RE: MEC
Unfortunately, I can not attend - next year, hopefully! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott Force Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC I too will be there. Any words of advice for first time attendees? I plan on bringing clean underwear and trying my first fish taco. In addition to that, what else can I expect? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC
Next year should be interesting. This is essentially the last MEC. According to the latest MEC mailing, Next year they will be combining MEC and TechEd into one new conference. -Original Message- From: Don Couch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 1:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Unfortunately, I can not attend - next year, hopefully! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott Force Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC I too will be there. Any words of advice for first time attendees? I plan on bringing clean underwear and trying my first fish taco. In addition to that, what else can I expect? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Brightmail
Yeah, me stupid foreigner :) I mis-read legit vs illegit. -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 8:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Brightmail Huh? You got your math wrong, Andrey. Alberto, Contact me offline if you want more input on nemx. /Peter - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 9:08 AM Subject: RE: Brightmail Hehe that sounds like Hotmail new strategy - reject 99% of mail and chances are most spam will be killed. -Original Message- From: Alberto Faccioli . [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 3:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brightmail NEMX seems to have good tools for spam filtering (and more). Server based (with user-specific rules), use RBL, and run on MSX 2K/5.5 and SBS4.5/2K. http://www.nemx.com/products/index.asp But I never heard of NEMX on this list other than one satisfied comment in early September: I'm using it succesfuly. It quarantines about 2000 messages a day of wich 20 are legit messages. Anybody else out there has any other experience to share? Alberto -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 2:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brightmail CloudMark is also a client app. Runs ok most of them. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 18:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Brightmail I'm running a copy of IHateSpam from Sunbelt (www.sunbelt-software.com). Seems to work well. This is not a server-based solution, but does most of the other things you want. You could add it to a standard image. David -Original Message- From: ITS.Teams.TNT.Mailing-Lists.MailingList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 2:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Brightmail We're currently investigating anti-spam products and are particularly interested in any products that allow the end user the ability to have some control over what is considered spam and what is not. Ideally, we'd like a product that places suspected spam into a separate folder within the clients' mailboxes where they can then deal with it themselves. In addition, we'd like for this to be a completely server-based solution. I know some products allow you to append a phrase to the subject of suspected spam messages so that users can then set up rules in Outlook to move those messages to a folder, but we'd prefer to have this happen automatically (without user intervention). The only product I've seen so far that can do this is Brightmail. Is anyone using Brightmail for Exchange? Are there any other products out there that would accomplish our goals? We're running Exchange 2000 SP2 and have about 2000 users. Thanks, Abby _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
RE: MIME and Exchange
Not sure. Some time ago I had an issue where Gordano NT Mail and Exchange 2000 could not communicate reliably with each other. We had to dumb down Exchange - US ASCII instead of default Western European ISO-8859-1 (default). Provide message body as plain text. I guess all these were for traffic from Exchange to NT Mail. Also I am looking at the settings right now. For the inbound traffic on the Exchange server we set the SMTP Virtual Server to only process 1 message per connection. For some reason NT Mail and Exchange did not agree on processing multiple messages per connection. -Original Message- From: Joe Berthiaume [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 5:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MIME and Exchange Andrey- This is an interesting point...i've forwarded it on to the PMDF guys...the only question I have is, if the encoding were screwed up, why are only certain files/mail messages getting hung up? -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 4:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MIME and Exchange If there is no DATA command, how does Exchange ever know that the data will be MIME or something else? I think there is something else going on there like different character sets or 7-bit vs 8-bit encoding. Also is there any way to force that PRDL system to send messages in UUENCODE? -Original Message- From: Joe Berthiaume [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 3:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MIME and Exchange Here's the story. We have essentially 2 systems...legacy system running PMDF mail, and the Windows end running Exchange 2000. Users frequently send messages, with attachments(simple text files) or bodies full of text(plain...fixed width), from the legacy end, via PMDF 6.11, to the Exchange Server ( Windows 2000 sp2, exchange sp2) and the messages are read with a mix of Outlook 2000 - 2002. Recently, some of these mails have not been reaching users inbox in Outlook. PMDF logs show that the message was sent, but no acknowledgment was received from Exchange, so PMDF marks it as a failure, and backs off and tries again later. SMTP logs on the Exchange Server show EHLO, MAIL, RCPT commands but no DATA or QUIT commands as a successful SMTP conversation would. Playing around with it some more resulted in some more data...it's possible to force PMDF to send the attachment as different MIME parts. If the attachment comes across as the 2nd MIME part it gets delivered on Exchange with no problem...but if it's included as the 1st MIME part, it doesn't come through. Note that the message isn't long...it just has a lot of columns.(224) sometimes with characters and things like tabs, *, - or ~'s. If we send just a short message, and short attachment, in the first MIME part, it comes across...thus leading me to believe that there's some kind of byte limitation in the first MIME part. PMDF support, and the PMDF admin here thinks it's Exchange...that it's in violation of some MIME RFC...I don't know. I can grab one of the files that won't come over and send it to Exchange from Yahoo, Hotmail, or AOL (yuck) and it comes over without a problem...I know that most mail services embed the attachments in the 2nd MIME part, but I think that's because even if you don't include any body text, they stick in that dumb advertising in the body of the message, thus forcing the attachment into MIME part #2. They are telling me to call PSS about this...but I hesitate to do so because stuff like this inevitably winds up being a PMDF screw up or misconfiguration (in case you haven't figured it out by now, I hate PMDF). Latest version of Trend Scanmail for Exchange 2000 is installed and running on the Exchange 2000 box. Thanks in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Disappearing appointments
Has anyone ever heard of Calendar appointments just disappearing? My users are complaining that they had a calendar appointment but it some how was deleted. Also one is saying that someone just received an invitation to a meeting from December of last year. Any one heard of this behavior? Thank you, Alex _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: win2k sp2 smtp server error 5.0.0
Updated - I think I might have found the problem: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q240832 but if I set it to use HELO, I don't get the option for it to use EHLO, so I would lose the ability to send out as ESMTP?? Rob Ellis Network Manager Profectus IT Tel 023 9224 7960 Mob 07974 111867 -Original Message- From: Rob Ellis Sent: 26 September 2002 15:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: win2k sp2 smtp server error 5.0.0 Using a Win2K sp2 box in our DMZ running the MS smtp server, as a relay for our E2K server. All incoming traffic flows fine, but we are getting a number of NDRs such as: The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did not report a specific reason. Check the address and try again. If it still fails, contact your system administrator. mail.profectus.co.uk #5.0.0 smtp;500 Syntax error, command unrecognized this is happening for a variety of domain names, including hotmail.com (which I'm not that worried about, but some of the domains are actually 'proper' domains.) Could it be that the IP that our server sits on has been blacklisted by certain ISPs? Rob Ellis Network Manager Profectus IT Tel 023 9224 7960 Mob 07974 111867 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Disappearing appointments
How is the calendar settings. Maybe check the date range. - Original Message - From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 8:12 AM Subject: Disappearing appointments Has anyone ever heard of Calendar appointments just disappearing? My users are complaining that they had a calendar appointment but it some how was deleted. Also one is saying that someone just received an invitation to a meeting from December of last year. Any one heard of this behavior? Thank you, Alex _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disappearing appointments
Has anyone ever heard of Calendar appointments just disappearing? Yes, but I tended to put it down to user error. My users are complaining that they had a calendar appointment but it some how was deleted. It's probably worth checking to see if the meeting creator didn't cancel/recall it. I'd start with the meeting creator (or their delegates if their inbasket is shared in any way) before I went any further. Also one is saying that someone just received an invitation to a meeting from December of last year. Any one heard of this behavior? Are you using pure Exchange or do you have any legacy systems on the side? (eg. PROFS connector, POP3 server) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Conversion
