Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution LDAP backend
Hi, On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 21:00 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: > On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 08:55 +0200, Free Ekanayaka wrote: > > > Evo ldap backend was nothing but, openldap patched ntlm. But there was > > > no update to it, as most distros patch OpenLDAP with ntlm and ship it. > > > > > Thanks, do you know of any documentation about using evolution with > > ntlm? > > > What do you mean by that? > I don't know much about ntlm, but from your answer I guess you think it would be a better replacement of evoldap. I've tried to google a bit but I couldn't find much about ntlm+evolution, so I was asking you some link where I can learn more about it. Thanks, Free ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution LDAP backend
On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 08:55 +0200, Free Ekanayaka wrote: > > Evo ldap backend was nothing but, openldap patched ntlm. But there was > > no update to it, as most distros patch OpenLDAP with ntlm and ship it. > > > Thanks, do you know of any documentation about using evolution with > ntlm? > What do you mean by that? -Srini. > Ciao, > > Free > > ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution LDAP backend
> Evo ldap backend was nothing but, openldap patched ntlm. But there was > no update to it, as most distros patch OpenLDAP with ntlm and ship it. > Thanks, do you know of any documentation about using evolution with ntlm? Ciao, Free ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution LDAP backend
Evo ldap backend was nothing but, openldap patched ntlm. But there was no update to it, as most distros patch OpenLDAP with ntlm and ship it. On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 17:12 +0200, Free Ekanayaka wrote: > Hi all, > > has anybody used the evoldap backend to set up a default LDAP > address book? > > The LDAP backend for evolution mail accounts works great, I just > followed the instructions here: > > http://live.gnome.org/Evolution_2fGConfLDAPBackend > > and everything worked as expected. > > However I was not able to set a default LDAP address book. I have > tweaked /etc/gconf/2/evoldap.conf in various ways, and I can make it > set the /apps/evolution/addressbook/sources variable with the values > I want, got from an LDAP query. However evolution keeps overwriting the > variable with its own default values. > > It feels like something wrong with the $(EVOLUTION_UID) value that the > evoldap backend uses to set the variable. > I have no idea about the gconf-ldap backend. -Srini ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
[Evolution-hackers] Evolution LDAP backend
Hi all, has anybody used the evoldap backend to set up a default LDAP address book? The LDAP backend for evolution mail accounts works great, I just followed the instructions here: http://live.gnome.org/Evolution_2fGConfLDAPBackend and everything worked as expected. However I was not able to set a default LDAP address book. I have tweaked /etc/gconf/2/evoldap.conf in various ways, and I can make it set the /apps/evolution/addressbook/sources variable with the values I want, got from an LDAP query. However evolution keeps overwriting the variable with its own default values. It feels like something wrong with the $(EVOLUTION_UID) value that the evoldap backend uses to set the variable. Of course setting the LDAP address book manually from evolution works fine. Thanks, Free ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers