RE: Really annoying when you disable an account.
Event ID: 9548 Source MSExchangeIS Type Warning Description Disabled user /O=Organization/OU=SiteName/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=BD732D8A does not have a master account SID. Please use Active Directory MMC to set an active account as this user's master account. Comments From a Usenet posting: You need an AD user that does not have a mailbox, then go to the Server/Storage Group/Database/Mailbox and you should be able to reconnect the orphan mailbox to the user. Links Q278966 Contributors Adrian Grigorof , Anonymous From: Varghese, Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 11:10 PM Subject: RE: Really annoying when you disable an account. Anyone have any info on this or am I SOL? Thank in advance. Wilson -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 8:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Really annoying when you disable an account. How come when you disable an account for a user that has left the company, you get a billion event 9548s? This is so damn annoying, is there a way to turn it off? Besides, I just disabled the account, I didn't remove it's master account SID so what's the problem? Is there a way to stop this event error from popping up all the time? Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: Lotus Notes connector
(My first attempt to post this was unsuccessful) Does anyone know a good site / resource for information on the Lotus Notes / Exchange 55 connector? Thanks Commence laughing. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Upgrade Exchange 5.5 to E2k error
Hi OK How do I know what version of Exchange 5.5 was originally installed.?? The server says its version 5.5 (Build 2653.23 Service Pack 4) Thanks -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, 4 May 2002 12:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Upgrade Exchange 5.5 to E2k error Ex5.5 Enterprise cannot be upgraded to E2k Std. You have 3 basic choices: 1. ExMerge all mailboxes to PSTs 2. Install an E5.5 Std and move mailboxes then inplace upgrade that server 3. Purchase the E2k Enterprise version -Original Message- From: Raji Arulambalam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:52 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Upgrade Exchange 5.5 to E2k error Subject: Upgrade Exchange 5.5 to E2k error Hi When I try to do an in-place upgrade of Exchange 5.5 SP4 to Exchange 2000 I get the following error from the Exchange 2000 Installation Wizard. I have followed the steps. 1) ADC, 2) Forestprep, 3) Domainprep. I was using the Standard version of Exchange 2000. The component Microsoft Exchange Messaging and Collaboration Services cannot be assigned the action Upgrade because: - You must use the same edition of Microsoft Exchange 2000 Setup (Enterprise or Server) as the existing installation Any help.?? TIA Raji ** This e-mail has been checked for viruses and no viruses were detected. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message has been swept for content and viruses. No viruses were detected. Contact the Helpdesk on extension 9CIS (9247) for assistance, if required. ** This e-mail has been checked for viruses and no viruses were detected. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Upgrade Exchange 5.5 to E2k error
FAQ 3.53 -Original Message- From: Raji Arulambalam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2002 4:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Upgrade Exchange 5.5 to E2k error Hi OK How do I know what version of Exchange 5.5 was originally installed.?? The server says its version 5.5 (Build 2653.23 Service Pack 4) Thanks -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, 4 May 2002 12:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Upgrade Exchange 5.5 to E2k error Ex5.5 Enterprise cannot be upgraded to E2k Std. You have 3 basic choices: 1. ExMerge all mailboxes to PSTs 2. Install an E5.5 Std and move mailboxes then inplace upgrade that server 3. Purchase the E2k Enterprise version -Original Message- From: Raji Arulambalam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:52 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Upgrade Exchange 5.5 to E2k error Subject: Upgrade Exchange 5.5 to E2k error Hi When I try to do an in-place upgrade of Exchange 5.5 SP4 to Exchange 2000 I get the following error from the Exchange 2000 Installation Wizard. I have followed the steps. 1) ADC, 2) Forestprep, 3) Domainprep. I was using the Standard version of Exchange 2000. The component Microsoft Exchange Messaging and Collaboration Services cannot be assigned the action Upgrade because: - You must use the same edition of Microsoft Exchange 2000 Setup (Enterprise or Server) as the existing installation Any help.?? TIA Raji ** This e-mail has been checked for viruses and no viruses were detected. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message has been swept for content and viruses. No viruses were detected. Contact the Helpdesk on extension 9CIS (9247) for assistance, if required. ** This e-mail has been checked for viruses and no viruses were detected. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Query but not view GAL
