use strict 2
I think that we can provide a more strict mode to deal with some long-lasting
defects. In more strict mode,
Implicit type conversion is disabled.Functions declarations are disabled. All
`function(){}` are considered function literal expression.Statement labels are
disabled or strictly restricted.A `break` statement or a fallthrough
declaration is required to be added into the branches inside a switch
statement.`eval` is disabled. ___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
Re: use strict 2
2013/7/24 BelleveInvis infinte.c...@hotmail.com I think that we can provide a more strict mode to deal with some long-lasting defects. In more strict mode, Why? Who does this benefit? You provide 5 rules. What ties them together? Why not other rules? What would be the benefit of this new mode over additional *external* tooling (like TypeScript or JSLint/JSHint/ESLint, etc.)? Be aware that TC39 seems to currently agree on the 1JS idea which is pretty much not adding any new modes anymore. So you'll need to make a very strong case to change their mind :-) David ___ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
Re: use strict 2
I consider your first three complaints as features instead of defects, and the
last one as an expert feature. The use strict directive corrected only
objectively problematic misfeatures.
??Claude
Le 24 juil. 2013 ?? 11:35, BelleveInvis infinte.c...@hotmail.com a ??crit :
I think that we can provide a more strict mode to deal with some
long-lasting defects. In more strict mode,
Implicit type conversion is disabled.
Functions declarations are disabled. All `function(){}` are considered
function literal expression.
Statement labels are disabled or strictly restricted.
A `break` statement or a fallthrough declaration is required to be added
into the branches inside a switch statement.
`eval` is disabled.
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
Re: use strict 2
BelleveInvis wrote:
I think that we can provide a more strict mode to deal with some
long-lasting defects. In more strict mode,
* Implicit type conversion is disabled.
* Functions declarations are disabled. All `function(){}` are
considered function literal expression.
This in particular is a private fetish -- whatever floats your boat, but
nothing to put in the standard.
Function hoisting as a simplified letrec and to enable top-down program
source decomposition is a feature.
/be
* Statement labels are disabled or strictly restricted.
* A `break` statement or a fallthrough declaration is required to
be added into the branches inside a switch statement.
* `eval` is disabled.
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
