Re: [EVDL] $7.5bn for ev charging stations across the US

2022-02-11 Thread EV List Lackey via EV
On 11 Feb 2022 at 15:04, nathan christiansn via EV wrote:

> The only problem that I see with this is that the government is making
> people who do not support EVs pay for ev charging.

Yep.  And even though I don't have any kids, the gubmint makes me pay taxes 
so that all those grubby undeserving kids in the neighborhood can go to 
school.  

NO FAIR!  I shouldn't have to pay tax for anything that doesn't benefit me 
personally, directly, right now.

Ever heard the phrase "promote the general welfare"?

EV charging supports the use of EVs.  So do subsidies, imperfect as they 
are.  The entire world population benefits from the consequent reduced air 
emissions of all kinds, including CO2.

We've had 40+ years of "greed is good" and "trickle down" economics. Well, 
so far the only trickling I see is melting glaciers and rising sea levels.  

David Roden, EVDL moderator & general lackey

To reach me, don't reply to this message; I won't get it.  Use my 
offlist address here : http://evdl.org/help/index.html#supt

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 
 It will always be one of the best jokes of democracy that it 
 gives its deadly enemies the means to destroy it.

   -- Joseph Goebbels
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

___
Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org
No other addresses in TO and CC fields
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org


Re: [EVDL] $7.5bn for ev charging stations across the US

2022-02-11 Thread Mark Abramowitz via EV
As far as I know, the charging business cannot yet be profitable without 
subsidies. 

If anyone has any contrary data, I would welcome it.  If there is any data 
showing WHEN it might be profitable, I would be happy to see that, too.

- Mark

Sent from my Fuel Cell powered iPhone

> On Feb 11, 2022, at 2:22 PM, Willie via EV  wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 2/11/22 5:04 PM, nathan christiansn via EV wrote:
>> The only problem that I see with this is that the government is making
>> people who do not support ev’s pay for ev charging. I say that we wait for
>> mass ev adoption to happen(which will happen very soon). After this,
>> businesses and apartment building owners will pay for ev charging stations
>> out of their own pocket because having ev charging as an amenity will
>> attract more customers/tenants. Some hotels are already starting to do this.
>> 
>> A government that is 28 trillion dollars in debt should not be spending
>> billions of dollars that it does not hav
> ABSOLUTELY!  In addition, government contributions are not needed and any 
> government money would  almost certain to be misspent. Examples abound.  
> Tesla has the charging problems solved.  Compare SuperChargers with EVGO and 
> the VW system.  All Tesla needs is a small fraction of the money that Biden 
> wants to spend.  Tesla knows the charging problem and how best to solve it.  
> Instead, Biden wastes his efforts denying the existence of Tesla while 
> proclaiming the EV dominance of GM.  Why does Biden expect credibility?
> 
> ___
> Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org
> No other addresses in TO and CC fields
> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
> ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
> LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
> 

___
Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org
No other addresses in TO and CC fields
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org


Re: [EVDL] $7.5bn for ev charging stations across the US

2022-02-11 Thread jamie via EV


A couple of relevant data points:

-Biden recently publicly credited Tesla as America's leading EV 
manufacturer. Yes, it took a while, but that talking point is over. 
Meanwhile we'll see if Ford, VW, GM, Hyundai, Kia, Nissan and others can 
catch up, as their new models arrive.


-The government is also making people who do not support fossil fuels 
pay for fossil fuel tax breaks and cleanups.


As a wider view, perhaps the thinking is that supporting nation-wide 
transportation initiatives offers benefits for overall American 
competitiveness, which benefits everyone. Even while recognizing that 
each subset in the transportation universe may not currently have 
individual support or direct use by every single person.


Cheers,
 -Jamie



On 2/11/22 3:22 PM, Willie via EV wrote:


On 2/11/22 5:04 PM, nathan christiansn via EV wrote:

The only problem that I see with this is that the government is making
people who do not support ev’s pay for ev charging. I say that we wait 
for

mass ev adoption to happen(which will happen very soon). After this,
businesses and apartment building owners will pay for ev charging 
stations

out of their own pocket because having ev charging as an amenity will
attract more customers/tenants. Some hotels are already starting to do 
this.


A government that is 28 trillion dollars in debt should not be spending
billions of dollars that it does not hav
ABSOLUTELY!  In addition, government contributions are not needed and 
any government money would  almost certain to be misspent. Examples 
abound.  Tesla has the charging problems solved.  Compare SuperChargers 
with EVGO and the VW system.  All Tesla needs is a small fraction of the 
money that Biden wants to spend.  Tesla knows the charging problem and 
how best to solve it.  Instead, Biden wastes his efforts denying the 
existence of Tesla while proclaiming the EV dominance of GM.  Why does 
Biden expect credibility?


___
Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org
No other addresses in TO and CC fields
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org


___
Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org
No other addresses in TO and CC fields
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org


Re: [EVDL] $7.5bn for ev charging stations across the US

2022-02-11 Thread Willie via EV


On 2/11/22 5:04 PM, nathan christiansn via EV wrote:

The only problem that I see with this is that the government is making
people who do not support ev’s pay for ev charging. I say that we wait for
mass ev adoption to happen(which will happen very soon). After this,
businesses and apartment building owners will pay for ev charging stations
out of their own pocket because having ev charging as an amenity will
attract more customers/tenants. Some hotels are already starting to do this.

A government that is 28 trillion dollars in debt should not be spending
billions of dollars that it does not hav
ABSOLUTELY!  In addition, government contributions are not needed and 
any government money would  almost certain to be misspent. Examples 
abound.  Tesla has the charging problems solved.  Compare SuperChargers 
with EVGO and the VW system.  All Tesla needs is a small fraction of the 
money that Biden wants to spend.  Tesla knows the charging problem and 
how best to solve it.  Instead, Biden wastes his efforts denying the 
existence of Tesla while proclaiming the EV dominance of GM.  Why does 
Biden expect credibility?


___
Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org
No other addresses in TO and CC fields
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org


[EVDL] $7.5bn for ev charging stations across the US

2022-02-11 Thread nathan christiansn via EV
The only problem that I see with this is that the government is making
people who do not support ev’s pay for ev charging. I say that we wait for
mass ev adoption to happen(which will happen very soon). After this,
businesses and apartment building owners will pay for ev charging stations
out of their own pocket because having ev charging as an amenity will
attract more customers/tenants. Some hotels are already starting to do this.

A government that is 28 trillion dollars in debt should not be spending
billions of dollars that it does not have.

-Nathan
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20220211/16f9b90c/attachment.html>
___
Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org
No other addresses in TO and CC fields
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org


Re: [EVDL] $7.5b for new EV charge stations across US

2022-02-11 Thread EV List Lackey via EV
On 11 Feb 2022 at 17:09, Peri Hartman via EV wrote:

> States are getting the go-ahead to build a nationwide network of 
> electric vehicle charging stations that would place new or upgraded ones every
> 50 miles along interstate highways as part of the Biden administrationTMs
> plan to spur widespread adoption of the zero-emission cars.

That's welcome news.  I hope $5b is enough.

Maybe I'm not being realistic but I'd like to see other non-EV-related 
incentives to accept and use the funding.  I suspect that the more forward-
looking states will take advantage of it, while the backward ones and those 
firmly in bed with big oil (Texas etc) won't.  But at least that gets more 
public chargoing points into states where EVs are more likely to be adopted.

> "Many might think of [EVs] as a luxury item," he said. 

Bunk.  That's a bog-standard anti-EV talking point dating back to the $100k 
Tesla Model S days.  It needs to die but never will.  The elitist ultra-rich 
anti-EV crowd will continue to rail against "elitist" middle class EV owners 
because it gets results for them.

> The reality is [that] nobody benefits more from EVs in principle than
> those who drive the longest distances, often our rural Americans. 

I'm obviously pro-EV, and it's theoretically true, but I think that a fair 
number of people will go "say what?" at that.

> Biden also has set a goal of 50% electric vehicle sales by 2030, part
> of a broader effort to become zero emissions economywide by 2050.  

Great goal.  Getting there is going to require a LOT more pushing.  And the 
USPS vehicle update PMG-lit dumpster fire is a disaster for a goal like that 
- 90% ICEVs getting 8.5mpg.  Good grief.

> Electric vehicles amounted to less than 3% of U.S. new auto sales last
> year, but forecasters expect big increases in the next decade. 

"Big increases."  Don't hold your breath.  

In Europe, unquestionably.  Also in some isolated but open-minded small 
nations such as Uruguay. Maybe in China.  Doubtful in Japan and US, and 
extremely unlikely elsewhere.

> Electric vehicle owners now charge their vehicles at home 80% of the
> time, making the need for EV charging stations at colleges,
> apartment-building parking lots or even public streets less urgent. But
> that is likely to change as more people who don't have a garage to
> house a charging station buy EVs. 

Wait, what?  Colleges and apartment parking lots ARE places where potential 
EV owners would charge *at home*.  They aren't in the same category as on-
street or public parking lot charging.

Actually, ALL of the above can provide home charging.  To me the use of 
public charging has been a major surprise in Europe.  I expected slower EV 
uptake there because so many people don't have garages or even off-street 
parking.  

Even Renault, arguably the EU's EV leader, fouled this up.  They didn't 
bother with Zoe DC CCS for 7 years, because they assumed that most owners 
would charge at home.  When they finally added it in 2020, they made it a 1k 
euro (!) option and limited it to 50kW.  

But lo and behold, Europe's EV buyers seem to be really digging the free 
charging offered by local governments and merchants - even though thanks in 
part to Renault's bork it's mostly 7kW / 22kW AC. 

What happens when that's saturated and starts to require payment?  Stay 
tuned.

Anyway, this is mosty good news, and I hope that it improves the highway 
charging situation all across the US.

David Roden, EVDL moderator & general lackey

To reach me, don't reply to this message; I won't get it.  Use my 
offlist address here : http://evdl.org/help/index.html#supt

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 
 The future is here, and everything needs to be destroyed. 

-- Allegheny Shredders 
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

___
Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org
No other addresses in TO and CC fields
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org


[EVDL] $7.5b for new EV charge stations across US

2022-02-11 Thread Peri Hartman via EV

States get go-ahead to build electric car charging stations
https://www.seattletimes.com/business/states-get-go-ahead-to-build-electric-car-charging-stations/

By HOPE YEN
The Associated Press

States are getting the go-ahead to build a nationwide network of 
electric vehicle charging stations that would place new or upgraded ones 
every 50 miles along interstate highways as part of the Biden 
administration’s plan to spur widespread adoption of the zero-emission 
cars.

...
The administration Thursday announced the availability of $5 billion in 
federal money to states over five years

...
states must submit plans to the federal government and can begin 
construction by this fall if they focus first on highway routes, rather 
than neighborhoods and shopping centers,

...
Each station would need to have at least four fast-charger ports
...
[Buttigieg]
“Many might think of them as a luxury item,” he said. “The reality is 
nobody benefits more from EVs in principle than those who drive the 
longest distances, often our rural Americans.”

...
The law provides an additional $2.5 billion for local grants, ... to 
fill remaining gaps in the charging network in rural areas and in 
disadvantaged communities

...
Biden also has set a goal of 50% electric vehicle sales by 2030, part of 
a broader effort to become zero emissions economywide by 2050.  Electric 
vehicles amounted to less than 3% of U.S. new auto sales last year, but 
forecasters expect big increases in the next decade. Consumers bought 
about 400,000 fully electric vehicles.

...
Electric vehicle owners now charge their vehicles at home 80% of the 
time, making the need for EV charging stations at colleges, 
apartment-building parking lots or even public streets less urgent. But 
that is likely to change as more people who don’t have a garage to house 
a charging station buy EVs.

...

--

Peri

<< Annoyed by leaf blowers ? https://quietcleanseattle.org/ >>

___
Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org
No other addresses in TO and CC fields
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org