach6. Map7. Every8. Filter9. Find10. Some Sebastian Malton  ___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss