Re: [ewg] [PATCH] IB/core: Add support for Receive Core Affinity

2008-08-05 Thread Eli Cohen
   
  +int ib_create_qp_range(struct ib_pd *pd, struct ib_qp_init_attr 
  *qp_init_attr,
  +  int nqps, int align, struct ib_qp *list[])
 
 It just seems wrong to me to require the caller to specify the alignment
 restrictions. Isn't this HCA specific?
I agree with you about this, but since my previous posts on the issue
did not receive too much attention, I did not want to change my
implementation before the issue has been discussed.

  Is IPoIB really going to know
 whether or not the QP numbers returned by this call are aligned
 or not? What if I call ib_create_qp_range() with nqps=3 and align=0?
I am not sure I understand your argument here: in this case you create 3
consecutive QPs with no other restrictions on the number of of the
first. 

 
 Also, in ib_verbs.h, struct ib_qp_attr now has a struct rca_attr field.
 I don't see why the struct rca_attr field is needed for ib_modify_qp().
 It seems to me that this information should be stored as part of the
 QP info when creating the N QPs. Why should the verbs caller need to
 know about this? The values are determined by the HCA when the QPs
 are created.
 
I totally agree with you here too and I also sent an email about that
some time ago. Again, I want to trigger a discussion to close on the API
before re-implementing. 

I hope to get more opinions and then re-work the patch.
___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg


[ewg] buy now Viagra (Sildenafil) 100mg x 90 pills US $ 159.95

2008-08-05 Thread Natalia Mayberry

Price for Viagra 50mg x 30 pills US $ 3.00 Per Pill
http://akyzag.bay.livefilestore.com/y1poD_EyPOjWZrdLptTpG3hoLWhLQcVNNTnDfdIpSNOrmS17pBgtHVjSBnZ7d9spoQAYnD6ExJWvwzv6OtLDXEvMg/index.html

___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg


[ewg] :o)

2008-08-05 Thread Kekua Yeary
Nei Ho, 




 
___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg

Re: [ewg] Suggestion to improve usibility of the install script

2008-08-05 Thread Stefan Roscher
On Sunday 03 August 2008 15:24:54 Vladimir Sokolovsky wrote:
 
 Hi Stefan,
 I did the required change,
 Please check in the OFED-1.4-20080804-0600 build.
 
 Regards,
 Vladimir
 

Great,

works fine for me. Thank you!

regards Stefan


___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg


[ewg] Only 3 month are required for your ehnancing, and she will notice that

2008-08-05 Thread Sean Locke

Wild nights. 10 reasons to try 
absolutely new enhancing product.   
 Click here!

___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg

[ewg] ofed-1.4 beta

2008-08-05 Thread Steve Wise

Tziporet,

I request that we make sure the following is in before we release beta:

- NFSRDMA fastreg patches _and_ NFSRDMA working at least on 2.6.27-rc1.  
Currently it doesn't install correctly.  Also we're waiting for the 
fastreg patch series from Tom Tucker which should be ready this week.


- RDS iWARP bcopy.   RDS doesn't currently build in the ofed_2_6_27 
branch, and there are a set of patches that apparently never got 
delivered to Vlad.  These should be ready this week as well.


I'm asking that we hold off spinning Beta until these are ready.  I 
don't see the point of a beta release if all the anchor functionality 
isn't in.  And from an iWARP perspective, the above two are anchor items.



Thanks,

Steve.
___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg


[ewg] [GIT PULL ofed-1.4 ofed_2_6_27] more cxgb3 backports

2008-08-05 Thread Steve Wise

Vlad,

Please pull from

git://git.openfabrics.org/~swise/ofed-1.4 ofed_2_6_27

These patches fix up suse and rehat backports.  I think cxgb3 should now 
compile on all the platforms.




commit 0f6891ea9533ccb00e25431352f7ea5f2ffcc161
Author: Steve Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:   Mon Aug 4 12:34:40 2008 -0500

   RDMA/cxgb3: backports for suse kernels.
  
   Signed-off-by: Steve Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]


commit 87bfa88d4daf4a5c2f39e9e6e8fdda3eb338ae0e
Author: Steve Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:   Mon Aug 4 12:10:47 2008 -0500

   RDMA/cxgb3: backports for redhat kernels.
  
   Signed-off-by: Steve Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg


Re: [ewg] ofed-1.4 ofed_2_6_27 and NFSRDMA

2008-08-05 Thread Steve Wise

Jeff Becker wrote:

Steve Wise wrote:


Jeff, I'm running on the ofed-1.4 ofed_2_6_27 branch.  Building 
against a 2.6.27-rc1 running kernel that has nfsrdma configured.  I 
then build/install the ofed drivers with nfsrdma configured in the 
ofed tree.  This  _should_ effectively replace  the xprtrdma and 
scvrdma modules from the 2.6.27-rc1 tree with the ofed built 
versions.  It apparently is not doing this.  The result is an oops 
when you try to use nfsrdma because the header files for key rdma 
structs are different from the 2.6.27-rc1 kernel includes and the 
ofed-1.4 includes.
It appears that the nfsrdma modules are _not_ getting installed by 
the ofed makefiles.  EG I don't see an xprtrdma.ko in 
/lib/modules/$(uname -r)/updates/kernel/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma.  I only 
see on in /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/kernel/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma.
Hi Steve. Thanks for finding this. Actually, I had only tested the 
base nfsrdma build/install on 2.6.26. I then switched to working on 
backports, and haven't had a chance to sync up my tree with the 
2.6.27-rc1 stuff. I'll do that as soon as I can.


Note there are no backports for 2.6.27-rc1.  I think this is 
makefile/bldenv issue.  I'm willing to debug this.


Also, i'm going to be taking Tom Tucker's fast-reg patches and adding 
them to ofed-1.4#ofed_2_6_27.  I'll try and get all this working on 
2.6.27-rc1.  How does that sound?


Also, did you include the nfsutils package in ofed-1.4?  We'll need that 
for mount.nfs.


Thanks!

Steve.
___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg


Re: [ewg] ofed-1.4 beta

2008-08-05 Thread Tziporet Koren

Steve Wise wrote:


I'm asking that we hold off spinning Beta until these are ready.  I 
don't see the point of a beta release if all the anchor functionality 
isn't in.  And from an iWARP perspective, the above two are anchor items.


I think there are several show-stopper from IB perspective too (e.g. 
IPoIB deadlock), and also no new MPI package is ready.

Do you think you can make it for next week?

Tziporet

___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg


Re: [ewg] ofed-1.4 beta

2008-08-05 Thread Steve Wise

Tziporet Koren wrote:

Steve Wise wrote:


I'm asking that we hold off spinning Beta until these are ready.  I 
don't see the point of a beta release if all the anchor functionality 
isn't in.  And from an iWARP perspective, the above two are anchor 
items.


I think there are several show-stopper from IB perspective too (e.g. 
IPoIB deadlock), and also no new MPI package is ready.

Do you think you can make it for next week?



Yes.

___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg


[ewg] Re: [GIT PULL ofed-1.4 ofed_2_6_27] more cxgb3 backports

2008-08-05 Thread Vladimir Sokolovsky

Steve Wise wrote:

Vlad,

Please pull from

git://git.openfabrics.org/~swise/ofed-1.4 ofed_2_6_27

These patches fix up suse and rehat backports.  I think cxgb3 should now 
compile on all the platforms.




commit 0f6891ea9533ccb00e25431352f7ea5f2ffcc161
Author: Steve Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:   Mon Aug 4 12:34:40 2008 -0500

   RDMA/cxgb3: backports for suse kernels.
 Signed-off-by: Steve Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]

commit 87bfa88d4daf4a5c2f39e9e6e8fdda3eb338ae0e
Author: Steve Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:   Mon Aug 4 12:10:47 2008 -0500

   RDMA/cxgb3: backports for redhat kernels.
 Signed-off-by: Steve Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Hi Steve,
cxgb3 compilation failed on:

Build failed on 2.6.20
Build failed on 2.6.19
Build failed on 2.6.16
Build failed on 2.6.17
Build failed on 2.6.18.6
Build failed on 2.6.9-55.ELsmp
Build failed on 2.6.9-42.ELsmp
Build failed on 2.6.9-67.ELsmp


  gcc -Wp,-MD,/tmp/ofa_1_4_dev_kernel-20080805-1757_linux-2.6.20_check/drivers/net/cxgb3/.l2t.o.d  -nostdinc -isystem /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.1/include -D__KERNEL__ -include 
include/linux/autoconf.h  -include /tmp/ofa_1_4_dev_kernel-20080805-1757_linux-2.6.20_check/include/linux/autoconf.h 
-I/tmp/ofa_1_4_dev_kernel-20080805-1757_linux-2.6.20_check/kernel_addons/backport/2.6.20/include/  -include /tmp/ofa_1_4_dev_kernel-20080805-1757_linux-2.6.20_check/drivers/infiniband/debug/mtrack.h 
-Werror-implicit-function-declaration  -I/tmp/ofa_1_4_dev_kernel-20080805-1757_linux-2.6.20_check/include  -I/tmp/ofa_1_4_dev_kernel-20080805-1757_linux-2.6.20_check/drivers/infiniband/debug 
-I/usr/local/include/scst  -I/tmp/ofa_1_4_dev_kernel-20080805-1757_linux-2.6.20_check/drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt  -I/tmp/ofa_1_4_dev_kernel-20080805-1757_linux-2.6.20_check/drivers/net/cxgb3 
-Iinclude -Wall -Wundef -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -Os  -mtune=generic -m64 -mno-red-zone -mcmodel=kernel -pipe -fno-reorder-blocks -Wno-sign-compare 
-fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -funit-at-a-time -mno-sse -mno-mmx -mno-sse2 -mno-3dnow -maccumulate-outgoing-args -DCONFIG_AS_CFI=1 -DCONFIG_AS_CFI_SIGNAL_FRAME=1 -fomit-frame-pointer -g 
-fno-stack-protector -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wno-pointer-sign   -DMODULE -DKBUILD_STR(s)=#s -DKBUILD_BASENAME=KBUILD_STR(l2t)  -DKBUILD_MODNAME=KBUILD_STR(cxgb3) -c -o 
/tmp/ofa_1_4_dev_kernel-20080805-1757_linux-2.6.20_check/drivers/net/cxgb3/l2t.o /tmp/ofa_1_4_dev_kernel-20080805-1757_linux-2.6.20_check/drivers/net/cxgb3/l2t.c

/tmp/ofa_1_4_dev_kernel-20080805-1757_linux-2.6.20_check/drivers/net/cxgb3/l2t.c:
 In function 't3_l2t_get':
/tmp/ofa_1_4_dev_kernel-20080805-1757_linux-2.6.20_check/drivers/net/cxgb3/l2t.c:340:
 error: implicit declaration of function 'vlan_dev_vlan_id'
make[3]: *** 
[/tmp/ofa_1_4_dev_kernel-20080805-1757_linux-2.6.20_check/drivers/net/cxgb3/l2t.o]
 Error 1


Regards,
Vladimir
___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg


[ewg] Re: [GIT PULL ofed-1.4 ofed_2_6_27] more cxgb3 backports

2008-08-05 Thread Steve Wise





Hi Steve,
cxgb3 compilation failed on:

Build failed on 2.6.20
Build failed on 2.6.19
Build failed on 2.6.16
Build failed on 2.6.17
Build failed on 2.6.18.6
Build failed on 2.6.9-55.ELsmp
Build failed on 2.6.9-42.ELsmp
Build failed on 2.6.9-67.ELsmp


I'll fix this asap.   I thought I had all the k.o. kernels working...

Steve.


___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg


Re: [ewg] ofed-1.4 ofed_2_6_27 and NFSRDMA

2008-08-05 Thread Jeff Becker

Steve Wise wrote:

Jeff Becker wrote:

Steve Wise wrote:


Jeff, I'm running on the ofed-1.4 ofed_2_6_27 branch.  Building 
against a 2.6.27-rc1 running kernel that has nfsrdma configured.  I 
then build/install the ofed drivers with nfsrdma configured in the 
ofed tree.  This  _should_ effectively replace  the xprtrdma and 
scvrdma modules from the 2.6.27-rc1 tree with the ofed built 
versions.  It apparently is not doing this.  The result is an oops 
when you try to use nfsrdma because the header files for key rdma 
structs are different from the 2.6.27-rc1 kernel includes and the 
ofed-1.4 includes.
It appears that the nfsrdma modules are _not_ getting installed by 
the ofed makefiles.  EG I don't see an xprtrdma.ko in 
/lib/modules/$(uname -r)/updates/kernel/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma.  I only 
see on in /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/kernel/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma.
Hi Steve. Thanks for finding this. Actually, I had only tested the 
base nfsrdma build/install on 2.6.26. I then switched to working on 
backports, and haven't had a chance to sync up my tree with the 
2.6.27-rc1 stuff. I'll do that as soon as I can.


Note there are no backports for 2.6.27-rc1.  I think this is 
makefile/bldenv issue.  I'm willing to debug this.
I thought backports are only included for kernels older than the version 
(2.6.27-rc1 in this case) on which the OFED release is based?


Also, i'm going to be taking Tom Tucker's fast-reg patches and adding 
them to ofed-1.4#ofed_2_6_27.  I'll try and get all this working on 
2.6.27-rc1.  How does that sound?

Great.


Also, did you include the nfsutils package in ofed-1.4?  We'll need 
that for mount.nfs.
I haven't done that yet, as I've been focusing on the kernel stuff. 
Also, I was thinking that it might be OK for folks to go grab that 
independently of OFED. But on second thought (and after seeing your 
suggestion) I agree. I'll see if I can pull together an RPM.


Thanks.

-jeff


Thanks!

Steve.


___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg


[ewg] iscsi backport for OFED1.4

2008-08-05 Thread Vladimir Sokolovsky
Hi Doron,
Please prepare iSCSI backport patches for OFED-1.4 (based on 2.6.27).
git://git.openfabrics.org/ofed_1_4/linux-2.6.git ofed_2_6_27

Note,
I removed all existing iSCSI backports (they can't be applied for 2.6.27-rc1).
There is a copy of these backports under kernel_patches/attic/backports.


Regards,
Vladimir
___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg

Re: [ewg] [PATCH] IB/core: Add support for Receive Core Affinity

2008-08-05 Thread Ralph Campbell
On Tue, 2008-08-05 at 09:10 +0300, Eli Cohen wrote:

   +int ib_create_qp_range(struct ib_pd *pd, struct ib_qp_init_attr 
   *qp_init_attr,
   +int nqps, int align, struct ib_qp *list[])
  
  It just seems wrong to me to require the caller to specify the alignment
  restrictions. Isn't this HCA specific?
 I agree with you about this, but since my previous posts on the issue
 did not receive too much attention, I did not want to change my
 implementation before the issue has been discussed.
 
   Is IPoIB really going to know
  whether or not the QP numbers returned by this call are aligned
  or not? What if I call ib_create_qp_range() with nqps=3 and align=0?
 I am not sure I understand your argument here: in this case you create 3
 consecutive QPs with no other restrictions on the number of of the
 first. 

My point is that I am guessing that the ib_modify_qp() will return
an error unless the QPs are created with the right alignment
but the caller has no way of knowing what the right alignment value
is and it shouldn't need to know since the ib_create_qp_range()
could have an argument or flag which says the created QPs should be
usable for receive affinity. The HCA driver can then use whatever
alignment is needed and mark the QP struct as being part of a group.
The ib_modify_qp() probably only needs a flag to say enable
receive affinity.

___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg


[ewg] Interesting RX Offers

2008-08-05 Thread Hilary Morrison

Splendid Medical Satisfactions

http://everyhingwanted.spaces.live.com/default.aspx

Most importantly, 
someone struggles


Victoria K., Boston

___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg


[ewg] gitweb add request

2008-08-05 Thread Andy Grover
Hi, I understand that an admin needs to take some action to get a user's 
git trees to show up on openfabrics, could an admin please do that for 
user agrover?


(BTW for those who haven't heard: I'm taking over RDS maint/devel from 
Olaf. Hi, nice to meetcha. :)


Thanks -- Andy
___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg


Re: [ewg] gitweb add request

2008-08-05 Thread Steve Wise

Andy Grover wrote:
Hi, I understand that an admin needs to take some action to get a 
user's git trees to show up on openfabrics, could an admin please do 
that for user agrover?


(BTW for those who haven't heard: I'm taking over RDS maint/devel from 
Olaf. Hi, nice to meetcha. :)


Thanks -- Andy
___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg

Hey Andy,

What are the paths to your git trees that you want published?  I think 
the admin needs that. 


BTW: EWG:  Who is admin these days?

Steve.


___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg


[ewg] is it you? karina here

2008-08-05 Thread karina

Hi,
i am here sitting in the internet caffe. Found your email and
decided to write. I am 25 y.o.girl.
I have a picture if you want. No need to reply here as 
this is not may email. Write me at [EMAIL PROTECTED]














___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg


Re: [ewg] gitweb add request

2008-08-05 Thread Andy Grover

Steve Wise wrote:
What are the paths to your git trees that you want published?  I think 
the admin needs that.

BTW: EWG:  Who is admin these days?


Really? You can't just do everything in ~/scm? Ok then:

/home/agrover
~/scm/ofed_1_3/linux-2.6.git
~/scm/ofed_1_3/rds-tools.git
~/scm/ofed_1_4/linux-2.6.git
~/scm/ofed_1_4/rds-tools.git

Regards -- Andy

___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg