[Evolution] backup a local folder emptying it (2.24.5)

2010-01-04 Thread Matthias Apitz

Hello,

With the change to the new year I wanted to make a copy of one of my big
local folders and clear it (i.e. remove all mails there); I did (with
Evo shutted down):

$ cd ~/.evolution/mail/local
$ ls -C1 backupIncoming*
backupIncoming
backupIncoming.cmeta
backupIncoming.ibex.index
backupIncoming.ibex.index.data
$ cp -p backupIncoming* ~/2009/
$ rm backupIncoming.*
$ cp /dev/null backupIncoming
$ ls -l backupIncoming*
-rw---  1 guru  wheel  0  4 ene 09:15 backupIncoming

now I started Evo and was expecting that the folder 'backupIncoming' was
empty and the backupIncoming.* files would be recreated by Evo (they
have been); but: Evo still has the Subjects of the purged mails and the
total number; of course clicking on one of the Subjects give an error
that the mail number XYZ could not be retrieved. 

What is wrong in my process? Where the Subjects are stored outside of
backupIncoming.* files?

Or what other way exists? I want to have the file
~/.evolution/mail/local/backupIncoming copied to a safe place (to read
it later with 'mutt') and have the ~400 MByte folder backupIncoming
empty;

Thanks in advance

matthias
-- 
Matthias Apitz
t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211
e g...@unixarea.de - w http://www.unixarea.de/
Vote NO to EU The Lisbon Treaty: http://www.no-means-no.eu
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Fwd: Suggestion for Evolution software

2010-01-04 Thread nomnex
On Sun, 2010-01-03 at 02:03 -0200, Chapinha 2008 wrote:

 1) the possibility to read all the messages of a specific contact
 (sent and received), that is possible to see with a tab added when you
 open the respective contact

This is complete different architecture. Outlook let you see the
messages/appointements/tasks for a given contact, link external
documents in its calendar and you can keep a journal of your activity.
Outlook is bloated and heavy. Evolution is not Outlook. You can use the
advance search function in Evolution to achieve the same result.

 2) the possibility to print several messages, when they are selected
 in Evolution, this is useful because man cannot archive old messages
 in PDF, for example.

A quick search on Goolge would answer your question, or see [1] for a
pointer 
bye
nomnex

[1] http://www.stchman.com/export_evolution.html

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Question on adding a CALDAV calendar

2010-01-04 Thread Milan Crha
On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 15:44 +, Markie wrote:
 There's a checkbox on the plugin UI to choose SSL or not, that's how
 it knows.
Xav

Hi,
Xav has right, the Use SSL checkbox in calendar preferences is used to
know whether it should use http:// or https://. Note that you can have
configured one proxy for http:// and another for https://, but I've no
idea whether it's the case for you. Also, not using SSL means, for
example, you password to a server is shown in plaintext over the
network. Might or might not be a problem for you.
Bye,
Milan

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Save as.../export a thread to disc?

2010-01-04 Thread Milan Crha
On Sat, 2009-12-26 at 12:56 +0100, Kurt Hansen wrote:
 I wish to save some threads from my news-account. When using the
 Save-option in the File-menu, there is no way to specify the format;
 it's saves as plain text and with the complete header information for
 each message.

Hi,
it's not only a plain-text format, it's an mbox format, which most of
the mail clients can import or open directly. Try to use:
Folder-Select Message Thread and then File-Save As.

 Is'nt it possible to save in e.g. HTML format with correct indention
 of the replies in the thread or just anything else than plain text
 with headers?

I'm not aware of anything, the nearest I would think of is a
File-Print, but it's probably not what you want.

 I'm new to Evolution (and Linux). Is there a completely other way to
 make an archive with valuable information from usenet postings?

No idea here.
Bye,
Milan

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] backup a local folder emptying it (2.24.5)

2010-01-04 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Monday, January 04, 2010 a las 09:19:40AM +, Pete Biggs escribió:

 On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 09:23 +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
  Hello,
  
  With the change to the new year I wanted to make a copy of one of my big
  local folders and clear it (i.e. remove all mails there); I did (with
  Evo shutted down):
 
 Did you kill all the Evo processes with 'evolution --force-shutdown' ?

