Re: [Evolution] Gmail integration w. Evolution

2016-11-21 Thread David Woodhouse
On Mon, 2016-11-21 at 21:49 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-11-21 at 19:31 +0100, Bart Vliegen wrote:
> > I tried that before (editing the /sources-files, rebooting etc), it
> > didn't work. 
> 
> Hi,
> okay, I tried it here and I see a difference. When I set
>    UseNamespace=true
> and use either
>    Namespace=[Gmail]
> or
>    Namespace=[Gmail]/
> then only folders under the [Gmail]/* are shown, all the top-level
> folders, which correspond to web UI's labels, are gone in the view. The
> only problem is that the folder tree still looks like
> 
>    Inbox
>    [Gmail]
>   Drafts
>   
>    Junk
>    Trash
> 
> which is not what you want.
> 
> I do not recall whether it worked differently in the past, I'm sorry.

Perhaps best just to file a bug for the wrongful removal of that GUI
feature.

-- 
dwmw2

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Gmail integration w. Evolution

2016-11-21 Thread David Woodhouse
On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 12:39 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> it sounds like you set a different IMAP namespace in the Thunderbird.
> Evolution's IMAP can do it too, it's only hidden from the UI since some
> older version (years ago). There is a plan to add some "Advanced IMAP"
> settings in the UI, but there is no time frame when it would be.
> 
> Anyway, back to the point: depending on the way you configured your
> account, either in the Evolution itself, or using GNOME/Ubuntu Online
> Accounts, (the later possibly not available in your OpenSUSE) search
> either
>    ~/.config/evolution/sources/
> or
>    ~/.cache/evolution/sources/
> 
> for *.source files which contain a line
>    [Imapx Backend]
> and also reference your Gmail address. Under that line you can see
> several keys, while the two you are looking for are:
>    Namespace=
>    UseNamespace=false
> 
> You write to the first the same thing your wrote to the Thunderbird,
> then you also change the second to be:
>    UseNamespace=true

Ewww. I hope whoever removed this from the GUI *before* creating the
'Advanced IMAP' setting is fully ashamed of themselves. We shouldn't be
making stuff that *was* simple, this hard.

-- 
dwmw2

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Version of Evolution that can compile on Centos 7

2016-11-21 Thread Rocketrrt
Hi Milan,

Thanks for the information.  I will look at other distributions to if there
is a stabl ones that I don not to change every 6 month to year (fedora).

Thanks again,

Ron



--
View this message in context: 
http://gnome-evolution-general.1774414.n4.nabble.com/Version-of-Evolution-that-can-compile-on-Centos-7-tp4664592p4664596.html
Sent from the Gnome Evolution - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Gmail integration w. Evolution

2016-11-21 Thread Milan Crha
On Mon, 2016-11-21 at 19:31 +0100, Bart Vliegen wrote:
> I tried that before (editing the /sources-files, rebooting etc), it
> didn't work. 

Hi,
okay, I tried it here and I see a difference. When I set
   UseNamespace=true
and use either
   Namespace=[Gmail]
or
   Namespace=[Gmail]/
then only folders under the [Gmail]/* are shown, all the top-level
folders, which correspond to web UI's labels, are gone in the view. The
only problem is that the folder tree still looks like

   Inbox
   [Gmail]
  Drafts
  
   Junk
   Trash

which is not what you want.

I do not recall whether it worked differently in the past, I'm sorry.

Bye,
Milan
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Version of Evolution that can compile on Centos 7

2016-11-21 Thread Milan Crha
On Mon, 2016-11-21 at 10:09 -0800, Rocketrrt wrote:
> What is latest-ed version of evolution that can be compiled
> with out having to redo the Gnome Desktop.

Hi,
the evolution doesn't depend on the GNOME Desktop, it's the opposite.
If you'd like to update evolution, then you should also compile
evolution-data-server, and this evolution-data-server is used by GNOME
Desktop, notably by GNOME Shell and others. The versions between yours
3.12.11 and 3.22.x contain several API changes in the evolution-data-
server, thus to have it properly running you would need to compile the
other dependencies as well.

> I will going to 7.3 shortly, but I don't think it has any upgrades to
> Gnome Desktop or Evolution.

There had been done updates, but no stable version updates, "only" bug
fixes had been done.

> I tried the 3.22 Evolution but it complained, sound like I need
> upgrade the Gnome Desktop also,

It depends on the actual error message. You can compile into a separate
prefix and run background D-Bus services manually, but the GNOME
Shell's calendar server makes it difficult (it keeps restarting the
evolution-calendar-factory background process, which is rather bad).

