Re: [Evolution] New messages don't appear

2003-01-14 Thread Not Zed
On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 23:08, Paul Hands wrote:
 Ross,
 
 I see the problem with evo/connector to an exchange server, so I think
 it's more to do with evolution than with a particular email server. 
 I'll try using an IMAP connection to the exchange server and see if it
 has the same problem.

If you're seeing it with exchange, then its a problem with connector,
you should contact ximian support with the issue, not this list.

 Michael



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Threading

2003-01-14 Thread Not Zed
On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 18:10, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
 Yo!
 
 I noticed that on mailing lists, threads are often broken. In some
 cases, it's just because evo does apparently not thread by Subject
 (which, if it did, I'd want to be able to switch off in any case), but
 in other cases it's unusual headers. Some (Thread-Id, Thread-Topic) seem
 really weird, but this one should be an easy fix:
 
 In-Reply-To: Message from Bob Apthorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED]  of Mon, 13 Jan 
2003 15:36:24 CST. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 
 I've asked the author of the offending message what mailer he used, I'll
 report back when I get an answer.

Its not that easy, we take the first  part of in-reply-to, which is
normally the right thing, but with some mailers it isn't.  It isn't
possible to tell from code ...


 cheers
 -- vbi
 
 -- 
 get my gpg key here: http://fortytwo.ch/gpg/92082481


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Trash not emptied on exit.

2003-01-12 Thread Not Zed
There's a known bug about this not always working (its time dependent,
so it depends on machine speed, etc).  It became 'too hard' to fix
because of some architectural issues with the way camel works ...

But its known and hopefully will be fixed one day.

On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 02:05, Dwight Tovey wrote:
 I use evolution on my laptop to access my email on my UW IMAP server. 
 On that server I use procmail to filter my messages as they come in and
 deliver them to appropriate folders in my home directory.  For example,
 all mail from the 'evolution-admin' goes into the ~/mail/Evolution
 folder, while all mail from my employer's server goes into the
 ~/mail/Work folder.  Any messages not caught by any of these filtering
 rules gets delivered to the regular INBOX in /var/spool/mail.
 
 In evo's Mail Preferences I have Empty trash folders on exit
 selected.  When I delete a message (whether from INBOX or from any of my
 local folders) I see it get marked for deletion, and if I check the
 Trash Vfolder I see it show up there.  However, when I exit evo and come
 back later, apparently only the messages that were deleted from INBOX
 are actually expunged.  Mail that was deleted from the other folders is
 still in the Trash Vfolder (and still marked as deleted in the original
 folder).  Manually using the 'Expunge' command while actually in a given
 folder will expunge the messages.
 
 I figure this is probably related to evolution using a Vfolder for trash
 instead of a real folder, but before that happens is there any way to
 get evolution to do an expunge in all subscribed folders?
 
   /dwight
 -- 
 Dwight N. Tovey
 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.dtovey.net/dwight
 ---
 If you are driving at the speed of light and you turn your headlights on, what 
happens?
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Problem subscribing to shared IMAP folders

2003-01-12 Thread Not Zed
On Sat, 2003-01-11 at 12:30, Jason Tackaberry wrote:
 On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 20:04, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
  We do not currently support multiple namespaces.
 
 Oddly enough, if I override the server-supplied namespace and leave the
 field blank, things appear to work correctly.  I can see both INBOX. and
 shared. namespaces.

Well thats just the server mapping the multiple namespaces into a single
namespace and folder tree.  Its not really the same as multiple
namespace support in the client, which basically means separate folder
trees off multiple roots.

I'm not sure when we'll support multiple namespaces, most of the code
required is now in place though.

 I guess I can expect odd behaviours since it's not officially
 supported.  But still, at least it's something.

You'll probably find other issues with shared folders, but if you're
just browsing it should be ok.



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] german menu

2003-01-12 Thread Not Zed

Hmm, not sure, perhaps it is a gtk font problem ?

does it work if you select say english locale?


On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 05:49, Michael Gruner wrote:
 Hi there,
 
 anyone knows, which files i have to edit to get all the german menu
 items possible in evo? My evo-version is 1.2.1 on a gentoo system. The
 problem is: there are placeholders for menu-items but there is no word i
 can see what evo does on clicking that item
 
 thanks for your help!
 
 micha
 -- 
 Michael Gruner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 __
 
 Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - http://mail.yahoo.de
 Bis zu 100 MB Speicher bei http://premiummail.yahoo.de
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Archiving Deleted Mail

2003-01-12 Thread Not Zed
On Sat, 2003-01-11 at 01:31, Alfred A. Lorber wrote:
 I was wondering if there is any way to get the following behavior in
 Evolution:
 
 My mail is handled by an IMAP server.  When I delete a message, I would
 like it to be moved to a local folder on my desktop machine so it can be
 archived.  I've tried to come up with some type of filter that would do
 this but haven't  been unsuccessful.  Currently what I do is
 periodically go to the Trash folder of my IMAP account, do a Select All,
 do a Move to Folder and select my archive folder, then do an expunge. 
 It sure would be nice to automate this.

I think thats about the easiest way you can do it at present.

 It would also be nice to have a Shft+Ctl+D that would simply expunge the
 current message and not archive it.
 
 Thanks for your help.  I apologize if this topic has already been
 covered.  I looked in the Evolution FAQ and could not find an entry that
 addresses my problem.
 
 -Alfred
 -- 
 Alfred A. Lorber
 Sandia National Laboratories
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Re: [Evolution-hackers] SIGSEGV on setting label -gdb output and analysis

2003-01-05 Thread Not Zed

On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 05:45, Mika Liljeberg wrote:
 On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 20:30, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
  What I'm saying is that EThread.server_port's queue is not modified
  outside of a EThread.mutex and so it is all safe. If that wasn't the
  case, I would agree with you - then there would be a poblem, but as far
  as I can tell, EThread.mutex is always in a locked state when
  EThread.serverport.queue is modified in any way.
  
 
 Ok, I see what you mean. Only the server's EThread handle is known to
 clients.

Yeah, that code is a bit dodgey, it breaks through some abstraction
layers, but its all part of the same code really, so ...

But server_port is just another member of EThread, so it is accessed via
a lock (even in thread_dispatch the lock is always held if the port is
to be modified).

The reason the code is there isn't very worthwhile anyway, there isn't
any reason you'd want to drop any messages, so it could probabhly be
removed.

  if you can find evidence to the contrary, please point it out.
 
 Well, e_thread_destroy() empties the server_port message queue without
 acquiring EThread.lock. Conceivably there could be a race there. I
 sincerily hope it's not just random memory corruption. ;-)

Memory bugs are sometimes hard to find ... :-/

e_thread_destroy doesn't need to lock because if anything still has a
handle to the ethread at the time it is destroyed, its already a bug.



___
evolution-hackers maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers



Re: [Evolution] Re: [Evolution-hackers] SIGSEGV on setting label -gdb output and analysis

2003-01-05 Thread Not Zed

On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 05:45, Mika Liljeberg wrote:
 On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 20:30, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
  What I'm saying is that EThread.server_port's queue is not modified
  outside of a EThread.mutex and so it is all safe. If that wasn't the
  case, I would agree with you - then there would be a poblem, but as far
  as I can tell, EThread.mutex is always in a locked state when
  EThread.serverport.queue is modified in any way.
  
 
 Ok, I see what you mean. Only the server's EThread handle is known to
 clients.

Yeah, that code is a bit dodgey, it breaks through some abstraction
layers, but its all part of the same code really, so ...

But server_port is just another member of EThread, so it is accessed via
a lock (even in thread_dispatch the lock is always held if the port is
to be modified).

The reason the code is there isn't very worthwhile anyway, there isn't
any reason you'd want to drop any messages, so it could probabhly be
removed.

  if you can find evidence to the contrary, please point it out.
 
 Well, e_thread_destroy() empties the server_port message queue without
 acquiring EThread.lock. Conceivably there could be a race there. I
 sincerily hope it's not just random memory corruption. ;-)

Memory bugs are sometimes hard to find ... :-/

e_thread_destroy doesn't need to lock because if anything still has a
handle to the ethread at the time it is destroyed, its already a bug.



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Built-in spam filtering?

2003-01-02 Thread Not Zed
Its been suggested before ...

You could just use an external app, and link it in the same way the
spamassasin stuff is normally linked in.

I still think doing it at the server end is the way to go though,
otherwise you have to waste time downloading the message anyway.


On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 03:42, Jim Frost wrote:
 I didn't have time to check the archives thoroughly but I'm somewhat
 surprised nobody has put a Bayesian spam filter or something like that
 into Evolution.  I'd kill for that.  I'd do it myself if I had the time,
 but I really don't.
 
 Anyway, in case this spurs someone to do some work, I did spend some
 time working on an imap server based bayesian system.  The idea was that
 with imap the folders are all on the server and I can easily create a
 special spam folder that users can drag and drop spam into, and use
 their personal folders for the not-spam side of things.  My system was
 rebuilding the databases every once in awhile out of cron but with a
 built-in system you could do it as-you-go (which would be cool).
 
 This was drop-dead simple to use from the user's point of view (my goal
 was that my wife should be able to use it without my help).  The
 downfall was that I haven't had the time to get the delivery stuff
 working and integrated into my mail delivery system.
 
 Apple's mail client with Jaguar (OSX 10.2) does something more or less
 like this, but instead of a spam folder there's a this is spam
 button.  And instead of moving probable spam into a special folder it
 colorizes them or destroys them (at your option).  In some ways I like
 this, but I would kind of like to be able to go in and edit the spam
 template messages so I think I'd still rather have a spam folder and
 have colorization or prioritization versus a trash folder as an option.
 
 Anyway, if anyone has time to work on something like this I bet a ton of
 people would love it.  I sure would.  In fact, I'd pay money if this
 feature were an add-on ala Exchange connectivity (hint).  I'd also pay
 money for a Windows version of Evolution (hint hint) so I didn't have to
 switch to Outlook whenever I have to use Windows.
 
 I note that I looked into spamassassin, which seems to be the preferred
 technique using an external filter, and I really dislike its rule-based
 system.  Way too many false positives, and a lot of work to set up and
 maintain too.  Spam filtering would be a great integrated feature and
 doesn't look like it'd be a lot of work to implement.
 
 jim
 
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Keybindings, hiding read messages, andattributions...

2003-01-02 Thread Not Zed
On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 02:43, Ibraheem Umaru-Mohammed wrote:
 On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 00:58, Not Zed wrote:
  On Thu, 2002-12-26 at 05:20, Ibraheem Umaru-Mohammed wrote:
   Hi,
   
   Is there a way to set read messages as hidden by default? I get tired of
   changing folders and when returning, the first thing i do is hide the
   read messages.
  
  It should remember the ones you've already hidden.
  
 
 It does, but only for the currently running session.

Hmm, its supposed to remember the state even across sessions.

  But you could try using a virtual folder with only unread messages in
  it.  It will get re-synced whenever you change back to it and
  automagically remove any newly-read messages.
  
 
 This is a neat. I couldn't work out how to create a virtual folder with
 only unread messages directly, but I was able to create a filter which
 moved read messages to another folder, which indirectly meant the
 corresponding virtual folder only had unread messages.

You just have to do 'status' 'is not' 'read', and set the vfolder
sources to 'all local and remote folders'

   Thirdly, is it possible to configure your attribution string when
   responding to messages? Just wondering if the quote string and/or the
   attribution strings are configurable, 
  
  Not that i can tell.
  
 
 Will it ever be, do you know?

I thought it already did, but since it doesn't i guess one day
something'll happen.  The hard part is making a user-friendly gui for it
(i.e. one that doesn't use %n and so forth).



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution-hackers] why i can't build evolution with krb5 libs?

2003-01-01 Thread Not Zed
On Tue, 2002-12-31 at 19:55, Calvin Liu wrote:
 i gave the configure option --with-krb5=my lib dir but the configure 
 result still reported Kerberos 4/5: no/no.
 is there any option as --enable-... relate to this?

it has to be the dir with a subdir of 'lib' and 'include' in it, not
just the lib dir?



___
evolution-hackers maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers



Re: [Evolution] Virtual Folder Doesn't work?

2003-01-01 Thread Not Zed
On Sat, 2002-12-21 at 01:57, Jean Neron wrote:
 Makes sense, more or less. Now that I know 'sent' isn't included, I
 can handle it as necessary.
 
 One feature I miss from Outlook is the ability to search *all*
 folders, sent, trash, everything. I looked around in evolution, but I
 can't see how I can do it without running a separate search on
 'trash'.
 
 Is there a way to search everything at one time?

No not yet.  Its a known limitation, with an oppen feature request still
pending.



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Finally Successful Build!

2003-01-01 Thread Not Zed

 So far, all seems to be working well. The only thing I notice that I
 have a question about is, all my mail folders on my remote mail account
 seem to show up underneath my remote Inbox. Not really a problem at all.
 Just an observation. Is this normal?

We now do namespaces slightly differently now, so we can support all
namespace options, so yeah its expected if your server uses a namespace
of inbox.



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] backing up ~/evolution

2003-01-01 Thread Not Zed
On Sat, 2002-12-21 at 00:34, Mertens Bram wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I want to write a little script to backup ~/evolution.
 I currently tar and compress the entire directory and the resulting
 files are about 35MB in size.
 
 What files can safely be skipped and will result in a considerable
 reduction of size?
 
 All mail-folders contain the following files:
 folder-metadata.xml
 local-metadata.xml
 mbox

You only need the above files, the ones below are generated from the
contents of the mbox file if they are missing/out of sync.

 mbox.ev-summary
 mbox.ibex.index
 mbox.ibex.index.data
 
 I suppose the .xml files are important since they appear to specify the
 type of folder. (anyway they're too small too influence the size
 considerably)
 But do I need any other files than the mbox file?
 
 TIA
 -- 
  #  Mertens Bram M8ram [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Linux User #249103  #
  # Red Hat Linux release 7.3 (Valhalla) kernel 2.4.18-3 i686 128MB RAM #
  #  1:54pm up 4 days, 3:59, 1 user, load average: 0.60, 0.22, 0.14 #
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Summary question [OT]

2003-01-01 Thread Not Zed
Brr :)

40 is hot
30 is warm
20 is cool
10 is brass monkey weather
4 is a nice cold beer :)

On Sat, 2002-12-21 at 12:40, Christopher Ness wrote:
 30 is hot,
 20 is nice,
 10 is cool,
 and 0 is ice.
 
 Ness
 
 On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 18:21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  And an even better question is how to get the weather info to display (when
  you can get it)  in _real_ numbers, like Fahrenheit and not Celsius!  ;-)
  
  I'm only half-joking---is there a way to adjust that?
  
  
  
 
  
  ahimsa 
  
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  et.uk cc: 
  
  Sent by:   Subject: [Evolution] Summary 
question 
  evolution-admin@   
  
  ximian.com 
  
 
  
 
  
  12/20/02 02:42 
  
  PM 
  
 
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
  Using Evolution 1.2.1 on RH8.0: is it just me or does Evolution seem to
  have recurring difficulties retrieving weather and newsfeed info?
  Sometimes it seems to get the info just fine and then other times it
  doesn't - and I haven't changed any relevant settings as far as I can
  tell. I'm not even calling for weather info from one site (or am I?),
  wanting info from the UK, Canada and Australia.
  Any ideas?
  --
  ahimsa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  ___
  evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
  
  
  
  
  
  ___
  evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Folder-specific settings - why I can't give upGnus yet

2003-01-01 Thread Not Zed

This seems reasonable, and perhaps something we can consider for the 1.5
development series.  I think its already been suggested before, and even
a patch submitted (it needed a lot of work to be generic enough).

On Sun, 2002-12-22 at 01:50, Kirk Strauser wrote:
 Evolution is terrific, and I've been using it increasingly more over the
 last few weeks for calendaring, task management, and as an address book
 (interacting with LDAP).  However, the email system lacks one thing
 that's keeping me from switching to Evolution for everything:
 folder-specific settings.  In Gnus (my current mailer of choice), you
 can modify pretty much any setting on a folder-by-folder basis, and
 those settings become the default for operations on the current folder. 
 This is wonderfully useful in the situation where one email account is
 used for multiple disjoint purposes.  For example, suppose that you use
 Evolution in a corporate setting.  You have a fair amount of
 intra-office communication, subscribe to a few mailing lists, and handle
 some tech-support email.  Further imagine that you have a seperate email
 address for each of these roles - one for talking to coworkers, another
 for communication with the outside word, and one for answering those
 support mails (because you *never* want to give an end-user your real
 email address, right? :).
 
 In Gnus, this is a snap.  You'd filter each of those mails into a
 seperate folder, and give each folder a different outgoing email
 address.  Want to GPG-sign email, but with different keys depending on
 roles?  Piece of cake.  Want one signature for internal email, but a
 different one for mailing lists?  It's a snap.  Visiting a folder for a
 mailing list and want to start a new thread?  Simply start a new email,
 and Gnus auto-populates the To: line based on the folder you're in (if
 applicable).  Want to have a project-specific folder where your response
 to an email gets saved in the folder itself automatically, your boss
 gets Cc:'ed, and you don't want a signature at all?  That setup would
 take about 10 seconds to create.
 
 I'd *really* love to see Evolution get this functionality as well, but I
 don't have any experience as an application developer (or the free time
 to start with this particular undertaking).  However, I think that the
 goal of having folder-specific settings should be as straightforward as
 adding a way for the user to modify variables associated with each
 folder, and accepting those variables as overrides to the global
 settings.  For instance, from the examples I gave above, I might create
 these folders with specific overrides:
 
 Internal:
From-address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  (from a list configured in
 the email accounts editor)
Signature: My boss is... (configured from the email Settings
 editor)
Signing-key: GPG:internal
 
 External:
From-address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signature: My opinions are not those of my company...
Signing-key: GPG:external
 
 Tech-support:
From-address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signature: For more information, visit our site at...
 
 Big Project Foo:
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
File-replies-here: Yes
 
 Evolution Mailing List:
From-address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To-address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 What does everybody think?  Does this seem like a reasonable thing to
 hope for?
 -- 
 Kirk Strauser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Reply to mail in a attachement

2003-01-01 Thread Not Zed
On Sun, 2002-12-22 at 12:32, Eric Lambart wrote:
 On Sat, 2002-12-21 at 17:07, willou wrote:
  Hello,
  
  Yes, for the moment, i aswer to the main message and i copy/paste the
  message in attachement into another new message which is destinated to
  the sender of the mail in attachement.
  
  With outlook, because the person who work with me use it, you can open a
  mail in attachement as a mail that you have in your inbox. Will it be
  possible to do this in a near time with Evolution ? (normaly, it will
  not be difficult, because the mail in attachement have the same syntax
  that an ordinary mail ...) 
 
 I can't speak for the Evolution team, but I haven't heard this discussed
 before on the list, and I can't imagine it's a high priority.  You may
 want to search through wishlist feature requests on
 bugzilla.ximian.com to see if it's already been mentioned--and if not,
 add a request of your own.

Yeah i'd agree with this.  It might be something to add in the 1.5
development series, and probably wouldn't be a lot of work (if there's a
way to make the gui make sense anyway).



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Problems with Evolution

2003-01-01 Thread Not Zed

  After installing 1.2.1 new I noticed new problem:
  
  - I have several mail accounts and when I check them using
send/receive password dialogs are too narrow - it
may sound like a joke but this is serious - I don't
see the whole account name and it's not obvious which
password should be used,
 
 I haven't seen this.  If you're saving passwords, you may want to try
 disabling all but one email account.  Then it's unambiguous which one
 you're being prompted for.  Repeat as necessary with the other accounts,
 and you'll get them all eventually.  Granted, if you don't want to save
 passwords, this isn't going to work well.

This might be theme related?  Are you using a non-default theme?

We're just using a gnome dialogue, so i'd have thought it would size
appropriately :-/



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Using fentun with Evolution to extract winmail.dat

2003-01-01 Thread Not Zed
I dont know anything about 'fentun', but perhaps:
 - the shell wrapper isn't passing arguments around properly
 - perhaps it needs to be run in a terminal (?)

On Tue, 2002-12-24 at 08:18, John Harlow wrote:
 Hi:
 
 This may have been discussed, but if so I missed it. I'm trying to get
 fentun working with E. 
 
 It works fine if I save the winmail.dat to a file and then run it.
 
 I've set up a shell wrapper which handles that for me and then
 associated it the mime type via the GNOME control center.
 
 If I run the shell from within Evo, it runs, but fentun fails to save
 anything. This also happens if I just skip the shell and use the mime
 type for the fentun exe directly.
 
 On the other hand, if I run the shell directly, it works just fine.
 
 Has anyone gotten fentun working better from within Evo?
 
 Thanks
 
 John
 
 -- 
 John Harlow, President BravePoint
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Voice: (770)449-9696 Fax: (770) 449-9003
 www.BravePoint.com Progress,Web and Java Specialists
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] building evolution w/ --prefix

2003-01-01 Thread Not Zed
On Wed, 2002-12-25 at 03:50, Jeff Boerio wrote:
 I tried building Evolution 1.2.0 with --prefix=/some/weird/path, but 
 when it came time to do gmake install, some things really, really
 wanted to be installed in /usr/share/...
 
 Now that I'm trying to build 1.2.1, I was hoping this might have been
 fixed.  But it appears the problem still exists:
 
 % cd /usr/local/src/ximian/evolution-1.2.1
 % ./configure --prefix=/some/weird/path/pkgs/evolution/1.2.1 --with-open-ldap
 % gmake
 [builds successfully]
 % gmake install
 ... [some stuff cut ]
 /bin/sh ../mkinstalldirs /usr/share/applnk/Applications
  /usr/intel/bin/ginstall -c -m 644 ./evolution.desktop 
/usr/share/applnk/Applications/evolution.desktop
 /usr/intel/bin/ginstall: cannot create regular file 
`/usr/share/applnk/Applications/evolution.desktop': Permission denied
 gmake[3]: *** [install-kdedesktopDATA] Error 1
 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/ximian/evolution-1.2.1/data'
 gmake[2]: *** [install-am] Error 2
 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/ximian/evolution-1.2.1/data'
 gmake[1]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1
 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/ximian/evolution-1.2.1/data'
 gmake: *** [install-recursive] Error 1
 
 I set --datadir and --sysconfdir and this didn't fix it either.  But,
 setting --with-kde-applnk-path seemed to do the trick.
 
 It looks like the KDECONFIG and KDE_APPLNK_DIR settings in .../data/Makefile
 are being ignored by configure?  Why wouldn't the KDE stuff get picked up 
 from the --prefix setting?  Was this an oversight, or intentional?

Not sure how it gets the kdeconfig settings, but if possible it should
be getting it from kde, which would probably be installed in /usr. 
Thats because the files are kde files, not evolution files, as such.



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Keybindings, hiding read messages, andattributions...

2003-01-01 Thread Not Zed
On Thu, 2002-12-26 at 05:20, Ibraheem Umaru-Mohammed wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Is there a way to set read messages as hidden by default? I get tired of
 changing folders and when returning, the first thing i do is hide the
 read messages.

It should remember the ones you've already hidden.

But you could try using a virtual folder with only unread messages in
it.  It will get re-synced whenever you change back to it and
automagically remove any newly-read messages.

 Secondly, are the keybindings configurable at all? When reading a
 message selected in the index, we get a preview of the message contents.

You dont get a preview, youy get the whole message.

 I want to be able to press PgUp, or PgDn keys to page up or down the
 message. What currently happens, is that the next or previous message is
 selected, which is the same action as the Up and Down keys.

You can use space and backspace for this.  Although some keybindings are
configurable, i think these are handled by the display code internally
and are not currently :-/

 Thirdly, is it possible to configure your attribution string when
 responding to messages? Just wondering if the quote string and/or the
 attribution strings are configurable, 

Not that i can tell.

 Finally, I'd like to configure a key sequence to a shell command, with
 the results inserted into my message. For example, coming from Mutt
 (vim), I would read in the output of a command such as boxes, into my
 message...is there a way I could achieve this in evolution, or perhaps
 achieving something similar other than inserting a text file or
 whatever?

I dont believe so, you have to do it via an intermediate file :-/


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] images in new mail

2003-01-01 Thread Not Zed




 Seems to work for me ... :)

Maybe you need to upgrade gtkhtml?


On Sat, 2002-12-28 at 03:32, Willem wrote:

Hi ,

I am new to this list, so correct me if I do something wrong!
I have the following problem.
When I make a new mail, and want to insert a image directly in it (so I
don't mean an attachment) there is nothing showing up! How come? 
The only thing I see is a sort of blank square.
Is this a simple problem?

Thanks, Willem Nellen.
-- 
Willem [EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution





Re: [Evolution] display font

2003-01-01 Thread Not Zed
in 1.0.8 you need to go to the gtkhtml settings in the gnome control
centre, and change the fonts there.

i think you can also get to it from the composer somewhere too.

On Sat, 2002-12-28 at 07:47, anto ..(='·'=).. wrote:
 Hallo!
 
 First time on this list, and I'm also pretty new to Evolution, so please bear with
 my question :o)
 
 I'm using Evolution 1.0.8 on Mandrake 9 and it seems that there's no way
 of changing the display font. I'd like to use Luxi Sans instead of the
 defaulf one...Is it possible?
 
 TNX
 
 _antonella
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] error compiling multisync

2003-01-01 Thread Not Zed
On Sun, 2002-12-29 at 00:34, gargarmel wrote:
 hi,
 
 i'm trying to sync my phone with evolution.
 compiling http://multisync.sourceforge.net/ complains about missing
 ical-evolution library:
 
 checking for icalcomponent_as_ical_string in -lical-evolution... no
 configure: error: You must have the ical-evolution library installed
 (i.e. Ximian Evolution). MultiSync is not yet configured to use the
 standard ical library..
 
 i am running evolution from the debian-sarge packages (version 1.0.5)
 
 what's wrong here? will i be lucky installing version 1.2?

I dont really know, but it sounds like a debian issue, as there is no
such thing as ical-evolution library in our build.  Perhaps you should
try debian's 1.2 install (+developer packages)


 kind regards, gargarmel.
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] about fonts again

2003-01-01 Thread Not Zed
On Sun, 2002-12-29 at 12:12, Michael Spurlock wrote:
 Only text based (non-html) messages are displayed with the fixed-width
 font.  If the message were in html, it would use the proportional font. 
 The reason it used a fixed-width font for text is to retain formatting
 in text files that were written and formatted to expect a fixed width
 font.  Otherwise the message would not be formatted properly when you
 read it.  However it would be nice if they would let us override this
 feature and force proportional fonts for all message types and ignore
 strict formatting rules.

You'd be surprised how ugly and unreadable it makes messages ...

 On Sat, 2002-12-28 at 17:34, anto ..(='·'=).. wrote:
  Hi again everybody!
  I've downloaded Red Carpet and updated to Evo 1.2.1, wich is so much
  better that the old version I was using...BUT I still have a stupid
  little problem with fonts. It seems that Evo can only use monospaced
  fonts to display e-mails. It's no big deal, but it woulkd be great if I
  could switch back to Luxi Sans. I just find it more 'readable'.
  Any advice?
  Thanx a lot and please excuse my bugging questions :o)
  
  Antonella
 -- 
 Michael Spurlock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Usability Request

2003-01-01 Thread Not Zed

What did you change?

On Mon, 2002-12-23 at 14:47, Matthias Hentges wrote:
 Hello all!
 
 I had a tough time yesterday trying to get Evolution to use ISO-8859-15
 fonts, so i can use the Euro symbol (¤). After more than fifteen minutes
 i have found out that Evolution needs to be restarted with an additional
 killev or the changes won't take effect.
 
 So my request is: Please pop up a dialog box telling the user to
 restart+killev Evolution when he changes something that requires it.
 
 It would make life in some cases a *lot* easier IMO.
 
 Thanks for your time and this wonderful program!
 
 -- 
 
 Matthias Hentges 
 Cologne / Germany
 
 [www.hentges.net] - PGP welcome, HTML tolerated
 ICQ: 97 26 97 4   - No files, no URL's
 
 My OS: Debian Woody: Geek by Nature, Linux by Choice
 
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] irrecoverable error

2003-01-01 Thread Not Zed

what version are you using?  try removing the mbox.ev-summary file in
the folder in questions' directory under ~/evolution/local

On Wed, 2003-01-01 at 08:11, Paul Rodriguez wrote:
 Hi, one of my mail folders has become irrecoverably corrupt  I can't
 even delete the folder or the messages inside (let alone read them). 
 What do I do?
 
 When i try to delete the folder it deletes the folder's subfolders in
 succession. Even though it tells me it is deleting the parent.

Yeah when you delete a folder it deletes the children too :-/



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



[Evolution-hackers] mail hacker leave

2002-12-19 Thread Not Zed

Thought i'd better let everyone know ...

Both Jeff and I are on leave until January 2, 2003.

So if you're after some specific mailer or mail development questions,
you may have to wait a little bit, although plenty of other people know
about as much we do anyway (this also covers patches).  I may check mail
from time to time, but dont rely on it.

Enjoy!

 Michael



___
evolution-hackers maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers



Re: [Evolution] moving $HOME to nfs

2002-12-19 Thread Not Zed
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 02:00, Joe Phillips wrote:
 My $HOME moved from /home/jaiger to /export/home/jaiger (hosted on the
 local nfs server).
 
 I have googled for relevant keywords and turned up some messages in the
 evo archives about not moving $HOME.  I've still attempted to move $HOME
 as I'm out of disk space.
 
 I've hand-edited config.xmldb and filters.xml but I still have
 problems.  
 
 Specifically, when I attempt to read a message stored in a local (as
 opposed to IMAP) folder, I get errors about Failed to get lock using
 fcntl(2): Permission denied.
 
 Relevant system versions:
 Workstation
 - Debian stable (recently patched)
 - Ximian GNOME, Evo 1.0.8 (via apt-get)
 - Linux 2.4.18 686 SMP (custom debian package)
 
 NFS Server
 - Debian stable (pretty-much standard but recently patched)
 - Linux 2.4.16 x86 SMP (looks like built from source)
 
 NFS server/client software will be whatever versions come with Debian
 stable and/or built into the respective kernels.
 
 My questions are:
 
 1- did I edit the correct files on moving my $HOME?  are there other
 places/files I should look?

Should have done, although config.xmldb stores a bunch of values hex
encoded (to get around bugs in libxml :-/), so you might not have got
everything.

 2- is that locking error due to (a) moving my home or (b) the home being
 on NFS?

Could be either, although its probably because of nfs.  Although the
code should 'ignore' such errors anyway and just fall back to dot
locking.

Use strace (a recent version that does threads properly) on
evolution-mail to see what files its accessing.

Or just try
killev
mv evolution evolution.back
evolution

and see if it works, if it does, then its probably just some missing
changes.


 thanks in advance.
 
 -joe
 -- 
  Innovation Software Group, LLC - http://www.innovationsw.com/
 Business Automation Specialists
  UNIX, Linux and Java Training
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Feature Request

2002-12-19 Thread Not Zed

We tried implementing this, but it hit too many bugs and performance
issues in the tree widget to be practical.  Its certainly one thing we'd
like to fix, but it needs the tree widget to work a bit better first.


On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 02:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Not sure if this is the proper way for feature request, but here goes
 anyway.
 
 When downloading messages from POP mailbox, the messages dont display in
 the top pane until all messages are downloaded (not just headers).   I
 would like to see my message headers in the top pane appear as they are
 downloaded, much the same as Outlook handles incoming messages.
 
 If there is a way to do this already, I'd like to know how.
 
 Thanks,
 Robert
 
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Error composing mailmessages

2002-12-19 Thread Not Zed
did you try running 'killev'?

after an upgrade you normally have to because some of the objects aren't
versioned properly and they hang around unless you terminate them
manually.

On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 22:20, Hans Scheffers wrote:
 Hi
 Yesterday morning I have updated my packages of evolutio and the 
 underlying packacges by the red-carpet program (RedHat 8.0).
 After this update I haven't been able to reply to a message or to 
 compose a new message, evolution just hangs and dies.
 Anyone knows what can be the problem? Use CAMEL_VERBOSE=1 doesn't say 
 much more either
 
 Greetz
 Hans
 
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Mails stucked in the Outbox???

2002-12-19 Thread Not Zed

Well what delivery errors are you getting?

Deletion should make it ignore those messages, although you could try
forcing an expunge to ensure nothing is left of the deleted messages.


On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 17:43, Tony Lindstrom wrote:
 I upgraded from 1.2.0 to 1.2.1 and now I am suffering from a strange
 problem.
 
 When I send mail from evolution (and this has worked for years) the
 first mail gets delivered allright, but it stays in the Outbox. Next
 mail will not be delivered, because (as I understand it) evolution
 thinks that it can't send any of them. And after this, everything is
 stucked in the Outbox. Even if I delete the mail that was delivered and
 trying to Send/Receive after that it doesn't seem to help. 
 
 If I restart evolution, then the next in line will be delivered, but it
 stays in the Outbox and the same problem continues for the rest of the
 mails
 
 This is really annoying. Yesterday I thought I sent about nine mails and
 I wondered why nobody answered me...:-(
 
 
 -- 
 http://www.iki.fi/tonyk
 NO PROBLEMS. THANK YOU FOR FLYING AMERICAN 
   PRIDE.
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] NOT sending HTML mail

2002-12-19 Thread Not Zed
On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 14:41, Dwight Tovey wrote:
 On Wed, 2002-12-18 at 20:59, Dwight Tovey wrote:
 
  I need to be able to send plain-text messages, with no HTML encoding. 
  For some reason, evolution 1.2.1 won't let me do that.  No matter how I
  set the Format messages in HTML check in Composer Preferences, I get
  an HTML section in my messages.
  
  Is there any way to get this turned off?
 
 OK, so how did I manage to send this message with no HTML?  Does the
 evolution list server strip it out or am I completely lost here?

If you're talking about the signature, it is converted to text before
sending.  It is just displayed separately to make it changable before
sending.



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] GnuPG : How to include the GPG signature inthe mail ?

2002-12-19 Thread Not Zed

This sounds like a bug somewhere.  There was a bug to do with
multipart/signed just fixed, so i dont know if that would address it.  I
suggest you open a bug on bugzilla.ximian.com and attach both the
message in sent and the received message to the bug.


On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 22:35, Nicolas ROBAUX wrote:
 MORE INFORMATION :
 
 I just made a test :
 When I send to myself a non-encrypted signed message :
 - In the Sent Folder, the message appears with is the padlock at the
 bottom, so I can check my own signature, and it works.
 - When I receive it, in the Inbox Folder, then is only the
 signature.asc files attached, with the arrow (text inline, etc...),
 and without the padlock. And I don't know how to check it !...
 
 Thank you again for your attention,
 
 Nicolas,
 France.
 
 Le jeu 19/12/2002 à 12:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
  Le mer 18/12/2002 à 22:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
  
   Evolution at the moment only supports PGP/MIME (which implies having a
   signature attachment), and not inline PGP.
  
  
  Ok, thank you very much for your reply.
  
  So, I have another question : when I receive, in Evo 1.2.1, a
  non-crypted mail with a file signature.asc attached, how should I
  verify it ? I have of course imported your public key in my keyring (ID
  : FAB62800, isn't it ?). At the bottom of the mail, I can only view the
  arrow of the signature.asc and choose view text in line or in text
  editor, or save it on the disk. There is no padlock icon (although there
  is a padlock icon when the signature is included in a crypted mail ; a
  click on this padlock, and the mail is verified)
  
  If I save it on the disk, gpg --verify signature.asc sees your key, but
  says BAD signature...
 
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Virtual Folder Doesn't work?

2002-12-19 Thread Not Zed
yep, sent is not included without including it explictly.

this is so 'unmatched' is relatively usable for most people.

i think sent is the only one (Trash is already a vfolder anyway).


On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 09:17, Jean Neron wrote:
 I'm trying to set up a virtual folder where I can keep track of all
 Email to and from a certain individual. I set the rules to be 'sender
 contains xx' and 'recipients contains xx', and said to execute the
 action if any criteria are met.
 
 All I get in the folder are messages 'from' this person, nothing I've
 sent him. The source is 'all local folders'. I'm using POP
 exclusively. Evolution 1.2.1 on SuSE 8.1
 
 On a hunch, I added my 'sent' folder to the list of folders to search
 (even tho' I already said 'all local folders') and then all the
 expected messages showed up.
 
 So, it seems that 'all local folders' automatically excluded 'sent'.
 Does this seem right? What other folders do vfolders ignore?
 
 Thanks.
 
 -- 
 Jean Neron [EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Feature request: selective quoting

2002-12-19 Thread Not Zed
about the best you can do at the moment is open a composer, and do
'paste quotation' when selecting the source message.

On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 12:50, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
 I really like the feature of some mail clients that allow you to select
 the text in the original message that you want to quote in your reply. 
 Then, only the selected text is quoted.
 
 If there isn't any way to do it in evolution now, it sure would be a
 valuable feature for me.
 
 -- 
 Arthur S. Alexion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Arthur S. Alexion LLC
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



[Evolution] mail hacker leave

2002-12-19 Thread Not Zed

Thought i'd better let everyone know ...

Both Jeff and I are on leave until January 2, 2003.

So if you're after some specific mailer or mail development questions,
you may have to wait a little bit, although plenty of other people know
about as much we do anyway (this also covers patches).  I may check mail
from time to time, but dont rely on it.

Enjoy!

 Michael



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Error trying to expunge messages

2002-12-17 Thread Not Zed

You could try just rm'ing the mbox.ev-summary file in the affected
mailbox (somewhere under ~/evolution/local/*/).

There was a recurring bug with this that should've been fixed after
about 1.0.5 (or maybe 1.0.8) or definetly in 1.2.x.

On Wed, 2002-12-18 at 00:18, Simone Peruzzi wrote:
 Thankyou very much Ben, i will wait a couple of days to see if someone
 else has encountered this error before...after that if it is the only
 solution applicable...i will try your. There are many valuable messages
 in my mailbox...and as first step...i will do a backup now.
 Looking for further answer...i thankyou again,
 Simone.
 
 On Wed, 2002-12-18 at 21:22, Ben Stringer wrote:
  Hi Simone,
  
  I also had this problem, first experienced around Evolution 0.99. I
  believe it started when I was deleting many emails one after the other
  (pressing the trashcan icon over and over again), although this is just
  a hunch and hard to back up with proof.
  
  In my situation several of my oldest messages in the folder (I keep many
  thousands of messages in my Inbox) could not be read.
  
  I ended up making a copy of my Inbox and hand editting the copy to
  remove what I believed were irrecoverable messages. When I started up
  Evo again, the irrecoverables where restored, and my expunge problem had
  gone away. I *DO NOT* recommend you do this unless you are confident in
  preserving your valuable messages.
  
  I suspect a corruption in one of the following:
  $HOME/evolution/local/Inbox/
- mbox
- mbox.ev-summary
- mbox.ibex.index
- mbox.ibex.index.data
  
  so hopefully someone else on the list can explain the ordering and
  interaction between these files, and if there are any tools to correct
  corruptions.
  
  Cheers, Ben
  
  On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 21:18, Simone Peruzzi wrote:
Hi to all the member of this mailing list.
   
   I'm here to disturb you just to know, why since few days to now i can't
   Expunge anymore my Evolution mailbox.
   I use Evolution 1.2.0, and when i try to expunge the deleted messages i
   received this error:
   Error while 'Expunging folder':
Error storing 'Local folders/inbox': Summary and folder mismatch, even
   after a sync'
   
   Do you know how to fix this particular problem? By the way the
   application is working fine...i can receive or send message...just the
   problem on erase the messages.
   Many thanks by now...
   Simone.
   
   
   
   ___
   evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
  
  
  ___
  evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
 -- 
 === 
 Simone Peruzzi 
 System Engineer 
 EGO Computing Staff 
 
 Phone: +39 050 752 577 
 Fax +39 050 752 566 
 Portable 
 EGO - European Gravitational Observatory
 Traversa H di Via Macerata 
 56021 S. Stefano a Macerata -Pisa-Italy 
 === 
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Filter problems

2002-12-16 Thread Not Zed
On Mon, 2002-12-16 at 17:42, Mika Liljeberg wrote:
 On Mon, 2002-12-16 at 02:16, Not Zed wrote:
   I have similar problems with my filters [Evo1.2.0 on Debian/Sid]. For
   some reason, the filters are not run automatically on my secondary mail
   account, a local /var/spool/mail mbox. (Yes, the right checkbox is
   ticked in mailbox settings). If I mark the emails and run the filters
   manually, they work. However, evolution then fails to add the
   x-evolution-source header to the messages when moving them into local
   folders.
  
  How have you setup the source?  You should use the 'local delivery'
  option.
 
 Ok, I see. That seems to work. What's the purpose of standard Unix mbox
 pool? Export only?

It is primarly for people to 'visit' existing mail, e.g. pine mail,
and/or those that like to use a re-usable inbox with other mail clients
like pine or elm etc.  It works, but is a fair bit less efficient if you
just want to copy new mail to evolution's storage area.

Also, the 'filter new messages' stuff in that code has a few bugs ...





___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] [Fwd: Pilot: Fatal alert]

2002-12-16 Thread Not Zed
On Mon, 2002-12-16 at 13:35, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
 Interesting, but Evolution 1.2.1 (and 1.0.8 before it) only showed the
 list server appended signature to me, and none of the message body.  I
 was hoping that forwarding it as an attachment (rather than in line)
 would have the same effect.  It's odd, but this only seems to happen
 with [some] mail from that list, and it only chokes when I view it with
 Evolution.  (In other words, Evolution seems to do fine with mail from
 all of my other sources, and kmail and mutt seem to display the body of
 these messages.)  Apparently, Evolution is seeing the list signature as
 the last alternative of the body of the message.

Looks like mail has been sent to the list in html + text versions, and
the mailing list software is stripping the html part, but not changing
the content type of the container appropriately.



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] EAddress: Could not start wombat

2002-12-16 Thread Not Zed
On Mon, 2002-12-16 at 12:47, Sulley wrote:
 I sent this message to gnome-pilot, then it occurred to me to send it
 here as well.  Also, the reason I'm compiling these packages myself is
 because the binaries don't work the way they're compiled (for reasons I
 don't understand).
 
 First, the good news:  I'm successfully synchronizing a Treo 270 on Red
 Hat Linux 7.3 using Evolution 1.2.0 (binary), after compiling pilot-link
 0.11.5 and gnome-pilot 0.1.66.  I'm so grateful for the effort put into
 these software packages.
 
 The problem:  I'm trying to switch to Debian.  On Debian I've compiled 
 pilot-link 0.11.5, gnome-pilot 0.1.71, and Evolution 1.2.1.  When I try
 to synchronize the same 270 I get the error message EAddress: Could not
 start wombat.  If I disable the EAddress conduit then I don't see any
 error messages during synchronization (the progress bar moves back and
 forth convincingly) but synchronization of the calendar and task list
 don't work (no effect).
 
 This is the only thing holding me back from switching to Debian (yay,
 Debian!).  Any ideas?  What should I try next?

I can only think of running 'wombat' separately and seeing why it
doesn't work (it might print some useful info out, it might also not). 
And/or running evolution and trying to use the addressbook?



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Can't check my mail anymore

2002-12-16 Thread Not Zed
On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 09:05, Eric Lambart wrote:
 Well I don't know where to take it from here.  Maybe someone else can
 help now that you've given more information.  Did you a do an oaf-slay
 after removing the /tmp files?
 
 There's a shell setting, I believe you do export CAMEL_DEBUG_VERBOSE=1
 and then run evolution-mail in a terminal.  It will tell you more
 information.  When you do this you should run evolution-mail FIRST, when
 no other Evo parts are running, and THEN run evolution.

Its actually CAMEL_VERBOSE_DEBUG, although in this case it sounds like
things are failing before it gets that far.

But yeah, definetly try running evolution-mai in a terminal separately,
just running evolution wont get you much useful info.  It could be
missing libraries or anything.





___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Date format in Inbox

2002-12-16 Thread Not Zed

I'm almost certain that it would be in there somewhere.

FWIW i hacked a bit on some code that could allow us to do that, but it
never got finished.

On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 04:31, Eric Lambart wrote:
 I wish... but I'm afraid not.  You may want to go to bugzilla.ximian.com
 and see if there is a wishlist item for this feature.  If you add one,
 please let us know what the bug # is =)
 
 Eric
 
 On Mon, 2002-12-16 at 04:10, Fran Rayner wrote:
  Is it possible to change the format of the sent field in the Inbox so it
  doesn't display 'Yesterday'or 'Today' but the actual date?
  
  Thanks
 -- 
 I have nothing against the American people... 
 ...but it is time for a regime change
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Filter problems

2002-12-15 Thread Not Zed
On Sun, 2002-12-15 at 22:31, Mika Liljeberg wrote:
 On Sat, 2002-12-14 at 18:23, Mark Nelson wrote:
  I've reciently added a second pop account to my evolution configuration,
  I've configured the first account (account_a) to download straight into
  my inbox and the second account (account_b) to download to a second
  folder via the filter mechanism. My problem is that since adding the
  second pop account my filters that have worked for a year suddenly have
  stopped working. All they do now is move mail between the Inbox and the
  folder used as the inbox for the second account.  I've attached my
  filters.xml file.  If anyone can tell me what I'm doing wrong I would be
  greatful 
 
 I have similar problems with my filters [Evo1.2.0 on Debian/Sid]. For
 some reason, the filters are not run automatically on my secondary mail
 account, a local /var/spool/mail mbox. (Yes, the right checkbox is
 ticked in mailbox settings). If I mark the emails and run the filters
 manually, they work. However, evolution then fails to add the
 x-evolution-source header to the messages when moving them into local
 folders.

How have you setup the source?  You should use the 'local delivery'
option.

 See also my bug report on bugzilla on related problems with the source
 account filter rule:
 
 http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=35191
 
 Regards,
 
   MikaL
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution-hackers] excuse my inexperience but...

2002-12-14 Thread Not Zed
This belongs on the evolution@ users list, send it there for a reply.

On Sat, 2002-12-14 at 13:54, David M. Cvet wrote:
 I downloaded the packages for evo 1.2.1, that included the evo rpm and 
 gnome-pilot rpm.  I get this:
 
  [root]# rpm -Uvh evolution-1.2.1-1.ximian.1.i386.rpm
  warning: evolution-1.2.1-1.ximian.1.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, 
  key ID fd4fe9e9
  error: Failed dependencies:
  ximian-evolution = 1.2.0-1 is needed by (installed) 
  evolution-pilot-1.2.0-1.ximian.1
  [roott]#
 
 Can you explain what I am missing?  I do have evo 1.2.0 operating on the 
 RH8 platform, gnome 2
 
 thanks,
 dc
 
 -- 
 
 David M. Cvet 
 401-159 Frederick St., Toronto, Ont. Canada M5A 4P1
 CELL:+1 416 726-8314  FAX:+1 416 366-7448
 
 
 
 
 ___
 evolution-hackers maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


___
evolution-hackers maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers



RE: [Evolution] Status=R in mbox

2002-12-14 Thread Not Zed
On Sat, 2002-12-14 at 21:48, Alexandre Aractingi wrote:
  Yeah it uses X-Evolution header.  But you can't really
  create your own, because it also requires the UID to be
  set properly.
  How do they get into the Sent folder?
 
 pilot-mailsync just appends the mail in text format at the end of
 ~/evolution/local/Sent/mbox:
 
   From alex@ROISSY Fri Dec 13 18:29:11 2002 +0100
   Status: R
   X-Status:
   X-Keywords:
   From: Alexandre Aractingi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: Test
   X-Mailer: pilot-mailsync-0.7.1
   Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
   Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 18:29:11 +0100 (CET)
   X-Evolution: 107e-0010   This line gets added when I open Evo
 
   This is the body
 
 
 So it won't be possible to get a UID for pilot-mailsync to use it? And what
 if pilot-mailsync creates a X-Evolution header of its own?

It could but is has to be careful that it doesn't create duplicates. 
(on the other hand, they just get fixed anyway so it might not be bad).

The header (in this case) is just an 8 digit hexadeximal uid, plus 4
digit hexadecimal flags field.  I think 'seen' is bit 4 from memory.
(i.e. 0x0010).

 (anyway, the sending works very nice, and the mails get copied in the Sent
 folder, which is what I need, so I'm happy, even if it shows as 'unread'
 :-))
 Thanks,
 Alex

BTW you shouldn't really be copying directly to sent mailbox, not
without locking anyway.  What you might want to consider is spooling the
files to a separate mailbox, and using that in evolution as a source
account for 'get mail', with a filter to copy it to sent.  Well, either
that, or make pilot-mailsync properly lock the mailbox (if it doesn't?).





___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Filter problems

2002-12-14 Thread Not Zed
On Sun, 2002-12-15 at 02:53, Mark Nelson wrote:
 Hi All 
 
 I've reciently added a second pop account to my evolution configuration,
 I've configured the first account (account_a) to download straight into
 my inbox and the second account (account_b) to download to a second
 folder via the filter mechanism. My problem is that since adding the
 second pop account my filters that have worked for a year suddenly have
 stopped working. All they do now is move mail between the Inbox and the
 folder used as the inbox for the second account.  I've attached my
 filters.xml file.  If anyone can tell me what I'm doing wrong I would be
 greatful 

Just for some clarifications:
 - which actual accounts are account_a and account_b
 - which are the actual folders
 - which are the new rule(s)




___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Summary info

2002-12-14 Thread Not Zed
need to setup proxies.  see the archives of this list for solutions, or
try the knowledgebase on support.ximian.com

On Sun, 2002-12-15 at 09:42, ahimsa wrote:
 What services do I need to have running in order to be able to get
 weather and newsfeed info downloaded using the Summary folder? All I
 have at present are messages saying that were was an error downloading
 data from ... whenever I open my Summary.
 Cheers
 AmF
 -- 
 ahimsa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Gnome2 desktop

2002-12-14 Thread Not Zed
On Sun, 2002-12-15 at 09:45, ahimsa wrote:
 Are there any bugs/scripts that would be within the deep bowels of
 Ximian that might interfere with the display and function of desktop
 icons on my Gnome2 desktop? The reason I ask is that whenever Ximian
 1.2.0 is open, the home and trash icons on my desktop either disappear

I presume you mean Ximian Evolution 1.2.0.

Looks like a gnome 2/nautilus issue/bug.  I dont see why you should have
problems running evolution with various gnome 2 apps, like nautilus.



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution-hackers] where is 1.2.1

2002-12-13 Thread Not Zed
On Sat, 2002-12-14 at 08:09, Ron Smits wrote:
 Evening
 
 I wanted to get 1.2.1 and I could not find a tarball for it on the
 ftp.ximian.com site.
 Checking out evolution from cvs gives me pre 1.4.1?

Maybe you were too quick?

 So what is the branche for 1.2.1? or where can I get the tarball?

Its the evolution-1-2-branch branch




___
evolution-hackers maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers



Re: [Evolution] Status=R in mbox

2002-12-13 Thread Not Zed

Yeah it uses X-Evolution header.  But you can't really create your own,
because it also requires the UID to be set properly.

How do they get into the Sent folder?