I did two attempts; in the first I've missed to kill the background
processes;

then I killed all, restored all the files, restarted Evo (the
folder was fine again); killed all Evo, moved away the folder and
restarted Evo, but the Index was still there;

matthias

-- 
Matthias Apitz
t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211
e g...@unixarea.de - w http://www.unixarea.de/
Vote NO to EU The Lisbon Treaty: http://www.no-means-no.eu
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] backup a local folder emptying it (2.24.5)

2010-01-04 Thread Milan Crha
On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 09:23 +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
 What is wrong in my process? Where the Subjects are stored outside of
 backupIncoming.* files?

Hi,
it's stored in folder's summary, I guess
~/.evolution/mail/local/folders.db
for you. Was there any reason to play with internal evolution files
instead of doing the same through the Evolution's user interface? Like:
a) create a new folder
b) dragdrop messages from one to the other
c) delete old message from old folder
d) expunge old folder
That might do pretty the same what you were trying to do, and updating
internal files properly. I guess there are not many options now:
a) close evolution; evolution --force-shutdown
b) delete folders.db file
c) run evolution (it'll recreate folders.db file).
If you use labels, tags, flags or anything on your messages under On
This Computer, then they will be lost by this. Alternatively, you can
just drop that one table from folders.db by some sqlite3 command.

Bye,
Milan

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] backup a local folder emptying it (2.24.5)

2010-01-04 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Monday, January 04, 2010 a las 10:50:59AM +0100, Milan Crha escribió:

 On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 09:23 +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
  What is wrong in my process? Where the Subjects are stored outside of
  backupIncoming.* files?
 
   Hi,
 it's stored in folder's summary, I guess
 ~/.evolution/mail/local/folders.db
 for you. Was there any reason to play with internal evolution files
 instead of doing the same through the Evolution's user interface?

yes there was a reason ...

 Like:
 a) create a new folder
 b) dragdrop messages from one to the other

... because dragdrop messages is a nice idea, but not if we are talking
about some thousand messages :-)

the folder 'backupIncoming' contains a backup of any mail I have
received in 2009 (copied by some filter to this folder because the
central Exchange server will trash all deleted mails after 24h);

 c) delete old message from old folder
 d) expunge old folder
 That might do pretty the same what you were trying to do, and updating
 internal files properly. I guess there are not many options now:

at the moment I have the folder I wanted empty restored from the backup
place and all is fine (like it was before I started the procedure this
morning);

 a) close evolution; evolution --force-shutdown
 b) delete folders.db file
 c) run evolution (it'll recreate folders.db file).

will try this later;

 If you use labels, tags, flags or anything on your messages under On
 This Computer, then they will be lost by this. Alternatively, you can
 just drop that one table from folders.db by some sqlite3 command.

do you mean: sqlite3 folders.db vacuum;? or can this be done affecting
only the one folder 'backupIncoming'?

Thanks for your feedback

matthias
-- 
Matthias Apitz
t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211
e g...@unixarea.de - w http://www.unixarea.de/
Vote NO to EU The Lisbon Treaty: http://www.no-means-no.eu
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] backup a local folder emptying it (2.24.5)

2010-01-04 Thread Milan Crha
Hi,

On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 11:14 +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
 El día Monday, January 04, 2010 a las 10:50:59AM +0100, Milan Crha
 escribió:
 
 ... because dragdrop messages is a nice idea, but not if we are
 talking
 about some thousand messages :-)

Ah, right, it takes its time. 

 do you mean: sqlite3 folders.db vacuum;? or can this be done
 affecting
 only the one folder 'backupIncoming'?

I meant something like DROP TABLE backupIncoming;, but there are about
two or three of the similar name, which should be better to drop as
well. After you drop the table, and start Evolution those will be
recreated automatically.
Bye,
Milan

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] backup a local folder emptying it (2.24.5)

2010-01-04 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Monday, January 04, 2010 a las 11:23:37AM +0100, Milan Crha escribió:

  do you mean: sqlite3 folders.db vacuum;? or can this be done
  affecting
  only the one folder 'backupIncoming'?
 
 I meant something like DROP TABLE backupIncoming;, but there are about
 two or three of the similar name, which should be better to drop as
 well. After you drop the table, and start Evolution those will be
 recreated automatically.

Hi Milan,

I've made a copy of 'folders.db' to /tmp and sqlite3 shows:

$ sqlite3 /tmp/folders.db
sqlite .tables back
backupIncoming

i.e. there is no other table name which matches the string 'back' and
also a full match does not show any other names for each folder; will
try to drop only that table...

Thx

matthias
-- 
Matthias Apitz
t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211
e g...@unixarea.de - w http://www.unixarea.de/
Vote NO to EU The Lisbon Treaty: http://www.no-means-no.eu
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] HELP, please.

2010-01-04 Thread Sylvia Sánchez

I don't understand your way to explain, that's why I didn't answer your
questions.  I guess that anybody else knows or understands the mail.  I
don' t they're bad persons who doesn't want yo answer you.


Regards
and Take it easy!
Sylvia
(from south)


El dom, 03-01-2010 a las 15:32 -0800, Brewster Gillett escribió:

 About three weeks ago I posted the query below to this list.
 So far there has been zero response.
 
 Let's ride the loop:
 
 * This has apparently never cropped up in anyone else's installation
 
   * Therefore it must be presumed to be a feature, not a bug
 
   * If so, then there should be an option switch for it
 
 I am not prepared to believe that this artifact could be presenting to
 other users and not be noticed. So where does that leave us?
 
 Does anyone have any ideas? My previous (4-year-old) version 1-Something
 Evo didn't pull this crap on me.
 
 Thank you,
 
 Brewster
 
 2.28.1 under Ubuntu 9.10
 ---
 
 On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 13:20 -0800, Brewster Gillett wrote:
  I have a Contacts question.
   how is it possible that:
  
  (1) in my Contacts editing screens, the Contacts are all listed
  by their sort by fields (generally last name first, the default)
  but when I am composing an email, smack TO:, and get the
  Contacts List popup, over there it lists them by the primary
  name in the Contact record (generally first name first).
  
  (2) There are contacts that appear in the latter list but do not
  show up in the former one. Which means they cannot be edited.
  
  Neither of these manifestations make a particle of sense - they do 
  not represent any sort of feature that anyone in their right mind would
  ever have requested - yet nobody else seems to be experiencing these
  kinds of problems, which of course implies that it may be an option
  switch.
  
  I have read through some 1200 Evo FAQs and have seen no mention of this.
  
  Does anyone have any ideas?
  
  Ubuntu 9.10 / Evo 2.28.1
  
  Brewster
  
  
 
 


signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] HELP, please.

2010-01-04 Thread Reid Thompson
On Sun, 2010-01-03 at 15:32 -0800, Brewster Gillett wrote:
 Does anyone have any ideas? 

  (1) in my Contacts editing screens, the Contacts are all listed
  by their sort by fields (generally last name first, the default)
  but when I am composing an email, smack TO:, and get the
  Contacts List popup, over there it lists them by the primary
  name in the Contact record (generally first name first).
I see the same from head approx 2 weeks ago (will rebuild from head
today).  I've never found it to be an issue though.  I tend to use the
search box and/or autocomplete to find addresses that I need.
  
  (2) There are contacts that appear in the latter list but do not
  show up in the former one. Which means they cannot be edited.
I don't know whether this issue exists for me or not.  I've not noticed
it, but that's not to say that it doesn't exist for me.  Are the
contacts being merged from a different 'list'?

reid
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Save as.../export a thread to disc?

2010-01-04 Thread Reid Thompson
On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 10:36 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
your easiest solution is probably ...
 I'm not aware of anything, the nearest I would think of is a
 File-Print, but it's probably not what you want. 
and select print to file, type pdf
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Save as.../export a thread to disc?

2010-01-04 Thread Kurt Hansen
man, 04 01 2010 kl. 10:36 +0100, skrev Milan Crha:
 On Sat, 2009-12-26 at 12:56 +0100, Kurt Hansen wrote:
  I wish to save some threads from my news-account. When using the
  Save-option in the File-menu, there is no way to specify the format;
  it's saves as plain text and with the complete header information for
  each message.
 
 it's not only a plain-text format, it's an mbox format, which most of
 the mail clients can import or open directly. Try to use:
 Folder-Select Message Thread and then File-Save As.

The complete thread is saved in plain text and can be opened/edited with
Gedit. The problem is, that all the messages headers (up to 52 lines) is
included. Not very readable and too much work to do to clean up the text
file.

  Is'nt it possible to save in e.g. HTML format with correct indention
  of the replies in the thread or just anything else than plain text
  with headers?
 
 I'm not aware of anything, the nearest I would think of is a
 File-Print, but it's probably not what you want.

The 'Print' command is not available when the complete thread is
selected (this is also a reply to Reid).

... but thanks for trying ;-)

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] HELP/new explanation for Sylvia

2010-01-04 Thread Brewster Gillett
On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 10:29 -0200, Sylvia Sánchez wrote:
 
 I don't understand your way to explain, that's why I didn't answer
 your questions. 

bg:

Fair enough. I'll try to explain a different way.

There is a master record for each Contact in the Address Book.
Within that record are several individual fields, two of which deal with
the name of the Contact. The first one is called Full Name, and 
carries the actual name of the contact. The second name field is
called File Under, and defaults to last name first. This second
field constitutes the user's instructions as to how they wish
their Address Book to be sorted.

There are also two places in Evolution where the list of Contacts
can be seen. The first one is in the main Contacts database,
or Address Book, which is where Contacts are selected to be edited.
The second place the Address Book can be displayed is when you are
in EDIT (email composing) mode, and you click on the TO: field,
whereupon a listing of your Address Book pops up in a small window.

The primary difficulty I am experiencing is that Evo is sorting
two different ways, depending upon where the Address Book is viewed.
When I am in the main Contacts (Contact adding and editing) area,
the Contact entries are sorted as they have been requested to be
sorted - last name first. But when I access the second instance,
the pop-up that responds to the TO: in the EDIT (email composing)
mode, that window is ignoring the instruction, and displaying the
Contacts sorted on Full Name, rather than on the File Under field.

The reason I am finding the lack of responses to this query so puzzling
is very simple: it seems that either nobody else has experienced
this, or that they have, and have ignored it. Does it not seem quite
unlikely that, if this is a bug in 2.28.1, nobody else would have
noticed it? Is it possible that people would actually put up with
having their Contacts incorrectly sorted every time they need to
retrieve one when composing an email?

Then as a related part of this, there are Contacts which appear in the
latter list but never show up in the main Contacts editing list.
That is also unacceptable; if for no other reason than those Contacts
which do not show on the main Contacts editing screen are therefore
no available for editing.

I really have to believe these conditions are both bugs, but I have
invested a lot of time in searching forum posts and bug lists, and have
yet to find either one. On the other hand , if they *are* bugs, why
is it that nobody else has noticed them?

I don't like mysteries. If I want mystery, I'll read Agatha Christie.
I don't need it in my email programs :-)

Brewster
 

-- 
***
Embrace a sharing community of sustainable justice low-carbon diversity
***
W. Brewster Gillett b...@fdi.usPortland, OR  USA
***
Simply because you don't like to hear it, that doesn't make it untrue.
***

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] HELP, please/reid

2010-01-04 Thread Brewster Gillett

 On Sun, 2010-01-03 at 15:32 -0800, Brewster Gillett wrote:
  Does anyone have any ideas? 
 
   (1) in my Contacts editing screens, the Contacts are all listed
   by their sort by fields (generally last name first, the default)
   but when I am composing an email, smack TO:, and get the
   Contacts List popup, over there it lists them by the primary
   name in the Contact record (generally first name first).

Reid Thompson wrote:

 I see the same from head approx 2 weeks ago (will rebuild from head
 today).  I've never found it to be an issue though.  I tend to use the
 search box and/or autocomplete to find addresses that I need.

I find autocomplete, in any program, to be less than optimal, so to
me it's easier to hit the TO: and scroll down. 

I thought the search function available in compose mode only searched
the body of the message? Are you saying it can be set to search the
Address Book?

Brewster wrote earlier:

   (2) There are contacts that appear in the latter list but do not
   show up in the former one. Which means they cannot be edited.