> I don't think I want to that on a production servers.

I agree, doing such things into the core of the Desktop (the
evolution-data-server API changes) is not good to in the production
machine. Better to wait for the distribution changes (if there will be
any), or use a distribution which provides newer evolution, if you need
it. It can be even in a virtual machine.

Bye,
Milan
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Gmail integration w. Evolution

2016-11-21 Thread Bart Vliegen
Milan Crha schreef op ma 21-11-2016 om 14:50 [+0100]:
> On Sat, 2016-11-19 at 13:29 +0100, Bart Vliegen wrote:
> > I found out that it isn't the IMAP namespace, but the IMAP server
> > directory that is set in Thunderbird. I can't find this setting in
> > the /sources files. Is it possible to set the IMAP server directory
> > in Evolution?
> 
>   Hi,
> I'd say it's just a different software (Thunderbird versus Evolution)
> and different terminology for the same thing. Try what I suggested and
> you'll see. Either it'll work, or not. You can always revert the
> change.

I tried that before (editing the /sources-files, rebooting etc), it
didn't work. 

regards,
Bart

___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


[Evolution] Version of Evolution that can compile on Centos 7

2016-11-21 Thread Rocketrrt
Hi,

I am currently using Evolution 3.12.11 on Cent-OS 7.2 with 3.14.2 Gnome
desktop.  What is latest-ed version of evolution that can be compiled with
out having to redo the Gnome Desktop.  The other option is to wait and see
if it is upgraded it a newer release, I will going to 7.3 shortly, but I
don't think it has any upgrades to Gnome Desktop or Evolution, still reading
the documentation.  Anybody have any idea when Red Hat will upgrading to a
newer version?  From history they might not be doing  anything until Red-Hat
8.0 which is years away.

I tried the 3.22 Evolution but it complained, sound like I need upgrade the
Gnome Desktop also, I don't think I want to that on a production servers.

Thanks,

Ron



--
View this message in context: 
http://gnome-evolution-general.1774414.n4.nabble.com/Version-of-Evolution-that-can-compile-on-Centos-7-tp4664592.html
Sent from the Gnome Evolution - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Forward Color

2016-11-21 Thread Rocketrrt
Hi,

 Thanks for the info.

Ron



--
View this message in context: 
http://gnome-evolution-general.1774414.n4.nabble.com/Forward-Color-tp4664540p4664591.html
Sent from the Gnome Evolution - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Gmail integration w. Evolution

2016-11-21 Thread Milan Crha
On Sat, 2016-11-19 at 13:29 +0100, Bart Vliegen wrote:
> I found out that it isn't the IMAP namespace, but the IMAP server
> directory that is set in Thunderbird. I can't find this setting in
> the /sources files. Is it possible to set the IMAP server directory
> in Evolution?

Hi,
I'd say it's just a different software (Thunderbird versus Evolution)
and different terminology for the same thing. Try what I suggested and
you'll see. Either it'll work, or not. You can always revert the
change.
Bye,
Milan
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Search for exact phrase in body of mail messages

2016-11-21 Thread Milan Crha
On Mon, 2016-11-14 at 10:32 +0100, Andrea Vai wrote:
> when I need to find an exact phrase (i.e. I put it in double quotes,
> "my search strings") in the search box
> ...
> 
> Is it by design, or a (known?) bug, or am I missing something?

Hi,
it's by design. Do it the same as you did above, quote multiple words
to make them the search code understand as one word, not as multiple,
aka
   my search string
are three separate words, while
   "my search string"
behaves like an exact phrase.

There are multiple factors related, like what account type the folder
you search in is, because some searches can be left up to the server
(for example in case of the IMAP it is, thus one doesn't need to have
downloaded all messages locally).
Bye,
Milan
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Forward Color

2016-11-21 Thread Milan Crha
On Fri, 2016-11-11 at 11:53 -0800, Rocketrrt wrote:
> Hi All, I am using Evolution 3.12.11. I am having a issue with color
> on replies or forwarding messages.

Hi,
while what Pete said is true, I want to add that the message composer
in your version doesn't understand CSS (cascading styles) used in HTML
messages. That had been added only in WebKit-based composers (and it
was one of the reasons to use WebKit as a composer) for 3.16.0+ of the
evolution. The preview panel already uses WebKit for message rendering,
thus you see the colors properly there.
Bye,
Milan
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list