Re: [Evolution] Mailing list filters
On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 10:03 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 14:22 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: But again, it's common sense on most lists It's not common sense, in any way. Someone who's never used mailing lists before will not just inherently understand this without needing instruction. Rather, it's a learned behavior that is obtained by interacting with the community and learning what the community standards and practices are. The common sense is to follow the standard of the community and indeed different lists are different communities. that means allowing posts from non-subscribers and replying to all, not just to the mailing list, to ensure non-subscribers are not dropped. Anyway, that's the way I run my mailing lists and the way I'll continue to interact with other, similarly-targeted lists, by default. Thank you that you didn't Cc'ed me ;). ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
[Evolution] Ability to reply to HTML email with same HTML format as it was received
Hi, Is there any way to keep the same (or almost) HTML format when replying ? Setting reply format to HTML doesn't help as the original message format is still lost. Some discussion about this (for kmail) : https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86423 Thanks ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] [Offtopic] Mailing list filters
On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 05:59 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: David, by your point of view, with quasi everybody add to the Cc header, why do we have mailing lists at all? For one reason, mailing lists exist because they are public and have archives, and because people who are interested in the mailing list topic can join the list themselves instead of requiring the message author to know these people by name on a planet with a few billion inhabitants. There might be more reasons. Or people. andre -- Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
[Evolution] OR statement in filter rules condition
In the message rules, is there a equivalent to an OR statement within a condition? One of my filter rules is dependent on the sender with a variable of different subject lines. Adding an additional condition with rule match to any won't work. Example: Sender: Contains: email address Subject: Contains: Schedule OR Plan OR Docket OR Program OR Agendum Does Evo already have mechanism already in place that addresses this that I just missed? Thanks guys! CentOS 7, Evo 3.8.5 EWS JM signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Ability to reply to HTML email with same HTML format as it was received
On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 08:16 +, D'Eimar De Jabrun Guillaume wrote: Is there any way to keep the same (or almost) HTML format when replying ? Setting reply format to HTML doesn't help as the original message format is still lost. Please always mention your Evolution version. Also, what does lost exactly mean? Evolution's previous mail composer backend did not support CSS. This is fixed in version 3.16 to be released this month. andre -- Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Cannot get email on machine authenticated to windows active directory
On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 12:26 -0500, Richardson, Steve wrote: When I click on the mail account, I get a red banner with the heading, Failed to open folder. That's followed by a smaller line stating, The reported error was The name org.gnome.KrbAuthDialog was not provided by any .service files. Is the krb5-auth-dialog package installed? andre -- Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
[Evolution] Cannot get email on machine authenticated to windows active directory
I'm running Linux Mint 17.1 which is authenticated thru our windows active directory. No problems there. Added my employers email account into Evolution via mapi (Evolution version 3.10.4); authenticated without a problem. I can see my contacts, calendar, tasks, etc.; now comes the problem. When I click on the mail account, I get a red banner with the heading, Failed to open folder. That's followed by a smaller line stating, The reported error was The name org.gnome.KrbAuthDialog was not provided by any .service files. Any all pointers would be most appreciated. Re, Steve ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] OR statement in filter rules condition
Am Dienstag, den 17.03.2015, 21:19 + schrieb Justin Musgrove: In the message rules, is there a equivalent to an OR statement within a condition? One of my filter rules is dependent on the sender with a variable of different subject lines. Adding an additional condition with rule match to any won't work. Example: Sender: Contains: email address Subject: Contains: Schedule OR Plan OR Docket OR Program OR Agendum Does Evo already have mechanism already in place that addresses this that I just missed? Thanks guys! CentOS 7, Evo 3.8.5 EWS You could create a search folder that matches on the sender address and - changing to that new virtual search folder - create a search for the subject terms. You could save that search. Alternatively, you could play with labels to accomplish that. -- thomas ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Evolution 3.15, Fedora 22 and Gnome Online Accounts
On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 17:07 +, Pete Biggs wrote: On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 10:16 -0600, Zan Lynx wrote: Evolution, or perhaps GOA has managed to screw backup and recovery yet again. Do they ever think these things through? You are using an Alpha release of a distro with a development release of an application ... and you didn't expect pain?? +1 And what is GOA, may I ask? poc ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Evolution 3.15, Fedora 22 and Gnome Online Accounts
On 03/17/2015 05:43 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 17:07 +, Pete Biggs wrote: On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 10:16 -0600, Zan Lynx wrote: Evolution, or perhaps GOA has managed to screw backup and recovery yet again. Do they ever think these things through? You are using an Alpha release of a distro with a development release of an application ... and you didn't expect pain?? +1 And what is GOA, may I ask? poc Of course I expect pain. I'd be happy to be surprised though. And anyway, as far as I can tell this particular problem would also happen to anyone using older versions of Gnome and Evolution. My message was kind of an alert of a possible problem for Evolution people so users might know what happened if they see it and developers can look into maybe fixing it. I don't need any help for this. I solved it by deleting the extra copies of the account configuration files. I also filed a bug with Fedora for Gnome Online Accounts aka GOA. Sorry for not defining the acronym earlier. ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Cannot get email on machine authenticated to windows active directory
That did it; much thanks! SDR -Original Message- From: Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.netmailto:andre%20klapper%20%3cak...@gmx.net%3e To: evolution-list@gnome.org evolution-list@gnome.orgmailto:%22evolution-l...@gnome.org%22%20%3cevolution-l...@gnome.org%3e Subject: Re: [Evolution] Cannot get email on machine authenticated to windows active directory Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 13:55:55 -0500 On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 12:26 -0500, Richardson, Steve wrote: When I click on the mail account, I get a red banner with the heading, Failed to open folder. That's followed by a smaller line stating, The reported error was The name org.gnome.KrbAuthDialog was not provided by any .service files. Is the krb5-auth-dialog package installed? andre ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] [Offtopic] Mailing list filters
On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 08:58 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 05:59 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: David, by your point of view, with quasi everybody add to the Cc header, why do we have mailing lists at all? For one reason, mailing lists exist because they are public and have archives, and because people who are interested in the mailing list topic can join the list themselves instead of requiring the message author to know these people by name on a planet with a few billion inhabitants. There might be more reasons. Or people. Andre, that is my point of view too. The resume of this point of view is that usually people subscribe to a list, so a reply to a list is all that is needed. People who are not subscribed to a list can use the archive, IOW there's either no need to Cc to anybody. JFTR sometimes the archives are only available to the list members, e.g. http://lists.jackaudio.org/listinfo.cgi/jack-devel-jackaudio.org , but it's not an open mailing list, to post to this list you need to subscribe first. Again, sometimes it makes sense to reply to the list and Cc, but that is only useful for a few exceptions. What's the point to use the Cc approach as standard procedure, when replying to a mailing list? I dislike to receive mails that don't include the mailing list headers. There's no reason for Tom and David to Cc me, resp. to Cc to the list and send to me. IMO I'm polite by trying to explain, why they should reply to the list only. Why do they use the Cc approach? For this list, when replying to subscribers, there's no need to Cc. Regards, Ralf PS: David, Tom, please if you send a mail to the mailing list, then for the same mail don't reply to me privately in addition. PPS: Enough said. I can't contribute anything else to this thread. ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
[Evolution] Evolution 3.15, Fedora 22 and Gnome Online Accounts
Evolution, or perhaps GOA has managed to screw backup and recovery yet again. Do they ever think these things through? A full account restore from a system of a different host name resulted in doubled online accounts in $HOME/.config/evolution/sources. Like so: $ grep AccountId=account_1425514256_0 -r . ./1425514256.2013.0@orpheus.source:AccountId=account_1425514256_0 ./1426523640.2025.14@felis.source:AccountId=account_1425514256_0 Now really what kind of sense does that make? I haven't looked into it all the way. This might be GOA's fault. But anyway. Sper annoying. ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Evolution 3.15, Fedora 22 and Gnome Online Accounts
On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 10:16 -0600, Zan Lynx wrote: Evolution, or perhaps GOA has managed to screw backup and recovery yet again. Do they ever think these things through? I have no idea who is they but if you're after being aggressive, https://wiki.gnome.org/Foundation/CodeOfConduct is worth a read. If you had an actual question, bring it up after calming down. Thanks, andre -- Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Evolution 3.15, Fedora 22 and Gnome Online Accounts
On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 10:16 -0600, Zan Lynx wrote: Evolution, or perhaps GOA has managed to screw backup and recovery yet again. Do they ever think these things through? You are using an Alpha release of a distro with a development release of an application ... and you didn't expect pain?? A full account restore from a system of a different host name resulted in doubled online accounts in $HOME/.config/evolution/sources. What sort of restore? A filesystem level restore or restoring from a backup made in Evolution (on a different machine)? Like so: $ grep AccountId=account_1425514256_0 -r . ./1425514256.2013.0@orpheus.source:AccountId=account_1425514256_0 ./1426523640.2025.14@felis.source:AccountId=account_1425514256_0 Now really what kind of sense does that make? Did you clear out all the info from the Evolution data stores or did you just restore over the top of other info (and hence get two copies)? I haven't looked into it all the way. This might be GOA's fault. But anyway. Sper annoying. Since these are development releases of both OS and application, then once you have worked out what's wrong the best thing is to file a bug against the appropriate component. P. ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Evolution 3.15, Fedora 22 and Gnome Online Accounts
On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 17:44 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 10:16 -0600, Zan Lynx wrote: Evolution, or perhaps GOA has managed to screw backup and recovery yet again. Do they ever think these things through? I have no idea who is they but if you're after being aggressive, https://wiki.gnome.org/Foundation/CodeOfConduct is worth a read. If you had an actual question, bring it up after calming down. It sounds like a bug, not a question. Which lives in bugzilla. -- dwmw2 smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] OR statement in filter rules condition
On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 21:19 +, Justin Musgrove wrote: In the message rules, is there a equivalent to an OR statement within a condition? CentOS 7, Evo 3.8.5 EWS Hi, not for your version, but the upcoming 3.16.0 has so called Free form expressions where you can combine 'and', 'or' and 'not' subparts. There might be a user manual entry for it, but at least the bug report link: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=550796#c10 Sender: Contains: email address Subject: Contains: Schedule OR Plan OR Docket OR Program OR Agendum This might look like: All conditions are met [ Sender ] [contains] [email] [ Free form expression ] [ or:(s:Schedule s:Plan s:Docket s:Program s:Agendum) ] Alternatively, both as a free form expression only: and:(f:email or:(s:Schedule s:Plan s:Docket s:Program s:Agendum)) Anyway, this is 3.16.0+ material, making things easier. Your version supports expressions too, but of a different syntax (not much different, but still). Make your filter rule look like: All conditions are met [ Sender ] [contains] [email] [ Expression ] [ or((header-contains Subject Schedule) (header-contains Subject Plan) (header-contains Subject Docket) (header-contains Subject Program) (header-contains Subject Agendum)) ] Bye, Milan ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
