I thought the comments about the other study were a bit over the top (FUD? Really?), but this study has a different conclusion, though it is regarding commercial use.
A different level of detail, perhaps. For those that had any of the number of legitimate gripes with the assumptions, I’d urge sending those to the authors, as well as to other appropriate forums. The levels of detail was just too good to toss out, even tho use some wacky assumptions skewed the results. https://www.greenfleetmagazine.com/10155068/evs-can-save-30-in-costs-at-three-years-study-says?utm - Mark Sent from my Fuel Cell powered iPhone -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20211111/4b979013/attachment.html> _______________________________________________ Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org No other addresses in TO and CC fields UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/ LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
