On 4/27/2010 5:23 AM, ronaldheld wrote:
comments on this paper: http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1004/1004.0148v1.pdf
Ronald
Unitary evolution has always implied that there is some basis in which there is no
decoherence. Recovery of a classical world must depend on (approximate) einselection of
special "pointer" states. So I don't think there is a transformation that gives eqn (2)
unless the system consists of time-like separate regions for the whole duration considered
- in which case they are already two physically separate "worlds" that have just been
represented together mathematically. I think decoherence depends on the *approximate*,
but not strict, separability of the interaction.
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-l...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
