Re: [Evolution] Assign Color, Move | Move, Assign Color Action - Filter

[Justin Musgrove]

On Tue, 2019-10-01 at 21:39 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-10-01 at 12:14 +0000, Justin Musgrove wrote:
> > What is the correct action order to set the color and move to a
> > folder?
> 
>   Hi,
> the Move operation basically stops processing, because the source
> message is non-existent after the move. That means that the Move
> should
> be after all other actions on the message.
> 
> The colors are kind of special thing, stored only locally. It's
> possible the color was not "inherited" to the destination message.
> Contrary, labels can be stored on the server (when it supports it),
> thus they can survive, because the server moves them over together
> with
> the message.
> 
> > The set colors do work every time using the "Select All, C-y" method
> > after the move is completed.
> 
> It's because it changes the destination message info, not the source
> message info.
> 
> I tried it here, with the current development version (to be 3.35.1).
> I
> noticed that the message in the destination folder had set the color
> after it had been moved, but when I entered the destination folder the
> EWS recognized there was some change and it refreshed the folder
> content, together with the local information for the new message,
> which
> resulted in the lost of the color information stored on the message
> info (I noticed the color was there when I entered the folder, then
> the
> message flashed and it was back in usual color).
> 
> Maybe the color tag could be special-cased on the evolution-ews side.
> I
> do not know whether there are more affected.
> 
> Feel free to file a bug at:
> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/evolution-ews/issues/new
> 
>   Bye,
>   Milan
> 

Excellent explanation. Submitted #71
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/evolution-ews/issues/71

-JM
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

[Evolution] Assign Color, Move | Move, Assign Color Action - Filter

[Justin Musgrove]

Evo: 3.28.5 (CentOS77) with EWS

What is the correct action order to set the color and move to a folder?
I have tried it both ways and get mixed/non-consistent results. The move
action always works, however the set color is mixed. The label action
consistently works, but I was trying to avoid unnecessary labels. I
watched the CAMEL_DEBUG=filters and didn't notice anything particularly
weird. These filters are high on the order list as they are used for
mailing-lists.

The set colors do work every time using the "Select All, C-y" method
after the move is completed.

I have tried both:
   1 set color
   2 move to folder
   3 quit proc
And
   1 move to foler
   2 set color
   3 quit proc

Surely I'm missing something simple here.

-JM
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Re: [Evolution] [EXTERNAL] - Re: pkcs7 smime signing always attachment

[Justin Musgrove]

On Tue, 2019-09-17 at 15:10 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-09-17 at 12:21 +0000, Justin Musgrove wrote:
> > evo:
> > --=-W2fyUEzwOWIHsaTn7POv
> > Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s"
> > Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s"
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
> > 
> > outlook:
> > --=_NextPart_000_0052_01D56C93.B184CB40
> > Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s"
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
> > Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s"
> 
> 
>   Hi,
> if I read it correctly, then, apart of the order, it's only about the
> used Content-Type. This particular thing had been changed recently,
> with [1]. The change is included in evolution-data-server 3.34.0. Note
> the application/x-pkcs7-signature is not as that wrong [2].
>   Bye,
>   Milan
> 
> [1] 
> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/evolution-data-server/merge_requests/17
> [2] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2311#appendix-C.1
> 
> ___
> evolution-list mailing list
> evolution-list@gnome.org
> To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Yep, that's it. Maybe i'll upgrade to fedora workstation in the
future... maybe. Realistically CentOS 8 a year or two after it's out.

-JM
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

[Evolution] pkcs7 smime signing always attachment

[Justin Musgrove]

Evolution: 3.28.5-2.el7 (CentOS 7), EWS Exchange

When I digitally sign emails with a smartcard, it indicates the email
has an attachment. Is there a setting to sign the emails without
indicating an attachment? Just curious.

Getting some complaints from other people that all my emails have
attachments. However, we have some users with Outlook and their
digitally signed emails do not indicate an attachment. Below is the
difference between evolution signing and outlook.


# Excerpt START

evo:
--=-W2fyUEzwOWIHsaTn7POv
Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s"
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64

outlook:
--=_NextPart_000_0052_01D56C93.B184CB40
Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s"

# Excerpt END

Oh and keep up the good work evo team, best email client out there.

