Re: [Evolution] Inbox too large

2009-10-01 Thread Milan Crha
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 14:47 -0700, anders70 wrote:
 Rename Inbox to e.g. Inbox_old (in case you need to rescue more)

Hi,
you can shorten the Inbox by lines you just moved to the Rescue file,
and save all your emails. Also, I wonder whether you have there only
live messages, or deleted too. As the Expunge on the folder should
shorten the file even more (but the split is necessary anyway).
Bye,
Milan

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Inbox too large

2009-10-01 Thread Benjamin L. May


On Tue, 29 Sep 2009, anders70 wrote:



Apparantly, Evolution does not actually remove messages from the inbox file,


Wow, I thought I was the only one with this problem. I've been opening up 
pine (!!!) once or twice a month to expunge all the email messages that 
evolution has been flagging as deleted...

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Inbox too large

2009-10-01 Thread Pete Biggs
On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 07:36 -0400, Benjamin L. May wrote:
 On Tue, 29 Sep 2009, anders70 wrote:
 
 
  Apparantly, Evolution does not actually remove messages from the inbox file,
 
 Wow, I thought I was the only one with this problem. I've been opening up 
 pine (!!!) once or twice a month to expunge all the email messages that 
 evolution has been flagging as deleted...

Are you saying that Expunge or Empty Trash doesn't work for you in
Evo?

Are the deleted messages visible if you untick Hide Deleted Messages?

P.

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Inbox too large

2009-10-01 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
  Apparantly, Evolution does not actually remove messages from the inbox file,
 Wow, I thought I was the only one with this problem. I've been opening up 
 pine (!!!) once or twice a month to expunge all the email messages that 
 evolution has been flagging as deleted...

? Ctrl-E doesn't work?

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Inbox too large

2009-10-01 Thread anders70

The 'interesting' point is, that the older emails in the top part of the
Inbox had already been moved to other subfolder a long time ago, without
actually beeing deleted from the Inbox file. So I didn't loose anything by
trimming the top off the Inbox file.  I supposed that moving a message,
actually first copies it, and then deletes the original. So logically, I
assumed that the messages I have moved out of the Inbox, was removed from
the Inbox file.

Now I have realized that I should have used the 'Expunge' function after
moving mails out of the Inbox, in order to ensure they are actually removed
from the Inbox file.

So hopefully I will not need the workaround of splitting/trimming the Inbox
file again.

Some sort of warning/reminder that the Inbox file is reaching a a ridiculous
size might be nice in future versions, along with an advice to use the
Expunge function :-)


-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Inbox-too-large-tp3619591p25695262.html
Sent from the Gnome Evolution - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Inbox too large

2009-10-01 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 13:25 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
 On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 02:00 -0700, anders70 wrote:
  Now I have realized that I should have used the 'Expunge' function after
  moving mails out of the Inbox, in order to ensure they are actually removed
  from the Inbox file.
 I would strongly advise everyone to turn off the Hide Deleted Messages
 function - at least then you can see what is happening.

Ditto; hide delete is a mis-feature [required by that set of users who
completely refuse to use e-mail correctly].  The best advice is not to
use it,  that way you are visually encouraged to perform Ctrl-E at
logical intervals.

  Some sort of warning/reminder that the Inbox file is reaching a a ridiculous
  size might be nice in future versions, along with an advice to use the
  Expunge function :-)
 It depends what you mean by a ridiculous size!  Some people get
 stressed if they have a inbox with more than a couple of messages in it!
 Others keep their whole life in it - and get really, really stressed if
 you even hint that they might have to reduce the size of their 2Gb inbox
 with 40,000 messages in it.

I've got one mailbox with 400,000 messages! :)

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Inbox too large

2009-10-01 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 07:36 -0400, Benjamin L. May wrote:
 On Tue, 29 Sep 2009, anders70 wrote:
 
 
  Apparantly, Evolution does not actually remove messages from the inbox file,
 
 Wow, I thought I was the only one with this problem. I've been opening up 
 pine (!!!) once or twice a month to expunge all the email messages that 
 evolution has been flagging as deleted...

http://www.go-evolution.org/FAQ#I_deleted_a_bunch_of_mail_but_my_mailbox_is_just_as_big_as_before._Why.3F

poc

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Inbox too large

2009-10-01 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 02:00 -0700, anders70 wrote:
 The 'interesting' point is, that the older emails in the top part of
 the
 Inbox had already been moved to other subfolder a long time ago,
 without
 actually beeing deleted from the Inbox file.

