Re: [ewg] RE: What is the branch that should be used for management packagefor OFED 1.4.1?

2009-02-17 Thread Tziporet Koren

Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:

Hi Sasha,

Below is the list of the OpenSM commits that should go into OFED 1.4.1:

1. Commit aa25fcba61e75ac94af2b950c200cdde433f110c
   Don't clear sw-need_update if port 0 is active.
   In a single switch subnet, after a fast switch reset, OpenSM
   doesn't configure LFT of the switch and the routing is lost.
   Bug #1507.

2. Commit 595f2e30026f9ec85674e6d70661d26de6f77a6b

   Update LFTs when entering master state
   Bug #1469.

3. Commit b44c398e7363e9c9605e9ee1d5893f872ef41feb
   Invalidate routing cache when entering master state
   Bug #1508

4. Commit 22da81f8cd432195f6c78cfe5f508f04b081aef7
   Fix full topology dump in ftree routing.
   Topology dump was missing all the leaf switches
   Bug #1509

5. Commit c07d245651035cc7ba3b89ac0e81d54bff829f4d
   Don't complain about invalid QoS options when its
   default values are used.
   Bug #1451.

6. Commit 72a2fa241dffacc2eea3c2b0c131f8bcb4792162
   Dump SA MAD before sending it, not after.
   Dumping of the SA MAD was done after the MAD was sent
   and returned to the pool, resulting in garbage in
   the OpenSM log.
   Bug #1510.

  


Sasha
Please open the branch and include the above pathces.
We also wish the new bug fixed (#1515)

Thanks
Tziporet
___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg


[ewg] [GIT PULL ofed-1.4.1] - fix to iw_cxgb3_0400 patch

2009-02-17 Thread Steve Wise

Vlad,

Please pull from

git://git.openfabrics.org/~swise/ofed-1.4.git ofed_1_4

This is a small fix to one of the patches I added last week.

Thanks,

Steve.

-

commit cfc38bc5ec39b8ec680c6181143407f9bb26cc29
Author: Steve Wise sw...@opengridcomputing.com
Date:   Tue Feb 17 09:47:51 2009 -0600

   RDMA/cxgb3: fix bad patch file.
  
   Signed-off-by: Steve Wise sw...@opengridcomputing.com


diff --git 
a/kernel_patches/fixes/iw_cxgb3_0400_remove_modulo_math_from_build_rdma_recv.patch 
b/kernel_patches/fixes/iw_cxgb3_0400_remove_modulo_math_from_build_rdma_recv.patch

index e5b4f2c..80dc61a 100644
--- 
a/kernel_patches/fixes/iw_cxgb3_0400_remove_modulo_math_from_build_rdma_recv.patch
+++ 
b/kernel_patches/fixes/iw_cxgb3_0400_remove_modulo_math_from_build_rdma_recv.patch

@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ index c84ac5b..b520d86 100644
-wqe-recv.sgl[i].to = cpu_to_be64(((u32) wr-sg_list[i].addr) %
-(1UL  (12 + page_size[i])));
+wqe-recv.sgl[i].to = cpu_to_be64(((u32)wr-sg_list[i].addr) 
-+((1UL  (12 + page_size[i]) - 1)));
++((1UL  (12 + page_size[i])) - 1));

 /* pbl_addr is the adapters address in the PBL */
 wqe-recv.pbl_addr[i] = cpu_to_be32(pbl_addr[i]);


___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg


[ewg] Re: What is the branch that should be used for management packagefor OFED 1.4.1?

2009-02-17 Thread Sasha Khapyorsky
Hi Yevgeny,

On 11:12 Mon 16 Feb , Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
 
 Below is the list of the OpenSM commits that should go into OFED 1.4.1:
 
 1. Commit aa25fcba61e75ac94af2b950c200cdde433f110c
Don't clear sw-need_update if port 0 is active.
In a single switch subnet, after a fast switch reset, OpenSM
doesn't configure LFT of the switch and the routing is lost.
Bug #1507.
 
 2. Commit 595f2e30026f9ec85674e6d70661d26de6f77a6b
Update LFTs when entering master state
Bug #1469.
 
 3. Commit b44c398e7363e9c9605e9ee1d5893f872ef41feb
Invalidate routing cache when entering master state
Bug #1508
 
 4. Commit 22da81f8cd432195f6c78cfe5f508f04b081aef7
Fix full topology dump in ftree routing.
Topology dump was missing all the leaf switches
Bug #1509
 
 5. Commit c07d245651035cc7ba3b89ac0e81d54bff829f4d
Don't complain about invalid QoS options when its
default values are used.
Bug #1451.
 
 6. Commit 72a2fa241dffacc2eea3c2b0c131f8bcb4792162
Dump SA MAD before sending it, not after.
Dumping of the SA MAD was done after the MAD was sent
and returned to the pool, resulting in garbage in
the OpenSM log.
Bug #1510.
 
 Anything I missed?

Don't know. From the list only bug#1507 was considered as major
(which is strange, the case should be pretty rear and hardly
reproducible), the rest have normal severity.

As far as I remember dot release policy is to include only critical bug
fixes. Isn't it?

Sasha
___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg