Re: [Evolution] Determining the account used for sending mail
On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 14:06, Dan Winship wrote: > > Ok! Then, the best way for this to work is: > > > > 1) Search the Recipient list for an address in your accounts > > (this should fail on a mailing list, so ...) > > 2) Use X-Evolution-Source. > > 3) Barring Neither working for some reason, use default account. > > So you'd think, but that's basically how it was supposed to work in > 1.0.x and he's saying it didn't really... I suspect something is messing > up so that it doesn't recognize the X-Evolution-Source header and step 2 > fails. Exactly correct. Aaron signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution] Determining the account used for sending mail
Well, I have 5 accounts configured right now, all POP3. They are from various hosts. The default account is [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] goes to picassofish.com. This is a Linux box on the net, has a sendmail server running on it. I connect via POP3 from evolution and download my mail. [EMAIL PROTECTED] goes to mail.kwic.com. KWIC is my ISP. They have a bunch of FreeBSD boxen and one of them is running sendmail. I, again, connect via POP3 to their mail server and download my mail. I then have a whole bunch of Evolution filters (SPAM stuff, folder routing, etc) but I don't think they play into this at all. No procmail, no other stuff in between. Now, replying to "normal" messages seems to work well - the correct account is probed from (presumably) X-Evolution-Source: but replying to mailing lists (any list, I'm on several) selects the default account ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) not the one specified in the X-Evo-source header. So, to summarize, they both travel to me via sendmail and POP3. They "merge", as far as I know, only in the sense that they are both stored on the same hard disk. Hmm... Interesting. I clicked reply to the message you sent to the list. It selected the right account. I'm guessing this is because I appear as a recipient? Thanks Aaron On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 13:04, Dan Winship wrote: > Need more detail. How many accounts of what types do you have > configured? > > If I send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], what route does it travel, and > likewise for [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Do the two get merged before or after > evolution gets involved, etc) > > On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 12:14, Aaron Kemp wrote: > > On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 11:34, Dan Winship wrote: > > > Can one of those I-don't-like-the-1.0.x-way people out there explain > > > what was wrong with it for them? The 1.0.x way sounds like it makes a > > > lot more sense to me... > > > > The old 1.0.x way doesn't work when replying to lists. Eg. I have two > > accounts (I have a lot more than that, but that's not the point) one is > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and one is [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am subscribed to > > this list via [EMAIL PROTECTED] When I clicked reply just now, Evolution > > selected my default account ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) instead of the one > > in the X-Evolution-Source: header ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). This is annoying as > > hell because if I don't change the from address, my mail is silently > > dropped by the list server since my address isn't subscribed. > > Ironically enough, this happened when I was talking to Jeff about the > > fact that the autodetection was broken. > > > > Other than that, I have no complaint with the way 1.0.x works, so if > > that bug could be fixed... Jeff assures me that it works in 1.1.x, I > > haven't been brave enough to start using the dev-snaps yet... > > > > > > > > Aaron > > > > > > signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution] Determining the account used for sending mail
On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 11:34, Dan Winship wrote: > Can one of those I-don't-like-the-1.0.x-way people out there explain > what was wrong with it for them? The 1.0.x way sounds like it makes a > lot more sense to me... The old 1.0.x way doesn't work when replying to lists. Eg. I have two accounts (I have a lot more than that, but that's not the point) one is [EMAIL PROTECTED] and one is [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am subscribed to this list via [EMAIL PROTECTED] When I clicked reply just now, Evolution selected my default account ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) instead of the one in the X-Evolution-Source: header ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). This is annoying as hell because if I don't change the from address, my mail is silently dropped by the list server since my address isn't subscribed. Ironically enough, this happened when I was talking to Jeff about the fact that the autodetection was broken. Other than that, I have no complaint with the way 1.0.x works, so if that bug could be fixed... Jeff assures me that it works in 1.1.x, I haven't been brave enough to start using the dev-snaps yet... Aaron signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution] tabbed browsing
Or do you mean message threads in Evolution? Aaron On Fri, 2002-07-12 at 17:35, Marcel Spitau wrote: > hi to everyone, > > i took a look on the official page from evolution to find out how to > make those tabs closed on default, or to close all opend tabs at once, > but I didn't find anything. > > Is there a chance to have this? Am I to stupid to find this thing? > > Could you help me please? > > Thanks. > > Marcel > > P.S. Excuse my BAD english please, I hope you will understand what I was > talking about ... > > > > > ___ > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution > signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution] Auto response function?
Maybe a filter action to send a message could solve this (and other) things? On Sun, 2002-02-03 at 19:01, Michael Leone wrote: > Is there a way in Evo (i.e., not using procmail, etc) to have an > autoresponse email? I use Evo's POP3 features to get my mail from my > ISP, and don't want to change that. Is there any way to have a 'Your > email received; I'm looking into it" response auto-generated? What would > be even better is to be able to specify an auto-response, based on > original sender, or on address sent to. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Evolution] email that crashes Evo
Have you tried clicking View -> Message Display -> Message Source before selecting the message? Or turning off the Preview Pane? Aaron On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 09:34, Gil Hauer wrote: > I received a (*&@#$-ing junk email this morning that crashes Evo > whenever I select it. Can anyone think of a way to delete it without > selecting it? > > Gil ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] getting netscape to launch an evolution composewindow
On Thu, 2001-12-06 at 10:01, John Klassa wrote: > > I checked the FAQ, and I searched the net, but I can't find an answer to > this (other than, in general, to use muttzilla). How does one get > netscape to launch an evolution "compose" window when you click a > mailto: link? How do you get evolution to launch a compose window > programmatically, in general? > With Galeon, you set the mail handler to evolution mailto:%t I would try whatever the netscape equivilent is. Good luck Aaron ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Openmail?
> That's odd, because the scenario we were presented with while talking to > the salespeople (ok, they were salespeople, not tech people), was setting > up an Openmail server in the domain, letting it replicate from the > Exchange servers, then making DNS/WINS changes to point the old Exchange > addresses at the new Openmail box. Something that would be difficult to > do transparently if we have to push out an Outlook client to every user in > what was a 7000 person company. For the record, I evaluated OpenMail at our company as a replacement for Exchange. I did have to install an OpenMail component on each Outlook workstation for full functionality. IIRC, once the plugin was installed a new source was available when configuring mail accounts. Evolution on the other hand is working great with Exchange (Mail anyway) without a plugin : ) I will be purchasing the connector when it's available though, since I don't think our IT department will be dropping Exchange anytime soon : / Aaron ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
RE: [Evolution] Ximian Connector
"Me too" I would glady fork over the dough to be a beta tester too, if the option exists. Thanks, Aaron On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 03:06, Jeppe, Nils wrote: > > Hello Ximian, > > I'll second that, if this is a possibility please get in touch with me and > I'll bug my superiours until they cave. > > > Best wishes, > Nils ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] change splash screen please
I didn't mind the current one : ) I think both the art team and the hackers are doing really great work. On 11 Apr 2001 02:23:22 +0300, Tuomas Kuosmanen wrote: On 10 Apr 2001 13:33:35 -0400, Neil Cooler wrote: > I vote for monkeys. > > Preferably fat ones.Fat monkeys are far more strange than a hacker's sunglasses.. :-) Tuomas Tuomas Kuosmanen - Art Director - Ximian - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com