Then use the reghack to restrict the number of recips a user can send to and have HR formulate a policy on proper use of the messaging system. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 7:23 AM Subject: RE: Query but not view GAL We want this feature to deter users from using the GAL as a mass distribution point. We don't want to advertise everyone's email address in the organization, but we want users to be able to query for the address of someone they know. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: From field
You might have to set up multiple email accounts in order for it to appear. Some older versions of Outlook OE had the from field appear automatically appear when multiple email accounts were installed. -Christian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: From field I know I already asked this question but there has to be someone out there that has the same problem as me. We recently purchased to new pcs with office xp sb. Outlook 2002 for some reason doesnt have the FROM field when you create a new message. Ussusally you go to view and click from button and it appeara. Also I tried to customize the fields and the from button isnt there either. Both pcs have the same configuration but one pc doesnt have the same options in outlook 2002. I have already uninstalled office 2002 and reinstalled it and still has the same options. Can anyone shed some light. Thanks Richard _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: From field
I use office xp, and have the from field in my view emails. --- Thanks, Paul Simon Network Manager Chestnut Health Systems 1003 Martin Luther King Dr. Bloomington, Illinois 61701 VOC: 309.827.6026 x2638 FAX: 309.827.2127 -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: From field I know I already asked this question but there has to be someone out there that has the same problem as me. We recently purchased to new pcs with office xp sb. Outlook 2002 for some reason doesnt have the FROM field when you create a new message. Ussusally you go to view and click from button and it appeara. Also I tried to customize the fields and the from button isnt there either. Both pcs have the same configuration but one pc doesnt have the same options in outlook 2002. I have already uninstalled office 2002 and reinstalled it and still has the same options. Can anyone shed some light. Thanks Richard _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 5.5 Port 110 binding only to local host
Hi All, I've got an exchange 5.5 server that has port 110 listening only on 127.0.0.1. How can I change the binding of the port to listen on the system's primary IP? Thanks in advance, Fred _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: slight OT - SMTP Policy
I think email policies are best left to HR, legal, AND the person in charge of messaging. A google search for 'email policy template' will return lots of ideas, such as: http://www.cli.org/emailpolicy/assemble.html William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Louis Joyce Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: slight OT - SMTP Policy Email policies are best left to your HR and legal department. Generally, you should only be involved when it comes to putting the policy in place. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions - Original Message - From: Mark Peoples [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 7:29 PM Subject: slight OT - SMTP Policy Hi, I am looking at implmenting a new e-mail policy for my organisation. Is anyone out there who has a company policy for e-mail (exchange specific or SMTP is OK) already written and are willing to share it with me? Basically, rather than re-inventing the wheel, I am looking for a policy that someone out there already has, to use as a basis for our own. If anyone can assist, please feel free to contact me direct: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, MP _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: any news on sp3?
What year? Might it require Windows2000 sp3? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: any news on sp3? July is the target date -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 5:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: any news on sp3? Ok... I lost my page a while back in the book known as waiting for the service pack. Anyone seen anything anywhere about ex2ksp3? info? target date? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 5.5 Port 110 binding only to local host
Hi All, I've got an exchange 5.5 server that has port 110 listening only on 127.0.0.1. How can I change the binding of the port to listen on the system's primary IP? Thanks in advance, Fred __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness http://health.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IM Client
There's a Mac IM client you can download from MS site -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 3:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IM Client Does the IM client work on exch2k fo rthe macs? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Antivirus Solution
Antigen is definitely the best AV software there is - It saves us every day and the Tech Support is fantastic. Myrna Rademacher Network Administrator Humes Barrington, P.C. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 5:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus Solution Their support team is in Madrid, too, I hear ;) ~ -K.Borndale IT Manager Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |-+--- | | David Weinstein | | | David.Weinstein@perkins| | | will.com | | | Sent by:| | | bounce-exchange-148870@l| | | s.swynk.com | | | | | | | | | 04/30/2002 03:37 PM | | | Please respond to | | | Exchange Discussions | | | | |-+--- --- ---| | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: RE: Antivirus Solution | --- ---| It is in the FAQ but Sybari's Antigen (www.sybari.com) has save my butt more times than I can count - reasonably priced too- -Original Message- From: Filipe Joel de Almeida [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Antivirus Solution Hi, My mail server doesn't have any anti-virus installed (Don't flame me, It's a server I've inherited). I'm thinking of buying an Anti-virus, and I would like to have some comments on what's the best solution in the market having in mind the importance of Price/performance. This server also has ISA server, so the AV should also scan all internet activity in the proxy. Thanks in advance, Filipe Joel de Almeida Network Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mobile: +351 967819600 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Best way to clean up corrupt calendar folder? (on server)
I'll search around for the old exchange client and give it a try. If you have NT4 you may find it in \program files\windows messaging... We use it from time to time _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 5.5 Port 110 binding only to local host
Hi All, I've got an exchange 5.5 server that has port 110 listening only on 127.0.0.1. How can I change the binding of the port to listen on the system's primary IP? Thanks in advance, Fred __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness http://health.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cerification question
Doesn't that depend on what the person pursuing the certification wants? I mean, on what scale are you determining the 'best'? Cisco is not a certification. They have several different certs. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cerification question There is a big sqaubble about the best certification to get( and this was being discussed at Ohio State) That if you was going to get any type of certification EXCHANGE IS NOT THE ONE to get, Cisco is the premier certification.One of the speakers was telling a senior class this before graduation starts. Do anyone agree with that or does it make a difference? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cerification question
Jack of all trades, master of none? kidding... Mostly -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chuck Bryant Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question Multiple, varied, certifications seems to make more sense in terms of flexible career options. -Original Message- From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cerification question There is a big sqaubble about the best certification to get( and this was being discussed at Ohio State) That if you was going to get any type of certification EXCHANGE IS NOT THE ONE to get, Cisco is the premier certification.One of the speakers was telling a senior class this before graduation starts. Do anyone agree with that or does it make a difference? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] == Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this electronic document is considered a confidential and/or privileged communication between John Burnham Insurance Services and the addressee(s). If the recipient(s) of this email communication is not the addressee(s), such recipient(s) is strictly prohibited from photocopying, distributing or otherwise using this email or its contents and/or attachment(s) in any way. If you received this message in error, please contact the sender listed above by any contact means listed. Thank you! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cerification question
Why do we go through this every three to six months? William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Soysal, Serdar Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question Certs are not a sign of competency. They just mean that the person is capable of memorizing braindumps. I interviewed MCSEs that answered the question Explain your NT domain structure in your previous job with an answer like We had ATM coming to the back of our PCs. You've got to be careful with MCSEs that come with huge resumes. There are some ways you can tell if they're good or not though. For example if the candidate writes MCSE with a larger font than his own name, you probably have a clueless wall-licker in your hands. If a person doesn't have certification, it means that he/she has not sat through the tests. That person can be the most knowledgeable guy out there. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Gordon Olson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question That guy is a knucklehead. The Best Cert is the one you need or help you do your job better. That is the best cert. I have a CCNP and CCDP and I really do not work in that industry. I really am an admin working with M$, Cisco, Citrix, Unix etc I studied the Cisco stuff because we were converting from x.25 to frame relay and I wanted to do it so I asked the company to give me a shot. I used the knowledge again when we switched to NVPN. My only point is that the Certs were about what I needed to improve my skill set. I had to hire a guy recently (echoing Lori and Ray) and I hired the guy that had very little Practical experience but he did have an MCSE. I thought that at least showed that he wanted to learn. I interviewed a few others that had more experience and never took the time to educate themselves in their chosen craft. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question Don't invite that speaker again. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cerification question There is a big sqaubble about the best certification to get( and this was being discussed at Ohio State) That if you was going to get any type of certification EXCHANGE IS NOT THE ONE to get, Cisco is the premier certification.One of the speakers was telling a senior class this before graduation starts. Do anyone agree with that or does it make a difference? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cerification question
New people. Old pissed off people. Etc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 8:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question Why do we go through this every three to six months? William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Soysal, Serdar Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question Certs are not a sign of competency. They just mean that the person is capable of memorizing braindumps. I interviewed MCSEs that answered the question Explain your NT domain structure in your previous job with an answer like We had ATM coming to the back of our PCs. You've got to be careful with MCSEs that come with huge resumes. There are some ways you can tell if they're good or not though. For example if the candidate writes MCSE with a larger font than his own name, you probably have a clueless wall-licker in your hands. If a person doesn't have certification, it means that he/she has not sat through the tests. That person can be the most knowledgeable guy out there. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Gordon Olson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question That guy is a knucklehead. The Best Cert is the one you need or help you do your job better. That is the best cert. I have a CCNP and CCDP and I really do not work in that industry. I really am an admin working with M$, Cisco, Citrix, Unix etc I studied the Cisco stuff because we were converting from x.25 to frame relay and I wanted to do it so I asked the company to give me a shot. I used the knowledge again when we switched to NVPN. My only point is that the Certs were about what I needed to improve my skill set. I had to hire a guy recently (echoing Lori and Ray) and I hired the guy that had very little Practical experience but he did have an MCSE. I thought that at least showed that he wanted to learn. I interviewed a few others that had more experience and never took the time to educate themselves in their chosen craft. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question Don't invite that speaker again. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cerification question There is a big sqaubble about the best certification to get( and this was being discussed at Ohio State) That if you was going to get any type of certification EXCHANGE IS NOT THE ONE to get, Cisco is the premier certification.One of the speakers was telling a senior class this before graduation starts. Do anyone agree with that or does it make a difference? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cerification question
Hi, Have you got any of those certificates? I suppose that you do not have! There is an expression in Turkey that is Kedi uzanamad ciere mndar der. I do not know the English version of the expression. It might be If the cat will not get the meat, he/she thinks that it must be BAD. Volkan MSc Engineer MCP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Soysal, Serdar Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question Certs are not a sign of competency. They just mean that the person is capable of memorizing braindumps. I interviewed MCSEs that answered the question Explain your NT domain structure in your previous job with an answer like We had ATM coming to the back of our PCs. You've got to be careful with MCSEs that come with huge resumes. There are some ways you can tell if they're good or not though. For example if the candidate writes MCSE with a larger font than his own name, you probably have a clueless wall-licker in your hands. If a person doesn't have certification, it means that he/she has not sat through the tests. That person can be the most knowledgeable guy out there. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Gordon Olson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question That guy is a knucklehead. The Best Cert is the one you need or help you do your job better. That is the best cert. I have a CCNP and CCDP and I really do not work in that industry. I really am an admin working with M$, Cisco, Citrix, Unix etc I studied the Cisco stuff because we were converting from x.25 to frame relay and I wanted to do it so I asked the company to give me a shot. I used the knowledge again when we switched to NVPN. My only point is that the Certs were about what I needed to improve my skill set. I had to hire a guy recently (echoing Lori and Ray) and I hired the guy that had very little Practical experience but he did have an MCSE. I thought that at least showed that he wanted to learn. I interviewed a few others that had more experience and never took the time to educate themselves in their chosen craft. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question Don't invite that speaker again. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cerification question There is a big sqaubble about the best certification to get( and this was being discussed at Ohio State) That if you was going to get any type of certification EXCHANGE IS NOT THE ONE to get, Cisco is the premier certification.One of the speakers was telling a senior class this before graduation starts. Do anyone agree with that or does it make a difference? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