Reid Thompson wrote:

 I don't know whether this issue exists for me or not.  I've not noticed
 it, but that's not to say that it doesn't exist for me.  Are the
 contacts being merged from a different 'list'?
 
 reid

Absolutely not - they all came into 2.28.1 as a bunch from my earlier
version of Evo.

I am really finding all of this very puzzling, which is highly
uncomfortable; I'm not generally this puzzled over something which
should be fairly simple :-)

Brewster

2.28.1 under Ubuntu 9.10

-- 
***
Embrace a sharing community of sustainable justice low-carbon diversity
***
W. Brewster Gillett b...@fdi.usPortland, OR  USA
***
Simply because you don't like to hear it, that doesn't make it untrue.
***

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] HELP, please/reid

2010-01-04 Thread Reid Thompson

Brewster Gillett wrote:


Reid Thompson wrote:


I see the same from head approx 2 weeks ago (will rebuild from head
today).  I've never found it to be an issue though.  I tend to use the
search box and/or autocomplete to find addresses that I need.


I find autocomplete, in any program, to be less than optimal, so to
me it's easier to hit the TO: and scroll down. 


I thought the search function available in compose mode only searched
the body of the message? Are you saying it can be set to search the
Address Book?
no... the To address entry field will autocomplete addresses ( not sure if this is default or requires some 
checkbox to be ticked somewhere ).. I'm currently at home so don't have easy access to my evo.  I can 
generally type 3 characters of an address in the To entry field and allow autocomplete to do the rest, hit 
enter, type 3 chars of the next address that I want, let autocomplete do the rest, repeat


In the address book itself, when i use it, i tend to do a similar thing... type in 3 chars in the search field 
and then dbl click the one i want..


Brewster wrote earlier:


(2) There are contacts that appear in the latter list but do not
show up in the former one. Which means they cannot be edited.


Reid Thompson wrote:


I don't know whether this issue exists for me or not.  I've not noticed
it, but that's not to say that it doesn't exist for me.  Are the
contacts being merged from a different 'list'?

reid


Absolutely not - they all came into 2.28.1 as a bunch from my earlier
version of Evo.

I am really finding all of this very puzzling, which is highly
uncomfortable; I'm not generally this puzzled over something which
should be fairly simple :-)

Brewster

2.28.1 under Ubuntu 9.10



___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] HELP/new explanation for Sylvia

2010-01-04 Thread Nick Jenkins
 But when I access the second instance,
 the pop-up that responds to the TO: in the EDIT (email composing)
 mode, that window is ignoring the instruction, and displaying the
 Contacts sorted on Full Name, rather than on the File Under field.

I observe the same behaviour in Evo 2.26.1; if it's still happening in
2.28, then suggest logging it as a new item in bugzilla.

 The reason I am finding the lack of responses to this query so
 puzzling
 is very simple: it seems that either nobody else has experienced
 this, or that they have, and have ignored it.

I think most people use auto-complete on a partially typed name or email
address, rather than clicking the To button, which is probably the
primary explanation for people's quietness.

 Is it possible that people would actually put up with
 having their Contacts incorrectly sorted every time they need to
 retrieve one when composing an email?

In general, I suspect the File under field is not being used as
consistently throughout Evo as it could be.

For example, in the contact editor dialog, I think File under should
be used consistently as the name of the dialog box, which is logged as:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=575312
(obviously that's a very low-priority bug, but I think it's symptomatic
that there are a few remaining places in Evo's UI where full name is
used when file under should be used instead as the display name and/or
sort order).

-- All the best,
Nick.

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


[Evolution] End Bulleted List by pressing Enter twice?

2010-01-04 Thread hspcd

In OpenOffice and in Thunderbird I can end a bulleted list and return to
'paragraph' form just by hitting the Enter key twice.  This makes a lot of
sense and I have seen this same behavior even in Microsoft applications. 
Evolution doesn't seem to support this.  If I have a bulleted list in
Evolution and I hit enter a couple of times it just gives me two bulleted
lines with no text.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/End-Bulleted-List-by-pressing-Enter-twice--tp27022831p27022831.html
Sent from the Gnome Evolution - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list