As has had been said many (*many* :-) times here, IMAP doesn't have a
Move operation, it only has Copy and Delete. Given that Delete means
mark for deletion, expecting that the user will do an Expunge at some
time in the future, this explains why you still have old messages
hanging around. Note that for consistency Evo uses this mechanism even
when the folder is not on an IMAP server (Exchange may be different, I
wouldn't know).

Get used to running Folder-Expunge (Ctrl-E) or File-Empty Trash once
in a while. The former is per-folder, the latter is per-account. You can
also set a Edit-Mail Preferences option to Expunge (Empty Trash
Folders) when quitting Evo.

poc

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Inbox too large

2009-10-01 Thread Xavier Bestel
On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 09:13 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
 On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 08:33 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
   I would strongly advise everyone to turn off the Hide Deleted
  Messages
   function - at least then you can see what is happening.
  
  Ditto; hide delete is a mis-feature [required by that set of users
  who completely refuse to use e-mail correctly].  The best advice is
  not to use it,  that way you are visually encouraged to perform Ctrl-E
  at logical intervals.
 
 This may be good advice for beginners, but I use Hide Deleted so I can
 see more real messages in one go. In what way am I refusing to use
 e-mail correctly?
 
 Perhaps a visual cue such as a colour change in the folder's name would
 be useful, to indicate folders with deleted messages in them.

Maybe a visual cue only when there are more than X deleted message (or
more than Y Mb of deleted messages), to exhort the user to expunge the
folder.

Xav



___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Inbox too large

2009-10-01 Thread Reid Thompson
On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 09:09 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
 On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 02:00 -0700, anders70 wrote:
  The 'interesting' point is, that the older emails in the top part of
  the
  Inbox had already been moved to other subfolder a long time ago,
  without
  actually beeing deleted from the Inbox file.
 
 As has had been said many (*many* :-) times here, IMAP doesn't have a
 Move operation, it only has Copy and Delete. Given that Delete means
 mark for deletion, expecting that the user will do an Expunge at some
 time in the future, this explains why you still have old messages
 hanging around. Note that for consistency Evo uses this mechanism even
 when the folder is not on an IMAP server (Exchange may be different, I
 wouldn't know).
 
 Get used to running Folder-Expunge (Ctrl-E) or File-Empty Trash once
 in a while. The former is per-folder, the latter is per-account. You can
 also set a Edit-Mail Preferences option to Expunge (Empty Trash
 Folders) when quitting Evo.
 
 poc

Note that File-Empty Trash does not expunge maildir folders.  A CTRL-E
in maildir folders is required until this is remedied ( i am assuming
that Empty Trash should include maildir folders ).
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Inbox too large

2009-10-01 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 15:58 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
 On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 09:13 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
  On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 08:33 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
I would strongly advise everyone to turn off the Hide Deleted
   Messages
function - at least then you can see what is happening.
   
   Ditto; hide delete is a mis-feature [required by that set of users
   who completely refuse to use e-mail correctly].  The best advice is
   not to use it,  that way you are visually encouraged to perform Ctrl-E
   at logical intervals.
  
  This may be good advice for beginners, but I use Hide Deleted so I can
  see more real messages in one go. In what way am I refusing to use
  e-mail correctly?
  
  Perhaps a visual cue such as a colour change in the folder's name would
  be useful, to indicate folders with deleted messages in them.
 
 Maybe a visual cue only when there are more than X deleted message (or
 more than Y Mb of deleted messages), to exhort the user to expunge the
 folder.

Sure, with a configurable preference option.

poc

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Inbox too large

2009-10-01 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 15:58 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
 On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 09:13 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
  On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 08:33 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
I would strongly advise everyone to turn off the Hide Deleted
   Messages
function - at least then you can see what is happening.
   
   Ditto; hide delete is a mis-feature [required by that set of users
   who completely refuse to use e-mail correctly].  The best advice is
   not to use it,  that way you are visually encouraged to perform Ctrl-E
   at logical intervals.
  
  This may be good advice for beginners, but I use Hide Deleted so I can
  see more real messages in one go. In what way am I refusing to use
  e-mail correctly?
  
  Perhaps a visual cue such as a colour change in the folder's name would
  be useful, to indicate folders with deleted messages in them.
 
 Maybe a visual cue only when there are more than X deleted message (or
 more than Y Mb of deleted messages), to exhort the user to expunge the
 folder.

OK, I created a BZ report:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=597055

Feel free to add comments.

poc

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Inbox too large

2009-09-30 Thread anders70

Apparantly, Evolution does not actually remove messages from the inbox file,
when asked to move messages to another folder. I just realized that my inbox
file contains messages from many years back, even though i (try to) embty my
inbox every summer and christmas break. Hence, I also just ran into the 2 GB
limit.

I developed the following workaround:

Ask evolution to create a new folder, called e.g. Rescue
Evolution will (among other things) create an empty file:
.evolution/mail/local/Rescue (which will be empty)
Quit Evolution

copy a suitable chunk of the end of the Inbox file to the file Rescue,
making sure that the first line copied will be the start of an email. that
is, the first line copied should be a: From ... field.

I used the shell command: tail -n xxx Inbox  Rescue to achieve this. The
trick is to find the right value for xxx (which is the number of lines from
the end of Inbox, that will be copied). xxx must be chosen so that the first
line copied is the beginning of the oldest e-mail you want to rescue from
the Inbox.
I started by guessing a number for xxx (e.g. 4,000,000) Then I looked at the
result with less Resuce. I then searched for the first instance of Jul
2009 as i wanted to rescue mails as old as this. Then I seached for the
first following instance of From, which gave me the beginning of a mail
receiven in July 2009. I noted the line number: yyy, and computed a new
value for xxx, as xxx= 4,000,000 - yyy +1. Running tail -n xxx Inbox 
Rescue again, then copied all my messages, starting from the chosen one, to
the Rescue file.

Rename Inbox to e.g. Inbox_old (in case you need to rescue more)

Start evolution

Go to the Rescue folder

Evolution will complain, but copy the messages in the Rescue mailbox into
it's internal format, making the rescued mails accessible once again.

Evolution will also create a new (empty) Inbox ... as there is no longer a
file called Inbox

Move all the messages from Rescue to the new Inbox if you like.

And you should be back in business. - it worked for me

Good luck. 


markybob wrote:
 
 Evolution has stopped being able to receive new emails.  When I try to
 fetch new mail (pop3), I receive this error message:
 Error while Feching Mail.  Cannot append message to mbox file:
 /home/markybob/.evolution/mail/local/Inbox: File too large
 
 ls -lh on the file shows that it is 2.0G in size.  What can I do short
 of deleting emails?
 
 Thanks!
 ___
 Evolution-list mailing list
 Evolution-list@gnome.org
 http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
 
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Inbox-too-large-tp3619591p25671534.html
Sent from the Gnome Evolution - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Inbox too large

2006-03-28 Thread Ow Mun Heng
On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 22:01 -0600, Mark Pinto wrote:
 Kernel 2.6.8.  glibc 2.3.6.  I'm convinced that it's an evolution
 issue (2.4, but I tested and have the same problem on 2.6), as I have
 2+G files on this computer that are handled fine.

You're not doing what was asked. Did you make sure you've expunged the
Inbox Folder after you moved the emails from the INBOX to the yearly
folder?

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Inbox too large

2006-03-28 Thread Ron Johnson
On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 22:01 -0600, Mark Pinto wrote:
 Kernel 2.6.8.  glibc 2.3.6.  I'm convinced that it's an evolution
 issue (2.4, but I tested and have the same problem on 2.6), as I have
 2+G files on this computer that are handled fine.

Evo 2.4.2.1 *definitely* has 2GB file size issues.

Attached is the error message I get while trying to attach a 
2.5GB file.

So, it's quite reasonable to expect that Evo has other small-file
bugs in it's code base.

 On 3/27/06, Greg Tassone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 20:06 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
   On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 16:48 -0800, Greg Tassone wrote:
  ...
The other problem could be that your system is missing large file
support.  How old is your kernel?
  
   LFS came in during the *early* 2.4 kernels.  *Nobody* (except a
   few m68k retro-geeks, and they mostly use 2.4.2x) uses such old
   kernels and glibc/libc6 anymore.
 
  Agreed.  This is compounded by the fact that XFS support probably
  indicates a later version as well.
 
  However, history around this list has taught me to NEVER take anything
  for granted.  I can't believe how old some of the stuff is that we hear
  about on this list (e.g., VERY old RedHat Linux installs, very old
  versions of Evo, old kernels, etc.).
 
  Therefore, I decided to at least ask the question, given the somewhat
  strange/rare circumstances of the error.

-- 
-
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson, LA USA

The warning message we sent the Russians was a calculated
ambiguity that would be clearly understood.
Alexander Haig


___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


[Evolution] Inbox too large

2006-03-27 Thread Mark Pinto
Evolution has stopped being able to receive new emails.  When I try to
fetch new mail (pop3), I receive this error message:
Error while Feching Mail.  Cannot append message to mbox file:
/home/markybob/.evolution/mail/local/Inbox: File too large

ls -lh on the file shows that it is 2.0G in size.  What can I do short
of deleting emails?

Thanks!
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Inbox too large

2006-03-27 Thread Stephen P. Schaefer
Can you create new folders and move old messages there?  It's better to
have things organized by topic, but that is labor intensive.  Because I
haven't got time, I've got folders named 2003, 2004, 2005.

- Stephen

On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 16:26 -0600, Mark Pinto wrote:
 Evolution has stopped being able to receive new emails.  When I try to
 fetch new mail (pop3), I receive this error message:
 Error while Feching Mail.  Cannot append message to mbox file:
 /home/markybob/.evolution/mail/local/Inbox: File too large
 
 ls -lh on the file shows that it is 2.0G in size.  What can I do short
 of deleting emails?
 
 Thanks!
 ___
 Evolution-list mailing list
 Evolution-list@gnome.org
 http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Inbox too large

2006-03-27 Thread Alex Malinovich
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 04:26:22PM -0600, Mark Pinto wrote:
 Evolution has stopped being able to receive new emails.  When I try to
 fetch new mail (pop3), I receive this error message:
 Error while Feching Mail.  Cannot append message to mbox file:
 /home/markybob/.evolution/mail/local/Inbox: File too large
 
 ls -lh on the file shows that it is 2.0G in size.  What can I do short
 of deleting emails?

This sounds like a filesystem issue. You're most likely storing your
mbox file on a FAT32 or an older ext2 filesystem. While you could
probably fix this by moving the mbox to a different filesystem, what you
really SHOULD do is cut down on how much stuff you have in that mbox.

Having a 2GB+ mbox file means that EVERY time you go to open up your
mail reader, it has to open a 2 GB file and read every single line in it
to get the list of emails. This is EXTREMELY inefficient. You should
either switch to a file-per-email system (ala maildir) or use different
folders as suggested by another poster.

-- 
Alex Malinovich
Support Free Software, delete your Windows partition TODAY!
Encrypted mail preferred. You can get my public key from any of the
pgp.net keyservers. Key ID: A6D24837


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Inbox too large

2006-03-27 Thread Mark Pinto
The filesystem is XFS, so that's certainly not a problem.  I created
yearly folders under On This Computer and moved them from Inbox, but
somehow the size of the file did not shrink.

On 3/27/06, Alex Malinovich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 04:26:22PM -0600, Mark Pinto wrote:
  Evolution has stopped being able to receive new emails.  When I try to
  fetch new mail (pop3), I receive this error message:
  Error while Feching Mail.  Cannot append message to mbox file:
  /home/markybob/.evolution/mail/local/Inbox: File too large
 
  ls -lh on the file shows that it is 2.0G in size.  What can I do short
  of deleting emails?

 This sounds like a filesystem issue. You're most likely storing your
 mbox file on a FAT32 or an older ext2 filesystem. While you could
 probably fix this by moving the mbox to a different filesystem, what you
 really SHOULD do is cut down on how much stuff you have in that mbox.

 Having a 2GB+ mbox file means that EVERY time you go to open up your
 mail reader, it has to open a 2 GB file and read every single line in it
 to get the list of emails. This is EXTREMELY inefficient. You should
 either switch to a file-per-email system (ala maildir) or use different
 folders as suggested by another poster.

 --
 Alex Malinovich
 Support Free Software, delete your Windows partition TODAY!
 Encrypted mail preferred. You can get my public key from any of the
 pgp.net keyservers. Key ID: A6D24837


 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

 iD8DBQFEKGiGBPYwh6bSSDcRAvUGAJ9VYgipjvYggWoRXV3WcYmT11LGNwCeJOFL
 4QoqJNy8z9WBc8qdHo9jiFg=
 =4lzS
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-


 ___
 Evolution-list mailing list
 Evolution-list@gnome.org
 http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list



___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Inbox too large

2006-03-27 Thread Ron Johnson
On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 16:38 -0600, Mark Pinto wrote:
 The filesystem is XFS, so that's certainly not a problem.  I created
 yearly folders under On This Computer and moved them from Inbox, but
 somehow the size of the file did not shrink.

Empty the trash.  Or Expunge.  Depends on which version of Evo 
you are using.

-- 
-
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson, LA USA

The President has kept all the promises he intended to keep.
George Stephanopolous

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Inbox too large

2006-03-27 Thread Greg Tassone
On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 17:26 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
 On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 16:38 -0600, Mark Pinto wrote:
  The filesystem is XFS, so that's certainly not a problem.  I created
  yearly folders under On This Computer and moved them from Inbox, but
  somehow the size of the file did not shrink.
 
 Empty the trash.  Or Expunge.  Depends on which version of Evo 
 you are using.


The other problem could be that your system is missing large file
support.  How old is your kernel?



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Inbox too large

2006-03-27 Thread Ron Johnson
On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 16:48 -0800, Greg Tassone wrote:
 On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 17:26 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
  On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 16:38 -0600, Mark Pinto wrote:
   The filesystem is XFS, so that's certainly not a problem.  I created
   yearly folders under On This Computer and moved them from Inbox, but
   somehow the size of the file did not shrink.
  
  Empty the trash.  Or Expunge.  Depends on which version of Evo 
  you are using.
 
 
 The other problem could be that your system is missing large file
 support.  How old is your kernel?

LFS came in during the *early* 2.4 kernels.  *Nobody* (except a 
few m68k retro-geeks, and they mostly use 2.4.2x) uses such old
kernels and glibc/libc6 anymore.
-- 
-
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson, LA USA

python -c 'print len(str(2**30))'
90309

___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


Re: [Evolution] Inbox too large

2006-03-27 Thread Mark Pinto
Kernel 2.6.8.  glibc 2.3.6.  I'm convinced that it's an evolution
issue (2.4, but I tested and have the same problem on 2.6), as I have
2+G files on this computer that are handled fine.

On 3/27/06, Greg Tassone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 20:06 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
  On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 16:48 -0800, Greg Tassone wrote:
 ...
   The other problem could be that your system is missing large file
   support.  How old is your kernel?
 
  LFS came in during the *early* 2.4 kernels.  *Nobody* (except a
  few m68k retro-geeks, and they mostly use 2.4.2x) uses such old
  kernels and glibc/libc6 anymore.

 Agreed.  This is compounded by the fact that XFS support probably
 indicates a later version as well.

 However, history around this list has taught me to NEVER take anything
 for granted.  I can't believe how old some of the stuff is that we hear
 about on this list (e.g., VERY old RedHat Linux installs, very old
 versions of Evo, old kernels, etc.).

 Therefore, I decided to at least ask the question, given the somewhat
 strange/rare circumstances of the error.



 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

 iD8DBQBEKKTaaI3pdOrDO40RAo8gAKDuRps0G0siCIjch7aV3dIHjIfVhACgoTi1
 p6mlt6aqD+EuBWc1SRXxnuo=
 =iao9
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-


 ___
 Evolution-list mailing list
 Evolution-list@gnome.org
 http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list



___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list