Is there a process in the migration is there a tool or anything that clears up any whitespace, or any errors that the old edb may have? Am trying to get some time allotted to run isinteg and eseutil on both of my edb's, but higher ups seem to think that something along the lines of an isinteg and eseutil are done by the migration process. cc _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disappearing appointments
Well it was an appointment that was from the current day. It was there at 8am but gone by 3pm when the appointment was. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 9:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Disappearing appointments How is the calendar settings. Maybe check the date range. - Original Message - From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 8:12 AM Subject: Disappearing appointments Has anyone ever heard of Calendar appointments just disappearing? My users are complaining that they had a calendar appointment but it some how was deleted. Also one is saying that someone just received an invitation to a meeting from December of last year. Any one heard of this behavior? Thank you, Alex _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Conversion
You have 2000? Create a new information store and move mailboxes to the new store. The mailbox move process preserves single instance storage. Moving the mailboxes only brings over the actual data, leaving whitespace behind. -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 9:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Conversion Is there a process in the migration is there a tool or anything that clears up any whitespace, or any errors that the old edb may have? Am trying to get some time allotted to run isinteg and eseutil on both of my edb's, but higher ups seem to think that something along the lines of an isinteg and eseutil are done by the migration process. cc _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Conversion
What are you migrating to? New hardware or newer Exchange? - Original Message - From: Callan, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 8:46 AM Subject: Conversion Is there a process in the migration is there a tool or anything that clears up any whitespace, or any errors that the old edb may have? Am trying to get some time allotted to run isinteg and eseutil on both of my edb's, but higher ups seem to think that something along the lines of an isinteg and eseutil are done by the migration process. cc _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
using mailserver from another domain
I have 2 w2k domains. 1 (domA) has a Xch mail server, the other (domB) not. Is it possible for the users of domB to use the mail server in domA. And what are the steps I have to take? Can I make a mailbox for the users of domB on the exhange server in domA? Many thanks in advance Berepoot _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disappearing appointments
Well, you havent given us much to go on, so at this point try disabling the local calendar option in Outlook. Unless you are using O2002, in which case that option doesnt exist. -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 9:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Disappearing appointments Has anyone ever heard of Calendar appointments just disappearing? My users are complaining that they had a calendar appointment but it some how was deleted. Also one is saying that someone just received an invitation to a meeting from December of last year. Any one heard of this behavior? Thank you, Alex _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange HELL
A HUGE block of training - in a hurry. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange HELL I was recently given the responsibility for an Exchange 2000 Server. This server has lots of problems: 1- The database disk is full, it has only 16MB free. The database has 5GB. 2- The online defragmentation tells me that the database has 1,9GB free, but I don't have enough free space to do an offline defrag. 3- When I run System Manager I only see Recipients and Tools. There's no sign of Global Settings and Administrative Groups 4- When I select Recipients I get the messages An invalid ADSI pathname was passed An operations error occurred I would like to hear your suggestions to solve all this problems. Thanks in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MIME and Exchange
Did you run the obvious other set of tests? Try sending from PMDF to those other mail systems as well. If you cough up the same errors, then . . . -Original Message- From: Joe Berthiaume [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 12:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MIME and Exchange Here's the story. We have essentially 2 systems...legacy system running PMDF mail, and the Windows end running Exchange 2000. Users frequently send messages, with attachments(simple text files) or bodies full of text(plain...fixed width), from the legacy end, via PMDF 6.11, to the Exchange Server ( Windows 2000 sp2, exchange sp2) and the messages are read with a mix of Outlook 2000 - 2002. Recently, some of these mails have not been reaching users inbox in Outlook. PMDF logs show that the message was sent, but no acknowledgment was received from Exchange, so PMDF marks it as a failure, and backs off and tries again later. SMTP logs on the Exchange Server show EHLO, MAIL, RCPT commands but no DATA or QUIT commands as a successful SMTP conversation would. Playing around with it some more resulted in some more data...it's possible to force PMDF to send the attachment as different MIME parts. If the attachment comes across as the 2nd MIME part it gets delivered on Exchange with no problem...but if it's included as the 1st MIME part, it doesn't come through. Note that the message isn't long...it just has a lot of columns.(224) sometimes with characters and things like tabs, *, - or ~'s. If we send just a short message, and short attachment, in the first MIME part, it comes across...thus leading me to believe that there's some kind of byte limitation in the first MIME part. PMDF support, and the PMDF admin here thinks it's Exchange...that it's in violation of some MIME RFC...I don't know. I can grab one of the files that won't come over and send it to Exchange from Yahoo, Hotmail, or AOL (yuck) and it comes over without a problem...I know that most mail services embed the attachments in the 2nd MIME part, but I think that's because even if you don't include any body text, they stick in that dumb advertising in the body of the message, thus forcing the attachment into MIME part #2. They are telling me to call PSS about this...but I hesitate to do so because stuff like this inevitably winds up being a PMDF screw up or misconfiguration (in case you haven't figured it out by now, I hate PMDF). Latest version of Trend Scanmail for Exchange 2000 is installed and running on the Exchange 2000 box. Thanks in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Conversion
Depends on the migration process being used. -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Conversion Is there a process in the migration is there a tool or anything that clears up any whitespace, or any errors that the old edb may have? Am trying to get some time allotted to run isinteg and eseutil on both of my edb's, but higher ups seem to think that something along the lines of an isinteg and eseutil are done by the migration process. cc _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: using mailserver from another domain
In the same AD Forest? Run setup.exe /domainprep on domB. -Original Message- From: Berepoot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, September 27, 2002 10:01 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: using mailserver from another domain Subject: using mailserver from another domain I have 2 w2k domains. 1 (domA) has a Xch mail server, the other (domB) not. Is it possible for the users of domB to use the mail server in domA. And what are the steps I have to take? Can I make a mailbox for the users of domB on the exhange server in domA? Many thanks in advance Berepoot _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lyris Experience?
I am running a mailing with Lyris Listserver and I have a mail oddity going on. Mails dont get delivered to anyone on my list with an @aol.com domain. If I open up Outlook Express on the same server and deliver the mail by sending to my ISP's SMTP server the mail gets to the AOL user. If I deliver using Lyris whether direct DNS delivery or sending on to same SMTP server for forwarding the mail never gets to the AOL account. The server has a DNS registration as well as a PTR record (list.jergens.com). When I had the domain name (jergens.com) entered under the computer name - advanced tab, the Outlook Express send would fail as well. Once I removed that, the Outlook Express send works now but the Lyris send is still failing. Anyone have any ideas? TIA Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: using mailserver from another domain
Just allow for relaying from domB by IP address [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Berepoot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 11:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: using mailserver from another domain I have 2 w2k domains. 1 (domA) has a Xch mail server, the other (domB) not. Is it possible for the users of domB to use the mail server in domA. And what are the steps I have to take? Can I make a mailbox for the users of domB on the exhange server in domA? Many thanks in advance Berepoot _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Conversion
New Hardware and New exchange Going from Two Exch5.5 Machine to A Clustered E2k Machine. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 11:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Conversion What are you migrating to? New hardware or newer Exchange? - Original Message - From: Callan, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 8:46 AM Subject: Conversion Is there a process in the migration is there a tool or anything that clears up any whitespace, or any errors that the old edb may have? Am trying to get some time allotted to run isinteg and eseutil on both of my edb's, but higher ups seem to think that something along the lines of an isinteg and eseutil are done by the migration process. cc _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Trend Scanmail Q: filt EXE but make exceptions
Don't block .zip, make them zip their .exe. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 3:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Trend Scanmail Q: filt EXE but make exceptions Can anyone using the Trend Scanmail product on Exchange(55) answer the following: Q: Is it possible to set the scanmail to filter EXE attachments, and/but Make exceptions for centain EXE's? Here is the deal: Ive got Exch55sp4 NT4sp6a... Running GRPSHL 4.5sp1(stop laughing it works now..finally) Ok So Ive got GS to filter out all EXE (along with martins list of evil too...plus some others) My problem was that I had to make an exception for 2 EXE's for an internal app to send out...NAI Tech came up with a reg hack/entry where I could specify these 2 EXE's and GS would allow them to pass. Ive been considering going to Scanmail...but have not gotten a straight answer(from Trend) as to weather I could do this...All I got was...dont filter EXE on the exchange box..do it at the interscan smtp prefilter software/boxsorry but I want to filter EXE's in the exchange box toobut I need these exceptions thanks bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why move to E2K
I have been asked by our CTO to justify why we should go to E2K and spend $2.00 as result of the move on new real time mirroring software. I have gathered the usual MS stuff but would you have any compelling reason that I could also add or point me to other resources. Thanks the extra 20 grand comes as a result of Double Take (which unfortunately we already own) not supporting E2K like Exch 5.5 (if you look at their site they never mention this) and thus the need to go to NSI Geo Cluster (another crap, pardon my english) as our CTO wants an automatic failover just in case there is no one around. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Conversion
New Hardware and New exchange Going from Two Exch5.5 Machine to A Clustered E2k Machine. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Multiple updaters for a DL
Well yea. She expecting to meet a guy. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 6:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Multiple updaters for a DL Missy still talks to anyone who will listen about our first in person meeting. -Original Message- From: Murray Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 11:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Multiple updaters for a DL I'm not quite sure now. Oh, Missy? Have you met Chris? I think you two would get along famously. humor-challenged Yes, I'm aware that Chris and Missy have attended several MEC events, and have probably met in person. I'm making another of my (in)famous attempts at humor. Please see the archives (and good luck to you) for examples of my previous successes. /humor-challenged - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 3:04 PM Subject: RE: Multiple updaters for a DL Dls can't be owners of DLs. What's the question again? -Original Message- From: Murray Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 12:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Multiple updaters for a DL You're killing me, Missy. So, obviously it wasn't Missy who said that a DL couldn't own another. My brilliant facility with logic enables me to deduce that it must've been someone else. Either that, or I've imagined the whole thing. So, first thing in the morning, I'm gonna have another whack at it. On a related note, Missy's second statement about E2K has me somewhat concerned (only somewhat, because I'm the calm, cool, collected type). This leads me to two questions: Isn't this a migration issue? How have other people dealt with this? - Original Message - From: Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2002 8:41 AM Subject: Re: Multiple updaters for a DL In 5.5, a DL can own another DL. In E2K, it cannot. - Original Message - From: Murray Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 11:56 PM Subject: Re: Multiple updaters for a DL That's what I thought. However, I couldn't make it happen. I seem to remember a post from some expert (you? Chris Scharff? Missy? Daniel? Oh, dear, that's gonna drive me nuts) saying that a DL couldn't be the owner of another DL. Hoping that this wasn't true, I tried it again and again. It seems to be true. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 8:28 AM Subject: RE: Multiple updaters for a DL I thought the way to do it was to put the DL in the Owner field for the list. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Murray Alexander Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 9:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Multiple updaters for a DL In the hope that I'm actually contributing something useful, because I _still_ can't figure out how to get at the archives... EX5.5 SP3, NT4 SP6a: I've discovered how to give multiple people update privileges on a DL. We have two domains, PEOPLE and EXCHANGE, where the latter trusts the former. Each Exchange mailbox is associated with a PEOPLE domain account. I created a NT Global Group (DLADMINS) that contains the NT accounts associated with the mailboxes of those who need update privileges. Then, in Exchange Administrator, I added that group, with User privileges, to the Permissions page of DLs that needed attention from these people. I know I've seen posts from others asking about this, but can't remember if anyone had a solution. If you did all this months ago and posted your findings, when did you do that? I've been keeping my own archive for about a year, and couldn't find it. If you know how to get to the archives, please give me lots of details off-line. Despite some foot-in-mouth postings earlier, I consider myself reasonably intelligent. I really do want to understand this stuff. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Wrong address pops up in OL2k
note that you can also delete a specific nickname from the list. when the little popup appears on the screen, you can hit the delete key and remove just that nickname. === Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 === -Original Message- From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, September 26, 2002 10:36 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: Wrong address pops up in OL2k Subject: RE: Wrong address pops up in OL2k Q242074 got it. Thanks, all. -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 4:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Wrong address pops up in OL2k Sure. Turn off auto-name checking. Type in the SMTP name (i.e., [EMAIL PROTECTED]) and let it resolve. It should stay that way from then on. Then, if you want, turn auto-name checking back on. Geoff... -Original Message- From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 3:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Wrong address pops up in OL2k Here's the situation: Mike (the user) wants to send an email to Heather (who is external to our organization). Heather is in Mike's Contacts list, and to email Heather he just types Heather in OL's To: field and everything is fine. Heather's email address has recently changed. Mike changed her entry in his Contacts to reflect the new address, but when he types Heather in the To: field now, it resolves to her old email address. I've confirmed that she is the only Heather in his Contacts, and that her email address as entered there is the current one. Any ideas? Thanks! ___ Chris Levis Applied Geographics, Inc. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: smtp address
Default Recipient Policy. === Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 === -Original Message- From: Berepoot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 4:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: smtp address I have a windows2000 domain and an Exchange 2000 server. All new mail enabled users recieve the [EMAIL PROTECTED] domain. But I want to change it in Exchange so that all the users get an email address of [EMAIL PROTECTED] domain. And the problem is that I know not enough of exchange to do that. Is there anyone who can give me the place where I can configure it in Exchange system management. Tx in advance Berepoot _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Opening other user's mailboxes
it's impossible to correct every off-base random usenet poster. you should, indeed, avoid looking at permissions on the M: drive. for mailbox permissions, you need to use the Mailbox Rights tab on the mailboxes as described in the KB articles. === Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 === -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 12:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opening other user's mailboxes Oh, that was a random Usenet poster telling another random Usenet poster that they should modify Mailbox permissions from the folders under the M:\ drive. They needed calendar permissions changed, so I assumed (very wrongly) that it could work also for the inbox permissions. However, because of this list, I am afraid to even look at the M:\ icon in Explorer so I thought I'd ask. By the way, no one responded to that random Usenet person telling them they are wrong. AW On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, you wrote: What? Do it in AD. Besides what does right clicking on Calendar have to do with Mailbox access? -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Opening other user's mailboxes Hi, If I look in the ACtive-directory Computers and Users console, I see that one of the users (that can open other mailboxes) is a domain-user, and also members of some distribution lists I setup. But if I use explorer, I see that under M:\ - DOMAIN - MBX - UserName - Inbox has the group everybody with full rights (!) I am not sure how this happened but I'd like to know how to change it. On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, you wrote: what permissions do the users have, I know that if you have Admin privleges you can open anyone mailbox. A -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Opening other user's mailboxes Hallo, I have (at least) 2 users that can open other user's Mailboxes. In my frantic search for a solution, I came across a post on usenet which states: Check the permissions in the (M) drive that exchange creates. Goto the mail box that you want to view, right click on the calendar, goto security, then set the permissions. Hope this helps. From reading this list, I know to ignore the M drive for doing backups. But in this case can I change permissions as mentioned above? I don't see how to do it in the Exchange Administrator console nor on the client. Thanks, AW Exchange 2000, client Outlook 2000 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How did you set up Searching Public Folders?
Not free. Microsoft SharePoint Portal Server can index and search public folders. There are other third party applications too. === Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 === -Original Message- From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 12:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: How did you set up Searching Public Folders? I've looked on Microsoft Knowledgebase and have found that you can't search sub folders with Public Folders because they can be on different Servers. Has any one an application or plug in that can do this? john Remember 9/11 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 ssl accelerator
I know people have done this quite a bit. Don't know about that specific hardware though. Does OWA work on the FE without the SSLA? === Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 === -Original Message- From: Info1 Team [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 4:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 ssl accelerator Anyone ever been successful deploying E2k in a front end/back end scenario with the front end box in a DMZ along with a hardware ssl accelerator? Can't get OWA to work correctly. You get prompted for authentication twice and then you can get into OWA, but Exchange automatically redirects it to a http vice an https connection. It's the exact same problem that is outlined in the below Q article. The only problem is that we aren't running a proxy server and there is no way on the h/w accelerator box to add the header. OWA will be the primary means of accessing corporate email and we need the functionality provided by the hardware SSL accelerator to handle all the SSL encryption/decryption with as many connections as possible vice limiting the number of connections using traditional IIS SSL. E2k Enterprise svc pk 3 Win2k Svc Pk 3 Intel Netstructure 7110 hardware accelerators PSS ID Number: Q260772 Article last modified on 09-18-2000 winnt: winnt == --- The information in this article applies to: - Microsoft Exchange 2000 Server --- SYMPTOMS When you use Microsoft Outlook Web Access (OWA) with Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) enabled to connect to a front-end Exchange 2000 Server computer that is running behind a proxy server, the SSL connection may not be successful. This problem may also occur when you are using only a back-end Exchange 2000 Server computer. CAUSE = This problem can occur because SSL or HTTPS requests arrive at the back-end Exchange 2000 Server computer on port 80 instead of arriving at the front-end Exchange 2000 Server computer. Redirects are returned as http://; instead of https://;. RESOLUTION == To resolve this problem, configure the proxy server to add the following header on upstream requests when OWA SSL requests are on port 443: FrontendHTTPS:ON STATUS == Microsoft has confirmed this to be a problem in Microsoft Exchange 2000 Server. Additional query words: xmrp == Keywords : Component : WebClient Version : winnt: Platform : winnt Issue type: kbbug Solution Type : kbnofix = Copyright Microsoft Corporation 2000. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC
I thought they'd already done that more or less. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 4:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Next year should be interesting. This is essentially the last MEC. According to the latest MEC mailing, Next year they will be combining MEC and TechEd into one new conference. -Original Message- From: Don Couch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 1:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Unfortunately, I can not attend - next year, hopefully! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott Force Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC I too will be there. Any words of advice for first time attendees? I plan on bringing clean underwear and trying my first fish taco. In addition to that, what else can I expect? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Trend Scanmail Q: filt EXE but make exceptions
For what it's worth you can do this in Antigen. -Peter -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 13:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Trend Scanmail Q: filt EXE but make exceptions Can anyone using the Trend Scanmail product on Exchange(55) answer the following: Q: Is it possible to set the scanmail to filter EXE attachments, and/but Make exceptions for centain EXE's? Here is the deal: Ive got Exch55sp4 NT4sp6a... Running GRPSHL 4.5sp1(stop laughing it works now..finally) Ok So Ive got GS to filter out all EXE (along with martins list of evil too...plus some others) My problem was that I had to make an exception for 2 EXE's for an internal app to send out...NAI Tech came up with a reg hack/entry where I could specify these 2 EXE's and GS would allow them to pass. Ive been considering going to Scanmail...but have not gotten a straight answer(from Trend) as to weather I could do this...All I got was...dont filter EXE on the exchange box..do it at the interscan smtp prefilter software/boxsorry but I want to filter EXE's in the exchange box toobut I need these exceptions thanks bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Conversion
Migrate using FAQ Appendix A and whitespace won't migrate. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Callan, Chris Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 11:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conversion New Hardware and New exchange Going from Two Exch5.5 Machine to A Clustered E2k Machine. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 11:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Conversion What are you migrating to? New hardware or newer Exchange? - Original Message - From: Callan, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 8:46 AM Subject: Conversion Is there a process in the migration is there a tool or anything that clears up any whitespace, or any errors that the old edb may have? Am trying to get some time allotted to run isinteg and eseutil on both of my edb's, but higher ups seem to think that something along the lines of an isinteg and eseutil are done by the migration process. cc _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Why move to E2K
Did you want justifications for IT or reasons it will help your business? Are you looking for a way to justify it so you can use it or are there actual business needs that E2K provides? The efforts in your justification may well point to it being unnecessary. William To save time: From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 1:37 PM Subject: Re: Why go to E2k My justifications: Information store can be split a different HDs. thus corruption doesnot mean probable loss of all of the days' emails or downtime for everyone. Exchange 2000 with Microsoft Windows 2000 has a single, enterprise directory, the Microsoft Active Directory directory service, for all file, print, application, user, and other messaging objects. When Microsoft Office documents are stored in Exchange 2000, Office users can take advantage of the power of Outlook to view, sort, search, and manage documents with the same tools they currently use for their messages, calendars, and contacts. Tightly integrated instant messaging, chat, multimedia conferencing, and mobile services Enhanced functionality for Microsoft Internet Explorer users When accessed through Internet Explorer , Outlook Web Access closely resembles the full client interface (see Figure 1). Outlook Web Access is also more efficient for Internet Explorer users because it does not require communication with the Outlook Web Access server for every mouse click in the interface support for embedded items Outlook Web Access now supports embedded items such as messages, appointments, and meeting requests, as well as contacts and posts. Support for public folders that contain contact and calendar items AD and Exchange can now be managed thru a single interface. however I am afraid this might not be enough! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of M2web Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 12:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Why move to E2K I have been asked by our CTO to justify why we should go to E2K and spend $2.00 as result of the move on new real time mirroring software. I have gathered the usual MS stuff but would you have any compelling reason that I could also add or point me to other resources. Thanks the extra 20 grand comes as a result of Double Take (which unfortunately we already own) not supporting E2K like Exch 5.5 (if you look at their site they never mention this) and thus the need to go to NSI Geo Cluster (another crap, pardon my english) as our CTO wants an automatic failover just in case there is no one around. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Why move to E2K
We don't know anything about how your organization uses Exchange, so there's no way to offer any constructive information about the ROI of upgrading. Certainly having an additional $20K to overcome will make the return harder to achieve. === Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 === -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, September 27, 2002 2:56 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: Why move to E2K Subject: Why move to E2K I have been asked by our CTO to justify why we should go to E2K and spend $2.00 as result of the move on new real time mirroring software. I have gathered the usual MS stuff but would you have any compelling reason that I could also add or point me to other resources. Thanks the extra 20 grand comes as a result of Double Take (which unfortunately we already own) not supporting E2K like Exch 5.5 (if you look at their site they never mention this) and thus the need to go to NSI Geo Cluster (another crap, pardon my english) as our CTO wants an automatic failover just in case there is no one around. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC
Mark Your Calendar To make it as convenient as possible for our customers to learn about the Microsoft platform - how the products work together, how to plan deployments, and how to build solutions - next year, the MEC content will be combined with Tech*Ed. Microsoft will be releasing of a core set of products in 2003 including Windows .NET Server 2003, Exchange, Office, Visual Studio .NET 2003, SharePoint Portal Server, SharePoint Team Services and SQL Server. In order to offer a mix of IT infrastructure and developer content in a single event, Tech*Ed will be significantly expanded and MEC will be discontinued as a stand-alone conference. An additional day and more than 100 new sessions have been added to the Tech*Ed agenda. You'll also receive more information about other Tech*Ed activities that will continue to foster the strong IT professional community. And, as a MEC 2002 attendee, you will receive $500 off the Tech*Ed 2003 registration fee. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 4:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC I thought they'd already done that more or less. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 4:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Next year should be interesting. This is essentially the last MEC. According to the latest MEC mailing, Next year they will be combining MEC and TechEd into one new conference. -Original Message- From: Don Couch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 1:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Unfortunately, I can not attend - next year, hopefully! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott Force Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC I too will be there. Any words of advice for first time attendees? I plan on bringing clean underwear and trying my first fish taco. In addition to that, what else can I expect? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Conversion
Need much more info. If your asking how to do this by asking this list then you should hire someone to do it. All migrations/upgrades have there own unique problems and processes based on the infrastructure. There is no one way. - Original Message - From: Callan, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 1:40 PM Subject: RE: Conversion New Hardware and New exchange Going from Two Exch5.5 Machine to A Clustered E2k Machine. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 11:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Conversion What are you migrating to? New hardware or newer Exchange? - Original Message - From: Callan, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 8:46 AM Subject: Conversion Is there a process in the migration is there a tool or anything that clears up any whitespace, or any errors that the old edb may have? Am trying to get some time allotted to run isinteg and eseutil on both of my edb's, but higher ups seem to think that something along the lines of an isinteg and eseutil are done by the migration process. cc _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