-JM
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Re: [Evolution] [EXTERNAL] - Re: Drag and Drop to PDF

[Justin Musgrove]

On Thu, 2019-06-06 at 20:44 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-06-06 at 18:05 +0000, Justin Musgrove wrote:
> > Evolution 3.28.5-2.el7 on CentOS 7.6
> > 
> > Setting the dconf value drag-and-drop-save-file-format to 'pdf' is
> > causing evolution to hang after dragging the email to gnome files.
> > 
> > Works great with the 'mbox' value, just not pdf.
> 
> Feel free to install debug packages, then run Evolution in gdb and
> when
> it hangs, press Ctrl+C, get a stacktrace, and file a bug report in
> the
> issue tracker of CentOS if CentOS still supports the old version
> 3.28.
> 
https://wiki.gnome.org/Community/GettingInTouch/Bugzilla/GettingTraces/Details#obtain-a-stacktrace
> 
> andre
> --
> Andre Klapper  |  ak...@gmx.net
> https://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/
> 

Thanks! Done
https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=16158

-JM
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

[Evolution] Drag and Drop to PDF

[Justin Musgrove]

Evolution 3.28.5-2.el7 on CentOS 7.6

Setting the dconf value drag-and-drop-save-file-format to 'pdf' is
causing evolution to hang after dragging the email to gnome files.

Works great with the 'mbox' value, just not pdf.

-JM
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Re: [Evolution] trying to set up smart card crashes evolution

[Justin Musgrove]

On Tue, 2015-06-30 at 08:24 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-06-29 at 21:55 +0200, ultraviole...@arcor.de wrote:
> > I cannot reproduce the crash with latest version (3.16.2.1-1). When 
> > I 
> > open the signing/encrypting certificate nothing is offered, where 
> > Thunderbird still works. What can I do to find out the reason?
> 
>   Hi,
> one of my coworkers found some steps to make the smart-card reader
> work. Even though it is for an ancient system and evolution, it may 
> be
> still relevant in some parts. I cannot test it, I do not have a smart
> card, but it worked for him.
> 
> Citation follows:
> 
> 1) evolution now uses standard combo of system sql:/etc/pki/nssdb and
> user sql:$HOME/.pki/nssdb databases
> 2) evolution runs as regular user but nss tools (modutil, nss-gui)
> remove read access from /etc/pki/nssdb/pkcs11.txt. The net result is
> that evolution is unaware of the module unless the permissions are 
> back
> to 0644 or the module is added to user's database as well
> 3) evolution only reads certificates upon it's start so you have to
> restart evo after you plug the card in
> 
> So the steps for coolkey-based cards are:
> 1) (as root) add coolkey module to your nssdb:
> # modutil -dbdir sql:/etc/pki/nssdb -add "CoolKey PKCS#11 Module" 
> -libfile /usr/lib64/pkcs11/libcoolkeypk11.so
> 2) (as root) fix the file permissions again:
> # chmod 0644 /etc/pki/nssdb/pkcs11.txt
> 3) plug in the reader & card if you haven't done so yet
> 4) restart evolution
> 5) go to Preferences - Certificates and you should see the 
> certificates
> that reside on the smartcard
> 
>   Bye,
>   Milan

Awesome! I have been looking for this exact fix!

JM

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

[Evolution] Filters Keep jumping off the deep end

[Justin Musgrove]

All,

Fedora 22, Evo 3.16.2.1, EWS

Not sure where to report this, but evo keeps hanging on me with 100%
cpu on 1 of my cores. After some digging, I discovered that my
"filters.xml" is jumping to astronomical size after adding some new
conditions under my label filter. 

Normally it is 36K, but it was sitting at 125M. The first time I saw
this I took it as a fluke, but now it has happened to me twice. "wc -l
filters.xml" showed 2666134 lines. After using vim ":%!uniq" it is now
at 962 lines. Thought this bit of info might help somebody out
there.

JM

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

[Evolution] Smart Reader for Secure MIME

[Justin Musgrove]

Evo 3.16.2.1 EWS Fedora 22

I having an issue with evolution not detecting the smart card in my
smart reader. I have installed the necessary supporting files, like I
did for RHEL7, in which case evo 3.8 detected the smart card and worked
like a champ. Since then I upgraded to Fedora 22. Are there any special
supporting files that must be installed to allow evo to successfully
detect it? NOTE: Firefox 38.0.1 is successfully detecting the security
device.

JM

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Re: [Evolution] EWS Outbox stays empty with option [Keep in Outbox]

[Justin Musgrove]

On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 17:34 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 13:52 +0000, Justin Musgrove wrote:
> > Fedora 22, Evo 3.16.2.1 EWS
> > 
> > Where is the [outbox] that the option "Send messages through Outbox
> > folder": "Keep in Outbox" uses? I assumed it is the "Outbox"
> > folder.
> 
>   Hi,
> it's the On This Computer/Outbox folder. Evolution doesn't support 
> per
> -account Outbox folders. There is an ancient enhancement request to
> support them, but it's still not done.
>   Bye,
>   Milan

Excellent! Good to know. As long as it works somewhere. :-) 

JM

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

[Evolution] EWS Outbox stays empty with option [Keep in Outbox]

[Justin Musgrove]

Fedora 22, Evo 3.16.2.1 EWS

Where is the [outbox] that the option "Send messages through Outbox
folder": "Keep in Outbox" uses? I assumed it is the "Outbox"
folder.

I see there is an outbox, but the folder stays empty after writing an
email and pressing the send button. Is this were the email stays until
the "Send/Receive" activated?

The option does work... emails are delayed until manually acted upon
from the "Send/Receive" button. Just the Outbox stays empty. Is this
the intended action? 

JM

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Re: [Evolution] View Group By Threads

[Justin Musgrove]

On Sun, 2015-05-10 at 14:21 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-05-10 at 12:13 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > I'm seeing both those message in the same thread. In fact the 
> > first 
> > one is the start of the thread.
> 
> This is what I get by using Evolution 3.16.1. The Evolution mailing
> list doesn't have it's own folder and I'm using a POP account. JFTR
> some mails are in the Sent folder.

I'm seeing the same behavior in evo 3.16.1. The GPG Auto download is
split into two threads.

> http://picpaste.com/pics/Screenshot_2015-05-10_14-01
> -53.1431260066.png
> 
> However, the first two mails are in the Inbox folder too, but only
> shown in a group with the other mails, if I use the search filter.
> 
> http://picpaste.com/pics/Screenshot_2015-05-10_14-02-51
> -LfTy8GrK.1431259713.png
> 
> The pictures automatically will be deleted in 7 day.
> ___
> evolution-list mailing list
> evolution-list@gnome.org
> To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

JM

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Re: [Evolution] GPG Auto download pub keys

[Justin Musgrove]

On Sat, 2015-05-09 at 19:11 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sat, 09 May 2015 17:36:17 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > I totally understand what you are saying.
> 
> And I absolutely agree with your argument. However, a web of trust 
> has
> got it's weak points too.
> 
> I "automatically" trust the key package of the distro I'm using, when
> there's a release of new keys for signing packages, because the 
> chain of
> trusted keys at least is halfway comprehensible. But automatically
> accepting each key needed to check the signature of an email is 
> risky.
> A user should care about the keys and be aware about the accepted
> keys. A mouse click isn't much work.
> ___
> evolution-list mailing list
> evolution-list@gnome.org
> To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Excellent points! I don't mind the auto downloading with the exception
of not blindingly setting the trust value. That way I can manually
validate and set the trust.

JM 

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

[Evolution] GPG Auto download pub keys

[Justin Musgrove]

All,

Is there an option to automagicly download pub keys of signed gpg
emails? 

EVO 3.16.1

JM

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Re: [Evolution] "OR" statement in filter rules condition

[Justin Musgrove]

On Wed, 2015-03-18 at 18:17 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
> Once 3.16 is released, the user documentation update in unstable
> https://git.gnome.org/browse/evolution/commit/?id=0b2ddf608d1ecca0f6995ff950cbfdbfe0601bb7
>  will be available on https://help.gnome.org/users/evolution/stable/
> 
> The available syntax options can be found in
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=550796#c10
> 
> Cheers,
> andre

Thank you andre. Is there a syntax list for the old "expression"
condition? I am currently unable to utilize the new revision.

thanks!

JM


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Re: [Evolution] "OR" statement in filter rules condition

[Justin Musgrove]

On Wed, 2015-03-18 at 06:56 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> Your version supports expressions too, but of a different syntax (not 
> much different, but still). Make your filter rule look like:
> 
>All conditions are met
>[ Sender ] [contains] [email]
>[ Expression ] [ or((header-contains "Subject" "Schedule")
> (header-contains "Subject" "Plan") (header-contains "Subject"
> "Docket") (header-contains "Subject" "Program") (header-contains
> "Subject" "Agendum")) ]

Nice! I have been unable to find any documentation defining the syntax
for the "Expression" condition. Would you be able to point me in the
right direction where this syntax is defined.

Thanks!
JM


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Re: [Evolution] "OR" statement in filter rules condition

[Justin Musgrove]

On Wed, 2015-03-18 at 09:33 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> If your filter set up is fairly simple you could possibly put the set
> of
> filters at the end of the processing, then the first would be
> 
>   Sender: does not contain: email address
>   Stop Processing
> 
> Then the next filter would be
> 
>   Any of the following conditions
>   Subject: contains: word1
>   Subject: contains: word2
>   etc.
> 
> That at least cuts it down from 5 rules to 2!
> 
> P.

That's a neat trick. I wonder if I could implement that else where in my
system. Thanks! 


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

[Evolution] "OR" statement in filter rules condition

[Justin Musgrove]

In the message rules, is there a equivalent to an "OR" statement within
a condition? One of my filter rules is dependent on the "sender" with a
variable of different subject lines. Adding an additional condition with
rule match to "any" won't work.

Example:
Sender: Contains: email address
Subject: Contains: Schedule OR Plan OR Docket OR Program OR Agendum

Does Evo already have mechanism already in place that addresses this
that I just missed?

Thanks guys!

CentOS 7, Evo 3.8.5 "EWS"

JM


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Re: [Evolution] Mailing list filters

[Justin Musgrove]

Thank you all, for the fire-hose of information concerning mailing-list
netiquettes and good practice methods. I, being a *newbie* to
"mailing-lists", not *nix in general, now have full understanding to the
pros and cons in regard to different style message replies. From what I
can conclude, there is no absolute right way to reply. Therefor, every
message I post, will need to factor in a "Human" logic decision process
based on the context, addressee, purpose and public benefit factor as to
which method should best be utilized.

Again thank you for the education, plus an enjoyment factor more
entertaining than watching "12 Angry Man".

-JM


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Re: [Evolution] Empty message in preview (was: Re: white space damage in reply)

[Justin Musgrove]

On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 14:42 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 13:02 +0000, Justin Musgrove wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 12:59 +0000, Justin Musgrove wrote:
> > > Weird, This message came across as only white-space. Yet the 
> > > message was
> > > available under the message source. And then again in the "repy"
> > > message.
> > 
> > And that last message "that I sent" is blank too.
> 
> Hi,
> not for me, I see both messages fine. Does it help to move away and 
> back to the message? It should reload the preview panel and
> eventually 
> show the message content. I guess you face:
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=745545
> 
> By the way, better to not hijack threads. :-)
> Bye,
> Milan

Seems to work now. I don't use the preview pane. But closing the message
and reopening about an hour later appears to have resolved it.

-JM


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Re: [Evolution] white space damage in reply

[Justin Musgrove]

On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 12:59 +, Justin Musgrove wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 08:16 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-03-13 at 13:14 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > > There's an evolution-hackers list for developers and, more 
> > > importantly, obvious bugs in Evolution should be reported in Bugzilla
> > 
> > Hi,
> > the bugzilla ( 
> >  https://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=evolution) is 
> > preferred, it's quite hard to track issues rose on any mailing list 
> > (at least for me). So for evolution in particular use the bugzilla 
> > please. Filling proper component (in your case 'Composer') and version 
> > (in your case '3.15.x') with the commit note (like 'git master at 
> > commit 658b109', which you can see in 'git log' result) would be also 
> > helpful. The commit "number" is just like the version number in stable 
> > releases.
> > 
> > Back to the original message:
> > 
> > I'm at commit 6b9d3c0 (and also at commit 658b1095e5) of evolution and 
> > none of the two mentioned issues is exhibited with it. The line 
> > concatenation had been discussed earlier on this list, that feature is 
> > disabled for 3.16.0. The extra line break doesn't happen here, I guess 
> > it's partly related to the first issue.
> > Bye,
> > Milan
> 
> Weird, This message came across as only white-space. Yet the message was
> available under the message source. And then again in the "repy"
> message.

And that last message "that I sent" is blank too.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Re: [Evolution] white space damage in reply

[Justin Musgrove]

On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 08:16 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-03-13 at 13:14 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > There's an evolution-hackers list for developers and, more 
> > importantly, obvious bugs in Evolution should be reported in Bugzilla
> 
> Hi,
> the bugzilla ( 
>  https://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=evolution) is 
> preferred, it's quite hard to track issues rose on any mailing list 
> (at least for me). So for evolution in particular use the bugzilla 
> please. Filling proper component (in your case 'Composer') and version 
> (in your case '3.15.x') with the commit note (like 'git master at 
> commit 658b109', which you can see in 'git log' result) would be also 
> helpful. The commit "number" is just like the version number in stable 
> releases.
> 
> Back to the original message:
> 
> I'm at commit 6b9d3c0 (and also at commit 658b1095e5) of evolution and 
> none of the two mentioned issues is exhibited with it. The line 
> concatenation had been discussed earlier on this list, that feature is 
> disabled for 3.16.0. The extra line break doesn't happen here, I guess 
> it's partly related to the first issue.
> Bye,
> Milan

Weird, This message came across as only white-space. Yet the message was
available under the message source. And then again in the "repy"
message.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Re: [Evolution] Mailing list filters

[Justin Musgrove]

On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 08:39 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> you mentioned in another email in this thread that you use
> evolution-ews. That reminded me of:
>https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671893
> which your version contains, but also of:
>https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=719376
> which your version doesn't contain. Once you have the version with
> the 
> later fix you'll have the filter on the List-ID (which is the message-
> list filter using internally) working for your EWS account.
> Bye,
> Milan

Thanks Milan!

Yep, I bet that is it. I've built some filters that will hopefully
process the messages as a work around. 

I will have to wait for an update through my distro until then.


-JM


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Re: [Evolution] Mailing list filters

[Justin Musgrove]

On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 00:48 +, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Btw, when replying to a message in Evolution try selecting just the
> part
> of the email you want to reply to, then hit reply while it's selected.
> I
> think that should override the normal reply behaviour, shouldn't it?
> 

That's a nice feature, selecting only those parts to respond to.
Unfortunately, the global respond method is adhered to every time.

-JM


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Re: [Evolution] Mailing list filters

[Justin Musgrove]

On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 13:07 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> there's a big problem with the way a mailing list handles mails and
> the
> way different MUAs handle mailing list mails. The least common
> denominator is that we should only reply to the mailing list and not
> to
> anybody else, we also shouldn't post to more than one list by one
> email.
> 
> Let me explain my point of view.
> 
> Some mailing lists are open mailing lists, but most mailing lists
> require subscription. However, not all mailing lists are based on
> mailman, but most are.
> 
> For mailman mailing lists it's possible to prevent sending duplicated
> messages. The drawback then is, that we will receive the mail that was
> sent to us directly only, IOW this mail doesn't contain mailing list
> headers.
> 
> Not all MUAs behave in the same manner. There are different ways to
> handle filters and even to invoke a mailing list reply. I for example
> use Claws and Evolution. Claws invokes mailing list replies by the
> "Reply" option, while Evolution does it using the "Group Reply"
> option.
> Regarding the way a mailing list reply is invoked, Evolution most of
> the
> times handles it better than Claws does, if we don't receive
> duplicated
> messages. OTOH Claws handles some other issues better than Evolution
> does and even this issue comes with variations.
> 
> However, IMO it's important to find the least common denominator that
> works for most MUAs. For mailing lists the rule is, that most of the
> times a reply should be send to the mailing list only. There are just
> a
> few exceptions when it makes sense to Cc and those exceptional cases
> could be handled automatically, if the mailing list doesn't overwrites
> the Reply-To header. In such a case Claws does behave better than
> Evolution. It's possible to always send a mail to the list and not
> send
> a copy, if a sender didn't use a Reply-To header, but if a Reply-To
> header is used, the reply will be send to the list and to the Reply-To
> address, assumed the mailing list doesn't overwrite the Reply-To
> header.
> 
> So, the major issue is, that different MUAs behave different and that
> even mailing lists using mailman, could have different settings, even
> settings a user can't set up by the account settings, such as e.g. how
> the list handles the Reply-To header.
> 
> The approach "my needs are the most important needs and my MUA does it
> the one and only right way" is ignorant. Communities should care about
> things in common.
> 
> It's common sense to send a mail to just one mailing list and to send
> a
> reply to the mailing list only. There are exceptions, but those are
> very
> seldom for user lists, so they are unimportant for the common sense
> and
> as pointed out, it's possible to handle the Cc'ing smarter, when using
> 
> Regards,
> Ralf

Since this mailing list requires a subscription, I will address my
responses to the mailing list, so that everybody benefits from the
answers.

Will the mailman ignore/bitbucket those messages that the source address
is not subscribed? 

-JM


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Re: [Evolution] Mailing list filters

[Justin Musgrove]

On Fri, 2015-03-13 at 16:25 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-03-13 at 16:01 +, Justin Musgrove wrote:
> > That sounds like an excellent idea. I will start doing the same. For
> > now, I added another condition "Recipients, contains,
> > evolution-list@gnome.org"
> 
> Please note that when replying on mailing lists such as this one, the
> usual practice is to quote those parts of the original message you wish
> to comment on, and add your remarks below them (see the present message
> for an example). Using the Attachment option for replies is not suitable
> in this context.
> 
> poc

My apologizes for my ignorance with using an incorrect method. Is there
a method in evolution to prompt a different "reply" methods in lieu of
the global option?

JM


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Re: [Evolution] Mailing list filters

[Justin Musgrove]

That sounds like an excellent idea. I will start doing the same. For
now, I added another condition "Recipients, contains,
evolution-list@gnome.org"

-JM
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, 2015-03-13 at 15:36 +0100, Thomas Mittelstaedt wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 13.03.2015, 13:43 + schrieb Justin Musgrove:
> > First off, I am new to the Mailing Lists, so the issue that I am having
> > is probably related more to user error.
> > 
> > Using Evolution 3.8.5 on CentOS 7.
> > 
> > My issue is that I setup a "Mailing List Filter" for this "Evolution"
> > mailing list, but the filter isn't working automatically. If I press
> >  then the message is processed properly. Filter should move the
> > incoming emails to a folder. I used the context menu (Create>Create a
> > Filter Rule for Mailing List...) off one of the mailing-list emails. I
> > ensured the "Apply filters to new messages in Inbox on this server" is
> > ticked. Still the message are not properly being filtered. This seems
> > like a simple task, yet I am unable to figure it out. 
> > 
> 
> Have you checked in the filters (main Menu -> Edit -> Filters) that the
> new filter rule is there and triggers on incoming mails? Maybe it has
> gotten into outgoing mails.
> 
I have found several times, I created a filter and had it not work
although it would work if specifically ran on the folder.  I was able to
get it to work by adding an action at the bottom of the list of actions,
stating to Stop Processing.  Can't figure why, but it does work.  My
policy is to add a Stop Processing action at the bottom of every filter
"Just Because".  I think there was a thread about just this, some time
ago.

___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
--- End Message ---


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Re: [Evolution] Mailing list filters

[Justin Musgrove]

The account is using the "EWS" protocol. I have ensured that evolution
is the only client accessing the mail server. The mailing list messages
are coming in with the "New" status. I have verified that filter is
under the "Incoming" tab under filters. I double checked that there are
not any active filter rules on the server.

I'm sure I am just over looking something.

-JM
--- Begin Message ---

> 
> My issue is that I setup a "Mailing List Filter" for this "Evolution"
> mailing list, but the filter isn't working automatically. If I press
>  then the message is processed properly. Filter should move the
> incoming emails to a folder. I used the context menu (Create>Create a
> Filter Rule for Mailing List...) off one of the mailing-list emails. I
> ensured the "Apply filters to new messages in Inbox on this server" is
> ticked. Still the message are not properly being filtered. This seems
> like a simple task, yet I am unable to figure it out. 

You don't say what sort of account it is (imap, pop, ews, ...) but if
the message is being filtered correctly with Ctrl-Y then the filter
itself is working.

The issue is usually to do with what is a "New" message.  If you have
another client looking at the same mail, then the mail will not be
considered "New" if that client sees it first - note that "Unread" is
not the same as "New".  If the mail isn't New, then the filters won't be
applied.

There are some hints on sorting out filter issues in the Evolution help:

Help -> Contents -> Common Mail Questions -> Mail filters are not
working.

P.

___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
--- End Message ---


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

[Evolution] Mailing list filters

[Justin Musgrove]

First off, I am new to the Mailing Lists, so the issue that I am having
is probably related more to user error.

Using Evolution 3.8.5 on CentOS 7.

My issue is that I setup a "Mailing List Filter" for this "Evolution"
mailing list, but the filter isn't working automatically. If I press
 then the message is processed properly. Filter should move the
incoming emails to a folder. I used the context menu (Create>Create a
Filter Rule for Mailing List...) off one of the mailing-list emails. I
ensured the "Apply filters to new messages in Inbox on this server" is
ticked. Still the message are not properly being filtered. This seems
like a simple task, yet I am unable to figure it out. 

Below is an excerpt from the message source that I believe the filter
rule should be acting on. I am just over looking something here?

Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion and user queries of Evolution
 
List-Unsubscribe:
,
 
List-Archive: 
List-Post: 
List-Help: 
List-Subscribe:
,
 

-JM


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list