Re: [Evolution] courier IMAP || Evo bug?
why? It displays the HTML page correctly if I use POP or if I use IMAP from the Exchange server or If I use Evo to send an HTML email ... When Evo loads an HTML email off the Courier IMAP server it appears to either be ignoring the Content-Type header or not understanding it. On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 14:50, Brian wrote: Wouldn't this be a gtkHTML bug and not an Evolution one? On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 14:30, Tom wrote: Has anyone had any problems reading HTML email from a Courier IMAP server sent from a PHP script? :) I am using PHP to send back an email registration ... if I send the email to Exchange server we have here and then read it with Evo ( still IMAP ) it works fine ... if I send the email to my Courier server and the check it with Evo it shows as plain text and the headers read as Content-Type: text/plain yet I am setting the header in PHP to Content-Type: text/html If I log into the server and read the mail there the Content-Type header is text/html If I use POP to check that same email ... it works fine it reads as html and the header shows it as html If I use Evo to send an html email everything works fine. any ideas?? P.S. I have also tried sending the email from a Cold Fusion page and I get the same behavior. -- Brian ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- -Tom GPG key: http://www.omnichannels.com/keys/tom.asc ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] courier IMAP || Evo bug?
On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 14:30, Tom wrote: Has anyone had any problems reading HTML email from a Courier IMAP server sent from a PHP script? :) ... Perhaps the server has some kind of MIME filtering software installed that is modifying the message? Peter -- Peter Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Why should I have to change my name? He's the one who sucks! -- Michael Bolton ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Determining the account used for sending mail
On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 13:57, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: If you go back to probably even last week or the week before in the archives for this list, you'll find numerous messages complaining about 1.0.x find my account from this message behavior. In fact, every week there are lots of complaints. All of them wanted it the way it is now. You're actually the first person that wants it the old way :-) People don't write email saying Dammit! Why can't you make evolution work exactly the way it already does?! How the @#$!@ am I supposed to used this thing when it does precisely what I want it to?! It's possible that there were thousands of people happy with the old behavior and just a handful who wanted it the new way. Can one of those I-don't-like-the-1.0.x-way people out there explain what was wrong with it for them? The 1.0.x way sounds like it makes a lot more sense to me... (If someone sends mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], why do you want the reply to come from [EMAIL PROTECTED]? Unless you don't ever want to send mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED], in which case, why not just claim that [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the email address for that identity?) -- Dan ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] courier IMAP || Evo bug?
I did the server install about 2 weeks ago, so unless it is a default option I don't think that is it. And as I said, if I send HTML email from Evo it works fine On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 15:28, Peter Williams wrote: On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 14:30, Tom wrote: Has anyone had any problems reading HTML email from a Courier IMAP server sent from a PHP script? :) ... Perhaps the server has some kind of MIME filtering software installed that is modifying the message? Peter -- Peter Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Why should I have to change my name? He's the one who sucks! -- Michael Bolton ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- -Tom GPG key: http://www.omnichannels.com/keys/tom.asc ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Determining the account used for sending mail
On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 11:34, Dan Winship wrote: Can one of those I-don't-like-the-1.0.x-way people out there explain what was wrong with it for them? The 1.0.x way sounds like it makes a lot more sense to me... snip The old 1.0.x way doesn't work when replying to lists. Eg. I have two accounts (I have a lot more than that, but that's not the point) one is [EMAIL PROTECTED] and one is [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am subscribed to this list via [EMAIL PROTECTED] When I clicked reply just now, Evolution selected my default account ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) instead of the one in the X-Evolution-Source: header ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). This is annoying as hell because if I don't change the from address, my mail is silently dropped by the list server since my address isn't subscribed. Ironically enough, this happened when I was talking to Jeff about the fact that the autodetection was broken. Other than that, I have no complaint with the way 1.0.x works, so if that bug could be fixed... Jeff assures me that it works in 1.1.x, I haven't been brave enough to start using the dev-snaps yet... switches from field to correct account Aaron signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution] courier IMAP || Evo bug?
