The Blob grows further

2001-02-16 Thread Bruce Moomaw



From the Aviation Week site ( www.aviationnow.com ):

"Cost overruns on the International Space Station are approaching $4
billion, and the White House's Office of Management and Budget has told NASA
to find a way to pay for it before the agency's fiscal 2002 budget is set.

"Sources tell Aerospace Daily that the station program office is developing
options to cut back the scope of the station to cover the cost increase.
Meanwhile, managers across NASA will be told Friday to find the money in
their programs to pay for it.

"Sources tell the Daily that the meeting, which includes agency associate
administrators and field center directors, will include a call from Dan
Goldin.  He will urge cuts in current programs to cover the additional
station costs over the next 4 years.

"The additional costs are projected to be between $3.6 and $4 billion.
Among the reasons for the station overrun are delays in Boeing's plans to
reduce the size of its station staff as work on various components of the
company's prime contract are finished, sources said.

"Some of the cost-cutting options that station managers are looking at
include 'off ramps' designed to halt station assembly short of what is now
understood as completion."

Comment is superfluous.


Bruce Moomaw



==
You are subscribed to the Europa Icepick mailing list:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project information and list (un)subscribe info: http://klx.com/europa/




SETI EDUCATION E-NEWS 2

2001-02-16 Thread Larry Klaes


SETI EDUCATION E-NEWS 2
==

E-Newsletter Contents:

Upcoming Public Events:
Science Talks

Opportunities for Educators:
Field Test Teachers Needed
Education Workshops
Student Summer Opportunity

Education Who's Who:
Ly Ly

Contact Information

==
UPCOMING PUBLIC EVENTS

For more information, link to http://www.seti.org/general/cal.html

Seth Shostak
March 2-4, 2001
CONTACT 2001 Conference 
Friday: NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA
Saturday-Sunday: Biltmore Hotel, Santa Clara, CA
For more information, visit http://www.softwaremanagement.com/contact/

Pascal Lee
March 7, 2001 at 7:00 pm
"Finding Mars on Earth"
Smithwick Theater, Foothill College
12345 El Monte Road
Los Altos Hills, CA
Call (650) 949-7888 for more information

Seth Shostak and Doug Vakoch
March 18, 2001 at 3:00 pm
A panel discussion: "SETI and the Social Implications of Contact"
Morrison Auditorium, California Academy of Sciences
Golden Gate Park, San Francisco, CA
For more information, visit
http://www.seti.org/general/cal_announce/seti_contact.html

==
OPPORTUNITIES FOR EDUCATORS

FIELD TEST TEACHERS NEEDED!  APPLY BY FEBRUARY 28.

The Voyages Through Time (VTT) curriculum development project is now
recruiting nationally for high school science teachers to field test VTT
during academic year 2001-02.  VTT is an integrated course in six
modules around the theme of evolution.  You can learn more about the
project and obtain an application to join us as a field test teacher by
connecting to the education pages on the SETI Institute web site and
following the links to Voyages Through Time:
http://www.seti.org/education/Welcome.html

==
EDUCATION WORKSHOPS

The SETI Institute staff presents workshops at a variety of science and
education conferences.  An education calendar appears at our Web site:
http://www.seti.org/education/cal-ed.html 

SAN DIEGO SCIENCE EDUCATORS ASSOCIATION 17TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE
MARCH 9-10
Web site http://www.sdsea.org/

"Why are Humans Different Colors?"
Pamela Harman and Edna DeVore
March 9, 8:00 am

"Life in the Universe: The Search for Life in the Galaxy"
Edna DeVore and Pamela Harman 
March 9, 9:30 am

"Explore the Invisible Universe with NASA"
Edna DeVore and Pamela Harman
March 9, 11:00 am

NATIONAL SCIENCE TEACHERS ASSOCIATION NATIONAL CONVENTION
March 22-25, 2001
St. Louis, MO
Web site http://www.nsta.org/conv/

Visit us in the exhibit hall
March 22-25

Voyages Through Time: Everything Evolves
"Why are Humans Different Colors?"
March 22, 12:30 pm

Life in the Universe: The Search for Life in the Galaxy
March 22, 9:30 am

Earth Science Shar-a-thon
March 23, 8:00 am

Astronomy Shar-a-thon
March 23, 9:30 am

SETI Workshop
"Bring SETI to your Classroom"
March 23, 4:30 pm

Earth Science Shar-a-thon
March 24, 8:00 am

"Explore the Invisible Universe with NASA"
March 24, 3:30 pm

==
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES

San Diego Science Educators Association 17th Annual Conference
2001: A Science Odyssey
Friday-Saturday, March 9-10, 2001, The San Diego Concourse
Web site http://www.sdsea.org/

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Educators Day 
Technology-Based K-12 Teaching-Learning Issues  Strategies 
Saturday, March 10, 2001, San Jose Convention Center
Web site: http://www.acm.org/acm1/educators/index.html

National Science Teachers Association National Convention
Thursday-Sunday, March 22-25, 2001
Cervantes Convention Center, St. Louis, MO
Web site http://www.nsta.org/conv/

Andrew Fraknoi
"The Violent Universe: Crashing Asteroids, Exploding Stars, and Cannibal
Galaxies"
Saturday, March 24, 2001, 9:00 am to 5:30 pm
155 Dwinelle Hall
University of California, Berkeley
For more information, visit http://www.learningsphere.org/astronomy.htm

"An Education Odyssey" Spring 2001 CUE Conference
Hosted by Computer-Using Educators, Inc.
Thursday-Saturday, May 17-19, 2001
Anaheim Convention Center, Anaheim, CA
Mail-in registration deadline is April 20
Online registration April 27
Please visit http://www.cue.org/ or call the CUE office at (510)
814-6630

"Portals to Learning" Fall 2001 CUE Conference
Hosted by Computer-Using Educators, Inc.
Thursday-Saturday, October 11-13, 2001
Sacramento Convention Center, Sacramento, CA
Mail-in registration deadline is October 1
Online registration October 7
Please visit http://www.cue.org/ or call the CUE office at (510)
814-6630

==
STUDENT SUMMER OPPORTUNITY

Three UC campuses (Davis, Irvine, and Santa Cruz) will be enrolling high
achieving high school students who excel in mathematics and science in
the 4-week residential programs for this summer.  UC is accepting

Quote of the Day for February 16, 2001

2001-02-16 Thread Larry Klaes


"If a man walk in the woods for love of them half of each day, he is 
in danger of being regarded as a loafer; but if he spends his whole 
day as a speculator, shearing off those woods and making earth bald 
before her time, he is esteemed an industrious and enterprising citizen."

   - Henry David Thoreau, "Life without Principle", 1863

http://eserver.org/thoreau/lifewout.html



==
You are subscribed to the Europa Icepick mailing list:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project information and list (un)subscribe info: http://klx.com/europa/




Astronomers mock Fox show about Moon fakery

2001-02-16 Thread Larry Klaes


The last paragraphs are especially incriminating:


Astronomers mock Fox show about Moon fakery

http://usatoday.com/usatonline/20010215/3069311s.htm

One sad part of the show for astronomers involves the production's use 
of Brian Welch, a well-liked NASA spokesman, who died unexpectedly in
November at age 42. Welch rebuts some of the coverup allegations. Show
producers confessed total ignorance of his death. 

''Don't hate us. We're just entertainers,'' Tipley says. 



==
You are subscribed to the Europa Icepick mailing list:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project information and list (un)subscribe info: http://klx.com/europa/




Re: NASA Watch comments on the Fox Apollo crapumentary

2001-02-16 Thread gerts mail


On Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:59:38  
 Larry Klaes wrote:

"MOON LANDING QUESTIONED ON THE ALL-NEW SPECIAL 'CONSPIRACY
THEORY: DID WE LAND ON THE MOON' FEB. 15 ON FOX"

NASA put a man on the moon for the first time in 1969 -- or did it? 
Could the entire moon program have been an elaborate deception staged to fool the 
public? The conspiracy theories are investigated in the all-new one-hour special"
 
Among the most ridiculous claims in this program was that astronauts 
were killed (by NASA) to keep them silent "because they knew too much" 
and that the Apollo landings on the moon were faked. 


Well, FOX wasn't even original, they stole the idea from the movie "Capricorn One"! In 
this movie it wasn't the Moon that NASA was pretending to have landed upon, but Mars. 
As for the killing of astronauts who knew to much: just the same.
Maybe the copyright-holders of "Capricorn One" are willing to sue FOX???

Gert van den Heuvel,
The Netherlands



Get your small business started at Lycos Small Business at 
http://www.lycos.com/business/mail.html
==
You are subscribed to the Europa Icepick mailing list:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project information and list (un)subscribe info: http://klx.com/europa/




Re: NASA Watch comments on the Fox Apollo crapumentary

2001-02-16 Thread Thomas Green


 "MOON LANDING QUESTIONED ON THE ALL-NEW SPECIAL 'CONSPIRACY
 THEORY:

Yes, Fox embarrassed themselves playing this drivel.  I'm not sure how poisonous this 
type of TV programming is compared to shows like "survivor" and its spin-offs, but 
ironically it may stimulate most people to ask more questions.  It's good
for people to be skeptical, but not blindly one-sided like the show.  I only caught 
glimpses of what was aired on TV, but some of the skeptics claims are fairly weak.  If 
they'd been a little more open minded, less stupid, and provided equal
time to viewpoints it could of been a better show.  Examples:

- The flag waves while astronauts plant it.  Is this due to wind?  If so, how come it 
stops as soon as the astronaut takes his hand away?  Why would there be wind on an 
indoor stage setting anyways?  Why does the flag look so stiff and
flutter so unnaturally?  If NASA is hoaxing us, wouldn't they have edited the pictures 
to remove any questionable material?

- The shadows aren't parallel.  Is this due to stage setting?  Maybe a fish-eye lens 
causes this?  Maybe parallax?  etc...

This kind of balanced questioning could produce some healthy thought.  Just because 
NASA or a scientist makes a claim doesn't make it true... so cover it from all angles. 
 Certainly NASA was able to land at least robots, since mirrors,
detailed pictures, and far pictures of earth were obtained.  What about lunar regolith 
samples?  Spectroscopic analysis?  Certainly the apollo rockets were sufficient to the 
task?  So turn the argument around:  how can NASA keep such a huge
secret and keep the scientists around the world fooled for so long?

It may be that Fox knows the average american better than I how else can you 
explain that you can air Alien Autopsy and also claim that we can't land people on the 
moon?  Just keep flashing sensational muck before your audience to keep
them watching through the ads.

The moral of the story? You can lead a moron to television, but ya can't make him 
think.



==
You are subscribed to the Europa Icepick mailing list:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project information and list (un)subscribe info: http://klx.com/europa/




New MIT Press books on AI and Evolutionary Robotics

2001-02-16 Thread Larry Klaes


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: new books from MIT Press
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 15:29:17 GMT

NEW BOOKS IN COMPUTER SCIENCE FROM THE MIT PRESS

Featured in this e-mail:

Introduction to AI Robotics, by Robin R. Murphy
Evolutionary Robotics, by Stefano Nolfi and Dario Floreano

*If you would like to receive a free hard copy of our Computer Science
catalog, please send an email including your name and mailing address to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], with "Computer Science catalog" in the subject line.


Please follow the URLs below for more information.

Introduction to AI Robotics
Robin R. Murphy

http://mitpress.mit.edu/promotions/books/MURIHF00

This text covers all the material needed to understand the principles
behind the AI approach to robotics and to program an artificially
intelligent robot for applications involving sensing, navigation, planning,
and uncertainty. Robin Murphy is extremely effective at combining
theoretical and practical rigor with a light narrative touch. In the
overview, for example, she touches upon anthropomorphic robots from classic
films and science fiction stories before delving into the nuts and bolts of
organizing intelligence in robots.
 
Following the overview, Murphy contrasts AI and engineering approaches and
discusses what she calls the three paradigms of AI robotics: hierarchical,
reactive, and hybrid deliberative/reactive. Later chapters explore
multiagent scenarios, navigation and path-planning for mobile robots, and
the basics of computer vision and range sensing. Each chapter includes
objectives, review questions, and exercises. Many chapters contain one or
more case studies showing how the concepts were implemented on real robots.
Murphy, who is well known for her classroom teaching, conveys the
intellectual adventure of mastering complex theoretical and technical
material.
 
Robin R. Murphy is Associate Professor in the Department of Computer
Science and Engineering, and in the Department of Psychology, at the
University of South Florida, Tampa.

8 x 9, 400 pp., 100 illus., cloth ISBN 0-262-13383-0

Intelligent Robotics and Autonomous Agents series
A Bradford Book


Evolutionary Robotics
The Biology, Intelligence, and Technology of Self-Organizing Machines
Stefano Nolfi and Dario Floreano

http://mitpress.mit.edu/promotions/books/NOLEHF00

Evolutionary robotics is a new technique for the automatic creation of
autonomous robots. Inspired by the Darwinian principle of selective
reproduction of the fittest, it views robots as autonomous artificial
organisms that develop their own skills in close interaction with the
environment and without human intervention. Drawing heavily on biology and
ethology, it uses the tools of neural networks, genetic algorithms, dynamic
systems, and biomorphic engineering. The resulting robots share with simple
biological systems the characteristics of robustness, simplicity, small
size, flexibility, and modularity. 
 
In evolutionary robotics, an initial population of artificial chromosomes,
each encoding the control system of a robot, is randomly created and put
into the environment. Each robot is then free to act (move, look around,
manipulate) according to its genetically specified controller while its
performance on various tasks is automatically evaluated. The fittest robots
then "reproduce" by swapping parts of their genetic material with small
random mutations. The process is repeated until the "birth" of a robot that
satisfies the performance criteria.
 
This book describes the basic concepts and methodologies of evolutionary
robotics and the results achieved so far. An important feature is the clear
presentation of a set of empirical experiments of increasing complexity.
Software with a graphic interface, freely available on a Web page, will
allow the reader to replicate and vary (in simulation and on real robots)
most of the experiments.
 
Stefano Nolfi is Coordinator of the Division of Neural Systems and
Artificial Life, Institute of Psychology, National Research Council, Rome.
Dario Floreano is Assistant Professor of Biorobotics and Adaptive Systems,
Institute of Robotics, Department of Microengineering, Swiss Federal
Institute of Technology, Lausanne.

7 x 9, 384 pp., 157 illus., cloth ISBN 0-262-14070-5

Intelligent Robotics and Autonomous Agents series
A Bradford Book

"An excellent book providing a thorough coverage of the subject. Clearly
and insightfully written, this is a must for researchers and postgraduate
students interested in new approaches to intelligent robotics."

--Phil Husbands, School of Cognitive and Computing Sciences, University of
Sussex

"This is an exciting new area that has implications and ramifications
ranging from psychology to artificial life; can we create robots with
intelligent or adaptive behavior using techniques comparable to the
Darwinian evolution that created the animals and ourselves? Here is an
authoritative, clearly written survey written by two of the researchers who
helped to pioneer the 

Re: Astronomers mock Fox show about Moon fakery

2001-02-16 Thread JHByrne


In a message dated 2/16/2001 7:32:17 AM Alaskan Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

 One sad part of the show for astronomers involves the production's use 
  of Brian Welch, a well-liked NASA spokesman, who died unexpectedly in
  November at age 42. Welch rebuts some of the coverup allegations. Show
  producers confessed total ignorance of his death. 
  
  ''Don't hate us. We're just entertainers,'' Tipley says. 

It just goes to show that the media is worthless for real reporting.  When 
entertainment outweighs truth, the sheeple laugh in ignorance.

