Something to learn from Mars Express

2002-11-22 Thread LARRY KLAES
  - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 7:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Driving force behind Mars Express The Ferrari Red Paint will not be the only thing breaking all speed records when it hurtles towards the Red Planet on-board the Mars Express spacecraft in 2003. The spacecraft itself has already broken some speed records of its own. Mars Express is the fastest-built satellite of its type in the history of space engineering.Read more at:http://sci.esa.int/content/news/index.cfm?aid=9cid=32oid=30991


Re: Something to learn from Mars Express

2002-11-22 Thread Paul Lavin

Run the data loss on theMartian atmosphere composition by me again.  When 
did this happen?

P

At 08:26 22/11/2002 -0800, you wrote:

It's one thing to build it, it is another to get it successfully to
Mars.  Deep Space is difficult exploration territory, and more than half
of Mars-bound spacecraft have failed.  Why?  It is a long way away.  The
quality of a spacecraft must be very very high.  The builders of the
spacecraft must be (1) very experienced and very good, (2) very very
good, (3) very very experienced, or, perhaps, (4) very very lucky.

Mars Polar Lander was one that was faster, better and cheaper, and made
quickly by a small team.  Now, the next attempt at soft landing is at
least 10 years from the MPL failure.  What's the lesson here?

Anyway, good luck to the Mars Express team, and especially the Beagle II
team.  All ground truth on the composition of the atmosphere is lost
(the data can't be found), and Beagle II is our chance to get more.
==
You are subscribed to the Europa Icepick mailing list:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project information and list (un)subscribe info: http://klx.com/europa/


Paul Lavin

+44 (0) 77 7588 6420 mobile
+44 (0) 20 7291 0991 London office
+44 (0) 15 8246 2720 home office
+44 (0) 15 8246 2536 home fax

==
You are subscribed to the Europa Icepick mailing list:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project information and list (un)subscribe info: http://klx.com/europa/




Re: Something to learn from Mars Express

2002-11-22 Thread joe_latrell

Faster, Better, Cheaper.  Pick any two.  Results may vary.

Joe Latrell


 It's one thing to build it, it is another to get it successfully to
 Mars.  Deep Space is difficult exploration territory, and more than
 half of Mars-bound spacecraft have failed.  Why?  It is a long way
 away.  The quality of a spacecraft must be very very high.  The
 builders of the spacecraft must be (1) very experienced and very good,
 (2) very very good, (3) very very experienced, or, perhaps, (4) very
 very lucky.

 Mars Polar Lander was one that was faster, better and cheaper, and made
 quickly by a small team.  Now, the next attempt at soft landing is at
 least 10 years from the MPL failure.  What's the lesson here?

 Anyway, good luck to the Mars Express team, and especially the Beagle
 II team.  All ground truth on the composition of the atmosphere is lost
 (the data can't be found), and Beagle II is our chance to get more. ==
 You are subscribed to the Europa Icepick mailing list:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Project information and list (un)subscribe info: http://klx.com/europa/



==
You are subscribed to the Europa Icepick mailing list:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project information and list (un)subscribe info: http://klx.com/europa/




Re: Something to learn from Mars Express

2002-11-22 Thread Christopher England

Paul Lavin wrote:
 
 Run the data loss on the Martian atmosphere composition by me again.  When
 did this happen?
 
 P

Thank you for asking!  

The Viking lander gas chromatography-mass spectrometer (GCMS) data is
not available anywhere.  
What is taken as gospel for the composition at the surface is the paper
The composition of the atmosphere at the surface of Mars, Owen, T. et
al; JGR vol 82 1977, p. 4635-4639.  The authors were PI's for the Viking
I and II GCMS experiments.  There is an oft-quoted table of composition
- it is missing any error bounds and the numbers don't add up to 100%. 
Alarm bells should ring!

My interest is the amount of molecular oxygen since I did a study for
NIAC on extracting this commodity (see http://www.niac.usra.edu under
Funded Studies and my name).  The number in the JGR paper for oxygen
seems to come from Earth-based measurements in 1972, not from Viking as
might be inferred from this paper (one must parse the words in this
paper like a Clinton speech).  In fact, composition will vary following
the alternate loss and gain of CO2 to/from the Poles.

Back to the lost data.  The GCMS data are not archived at the NSSDC
(http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/) where they belong, or at the Planetary
Data System (PDS, http://pds.jpl.nasa.gov/) where they also belong.  I
have had extensive contact with the Atmospheres Node of the PDS, but it
has been difficult to raise any interest or concern there.  I have
confirmed (doubly confirmed, even) that the NSSDC does not have it
anywhere such as in a cellar.  I have corresponded with Prof. Biemann
whose name is listed on the appropriate (but blank) page on the NSSDC
website.  He confirms that he does not have the data.  

There is a hardcopy!  On a two foot high pile of green decaying computer
paper, in octal format.  I basically ran out of energy trying to get
this data out of the owner's attic and into digital form, but maybe next
year.   

Just yesterday I found out that Mariner 9 photos of Mars are also not
available, this from a researcher who wants to compare early 1970's
photos with current ones.  I have also heard that Viking Orbiter radio
occultation data are lost.  This last seems astounding since no one
could ever suggest that this information was without value.  

No one seems to take ownership of these problems.  The PDS says it does
not have funds to recover this data.  They do not seem to feel at all
guilty about their poor husbandry of this information.   As you may
note, I have strong feelings on this issue.

Chris
 
 
 At 08:26 22/11/2002 -0800, you wrote:
 

 Anyway, good luck to the Mars Express team, and especially the Beagle II
 team.  All ground truth on the composition of the atmosphere is lost
 (the data can't be found), and Beagle II is our chance to get more.
 ==
==
You are subscribed to the Europa Icepick mailing list:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project information and list (un)subscribe info: http://klx.com/europa/