I sent you off an email ... did it work? What Evo branch are you running ( both I would assume ) On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 15:19, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: If it works on other IMAP servers, I would suspect that this is a bug in your IMAP server. Care to send a copy of this message to me? Since my IMAP server is also a Courier imapd, I should experience the same problem? If I don't, then I suspect that maybe your Courier IMAP server's configuration might be to blame. Jeff On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 14:30, Tom wrote: Has anyone had any problems reading HTML email from a Courier IMAP server sent from a PHP script? :) I am using PHP to send back an email registration ... if I send the email to Exchange server we have here and then read it with Evo ( still IMAP ) it works fine ... if I send the email to my Courier server and the check it with Evo it shows as plain text and the headers read as Content-Type: text/plain yet I am setting the header in PHP to Content-Type: text/html If I log into the server and read the mail there the Content-Type header is text/html If I use POP to check that same email ... it works fine it reads as html and the header shows it as html If I use Evo to send an html email everything works fine. any ideas?? P.S. I have also tried sending the email from a Cold Fusion page and I get the same behavior. -- -Tom GPG key: http://www.omnichannels.com/keys/tom.asc ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- -Tom GPG key: http://www.omnichannels.com/keys/tom.asc ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Determining the account used for sending mail
Why doesn't Evolution simply use the account in the To: tag when you do an action on a received message? If it can't find it, use the default. Sounds simple. I didn't appear in the To list of your message. How does Evo know what account to reply from? The default account will often not be right if you have a bunch of accounts. -- Dan ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Determining the account used for sending mail
Dan, I just realized I put my foot in my mouth when I sent that message and I got a msg from a different mailing list and the To: tag was that mailing list addy. I'll try to take it out now. So I guess it uses the X-Evolution-Source: tag, I didn't notice it below my mail servers SpamAssasin tags. Trying to learn the ways of email and clients... Cheers, Chris On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 13:56, Dan Winship wrote: Why doesn't Evolution simply use the account in the To: tag when you do an action on a received message? If it can't find it, use the default. Sounds simple. I didn't appear in the To list of your message. How does Evo know what account to reply from? The default account will often not be right if you have a bunch of accounts. -- Dan ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Determining the account used for sending mail
On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 13:50, Ryan P Skadberg wrote: Ah now I get this. So, basically, you have 2 IMAP accounts He was actually talking about 2 POP accounts, but it should work basically the same. Ok! Then, the best way for this to work is: 1) Search the Recipient list for an address in your accounts (this should fail on a mailing list, so ...) 2) Use X-Evolution-Source. 3) Barring Neither working for some reason, use default account. So you'd think, but that's basically how it was supposed to work in 1.0.x and he's saying it didn't really... I suspect something is messing up so that it doesn't recognize the X-Evolution-Source header and step 2 fails. -- Dan ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] courier IMAP || Evo bug?
I don't seem to have received it? Jeff On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 15:30, Tom wrote: I sent you off an email ... did it work? What Evo branch are you running ( both I would assume ) On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 15:19, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: If it works on other IMAP servers, I would suspect that this is a bug in your IMAP server. Care to send a copy of this message to me? Since my IMAP server is also a Courier imapd, I should experience the same problem? If I don't, then I suspect that maybe your Courier IMAP server's configuration might be to blame. Jeff On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 14:30, Tom wrote: Has anyone had any problems reading HTML email from a Courier IMAP server sent from a PHP script? :) I am using PHP to send back an email registration ... if I send the email to Exchange server we have here and then read it with Evo ( still IMAP ) it works fine ... if I send the email to my Courier server and the check it with Evo it shows as plain text and the headers read as Content-Type: text/plain yet I am setting the header in PHP to Content-Type: text/html If I log into the server and read the mail there the Content-Type header is text/html If I use POP to check that same email ... it works fine it reads as html and the header shows it as html If I use Evo to send an html email everything works fine. any ideas?? P.S. I have also tried sending the email from a Cold Fusion page and I get the same behavior. -- -Tom GPG key: http://www.omnichannels.com/keys/tom.asc ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- -Tom GPG key: http://www.omnichannels.com/keys/tom.asc -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Console perms messed up (was: RPMS for Palm m500series)
