Re: [Evolution] The lost message (weird filter behaviour)
Op vr 02-08-2002, om 12:24 schreef Mertens Bram: > Hi, > > This morning I received a message from a professor at my university, > neither the sender nor the subject matched any filter so it was supposed > to be delivered to my INBOX. > > However it was delivered to the folder where I keep the messages from > the OpenOffice.org swriter mailing list. I had a problem like this a few weeks ago. Also with a mailinglist. But if I remember well it was the Ximian mailinglist. When I changed the filter to filter on to address containing @ximian.com, everything worked fine again. The strange thing is that I have more filters on mailinglists, and with those I do not have this problem. ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] The lost message (weird filter behaviour)
Hi, The problem is getting worse, it seems that all messages that do not match a filter are being delivered to my swriter folder (actually it's local folders>Bram>linux>openoffice.org>swriter) I first believed the filter for the swriter folder was to blame but now I noticed that messages that match filters further down the list do get delivered to the correct folders. If anybody is interested in seeing the filter-file I'd be happy to mail it, just drop me a note at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is anybody else experiencing problems with this? TIA, -- | Mertens Bram "M8ram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Registered [Red Hat] Linux User # 249103 since Octobre 2000 | http://linux.be | http://www.redhat.com | http://counter.li.org \ ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] The lost message (weird filter behaviour)
On Fri, 2002-08-02 at 12:55, Mertens Bram wrote: > Hi, > > Your post to my other thread (filter feature request) got me thinking: > one of the rules in the swriter filter is > > > > [sw-users] > > > > could it be that Evo sees the [sw-users] as an (invalid) regex that's > causing this problem? No. Note that the type here is "string" and not "regex". The normal "Subject contains"-type rules do not use regex. If you want to use regex, you need to use the Header Regex filter rule. Jeff > > Thanks, > > -- > | Mertens Bram "M8ram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > | Registered [Red Hat] Linux User # 249103 since Octobre 2000 > | http://linux.be | http://www.redhat.com | http://counter.li.org > \ > > > > ___ > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] The lost message (weird filter behaviour)
On Fri, 2002-08-02 at 06:24, Mertens Bram wrote: > Hi, > > This morning I received a message from a professor at my university, > neither the sender nor the subject matched any filter so it was supposed > to be delivered to my INBOX. > > However it was delivered to the folder where I keep the messages from > the OpenOffice.org swriter mailing list. > > I checked and double checked the filter I use to put messages in that > folder (it's quite complicated because I move messages from the general > mailing list there as well), I even checked the xml file but I can't > find the reason why it would have been moved to that folder! mind sending me the rule that moves messages into that folder and also sending me the message? > > Luckiliy I have a vfolder set up to catch all messaged sent directly to > me (as opposed to some mailing list) so I was able to mark the message > as unread and find it. > > I then edited the rule that moves all messages from my professors to the > "Prof UA" folder, this filter is above the previously mentioned filter, > and chose "apply filters". The message was moved to the correct folder > BUT it wasn't marked 'important' until I pressed "apply filters" again! That's because it applied the important flag to the message in the original folder; not the message that got moved. > > So I have two problems: > 1) some filters are acting strange (btw I'm no longer having problems > with the "apply color" filter sounds like they are working fine to me :-) > > 2) Is it possible to see to which folder a message belongs when you're > reading it in a vfolder? If not I think that would be a nice feature! :) in the development cvs version, yes. You can add a column to the message-list that shows the source folder for a message. Jeff -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] The lost message (weird filter behaviour)
Hi, Your post to my other thread (filter feature request) got me thinking: one of the rules in the swriter filter is [sw-users] could it be that Evo sees the [sw-users] as an (invalid) regex that's causing this problem? Thanks, -- | Mertens Bram "M8ram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Registered [Red Hat] Linux User # 249103 since Octobre 2000 | http://linux.be | http://www.redhat.com | http://counter.li.org \ ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] The lost message (weird filter behaviour)
On Fri, 2002-08-02 at 17:57, Peter Williams wrote: > I suspect this has something to do with needing a "Stop processing" > rule, but it's difficult to say. The filters that apply a color don't have a stop processing, they're at the top of the list, the message is moved to the correct folder by a later filter. That way I can color-code messages from "@sun.com" and use another filter to determine wheter it belongs to the swriter, the calc or the general folder... does that help? > This is possible in 1.1.x; you can add a column to the message list > called Original Location. (You can add a column by right-clicking on the > headers of the message list). Hmm, that's the devel-tree isn't it? When will that be implemented in a stable release? :)) Thanks! -- | Mertens Bram "M8ram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Registered [Red Hat] Linux User # 249103 since Octobre 2000 | http://linux.be | http://www.redhat.com | http://counter.li.org \ ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] The lost message (weird filter behaviour)
On Fri, 2002-08-02 at 06:24, Mertens Bram wrote: > 1) some filters are acting strange (btw I'm no longer having problems > with the "apply color" filter I suspect this has something to do with needing a "Stop processing" rule, but it's difficult to say. > > 2) Is it possible to see to which folder a message belongs when you're > reading it in a vfolder? If not I think that would be a nice feature! :) > This is possible in 1.1.x; you can add a column to the message list called Original Location. (You can add a column by right-clicking on the headers of the message list). Peter -- Peter Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Why should I have to change my name? He's the one who sucks!" -- Michael Bolton ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] The lost message (weird filter behaviour)
Hi, This morning I received a message from a professor at my university, neither the sender nor the subject matched any filter so it was supposed to be delivered to my INBOX. However it was delivered to the folder where I keep the messages from the OpenOffice.org swriter mailing list. I checked and double checked the filter I use to put messages in that folder (it's quite complicated because I move messages from the general mailing list there as well), I even checked the xml file but I can't find the reason why it would have been moved to that folder! Luckiliy I have a vfolder set up to catch all messaged sent directly to me (as opposed to some mailing list) so I was able to mark the message as unread and find it. I then edited the rule that moves all messages from my professors to the "Prof UA" folder, this filter is above the previously mentioned filter, and chose "apply filters". The message was moved to the correct folder BUT it wasn't marked 'important' until I pressed "apply filters" again! So I have two problems: 1) some filters are acting strange (btw I'm no longer having problems with the "apply color" filter 2) Is it possible to see to which folder a message belongs when you're reading it in a vfolder? If not I think that would be a nice feature! :) Suggestions and comments are welcome! TIA, Bram -- | Mertens Bram "M8ram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Registered [Red Hat] Linux User # 249103 since Octobre 2000 | http://linux.be | http://www.redhat.com | http://counter.li.org \ ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
