Re: [Evolution] Evolution, Google and SSL/TLS problem
On Sun, 2016-06-26 at 10:58 +0200, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote: > I'm happy with > my current OS (Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS) Ubuntu 10.04.4LTS is no longer supported: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases > and installing a new system and setting > up everything again the way I want it to be is just a huge waste of > time... You can upgrade Ubuntu without reconfiguring your system: http://www.ubuntu.com/download/desktop/upgrade In this case though because 10.04.4 is so old, a fresh install would probably be easier (and safer) if you want to go to the latest (16.04). Regards -- Ian ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Messages with large text attachments bog Evolution down
On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 17:16 -0700, Tim Wescott wrote: > Yesterday a customer sent me an email with a long (400kB) text file > attached. > > Clicking on the mail seriously bogs Evolution down You don't say which version of Evolution which might be important. I get the same problem on CentOS 7 with Evolution 3.8.5. Notices sent from environment monitoring with 3 text attachments cause evolution to freeze for ~ 4 minutes. I tried running with debugging turned on and with strace but didn't get any more clues. My current workaround is to filter those messages to a separate folder and process them in alpine. -- Ian ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] EWS Cannot resolve hostname
On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 07:35 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: I would checkout proxy settings, maybe evolution uses proxy which cannot connect to the destination host. The settings is at Edit- Preferences-Network Preferences, select Direct Connection there. That was it. I changed the proxy setting from Use system defaults to Direct connection to the Internet and now it works. Thanks -- Ian ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
[Evolution] EWS Cannot resolve hostname
Hi I've configured Evolution to connect to our exchange server with EWS. Versions are: evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu1 evolution-ews 3.10.2-0ubuntu2 Everything went smoothly with the configuration - the correct URL was found - but when I try to authenticate I get this debugging output: HTTP/1.1 2 Cannot resolve hostname (exchange.our.domain) Soup-Debug-Timestamp: 1424816438 Soup-Debug: ESoapMessage 0 (0x7fccc800d140) /etc/resolv.conf has the correct name servers listed and the hostname resolves with host, nslookup or dig. Adding the exchange servers address to /etc/hosts made no difference. Removing the entry 'mdns4_minimal [NOTFOUND=return]' from /etc/nsswitch.conf also made no difference. The same settings are working fine on Centos 7 with evolution 3.8.5. Any idea why EWS can't resolve the server hostname on Ubuntu 14.04? Thanks -- Ian ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
[Evolution] Calendar and GAL not working with exchange 2010
Hi With Evolution 3.4.3 mapi connection to Exchange 2010, the Exchange Calendar doesn't show and lookups in the Global address list fail. Accessing the calendar gets this error after a long delay: Error loading calendar Timeout was reached Accessing the address book gets this error after a delay: Unable to open address book This address book cannot be opened. This either means that an incorrect URI was entered, or the server is unreachable. A couple of other things: firewall is turned off and selinux disabled This is a fresh install of Fedora 17 and a new user account so no legacy from older versions. This was all working well last week with Evolution 3.0.3 on Fedora 15. Are there any known problems connecting 3.4.3 to Exchange 2010? Thanks -- Ian ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Add more accounts on MAPI
On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 11:13 +0200, Josu Lazkano wrote: Hello again, is there anyone with this configuration? I'm using Evolution 3.0.2 (on Fedora 15) with 2 MAPI accounts and a couple of IMAP accounts. It's working fine (apart from known problems with 3.0.2). -- Ian ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] (no subject)
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 01:24 +1000, Mike Terryberry wrote: Why doesn't Evolution have a Deleted Items folder? Look in the Trash folder. That's a virtual folder. You can also see your deleted messages by going to the View menu and setting Show Deleted Messages which will then appear with a line through them in the original folder. -- Ian ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Alert when sending to unqualified addresses.
On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 10:36 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: It's probably easier just to add the fully-qualified address to your contacts list so Evo will insert it when matching a prefix. In this case it'll be easier to ignore the alert by clicking Send than to add all internal users to the contacts. It would be nice if the alert could be disabled but it's probably not worth logging an enhancement request for such a low priority request. Thanks -- Ian ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Alert when sending to unqualified addresses.
On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 10:36 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: File an Enhancement Request if you'd like this changed Request for an enhancement logged: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=637906 -- Ian ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
[Evolution] Alert when sending to unqualified addresses.
Just upgraded to 2.32.1 and so far everything is going well except that any message to to an unqualified address gets an alert: Are you sure you want to send a message with invalid address? The following recipient was not recognized as a valid mail address: Under Composer Preferences/General/Alerts there are a number of useful alerts that can be turned on or off but not this one. Is there a way to disable this alert. I can click on Send to have the mail delivered but I do this a lot and I'd rather not have the alert pop up every time. Another option, I guess, would be to set a default address to be added automatically to unqualified addresses but I can't see a way to configure that either. Thanks -- Ian ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Evolution Help
On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 16:17 -0400, Bill Wright wrote: Today when attempting to send mail, I noticed that send/receive icon is GRAYED OUT thus not functional. Does the connection icon at the bottom left show evolution is working offline? If so try clicking the icon to put it online. -- Ian ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Question about Google Chrome
On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 17:52 +0200, philippe_pfeif...@bluewin.ch wrote: Usually Firefox opens, I just wonder, is there a possibility to open Google Chrome instead? That's a desktop setting. For example if your desktop is gnome go to System/Preferences/Preferred Applications and set your Web Browser appropriately. -- Ian ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Installing evolution
On Sat, 2010-06-05 at 09:34 -0700, larrysl...@znet.com wrote: Hello, I have downloaded and extracted evolution 2.30.1 in Fedora 10. How do I install 2.30.1? You can't (not easily anyway). If you want evolution 2.30.1 you'll have to upgrade to Fedora 13. Fedora 10 has been out of support for 5 months so it would be a good idea to upgrade. -- Ian ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Evolution Crashes frequently
On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 07:26 -0700, David L wrote: I think my situation is aggravated by using evolution-exchange That was my experience. Evolution with evolution-exchange (and particularly with the gal enabled) crashed often. Connecting to Exchange with imap has been much better. -- Ian ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Getting list of public folders
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 15:34 -0400, ed...@aim.com wrote: Why does Evolution try to load the list of public folders when it starts up and refreshes the mailbox? We have over 30,000 public folders and it takes forever to finish refreshing the mailbox. Is there a way to shut this off? Your Exchange admins can do it by disabling public folders for your account. -- Ian ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Does Evolution really need to be so terribly bad?
On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 11:23 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: Is this also the case when your account is exchange-based? I have no direct knowledge of this, but I believe Evo tries to be consistent and applies the IMAP model across the board. It also does it with local (i.e. POP) mail. The last time I connected Evolution to Exchange was with 2.12. At that time it followed the Exchange model: deleted messages were moved to the Deleted Items folder. I haven't been able to get 2.22.3.1 to work with our Exchange server except as an imap client so I can't say if that's still the case. -- Ian ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Does Evolution really need to be so terribly bad?
On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 18:09 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: Is your server running Exchange 2007? I have no problems with Exchange 2003 and Evo 2.22.3.1. 2003. I have to admit I didn't try very hard to get it configured. imap suits me better in most respects. -- Ian ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Does Evolution really need to be so terribly bad?
On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 00:13 +1000, Bernhard Beyen wrote: The first thing I noticed was that emails that have been deleted are moved to Trash as should be but from there individual deletion of emails is not possible any more as only the entire folder can be purged. That's because the Trash folder is a virtual folder not a real folder. When you delete a message it's not removed, it's just marked as deleted and not shown by default. The Trash virtual folder shows all the messages which have been marked as deleted. Messages aren't actually deleted until you Expunge the Trash (which removes all deleted messages) or Expunge in a folder which removes all deleted messages in that folder. You can configure evolution to show messages marked for deletion by unchecking Hide Deleted Messages in the View menu. You can configure evolution to Empty Trash folders automatically at a set interval in Edit/Preferences/Mail Preferences/General/Delete Mail. What you can't do (as far as I know) is have deleted or expunged mail moved to a real (not virtual) Trash folder (which would be a nice option to have). -- Ian ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Moving to Evo from Thunderbird?
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 11:38 -0500, Chris Williams wrote: I can't be the only exception to this. I've been using Evo since it's .9x days on various flavors of Fedora Core, and recently Ubuntu. In all this time, I have only seen Evo crash a handful of times. My initial impression is that Exchange users are the ones that seem to suffer the most, is that the case? Seems like it might be. I've been using Evolution for a long time also and found it very stable until we moved to Exchange. Not only does Evolution crash more often it generates a bug report on just about every exit (and has a acquired a few other annoying habits like multiple password prompts). The Exchange connector also crashes sometimes so although Evolution is still running it can't connect to the Exchange server. A few linux users here have moved from Evolution to thunderbird after being migrated to Exchange (which is ironic when Evolution is the only linux client our Exchange service officially support). Maybe things will improve when Evolution can do MAPI. -- Ian ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Re: [Evolution] Exchange and GAL port
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 10:56 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: Evolution GAL uses the openldap to fetch addresses. It should be using the ldap port. Try using ldap calls to your server to see if you can get the replies from your GAL server. Yes that works. The exchange admins posted the wrong server address. With the AD ldap server address it works fine. Thanks for the reply -- Ian ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
[Evolution] Exchange and GAL port
We're moving to Exchange (sigh). Everything is working except the GAL always times out (after a long delay). Some packet sniffing showed evolution was sending to port 3268 on the global catalog server but no replies ever came back. The reply from the Exchange admins was: From what we understand evolution uses the webfrontend to do all it's communication to all the traffic should be over port 80. I believe Evolution does do some of it's communication over webdav but judging by the packet sniffing results, it's trying to connect to the global catalog server on port 3268 not port 80. I did try appending :80 to the server address but that didn't work. Which port on the catalog server should Evolution be connecting to? Is there any way to change the port (apart from modifying the source)? Would changing the port help in any case? Thanks -- Ian ___ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