On Sat, 2002-12-14 at 08:04, Alexandre Aractingi wrote:
 Hi,
 I use pilot-mailsync to send emails from my Palm. When I sync, the emails
 are sent with sendmail, and copied in the sent items folder of Evo. The
 mails then show up as unread in the sent items, although the status flag
 is set to 'R'.
 I guess the read/unread status should be taken from somewhere else
 (mbox.index?), so my question is: is there a way for a third party app to
 write a mail in the sent items with the status flag understandable by Evo?
 Thanks,
 Alex
 
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Importing mbox files to IMAP server?

2002-12-13 Thread Not Zed
On Sat, 2002-12-14 at 10:01, Eric Lambart wrote:
 Hi there, for the first time in a long time, I tried to import an mbox
 format file into Evolution.
 
 I went through the usual dialogs, selecting the file and IMAP target
 folder, and then Evolution got stuck on the first message (Importing
 item 1), and I had to cancel.  I tried this several times with
 different folders and source files, all with the same result.
 
 Then, on a hunch, I created a local test folder, repeated the process
 and it worked!
 
 The difference?  IMAP/Maildir vs. local mbox.
 
 It appears the importer can't import an mbox file unless the target
 folder is also in mbox format.  Is this intentional?

No, it just sounds like some sort of bug.  The importer is hidden from
all those details by the api.

 The only solution I can see is to import into a local folder, select all
 messages and drag them into the real target folder.

You could also just setup a folder of type 'local unix spool file or
directory', and point that to a directory of the mbox files, or an
individual mbox file, and then do the copy similarly.




___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] UTF-8 message shownb as garbage ...

2002-12-13 Thread Not Zed
FWIW it doesn't work here either.  The message is fine though ... hmm.

I do get these warnings - looks like the font handling code is trying to
use iconv converters i dont have in my libc:

widgets-WARNING **: Could not open converter for 'UTF-8' to 'UCS-2BE'
charset
widgets-WARNING **: Could not open converter for 'UCS-2BE' to 'UTF-8'
charset

I dont see why setting the encoding to utf8 explictly works though, it
does here too :-/.  Maybe gtkhtml ?


On Sat, 2002-12-14 at 03:55, Xavier Bestel wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I received this mail (in UTF-8 as you can see in the source: it says
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8), but it seems it is still
 displayed as iso-Latin-something, so all accentuated chars are like
 traditionnal UTF-8 garbage.
 If I force the mail to be shown as UTF-8, all works well.
 
 Shouldn't Evo (1.2.0 in my case) autodetect that ?
 
   Xav
 
 __
 
 From: Francis Limousy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [APRIL] petites questions juridiques
 Date: 13 Dec 2002 13:42:32 +0100
 
 
  A ma connaissance, il n'existe aucune jurisprudence en la matière et
  cela est un vrai problème. Mais plusieurs avocats et juristes se sont
  déjà penchés sur le sujet et tous reconnaissent que la GPL est
  globalement en accord avec le droit français. Si mes souvenirs sont
  bons, les clauses de limitation de responsabilité sont discutables
  mais la GPL ne fait là ni plus ni moins que les licences de produits
  propriétaires.
 
 Ouille c'est bien ce que je craignait.
 
  Le jour où tu porteras plainte contre un site qui a innocemment
  reproduit ton logo (j'entends sans volonté de tromper) parce que c'est
  le seul moyen que tu auras de faire pression sur tes détracteurs ou
  parce que tu te diras qu'il y a du fric à récupérer facilement, ce
  jour là , tu rejoindras le club pourri des BAYO, DANONE et consors. Je
  pense que je demanderai alors ton exclusion de l'association ! (c:{
 
 Hum, j'espère franchement trouver des moyens plus honêtes et plus
 efficaces de gagner de l'argent.
 Le jour ou j'en serai la, je pense qu'il faudra tres franchement que je
 change de commercial ;)
 
  En attendant, longue vie à ta prochaine société !
 
 Merci beaucoup, je vous enverrai un faire-part du gros bébé quand il
 sera né.
 
 
 
 ___
 Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français !
 Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com
 
 
 __
 
 -- 
 Pour se desinscrire de cette liste (et donc ne plus etre membre de l'APRIL) :
 envoyez une demande a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Administration : http://lists.april.org/wws/
 
 Agenda : http://agenda.april.org/
 
 Coin adherents : http://www.april.org/secure/members/


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Outlook does not like .asc signature

2002-12-13 Thread Not Zed
On Sat, 2002-12-14 at 06:02, Cliff Wells wrote:
 On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 07:36, Ed Weinberg wrote:
  I send gpg signed email to a friend and Outlook told
  him that it was deleting the email because it had a dangerous
  attachment.  Can anyone verify that Outlook, with the latest updates,
  does or does not do this?
 
 Friends don't let friends use Outlook ;)
 
 I've ceased sending signed messages to mailing lists because of all the
 complaints from Outlook users... it always amazes me that so many
 otherwise highly intelligent people insist on using broken tools :(

Unfortunately in many corporate environments, they have no choice.

Fortunately i've never been in one :)



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution-hackers] Understanding Camel

2002-12-12 Thread Not Zed
On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 01:36, Dave Kelly wrote:
 Hello
 
 In trying to understand the camel provider model I have a few questions:
 
 0) How can I get some debugging output out of a camel provider ? printf, 
 fprintf and g_print all seem to have no effect.

As Jeff said, just run evolution-mail in a separate terminal.  Usually
in gdb helps too (you're probably going to get a lot of crashes and
stuff).

 1) I am writing a provider for a remote store. When setting up a new 
 account using the config druid, an attempt is made to log on to the 
 remote store but it does not seem possible to be able to prompt for a 
 password. I have lifted the following code out of the IMAP provider:
 
 prompt = g_strdup_printf (_(%sPlease enter the IMAP 
   password for %s@%s),
 errbuf ? errbuf : ,
 service-url-user,
 service-url-host);
  service-url-passwd =
 camel_session_get_password (
session, prompt, TRUE,
service, password, ex);
  g_free (prompt);
  g_free (errbuf);
 
 
 This is never displayed in the druid.
 
 The issue I have here is that, on my remote store, it is possible to 
 lock an account after a number of unsuccessful login attempts. If the 
 druid fails to login, which it always does, this will increment the 
 failed login count on the server.
 
 I'd like to be able to drop out of the routine if the call is being made 
 from the druid. I thought that CAMEL_IS_SESSION would solve this as 
 that's one of the assertions in camel_session_get_password but adding a 
 check for this has no effect.

No, you dont need to do any of that.  If we are in 'non interactive'
mode, which is the state the druid runs, then any calls like
get_password() just behave exactly as if the user had pressed 'cancel'.

The druid does some pre-checks before it tries to connect for real, for
things like authentication methods.

Since you need to cater for this case anyway (and presumably not try to
connect), it should be a transparent process.

camel_session_get_password() will return NULL (and i think set the
exception to USER_CANCEL?), so if that happens, just assume it was a
user cancel.

 2) What is the flow of calls to a provider ? I have set up a call to the 
 get_folder_info method of a store class so that it immediately returns 
 an exception but, probably related to question (0), I am seeing no 
 output. I would like to know when, in the process of using the mail 
 client, each method of the store and folder classes is called.

Hmm, yeah this definetly needs some documentation ... :-/

But basically once it is connected (and not, if it is an offline capable
store), it will do a get_folder_info().  You need to get past 0 and 1
above before it'll get there.

Then the store needs to emit various events
folder_created/deleted/renamed when things change, or new folders become
available.  These are so the display updates automagically.

But ... the code can't really use get_folder_info() to initialise
anything.  e.g. you could get_folder() at any time after connection is
established, or any other calls.




___
evolution-hackers maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers



Re: [Evolution] Inline image display size

2002-12-12 Thread Not Zed

No, there's no way to do this currently.

You'll have to stick to doing 'view in xx' where 'xx' does this for you
:-/

On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 21:30, David McNab wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I've just got mgetty up and working for fax send/receive on my box. One
 of its nice features is that it emails incoming faxes to a user.
 
 The only issue is that the PNG files for the fax pages are displayed at
 full size in Evolution.
 
 Is there any way to set Evolution so that images are reduced to fit the
 current *width* of the message display pane/window?
 
 Cheers
 David
 
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Remove Duplicate Mails

2002-12-12 Thread Not Zed

There's no way to do this at present.

You could try:
  - dont filter messages from your imap server (you can turn this off)
  - unsubscribe one of the mail boxes from the mailing lists
  - add 'source account' terms to your filters

On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 22:54, Denny Schierz wrote:
 hi,
 
 how can i remove duplicate Mails? This is because i added a IMAP Account
 from my firm and i have the same Mailinglists there. Now if Evo filters
 this Mails, he put it also in the Filterboxes how my local Accounts are.
 
 thx
 
 ps i have evo 1.0.8
 


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Problems displaying HTML messages

2002-12-12 Thread Not Zed

Can you create a bug and attach a sample message as downloaded from
evolution via 'save as'?  Bugs are created via bugzilla.ximian.com, use
the mail or gtkhtml parts.

It may be some weirdness with the imap server which is breaking things,
or it could be just html issues (e.g. fonts).

Reply with the bug link here.

FWIW the camel warnings probably aren't very important (many camel
warnings are about rfc strictness).

On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 00:59, Nuno Pereira wrote:
 OK, I might be getting near...
 
 There's a precise point in time where the HTML messages stopped
 displaying. And all messages I have received before that can still be
 displayed, only the new ones cannot.
 
 So, I went to check the mail headers and found the following:
 
 The IMAP server is a Lotus Domino Server. I recently changed my
 preferences in Notes to store my mail as MIME instead of Notes Rich
 Text. I need this so that I can send and receive meeting invitations
 (using iCal).
 
 Before I changed this, I had the following the message headers (these
 messages display correctly):
 
 X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on EMDNOTES/EMD(Release 5.0.11 |July
 24, 2002) at 10/12/2002 13:29:38
 
 Now, I have the following:
 
 X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on EMDNOTES/EMD(Release 5.0.11 |July
 24, 2002) at 11/12/2002 09:16:55,Serialize by Router on
 EMDNOTES/EMD(Release 5.0.11 |July 24, 2002) at 11/12/2002
 09:16:56,Serialize complete at 11/12/2002 09:16:56
 
 
 This is now always the case for every message, so I suppose it's a
 normal operation of the Domino server to be able to store the message in
 MIME format. Even messages not in HTML have this, and they display
 correctly.
 
 Now, let's not blame Lotus Domino for doing this (if this indeed is the
 cause);-)
 
 If I use KMail to read the same messages, I have absolutely no problem.
 Hope this can help finding a solution.
 
 Nuno
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] IMAP subfolders not accessible after upgrade to1.2; Settings crash evolution

2002-12-12 Thread Not Zed
You need to upgrade to 1.2.1 at least.

We broke namespaces of  with 1.2 :-/, which is how 'altnamespace'
works.

On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 09:24, Wernig Markus wrote:
 Hello
 I am using evolution on SuSE 8.0 with ximian-gnome as default desktop.
 Today I kind of upgraded my ximian: not through red carpet, but usin the
 installer downloaded from go-gnome.org. Everything seemed to work fine.
 
 Problem: since the upgrade (1.08 - 1.2) evolution cannot access any
 subfolders on my cyrus imap(ssl) server. The mails in the top level
 directories are displayed correctly. As soon as I try to access a
 subfolder in the same top level directory, I get an error of the kind 
 [... Mailbox /subfoldername does not exist] (AFAIR, sorry. I'm not at
 the desktop at the moment)
 It seems like evolution were not prepending some information needed.
 The cyrus is configured with altnamespace: yes, i.e. all top level
 directories are on the same level as INBOX and not subfolders thereof.
 
 Also, I cannot access the settings anymore; as soon as I go to
 Tools-Settings, I am told something like the component for type mail
 has exited. You will need to restart evolution ... So no chance to
 change any folder settings.
 
 Do you have any idea what to do?
 
 ps: ran killev an oafslay afterwards, rebuilt the config from scratch.
 
 tia /markus
 
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Can evolution import mail filter from netscape?What version does it support?

2002-12-12 Thread Not Zed
You'd have to check the source, but there's code there to import filters
from netscape 4 _i think_.

I'm not sure if its still built ...

its in 
 mail/importers/

On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 13:04, Calvin Liu wrote:
 Thanks.
 Calvin
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] [evo1.2] Not as peaceful as I thought (was Folderpane layout question (with imap))

2002-12-12 Thread Not Zed
On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 20:36, Francois Taiani wrote:
 Hum,
 
 sorry about all the copies I sent to the list. The migration from 1.0.8
 to 1.2.0 was not as peaceful as I first thought. The send/receive
 component blocked each time I tried to send mails with evolution 1.2.0,
 and I could not know if my mail was out or not.

Gak :-/  Not good.

 (The error message on evolution closing was:
 
 Waiting for component to die --
 OAFIID:GNOME_Evolution_Mail_ShellComponent
 
 repeated ad infinitum)
 
 Well, now I'm back with evo1.0.8 (until I can spend more time to find
 out what's wrong). BTW, I tried CAMEL_VERBOSE_DEBUG=1 evolution-mail
 as I had been told when I had troubles with evo1.0.x, but apparently
 that does not work any more in the new 1.2.0 version. (I could find no
 evolution-mail executable, and CAMEL_VERBOSE_DEBUG=1 had no influence on
 the console output of evolution itself.)

evolution-mail has moved to ${prefix}/libexec/evolution-mail

But apart from that, CAMEL_VERBOSE_DEBUG=1 should be used as usual.

As to your original problem - it wont change.  We got it wrong when we
did it the first time, and we need to show the namespace, otherwise many
valid imap folder scenarios can't work.  This way there are no problems,
and there will be no changes required when we support multiple
namespaces.


 On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 10:20, Francois Taiani wrote:
  Hi everyone,
  
  I've seen there have been many messages regarding imap in evo1-2, so
  maybe this question has already been asked. Sorry if this is the case:
  
  I've just migrated from 1.0.8 to 1.2.0. It went quite peacefully up to
  now, thanks to killev. I'm just annoyed by the new folder pane
  presentation, which adds a new logical folder corresponding to my imap
  namespace in my imap account subtree. I.e, now I have
  
  -ftaiani[at]imap
-.home.ftaiani.mail  // NEW in evo 1.2.0
| +Teaching
| -Mailing_List
| | -Evolution
| | -misc
| +Friends
-INBOX
-Trash
   
  Instead of (in 1.0.8)
  
  -ftaiani[at]imap
+Teaching
-Mailing_List
| -Evolution
| -misc
+Friends
-INBOX
-Trash
   
  I preferred the old way. In my case, the new namespace node just adds
  visual noise. (I think that's because I only have one namespace. If it
  was possible to tell evolution not to display namespace nodes when
  there's only one of them, that would be great.)
  
  Francois
  
  
  -- 
  Francois Taiani [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  LAAS-CNRS http://www.laas.fr
  
  
  ___
  evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
 
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] [evo1.2] Not as peaceful as I thought (was Folderpane layout question (with imap))

2002-12-12 Thread Not Zed

 Well, now I'm back with evo1.0.8 (until I can spend more time to find
 out what's wrong). BTW, I tried CAMEL_VERBOSE_DEBUG=1 evolution-mail
 as I had been told when I had troubles with evo1.0.x, but apparently
 that does not work any more in the new 1.2.0 version. (I could find no
 evolution-mail executable, and CAMEL_VERBOSE_DEBUG=1 had no influence on
 the console output of evolution itself.)

Oops, I got it wrong in my last mail.  Too much gnome-2 porting work 
not enough sleep.

evolution-mail should still be in the same location as it was before, in
/usr/bin

If its not ... uh, check the rpm listing I guess.



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] POP3 spamkiller

2002-12-12 Thread Not Zed
The only problem with this, as stated in a previous mail, is that it has
to download the complete message all the time anyway.

It really needs to be done at the server, if you pay for bandwidth
anyway.

On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 08:00, HvR wrote:
 you can do the same thing with filters: just filter the email tru your
 spam detecting program and have it return exit 1 for spam 0 for not spam
 then for the action just move email to spam folder or delete if exit
 code was 1
 
 On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 13:03, ahimsa wrote:
  Greetings
  This may have already been dealt with, and if so I apologise for
  repetition ...
  I am wanting to use a spam-filter for my POP3 dial-up account, where
  Evolution 1.2.0 is my email client. Thus far, I have set some rules up
  for sender/subject, but this is still reactive and I'd prefer to do this
  more proactively if possible. I know with KMail - for e.g. - one can set
  a command to execute that will launch a program to scan the POP3 account
  and filter spam out according to pre-defined criteria without
  downloading it, and once it has dropped/rejected the email that fits the
  criteria, it will then download the remaining mail. Is there something
  similar (both program and setting) that would accomplish the same thing
  using Evolution?
  Cheers
  AmF
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Known PGP/MIME Problem

2002-12-12 Thread Not Zed

In short, 1.0.x is known to be faulty.
1.2.x should not be faulty.

I had mutt fail on some evolution generated test cases, but in these
cases mutt was at fault (it was truncating the last blank line of quoted
printable data).


On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 11:42, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
 In Evolution 1.0.x, we did not treat signed parts as opaque because
 our MIME parser had been written to comply with previous MIME
 specifications which did not define such a type. It is, in our opinion,
 broken that rfc2015 requires signed 
 parts to be treated as opaque
 because it is placing further restrictions which did not previously
 exist for MIME. This is an absolute no-no when extending standard
 protocols. Then, of course, the PGP/MIME authors broke things yet again
 when they released the newer rfc3156 specification which was not fully
 compatable with rfc2015.
 
 So, to answer your question: in Evolution 1.2, we have modified the
 parser to special-case multipart/signed so that we keep the raw data
 (this is what opaque means) so that when we go to verify the signature,
 we feed gpg the raw data as originally found in the mbox file.
 
 So, if signatures are failing to verify then it is likely that either:
 
 1) the signature was created according to rfc2015 rules or...
 2) the signature is broken (assuming that gpg doesn't have any bugs)
 
 Jeff
 
 On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 18:53, Dave Barton wrote:
  In response to a recent posting I made to the GnuPg users list, I
  received a reply that there is a known problem with Evolution and
  PGP/MIME.
  
  With the exception of a couple of signatures which will not verify, I
  have not experienced any problems with PGP/MIME using Evolution 1.2
  
  Is there a known problem?
  
  Dave
 -- 
 Jeffrey Stedfast
 Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  - www.ximian.com
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] backing up evolution

2002-12-10 Thread Not Zed
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 18:54, Ron Smits wrote:
 Subject says it all I guess,
 
 I am playing with several settings in gnome, garnome and evolution and
 destroy all of them regularly.
 Just tarring up $HOME/evolution does not seem to be enough. Very often
 inbox will be a folder that cannot contain messages.
 
 Any thoughts or ideas about this?

What version?  There are some bugs in pre 1.2.1 which can manifest
itself in this way.

So long as you killev before backing up/restoring ~/evolution, that
should be sufficient for all evolution settings and mail.



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] complex boolean like filter rules

2002-12-10 Thread Not Zed
You could try using the expression filter type.  This takes a
scheme-like s-expression, which you can use to produce arbitrary logic
in a more-or-less straightforward way.

e.g. something like
 (and (or (body-contains foo blah frum)
  (header-contains subject ximian helixcode))
  (not (header-contains subject evolution redcarpet)))

represents:

(body contains foo or blah or frum  OR subject contains ximian
or helixcode )
 AND
( NOT ( subject contains evolution or redcarpet ) )


Most of the *contains rules have an implicit OR by adding more terms in
them.  Although not all of them.  The expression editor isn't really
setup though (you could just create empty ones and edit the xml file
directly in ~/evolution/filters.xml, but it is xml, not a text file).

Check the $prefix/share/evolution/filters.xml  (i think) file for
examples of available commands (just the stuff in ()'s, without the
${abc} stuff which is for substitution).

However, none of it is particularly documented, and the format may
change in the future (e.g. to be real scheme) - although i can't see any
of that happening any time real soon because it is sufficient as it is.

The only other alternative is to use an external program and do the
logic there as a 'pipe to shell command' filter.

If you can design a usable and implementable interface to manage filters
of this complexity, you're welcome to.  We've generally found however,
that having filters too specialised just isn't much use to 99% of the
people out there, and adding an interface to make it possible would
probably be a mess.


On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 20:02, Aristotle wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I would like to add complex rules - with if and or type statements but I
 can only find where to add a bunch of rules and apply by all being met
 or at least one.
 
 Any idea who to make this a little more flexible?
 
 Say to the effect of if (mail containing A or B or C) but NOT (D or E or
 F) and so on
 -- 
 --
 Adelaide, South Australia
 AIM demosthenes aus Gabber demosthenes
 Yahoo IM demosthenes_down_under
 ICQ 175117479 PGP(GPG) key ID D408E804
 Unreal Tournament 2003 demosthenes
 (internode.on.net game servers)
 --
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution-hackers] select blocks mailer

2002-12-09 Thread Not Zed
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 05:52, William Jon McCann wrote:
 Hello,
 
 A bit more info...
 
 The evolution-executive-summary process is always in the stopped state 
 at the time of the hang.  I have been trying to get evolution to hang 
 while I have strace attached to the evolution-executive-summary process. 
   So far, I have been unsuccessful.
 
 When strace is *not* attached to the process (via strace -p) the process 
 will go into the stopped state after no more than 10 minutes or so. 
 When strace is attached to the process it does not go into the stopped 
 state (tried three times of about an hour each).

A backtrace of when the program has hung is more useful, but see below
first.

 Does this make sense to anyone?
 
 Is the problem here that evolution-mail is trying to talk to the stopped 
 executive-summary ?

Yes.

I can't remember if you were building from source or not - if so, make
sure you have the latest 0.7.x version of soup installed, as it can
cause lots of hangs like this (i forgot about soup).  Talking 1.2 code
here as well.



___
evolution-hackers maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers



Re: [Evolution] IMAP folder creation problem

2002-12-09 Thread Not Zed
Try upgrading evolution.

On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 03:03, Eric Newman wrote:
 I know this was discussed last month, but I never saw a resolution to
 the problem. I am getting the Cannot create the specified folder:
 Generic error dialog whenever I try to create a folder in an IMAP
 account. It doesn't matter what name I try. Specifically, I've tried
 bugs, foo, bar, and test, and none of them worked.
 
 Was this problem solved somewhere that I missed in the archives?
 
 Thanks,
 Eric
 
 PS - This is RH8 with Evo 1.2.
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



re: [Evolution] IMAP folder creation problem

2002-12-09 Thread Not Zed

Well i posted out for people to test these problems with the snapshot
packages 2 weeks ago, and nobody seemed to do anything about it.

On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 09:55, Marcus Brubaker wrote:
 This is (hopefully) fixed in the upcoming 1.2.1 release.  However, I am
 running a CVS version and the bug doesn't seem to be really fixed.  It
 was filed (and recently closed) as 33668.  Once the final 1.2.1 comes
 out I'll test things out again and see if its really fixed or not.
 
 On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 16:49, Peter Draksler wrote:
  I also still have this problem and haven't seen any documentation noting
  this as a bug or known problem.  I'm running RH 7.3 with Evo 1.2.
  
  Peter
  
  I know this was discussed last month, but I never saw a resolution to
  the problem. I am getting the Cannot create the specified folder:
  Generic error dialog whenever I try to create a folder in an IMAP
  account. It doesn't matter what name I try. Specifically, I've tried
  bugs, foo, bar, and test, and none of them worked.
  
  Was this problem solved somewhere that I missed in the archives?
  
  Thanks,
  Eric
  
  PS - This is RH8 with Evo 1.2.
  
  
 -- 
 Marcus Brubaker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] POP3 and IMAP gone (!) after upgrade

2002-12-09 Thread Not Zed

It looks like the base libcamel.so hasn't been built with SSL enabled,
but the camel-providers have been.  How that can happen is anyone's
guess, because they're all built at the same time.

But its definetly a packaging problem, look for new packages from
Debian.


On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 15:29, Filip Radlinski wrote:
 Hi.
 
 Thanks for the quicky reply.
 
 I'm not sure if its not some libraries problem on my system because I 
 also tried installing other binary packages (convtering both the Redhat 
 and Mandrake RPMs to DEBs with alien), and they also had the same
 problem.
 
 I tried running an strace to work out exactly what library is not being 
 found and where it is being looked for, but couldn't work it out. All 
 libraries that I can see being opened are in fact found. Can you think 
 of any way I can work out exactly what the problem is?
 
 I discovered I get exactly the same error message if I try sending mail 
 - SMTP doesn't work either. I see evolution has five libraries in 
 /lib/evolution/1.2/camel-providers, with the three named smtp, pop3 and 
 imap matching a grep on camel_tcp_stream_ssl_new - exactly the three 
 methods that are broken.
 
 What library is supposed to provide that function? Any ideas about how I 
 can tell evolution where to look for it?
 
 Thanks,
 Filip
 
 Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
  this is a problem you should be asking the debian maintainer(s) as this
  is a packaging bug and thus has nothing to do with us.
  
  But yes, the problem is that your camel installation is borked.
  
  Jeff
  
  On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 19:07, Filip Radlinski wrote:
  
 Hi.
 
 I just upgraded evolution to version 1.2.0-4 (under Debian) and the mail 
 settings no longer have the option POP3 or IMAP - under the receiving 
 mail tab there are only the following options:
 
- standard unix mbox
- maildir format
- mh format
- local delivery
- none
 
 My list of accounts still shows up as having the protocol pop and 
 imap, but the accounts don't work (i.e. its as if they didn't exist. I 
 can't check mail, see the imap folders, see the receive mail settings, 
 anything). The only error I can get is when I try subscribe to 
 folders. That gives me:
 
 Error while 'Opening store imap://filip@mail server/;use_ssl=always':
 Cannot load /usr/lib/evolution/1.2/camel-providers/libcamelimap.so: 
 /usr/lib/evolution/1.2/camel-providers/libcamelimap.so: undefined 
 symbol: camel_tcp_stream_ssl_new
 
 This looks like a libraries problem, I reinstalled libcamel0, version 
 1.2.0-4, but that didn't help. I'm quite sure I have all the other 
 necessary libraries installed too...
 
 Any ideas? I really don't want to have to move all my mail archives and 
 filters to a different email client! (I'm using Mozilla mail temporarily...)
 
 Thanks,
 Filip
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
 
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



re: [Evolution] IMAP folder creation problem

2002-12-09 Thread Not Zed
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 16:54, Marcus Brubaker wrote:
 I did send a response back then.  However, I just tested with the most
 recent snapshot and the behaviour appears to be a little finicky,
 although for the most part functional.  I was able to create the
 directories unlike before, although Evo crashed when I tried to delete
 the top-level test directory that I had just created.  Deleting the
 subdirectories first, then the top-level directory worked fine.

Ok, that sounds like an unrelated bug, to do with deletion (33525).

 The recent changes seemed to have fixed things, thanks for the great
 work!

Ok cool, if it otherwise works it sounds ok.



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] 'syncing' evolution.

2002-12-08 Thread Not Zed
On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 02:30, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
 On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 05:56, Not Zed wrote:
  On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 12:47, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
   On Thu, 2002-11-28 at 18:35, Jean-Marc V. Liotier wrote:
On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 13:07, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
 [...]
It has been discussed recently in a couple of threads :
http://lists.ximian.com/archives/public/evolution/2002-November/022710.html
http://lists.ximian.com/archives/public/evolution/2002-October/022373.html
   
   Sorry, but my question is completely different from what was asked in
   these threads. I have evo running 24/7 on both machines. When getting
   home the mails that are already read appear as unread mail. I do not
   want to exit evo. All I want is evo to refresh its 'read' mail status.
  
  Evolution currently cannot operate in this mode.  You need to quit one
  of the clients to pick up the changes.
 
 looks like going to offline mode and then to online mode also causes a
 full rescan. however this still takes ages compared to just rescanning
 whose read/unread mail counts.

It doesn't require a full re-scan, but it does require a scan of all
flags and messages.  IMAP has no other way of notifying off-line updates
to folders, so it is either this, or you have an invalid image of the
folder which isn't acceptable to most users.



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] evolution crash

2002-12-06 Thread Not Zed
doesn't look particularly useful on its own. :-/

On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 17:02, Ron Smits wrote:
 Morning 
 
 Does the following look familiar to anyone? If not I will make some
 backtraces
 
 evolution-shell-WARNING **: Error changing interactive status of
 component OAFIID:GNOME_Evolution_Mail_ShellComponent to FALSE --
 IDL:CORBA/COMM_FAILURE:1.0
 
 -- 
 Ron Smits [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Why does evo add headers when I save msgs?

2002-12-06 Thread Not Zed
Probably because camel enforces valid mailbox formats when it writes
data.  So if the mail includes 8 bit data, it has to write it with an 8
bit header.

On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 20:38, Otto Tronarp wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Why does Evolution add new headers when I save a msg with file-save as
 ? I'm helping a person to diagnose a problem with his mail client and or
 smtp server and he is sending me a lot of test mails that I save and
 mail back as attachments, but now I noticed that evo adds new headers to
 the mail when I save it. More specifically the mails lack a
 Content-Transfer-Encoding header (thats the problem...), but when I save
 the messages evo adds a Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit. That is pretty
 annoying since now I have to manually extract the mails from the mailbox
 :(.  
 
 
 Otto
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] email filter precedence / priority

2002-12-05 Thread Not Zed
and you need to order the filters in order of preferences.  e.g. mailing
list at the top, then personal mail, and then whatever's left over seems
to work ok.

On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 19:30, Eric Lambart wrote:
 You need to add a Stop Processing action to your filters where this is
 a problem. This will prevent any other filters from acting on the
 message.
 
 On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 23:52, Aristotle wrote:
  Hi,
  
  First I want to thank Ximian for providing such an excellent product for
  an insanely cheap price (free!!!)
  
  I know times are REALLY tough right now so I say on behalf of many
  people - THANK YOU.
  
  Now - I have a multitude of filters set up which is great - but one is
  to capture all personally addressed email (ie - not mailing list or
  includes me on the CC line) but it also captures email to a mailing list
  that is already captures by the appropriate filter but is addressed to
  me rather than a mailing list address - so I wind up with several copies
  of the one email through different folders.
  
  Do I just need to manually exclude the mailing lists in my 'personally
  addressed' mail filter?
  
  A GREAT feature would be to have a screen on a the filter dialogue to
  click on existing filters to exclude mail from for a specific filter to
  avoid double up?
 -- 
 I have nothing against the American people... 
 ...but it is time for a regime change
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] broken up emails changing file associations

2002-12-04 Thread Not Zed

 2. I have recently started to notice a significant number of broken-up
 messages. In other words, two messages hit my inbox, with the second one
 having no date, no subject and a body which is either empty or contains
 the bottom portion missing from the other message. It appears that this
 started happening shortly after I activated SpamAssassin on my web
 host's mail server.

Sounds like a spam assassin bug/misconfiguration.  Is the mail server or
your box Solaris?  It uses a different mailbox format which can lead to
weirdities like this.




___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution-hackers] questions: about set focus to summary orother accounts in mail module

2002-12-02 Thread Not Zed
Hmm, looking at that bug, i dont think you want the mailer doing this.  

Perhaps it needs to find any components still displaying the
now-disabled account, and destroy them.  The shell will then pick this
up and clean up the display (i.e. switch to summary or something).


On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 16:09, leon.zhang wrote:
 hi,Ettore
 I want to finish a fucntion, which can send message from mailer to 
 shell, and make shell set focus to summary or other accounts  just like 
 user click them (in shell).
 This functon will be helpful to fix bug 32736.
 I have researched it for  days,but can not do with it.  thx
 
 cheers
 
 
 leon
 
 
 
 
 ___
 evolution-hackers maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


___
evolution-hackers maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers



Re: [Evolution] vFolder not looking at my Sent items

2002-12-02 Thread Not Zed
If you use a sent folder, you need to explicitly add that folder to the
vfolder rule for it to appear.  Just using 'all active remote' folders
doesn't work.

Most people dont want sent in their vfolders, this is why it works this
way.  Also, the sent folder setting is checked, not the folder name.

On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 23:31, Tommy Kelly wrote:
 Version 1.2, running with IMAP
 
 I have copies of my outgoing mails placed in an IMAP
 folder called Sent (i.e. not the default local Sent
 folder).  But when I create a vFolder looking for
 certain recipients it fails to spot mails in that Sent
 folder.
 
 If I take the mails out of Sent and put them somewhere else
 (any other IMAP folder), then the vFolder rule spots them and 
 they appear in the vFolder.  But when I put them back into 
 Sent they disappear from the vFolder.
 
 If I change the IMAP account's settings so that the IMAP
 Sent folder is no longer special (e.g. I point back to 
 the default local Sent folder), it still doesn't work.
 
 If I rename the Sent folder to something else,
 it still doesn't work.
 
 Any ideas?
 
 Thanks,
 Tommy
 
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Evolution online/offline state

2002-12-02 Thread Not Zed
On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 01:07, Daniel Eriksson wrote:
 Hi.
 I wrote to the list about this about a year ago. I
 never got any real response then so I'll try it
 again. I use Evolution on my modem connected
 computer. My problem is that the online/offline
 state in Evolution doesn't reflect the real
 online/offline state of my computer. This can of
 course easily be solved by me clicking the
 online/offline button in Evolution every time i
 connect/disconnect to Internet. I have a proposal
 for a better solution though, just wanted to know
 what everybody else thinks about it.
 
 The solution is very easy. I would need a checkbox
 in the Evolution settings named something like
 display annoying messages when no network found
 (or maybe the negated version silently discard
 network errors). My idea is that if I try to send a
 mail my computer tries to connect to the smtp server
 and if it's not found it silently puts the mail in
 my outbox without telling me and when the computer
 tries to check the pop3 server for mail and it can't
 be reached it just doesn't check it.
 
 This way my Evolution could always stay in online
 mode and work anyway. Couldn't be more than at most
 ten lines of code to implement, could it?

No its not really that easy at all.  You can't just hide all errors
because you dont know which are network errors and which are something
else entirely.  For example, the error messages from local mailboxes
such as 'out of disk space' are a bit more important, but currently they
just use the same error codes.

I suggest you just learn to click offline, that is what its there for.



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Word Wrap

2002-12-02 Thread Not Zed
If you set it to 'normal', it will word-wrap to a standard size.

On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 12:32, david grant wrote:
 I must have missed something but for the life of me I can't get
 Evolution 1.2 to word wrap the message body when changing window sizes.
 Can anyone help me, please?
 -- 
 david grant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] meeting auto accept?

2002-12-02 Thread Not Zed
On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 04:20, Marc Williams wrote:
 Is there a way to automatically accept a meeting?  One of the filters
 that I've overlooked perhaps?
 
 If not, could that feature be added?

Hmm, I dont think so.

It might be possible to write an external program which gets run as a
filter, and then does the accepting under the bonnet, so to speak.

Might be worth adding as a wishlist bug in bugzilla.ximian.com so the
idea isn't lost.



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Error when Sending

2002-12-02 Thread Not Zed
On Sat, 2002-11-30 at 19:41, Michael A. Peters wrote:
 I use a .Mac mail account.
 
 Sometimes when their server is having trouble, I get an authentication
 error : http://12.233.82.128/~mpeters/images/evolution_error.png
 
 It asks me to re-enter the password, and stops checking until I do.
 The problem is that I subscribe to a LOT of e-mail lists - and if I'm
 gone for a week (sometimes even a weekend if the lists are busy) my 15mb
 of pop can get filled.
 
 If I have my box running an popping every half hour while I am gone, my
 mail box doesn't fill. But this breaks if there is this error.
 
 Is there any way to configure evolution to cancel its pop attempt if it
 gets this error, and just try again at the next scheduled pop?

Nup.

The problem is that pop only has one error, -ERR.  It uses the same for
bad password and everything else.  We assume that if we get it the first
time connecting its probably a bad password, but as you can see, mail
servers use it for other purposes, like they're busy or something.

 My e-mail password doesn't change, evolution should be able to have a
 setting to ignore that error and just try again later.

Which error?  All errors?

 Anyone know how to do this?
 
 -- 
 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
 Michael A. Peters
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] How to trace evolution?

2002-12-02 Thread Not Zed

also see support.ximian.com, goto the knowledge base, and search for
Backtrace.

BTW ... there is no version 1.20 of evolution.

On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 04:00, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
 gdb is probably the best?
 http://primates.ximian.com/~fejj/how-to-submit-a-useful-bug-report.html#how has some 
directions on how to gdb evolution
 
 Jeff
 
 On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 09:41, Patrick wrote:
  Hi,
  
  I've experienced some strange lockups and would like to know how I can
  trace what Evolution-1.20 is doing (especially composing a message).
  
  Thanks,
  Patrick
  
  
  ___
  evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
 -- 
 Jeffrey Stedfast
 Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  - www.ximian.com
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] idea for vFolders

2002-12-02 Thread Not Zed
If you edit $prefix/evolution/vfolders.xml you can just copy the
recipients rule, change its name, and add a sender's option.  Its done
using an s-exp which isn't too unobvious if you compare it to other
rules.

send us a patch and we can put it in the distro (otherwise it will get
overwritten when you upgrade?).

On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 09:57, Rob Brown-Bayliss wrote:
 Hi all.
 
 Would it be possible to makechanges to the  vFolder to have a 'sender or
 recipiants' option?  At the moment I find I am mkeing a lotof duplicate
 entries, one for sender contains and one for recipients for the same
 vFolder.
 
 Also, how about an all mails in folder x type option? 
 
 -- 
 
 *  Rob Brown-Bayliss
 *  =  
 *  zoism.org
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Shortcuts

2002-12-02 Thread Not Zed
On Sat, 2002-11-30 at 03:28, René Seindal wrote:
 On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 00:13, Dave Barton wrote:
  On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 08:20, René Seindal wrote:
   Hi,
   
   I have just installed Evo1.2 from Debian unstable, on a Debian testing
   system.  I had quite some problems with imap and subscriptions which I
   have ironed out.
  
  Sorry, can't help you there.
  
   My main grievance now is the lack of keyboard shortcuts.  Where are they
   all?  I especially miss q which switched there preview pane on and off. 
   I used it a lot, and now its gone :-(
  
  Most are still there, but have been moved around a bit ?:/
  The toggle preview pane is now the ~ (tilde) key.
 
 I just discovered a tiny ` in the menu for View | Preview Pane, but on
 my Danish keyboard it was nowhere to be found.  After searching a bit I
 found it on AltGr-Shift-v, but it didn't work, probably because of the
 shift-key.  I remapped it with xmodmap to AltGr-v, and it works, but it
 is very cumbersome, as I have to release the AltGr key each time.
 
 Why on earth have such a silly character been chosen?  We don't all use
 American keyboards, so shortcuts involving punctuation will cause
 problems with different types of keyboards, maybe with the exception of
 dot and comma.  Having a shortcut on single back quote is plain silly.

I have no idea why that was chosen, other than i think q couldn't be
used anymore, and ` is close to q on *some* american keyboards.  On this
one its over past enter - not very convenient either.

 Whats wrong with the function-keys?  As far as I can see, only F9 is
 used.

function keys seem to be used by window managers a lot, at least with
qualifiers.  the other problem is they're usually hard to remember.  i'd
be in favour of using them more, but its a ui issue.



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Attachment in the middle of a message

2002-12-02 Thread Not Zed
Yes, its a 'bug' in apple mail.

The attachment is probably a uuencoded message or something embedded in
the mail content.  Since they are often pictures, this is the place to
show them.

Although without seeing the message in question i have no idea ...

On Thu, 2002-11-28 at 23:48, Mertens Bram wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I just received a message from the sane-devel list with an attachment
 which appears in the middle of the message...
 
 The message was sent with Apple Mail (2.548) (according to the X-mailer
 header).  I am using RH7.3 and Evo 1.2.
 
 Is this something Evo should be able to fix (i.e show the attachment at
 the end of the message) or is this a bug in Apple Mail?
 
 It's not a big deal, the rest of message is still readable, it just
 surprised me a bit.
 
 Regards
 
 p.s. if someone wants a copy of the message, just let me know, the
 attachment is only a small (gzipped) patch...
 -- 
  #  Mertens Bram M8ram [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Linux User #249103  #
  #  Red Hat Linux 7.3  KDE 3.0.0-10  kernel 2.4.18-3  i686  128MB RAM  #
  #  2:12pm up 8 days, 3:02, 3 users, load average: 0.67, 0.28, 0.21 #
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] CRL and Revoke Certificate

2002-12-02 Thread Not Zed

On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 04:10, Jean-Marc V. Liotier wrote:
 On Thu, 2002-11-28 at 12:46, lance lim wrote:
 
  I am a newbie, How do ximian handle revoke or
  compromise certificates ?
 
 According to Notzed in
 http://lists.ximian.com/archives/public/evolution/2002-November/023677.html S/MIME 
and certificate management are wishlist items not yet implemented because of lack of 
resources.
 

If you're using SSL, i'm not sure what libnspr does.  Some of that stuff
is handled internally by the library so there is probably somne support
for it.  In the evolution code, if users have overridden certificate
failures, then they remain overridden.



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Certificates?

2002-11-27 Thread Not Zed
On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 13:12, Bradley Alexander wrote:
 Similar to Damian's PGP inline vs PGP/MIME question, now that we have
 reached the 1.2 milestone, is there any chance of handling certificates
 in the near future? Since I work for Verisign, all of the windows people
 use their certs to sign/encrypt emails, and it confuses my poor evo
 session, and most times I wind up having to download it rather than
 reading it in the mailer.
 
 I originally asked this when 1.0 was released, and was given the
 projected date of some day... Are we any closer?

Yes we're closer.  To that day.

S/MIME is still a wanted yet unimplemented feature due to lack of
resources.



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



[Evolution] Evolution 1.2.1 IMAP testing, bugs 33668 33309

2002-11-27 Thread Not Zed

Hi Everyone,

We know people have been having some specific problems with 1.2, bugs
such as 33668, and 33309, and have put a patch in which should address
them.  I think its related to a namespace of .

We'd like people who have been having such problems to give the current
snapshots (or CVS) a go, so we can make sure they are addressed for the
1.2.1 release.  The problem manifests itself in several ways, from not
being able to select folders, to not being able to create them, or just
spurious BAD error messages during startup.

The snapshots should also address the INBOX not being subscribed
problem in a more transparent way, feedback on whether that is fixed or
not would also be useful.

Currently snapshots are only available for Solaris, RH7.2, and by
tommorow, RH7.3.  This will hopefully include enough people to verify if
the problems are fixed.

Thanks
 Michael




___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Palm sync inbox

2002-11-26 Thread Not Zed
On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 09:36, Lonnie Borntreger wrote:
 On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 07:46, Steve Sykes wrote:
  My palm m515 syncs fine except for mail.  The mail stays on the palm
  and doesn't seem to get the mail from Evolution.  The conduit shows
  sendmail active but I must be missing something.  Any ideas?
 
 The sendmail conduit will send any mail you've written on the palm
 through sendmail and out to its recipient.  It does not sync the INBOX. 
 That does not exist AFAIK.

This is correct, we dont support mailbox syncing.



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Remaining Image in 1.2

2002-11-26 Thread Not Zed
On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 02:32, Etienne Tourigny wrote:
 I have seen that also.  Emptying the trash doesn't work, although
 Expunge works.  Has anyone filed a bug report before I do?

yes it is in the bug system.

 On Sun, 2002-11-24 at 13:32, Dennis Tuchler wrote:
  Often (not always), when I have deleted the last entry on the list of
  messages, the image of that last message remains in the preview screen
  -- even after new messages are loaded with a later click on
  Send/Receive.
  
  It is annoying.  Is there any way I can prevent this continuation of a
  message in the preview screen?
  
Hide the message pane.



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Did it again

2002-11-25 Thread Not Zed

Did you subscribe to inbox?
Did you try to restart twice?

BTW an easier fix might be just to delete
~/evolution/mail/imap/user@account/.ev-store-summary or
all of
~/evolution/mail/imap/user@account

This should hopefully be fixed in 1.2.1, if you can try a snapshot i
suggest you do, so we can get it tested as much as possible before
release.


On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 02:23, Ron McKeating wrote:
 I just had a recurrence of a problem I had last week after I upgraded
 evo. I had exited and restarted. Now my root folder was my inbox with
 the message this folder cannot contain email. Can anybody tell me why
 this keeps happening. I fixed it same as I did last time, I deleted my
 evolution directory and re ran evo, then copied my vfolders and other
 config stuff back in.
 
 Ron 
 -- 
 Ron McKeating
 Senior IT Services Specialist
 Computing Services
 Loughborough University
 Tel: 01509 222329
 
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] twaeking Preferences manually

2002-11-25 Thread Not Zed
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 03:46, guenther wrote:
 cheers();
 
 Are there any Infos, where the configuration preferences in the files
 are and which settings are possible and what they do? I mean, everything
 that can be tweaked, with and without a GUI.

Only in the source.

 Is ist possible, to view in Thread mode as default?

Hmm, that might need source modifications at the moment.

 Any hint welcome...
 
 ...guenther
 
 
 -- 
 char *t=\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4;
 main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;il;i++){ i%8? c=1:
 (c=*++x); c128  (s+=h); if (!(h=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] When is Evolution 1.4 due out?

2002-11-25 Thread Not Zed
On Fri, 2002-11-22 at 21:48, Aristotle wrote:
 But there is no indication of when it is due out?

When its finished and stable :)

Snapshots should be out in a week or so hopefully, so you can track the
stability as it changes.



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] twaeking Preferences manually

2002-11-25 Thread Not Zed
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 11:21, guenther wrote:
 cheers();
 
  Only in the source.
 
 k, I will have a look, thx.
 
 Is it documented or even readable? Or have I to trace a parser? ;)

not really much of either.

 
   Is ist possible, to view in Thread mode as default?
  Hmm, that might need source modifications at the moment.
 
 Would be a considerable modification, I think. The Thread view is very
 helpful, should be configurable in the Views.

No its probably a 1 line change

 ...guenther
 
 
 -- 
 char *t=\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4;
 main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;il;i++){ i%8? c=1:
 (c=*++x); c128  (s+=h); if (!(h=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] preferences don't stick

2002-11-24 Thread Not Zed
Upgrade to at least 1.0.8.

On Sun, 2002-11-24 at 22:25, jeff wrote:
 Greetings.
 I'm using Evolution 1.0.5 under KDE on Debain installed by Knoppix (is
 that enough for you? :)
 
 I've noticed that some of my settings don't seem to stick between
 logins.  Hide Deleted Messages, Preview Pane, and large icons in
 Shortcuts revert each time I open Evolution.  Am I missing something?
 
 I've gone through the FAQ's, Knowledgebase, and gnomecc, all with no
 luck.
 
 Suggestions welcome.
 
 Thanks,
 Jeff
 
 P.S. Not knowing about programming, is it a big deal to be able to drag
 messages directly to folder shortcuts?
 
 
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Evolution changed my login

2002-11-24 Thread Not Zed

This doesn't sound like anything to do with Evolution, maybe some other
package down the line.

redhat uses /etc/sysconfig/desktop or something to set the login
manager, dont know about anything else.

On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 07:55, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
 I boot directly into state 5, with a gui login.  My default session is 
 KDE, and I think the login was kdm.  When I installed Evolution with 
 Red Carpet, it changed this login to a more primitive version (possibly 
 gdm or xdm).  Is there a way to change it back?  I can't imagine that 
 Evolution needs a particular login, and am pretty annoyed at it being 
 changed without my foreknowledge and permission.
 -- 
 
 ___
 Art Alexion
 Arthur S. Alexion LLC
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.alexion.com
 
 ___
 evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



Re: [Evolution] Can HEAD gtkhtml co-exist?

2002-11-24 Thread Not Zed
On Sun, 2002-11-24 at 19:11, Lonnie Borntreger wrote:
 I currently have the evolution-1-2 branch of gal installed alongside of
 the HEAD version.  Can I do the same with gtkhtml?  I've been compiling
 it, but haven't had the guts to actually install it.
 
 Basically, I'm trying my best to blow up my box by compiling Evolution
 from HEAD. ;-)

Yep, you should be able to.

FWIW though, I think all the developers have a separate /opt/gnome2 tree
for their gnome2 porting work.



___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



[Fwd: [Evolution] Custom Keyboard Shortcuts]

2002-11-24 Thread Not Zed

The main reason is we use bonobo for menu's and so forth, and it doesn't
support the original gtk way of customising menu's.

Secondly, it isn't as useful as you think; few people ever customise
accelerators.


---BeginMessage---




Folks,
 I'm sure this has been asked and answered loads of times.. I've search archives to attempt and locate an answer but to no success...

Why does Evolution not support custom keyboard shortcuts?

Maybe I'm going out on a limb here.. but something tells me.. I'm going to get a load of of those we must standardise replies.. but anyway.. I like to live dangerously..

The whole wonderful thing about Gtk shortcuts is that you choose your own.. and the on the fly way of holding the selected menu option and just typing your assigned code is very cool. Anyone who uses Gimp a lot will tell you just how useful these customisable shortcuts are.

Another thing helped by the customisation is the fact that we don't annoy non-US keyboard users.. sometimes the simple handy shortcuts are not as accessible as you may think.

And last but not least.. our friends in Redmond, (AFAIK) have not yet copied the concept of custom GTK shortcuts.. so having them accessible in Evo, would be yet another advantage over Outlook

Big Frown 




Regards,
 Cormac











This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com


---End Message---


Re: [Evolution] Sharing mails

2002-11-24 Thread Not Zed
I'll just add that running multiple concurrent clients from differnt
users on the same data, without using imap etc, is not guaranteed not to
lose mail or settings.

On Sat, 2002-11-23 at 21:22, Jørn Christensen wrote:
 Yeah.. maybe I should try that. Have no experince in IMAP... but that
 I can get :-)
 
 
 On Sat, 2002-11-23 at 00:39, Rick Ziegler wrote: 
  Hi Jørn-
  What I have done for exactly this purpose is to set up an IMAP server. 
  This has many advantages, including:
  1)  Your account and your mail account can be different accounts.
  2)  You can run any number of mail clients and see the same folders.
  3)  You can have remote access to your mail if you have an always on
  connection like cable or dsl.
  
  I personally use fetchmail, maildrop, and courier-imap, but your tastes
  may vary.  The reason I chose courier is because the maildir format
  allows for concurrent access to folders.
  
  Best of luck!
  -Rick
  
  On Fri, 2002-11-22 at 11:01, Jørn Christensen wrote:
   Hi
   
   I have evolution 1.2.0 installed on my box.
   Now my dad wants to use evolution as well and share our emails.
   I just thought of making a symlink from his evolution folder to mine and
   works just great - except for the fact that evolution makes cearten
   files read and write for me and for my ONLY!
   
   Each time I run evolutio, there are certain files that my dad cannot
   read (and the other way around is also the case). The files are: 
   - camel-cert.db
   - config.xmldb
   - private (folder)
   
   What do I do to let my dad acces my mails.
   
   I do not want him to type a password - if I can help it - And certanly
   not mine
   
   ~Jørn Christensen
   
   
 
 -- 
 
 Jørn Christensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution



  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >