http://www.setileague.org/editor/setisci.htm

A Science, Not A Search
                               
by Dr. H. Paul Shuch, Executive Director
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Recently, the notion that we share our universe with countless 
sentient species has emerged out of the realm of fiction, into 
the scientific mainstream. Over the past forty years, dozens of 
organizations have conducted scores of experiments in the emerging
discipline of SETI, the Search for Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence. 
As executive director of the grass-roots nonprofit SETI League, I am 
privileged to head up one of those searches. But I do not speak for 
SETI!

Perhaps the most highly visible of the various scientific organizations 
seeking our cosmic companions is the prestigious SETI Institute in
California. Spun off from a onetime NASA SETI effort, SETI Institute 
scientists conduct numerous Life in the Universe studies, as well as 
one of the most comprehensive surveys ever for artificial radio emissions 
from space. It was their expertise that informed the technical content 
of the popular film Contact, and their efforts that keep SETI high in 
the public consciousness. They are among the most highly respected of my 
colleagues, and I am proud to practice SETI in such august company.

But SETI is a science, not a single search. I frequently read glowing 
press accounts of my colleagues' accomplishments, which are invariably 
attributed to some monolithic organization referred to as 'SETI.' 
"SETI has received a grant..." I read in the paper, or "SETI's chief 
scientist is lecturing at..." or "the director of SETI says that..." 

Certainly, this generalization of SETI Institute into simply SETI is
not the doing of my modest Institute colleagues, but rather represents 
a tendency of the media to lump together all related efforts under a 
common banner. But to call the SETI Institute (or any one organization) 
'SETI' is equivalent to referring to the National Science Foundation as 
simply 'science', or to NASA as 'space.' It implies a level of homogeneity 
which, if it indeed existed, would rob our discipline of its broad 
diversity, and stifle creative science.

Each of the various SETI organizations around the world tackles a complex 
problem from a unique perspective. Since we cannot yet say which approach 
is the right one, we certainly cannot say that any is wrong. The efforts 
of hundreds of scientists now working on several independent searches may 
some day gain us entry into the cosmic community. Collectively, one might
call them SETI. Individually, each is but a piece of the puzzle.

The other day I was preaching SETI to a group of students, one of whom 
said, "we already know all about it. We use your screen-saver." She was 
referring to SETI@home, a highly successful initiative out of the 
University of California, Berkeley. That famous experiment in distributed 
computer processing is also a piece of the puzzle. But shouldn't we, 
educators and media alike, try to show the world the big picture?

Dr. Shuch, executive director of the nonprofit, membership-supported 
SETI League, Inc., does not speak for SETI. 



==
You are subscribed to the Europa Icepick mailing list:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project information and list (un)subscribe info: http://klx.com/europa/

Reply via email to