-- JHB
==
You are subscribed to the Europa Icepick mailing list:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project information and list (un)subscribe info: http://klx.com/europa/




Re: NASA Watch comments on the Fox Apollo crapumentary

2001-02-16 Thread JHByrne


In a message dated 2/16/2001 11:36:09 AM Alaskan Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 It may be that Fox knows the average american better than I how else 
can 
 you explain that you can air Alien Autopsy and also claim that we can't 
land 
 people on the moon?  Just keep flashing sensational muck before your 
audience 
 to keep
  them watching through the ads.

One of the most thought-provoking comments I've ever heard came from one of 
the 20th century's greatest politicians (although, Bill Clinton probably also 
could have written something similar).  The politician I'm referring to?  
Adolf Hitler.  The quote?

'Repeat a lie long enough, and loudly enough, and people will start to 
believe it'.

Remember Orson Welle's 'War of the Worlds' broadcast of 1936?  Some things 
never change.  But, that's what scientists are FOR.  To debunk superstition.  
You can't grow strong analytical 'muscles' in the absence of challenge.

-- John Harlow Byrne
==
You are subscribed to the Europa Icepick mailing list:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project information and list (un)subscribe info: http://klx.com/europa/




Re: NASA Watch comments on the Fox Apollo crapumentary

2001-02-16 Thread Bruce Moomaw



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Friday, February 16, 2001 3:15 PM
Subject: Re: NASA Watch comments on the Fox Apollo crapumentary



In a message dated 2/16/2001 11:36:09 AM Alaskan Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 It may be that Fox knows the average american better than I how else
can
 you explain that you can air Alien Autopsy and also claim that we can't
land
 people on the moon?  Just keep flashing sensational muck before your
audience
 to keep
  them watching through the ads.

One of the most thought-provoking comments I've ever heard came from one of
the 20th century's greatest politicians (although, Bill Clinton probably
also
could have written something similar).  The politician I'm referring to?
Adolf Hitler.  The quote?

'Repeat a lie long enough, and loudly enough, and people will start to
believe it'.

Remember Orson Welle's 'War of the Worlds' broadcast of 1936?  Some things
never change.  But, that's what scientists are FOR.  To debunk
superstition.
You can't grow strong analytical 'muscles' in the absence of challenge.

-- John Harlow Byrne


Actually, I think it was Goebbels who said it -- not Hitler himself
(although dear Adolf did say, "A new age of magical interpretation of the
world is coming -- of its interpretation by the will rather by the
intellect.  There is no such thing as knowable truth, either in the moral or
in the factual sense.")

And as for Clinton -- well, not to get into an ideological piefight in this
web group, but Ronald Reagan was even more notorious for it.  (One of the
neglected parts of Edmund Morris' controversial biography -- although it was
reporinted in "Newsweek" -- spends one whole page simply listing Reagan's
long parade of literally grotesque misstatements of the most elementary
facts, after which Morris notes that Reagan kept cheerfully repeating the
same howlers over and over no matter how many times other people, including
his own staffers, corrected him.  Not a man significantly concerned with his
level of accuracy, in short.)

The Fox documentary, however, is notable because it's a perfect reflector of
two other important facts.  First, the fact that we live in the "Media Age"
(just as predicted by Arthur C. Clarke) doesn't mean that we live in the
"Information Age" -- because we're being deluged with a tidal wave not just
of true information, but of lies and misinformation, and we're all still
faced with the tremendous problem of trying to sort out the truth from the
lies.   Second, we have here further proof that -- at the same time that
human society becomes more and more dependent upon scientific and
technological knowledge -- the average person remains just as ignorant of
elementary science as ever.  If this keeps up, scientists and engineers will
end up as a sort of High Priesthood, probably complete with tall headdresses
and human sacrifices.  What do you do about this?  Damned if I know.

Bruce Moomaw

==
You are subscribed to the Europa Icepick mailing list:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project information and list (un)subscribe info: http://klx.com/europa/