On 月, 2002-07-29 at 05:41, Not Zed wrote:
use strace to find out what the actual reason is (perms or existance,
etc)
On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 04:17, Stuart Luppescu wrote:
On 日, 2002-07-28 at 13:20, Etienne Tourigny wrote:
Greetings,
due to demand for Palm m500 compatible evolution RPMS I just put 4 RPMS
at the following URL:
http://www.omeo.ca/pub/evolution/
evolution-1.0.8-et.3.i386.rpm (binaries are stripped)
gnome-pilot-0.1.65-et.3.i386.rpm (contains gnome-pilot-devel)
gnome-pilot-conduits-0.9-et.3.i386.rpm
pilot-link-0.10.99-et.3.i386.rpm
This now works fine with my M515, but now I find that I can't start a
wterm (rxvt modified to be WindowMaker-like). I get these messages:
wterm: can't open pseudo-tty
wterm: aborting
This is pretty weird. When I tried strace on my machine at work, I get
this:
open("/dev/ptyx6", O_RDWR) = 4
access("/dev/ttyx6", R_OK|W_OK) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied)
close(4)= 0
open("/dev/ptyx7", O_RDWR) = 4
access("/dev/ttyx7", R_OK|W_OK) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied)
close(4)= 0
open("/dev/ptyx8", O_RDWR) = 4
access("/dev/ttyx8", R_OK|W_OK) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied)
close(4)= 0
open("/dev/ptyx9", O_RDWR) = 4
access("/dev/ttyx9", R_OK|W_OK) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied)
close(4)= 0
open("/dev/ptyxa", O_RDWR) = 4
access("/dev/ttyxa", R_OK|W_OK) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied)
close(4)= 0
open("/dev/ptyxb", O_RDWR) = 4
access("/dev/ttyxb", R_OK|W_OK) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied)
close(4)= 0
This is just a section of what strace produces. There are 175 such
EACCES errors. But when I run it on my computer at home (basically the
same setup) I get this:
open("/dev/ptyx5", O_RDWR) = 4
access("/dev/ttyx5", R_OK|W_OK) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied)
close(4)= 0
open("/dev/ptyx6", O_RDWR) = 4
access("/dev/ttyx6", R_OK|W_OK) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied)
close(4)= 0
open("/dev/ptyx7", O_RDWR) = 4
access("/dev/ttyx7", R_OK|W_OK) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied)
close(4)= 0
open("/dev/ptyx8", O_RDWR) = -1 EIO (Input/output error)
open("/dev/ptyx9", O_RDWR) = 4
access("/dev/ttyx9", R_OK|W_OK) = 0
In this case, there are 135 lines with the EACCES error but then it
succeeds on /dev/ptyx9. I sure don't get it.
--
Stuart Luppescu -=- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
University of Chicago -=- CCSR
才文と智奈美の父 -=-Kernel 2.4.19-pre10-xf
He who laughs last -- missed the punch line.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution] Determining the account used for sending mail
On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 14:06, Dan Winship wrote: Ok! Then, the best way for this to work is: 1) Search the Recipient list for an address in your accounts (this should fail on a mailing list, so ...) 2) Use X-Evolution-Source. 3) Barring Neither working for some reason, use default account. So you'd think, but that's basically how it was supposed to work in 1.0.x and he's saying it didn't really... I suspect something is messing up so that it doesn't recognize the X-Evolution-Source header and step 2 fails. Exactly correct. Aaron signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution] Determining the account used for sending mail
On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 12:56, Dan Winship wrote: Why doesn't Evolution simply use the account in the To: tag when you do an action on a received message? If it can't find it, use the default. Sounds simple. I didn't appear in the To list of your message. How does Evo know what account to reply from? The default account will often not be right if you have a bunch of accounts. But that is when it (in 1.0) was supposed to fall back to using the Evolution Source header (the always method in 1.1) - if you aren't in the recipient list. So in either case, for mailing lists, it should work the same. However, if someone emails one of my aliases, and the Evolution Source is use first, it will NEVER use the correct reply. The email address I use for this any mailing list is an alias, so for mailing lists, neither 1.0 or 1.1 operation works. But at least the 1.0 worked for non-mailing list emails. TTFN, Lonnie Borntreger ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Filtering on Specific Header
use regex's, they're faster and simpler anyway. On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 00:32, Jeff Bearer wrote: I do a lot of filtering on the Received header to stop spammers. But there can be several Received headers in a e-mail and the filter only looks at the first one. I don't know if this is by design or not, but maybe it would be good to look at all the received headers? I suppose that a regular expression filter will do the job, I'll have to give it a try. I just wanted to post to make you aware of potentially confusing behavior. ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Total payment
What was this? In Evo 1.1.x I can see that the original mail was 14k, but I see no body... Yet another harmeless virus? -- * * Rob Brown-Bayliss * ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] VOrdner bug?
My guess is that it is being added to the trash and becoming a candidate for unmatched. It shouldn't really be doing this though, so its a bug. I have plans to address this better, but its a lot of work still, and probably wont make it into 1.2 either. On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 23:49, Andreas Kostyrka wrote: Hi! I've got a curious behaviour with evolution 1.0.8 (ximian for SuSE8.0, KDE3 desktop). When I click on the outbin (Ausgang), suddenly the messages in there seem to be added to the VFolder (VOrdner) set, because the Not matched (Nicht passend) folder contains all the messages that I have sent. (I have all VFolders setup as source==Inbox) I'm curious if this is considered a bug, and if so, how do other people read their personal emails after having filtered out mailing lists via VFolders? TIA, Andreas ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] VOrdner bug?
Am Die, 2002-07-30 um 13.16 schrieb Not Zed: My guess is that it is being added to the trash and becoming a candidate for unmatched. It shouldn't really be doing this though, so its a bug. Well, this time I could only reproduce it by clicking on Trash, not the outbin. Basically I have the impression that VFolder is magically trying find out which folders are to be searched for data sources. And it seems to get it wrong often. :( It seems to produce some hard to reproduce bugs :( Andreas ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] VOrdner bug?
On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 15:14, Andreas Kostyrka wrote: Am Die, 2002-07-30 um 13.16 schrieb Not Zed: My guess is that it is being added to the trash and becoming a candidate for unmatched. It shouldn't really be doing this though, so its a bug. Well, this time I could only reproduce it by clicking on Trash, not the outbin. Basically I have the impression that VFolder is magically trying find out which folders are to be searched for data sources. And it seems to get it wrong often. :( Not really. When the vtrash is created, it is marked as a 'private' folder, which should not become part of the unmatched code. All other vfolders it doesn't do 'magic' like that either. It seems to produce some hard to reproduce bugs :( *shrug* ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Determining the account used for sending mail
On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 11:06, Dan Winship wrote: 1) Search the Recipient list for an address in your accounts (this should fail on a mailing list, so ...) 2) Use X-Evolution-Source. 3) Barring Neither working for some reason, use default account. So you'd think, but that's basically how it was supposed to work in 1.0.x and he's saying it didn't really... I suspect something is messing up so that it doesn't recognize the X-Evolution-Source header and step 2 fails. That's my take, as well, and I'm using the latest 1.1 snapshot, downloaded yesterday. How about scanning the Received from delivery chain from source to destination first, then looking in recipients, and finally at the X-Evolution-Source header? I'm attaching your message as I received it below so you can check out the headers. For some reason, evo picked my [EMAIL PROTECTED] (default) account when I selected reply to list. Both accounts are POP3. From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 30 11:19:27 2002 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp.well.com (smtp.well.com [206.14.209.7]) by mail.well.com (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g6UIJRri019907; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 11:19:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from trna.ximian.com (trna.ximian.com [141.154.95.22]) by smtp.well.com (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g6UIJPeR019405; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 11:19:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from trna.ximian.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by trna.ximian.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6UI4M301437; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 14:04:22 -0400 Received: from peabody.ximian.com (peabody.ximian.com [141.154.95.10]) by trna.ximian.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6UI4F301410 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 14:04:15 -0400 Received: (qmail 18489 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2002 18:05:04 - Received: from dmz.ximian.com (HELO twelve-monkeys.boston.ximian.com) (141.154.95.1) by peabody.ximian.com with SMTP; 30 Jul 2002 18:05:04 - Subject: Re: [Evolution] Determining the account used for sending mail From: Dan Winship [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Ryan P Skadberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Evolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1028045676.21993.4.camel@kempalaptop [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.1.0.99 (Preview Release) Date: 30 Jul 2002 14:06:44 -0400 Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailman-Version: 1.1 Precedence: bulk List-Id: Evolution users mailing list. evolution.ximian.com X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO version=2.31 X-Spam-Level: X-UIDL: 6e606d9da08bc0224d57a275aeeebc58 X-Evolution-Source: pop:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/inbox Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 13:50, Ryan P Skadberg wrote: Ah now I get this. So, basically, you have 2 IMAP accounts He was actually talking about 2 POP accounts, but it should work basically the same. Ok! Then, the best way for this to work is: 1) Search the Recipient list for an address in your accounts (this should fail on a mailing list, so ...) 2) Use X-Evolution-Source. 3) Barring Neither working for some reason, use default account. So you'd think, but that's basically how it was supposed to work in 1.0.x and he's saying it didn't really... I suspect something is messing up so that it doesn't recognize the X-Evolution-Source header and step 2 fails. -- Dan ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
