RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2
For WebShield: SolutionID nai12092 SolutionID nai16437 For Groupshield 5.0: SolutionID nai24822 It's documented, it's fixed, but you must contact NAI to get hold of it, which I did about 2 weeks ago, and they never got back to me. Sorry for the tone, but I'd rather be called wild and irresponsible on a dancefloor than in a forum. -Original Message- From: Dan Bartley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 October 2002 2:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 I could not let this one pass. For the record, you better take a closer look at how you have installed Exchange and GroupShield and how things are managed in your network. Particularly if your description below is accurate. First off, why isn't your boot.ini read only? It is supposed to be. Second, why isn't your OS defaulting to the c:\winnt if the boot.ini can not be found, it is supposed to. Perhaps you installed to a non-default directory, that would be a good reason. Third, I've been using GroupShield 5.0, 5.1 and 5.2 on numerous systems at several companies. Updates have failed many times and I have encountered many different annoying bugs, but never has it done even close to what you described below. Before you start making software changes and decisions, I suggest you re-evaluate your current management models and trouble shooting techniques first. Sorry for the terse tone, but there are many people new to this area reading these posts, and wild, irresponsible statements like below do not help others develop a professional edge. As far as what is best, as Andy David said, use what works for you. It all comes down to preferences on bugs and features. None of them are perfect, everyone has a different experience for each one. Test several, see what addresses the most of what you need and expect. Best Regards, Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 18:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 I'll have a look at trend... Thanks for the info. For the record, we DID have an issue with Groupshield, and this goes out to ALL GROUPSHIELD USERS. There is a bug in Groupshield when used on an Exchange 2000 server. If the internet update fails (something quite normal as it's done daily over FTP, so it's bound to fail), it DELETES ALL NON-READ-ONLY FILES IN THE ROOT OF C:! That includes BOOT.INI. It happened to us twice on a live system, and once on a test system! Windows simply complains that it can't find NTOSKRNL.EXE and stops booting... We had to boot with the Win2K CD into the Recovery Console and manually copy a boot.ini file from another (similar) server to get it back up... -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 October 2002 11:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Heck, if it works for you and you have had success with it, stick with it. I have had bad experiences with McCrappy, and the upgrade price to the e-policy thing was more than just simply switching to Trend, with I really like. Ive also used Antigen, Symantec and ImNotGoingToScanIT, and of those , I have found Trend and Sybari the best, an opinion shared by many. BTW, once I switched to Trend, I rescanned and found viruses that McCrappy missed. YMMV. -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 5:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Can someone elaborate? We've been using it for 2 years and never had any problems. We're about to renew our subscription (not sure if we did already), as well as installing the management console (they call it e-policy orchestrator nowadays..) on a new server If it's so crap, we'll consider switching... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 October 2002 8:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 That will eventually change. They you will come back to the good side. -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 We use McAfee throughout... Never had any problems (apart from constantly trying to remember if it's called McAffee or McAfee or McAffe).. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 October 2002 4:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Or not... -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 7:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Or Symantec... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 00:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject:
RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5
No from Veritas it's their enterprise product. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 October 2002 02:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 Are u saying Netbackup from CA ? -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 10:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 Try Netbackup works on Unix or NT. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 October 2002 03:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Backing up Exchange 5.5 I was exposed recently to TSM Tivoli. I did about a 20-30 plus restores half of those from scratch. Nothing but net. Pardon the pun. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 6:36 AM Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 Try HP OmniBack II. Don't know the price but works just great. -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 9:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 It's BrightStor , same under CA .. Is ArcServe 2000 really that bad ? I've just tried, and it turned out not too bad. On the middle of discussing want to purchase or not !! -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 2:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 Brightwhore? Same crap. New name. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Fioon Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 I've download the BE trial copy , but it can't run. Funny, hang on Self Extract. Download again, same thing happened again. Any opinion on new ArcServe2000 BrightStore for the Disaster Recovery on Exchange 5.5 Issue ? Fin -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 11:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Backing up Exchange 5.5 Yes, as a google search would have shown. - Original Message - From: Fioon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:09 AM Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 Hi, May i know which third party are you guys talking about on this Backup Exec ? It's Veritas ?? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (6) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Recovering an Event Script from a Mailbox
But http://mail.tekscan.com/nomailboxes.htm Yes? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 01:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovering an Event Script from a Mailbox BLB = Brick Level Backup, or backup of individual mailboxes. SMR = I am guessing that this is Single Mailbox Restore. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Fioon Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 9:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovering an Event Script from a Mailbox Hei, Recently have interested in Veritas, but quite new. May i know what is BLB SMR guys referring to ? Thanks -Original Message- From: Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2002 1:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovering an Event Script from a Mailbox Thank you very much. Fortunately, I'm not using BLB. I'll proceed with my SMR. If I can't get it back through agents tab, I'll try the decoder and/or mdbvue . I'll let you know how I made out. Thanks again, Louise -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 5:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovering an Event Script from a Mailbox It's been quite a while when I was playing with this stuff and I remember that it is not trivial. Let's see what I can remember... The Exchange 5.5 Scripting agent script itself is stored as a hidden item in the folder it is applied to (in your case: the particular mailbox on Server A). Another second config item, also hidden, is created on the server the script is supposed to be executed (in your case Server B) in the system folder Event_Config (or similar - can't remember the correct name unfortunately). So, if you just want to get the script code back then try to restore the whole mailbox store on a recovery server [1] and use either a debugging tool [2] or try to connect with Outlook and see if you can get it via the Agents tab. [1] Note that if you use BLB [3] you might not be able to restore Scripting Agents. Only if you use an Exchange backup aware product to do a full IS backup/restore you have a chance. [2] Either MicroEye ScriptDorector (http://www.microeye.com/scriptdirector) or the Microsoft Agent Editor (used to be in the Exchange 5.5 SDK or BackOffice Resource Kit 4.5) or plain mdbvu32.exe (comes with Exchange on the setup CD). But the latter needs to be used CAREFULLY. [3] BLB = Brick Level Backup like it is offered with ArcServe, Veritas and other backup software. Siegfried / -Original Message- From: Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 8:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recovering an Event Script from a Mailbox Hi all, I'm hoping you can assist me in just how to recover an event script that is associated with a particular mailbox. It seems the script just disappeared and the developer did not have a copy. The mailbox sits on server A and the script was added to it through the Agents tab. The script executes on Server B. Presently, I'm making an assumption that restoring the mailbox from server A, I should also get the script. Is this correct? Thanks in advance, Louise _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _
RE: win2k sp2 smtp server error 5.0.0
Thanks for the help guys. My configuration only has one IP bound on the exchange server, so unfortuantely that technote didn't apply but definitely went into the saved bin! I did indeed telnet to the multiple mx records to test if they were up or down. A majority of ours goes to Govt. Facilities, and so far seem to be valid alternates. I did however, find one queue article that addressed this issue, but the fix is supposed to be in the SMTP service through IIS. Basically apply SP3. I did this over the weekend on a customer site, and 3 of their retry queues did clear, but many others did not. Still working it. The Q article I found was: Q303889 If a host answers and rejects the message, the message won't be rejected to another server. For example, a customer of mine had three ISP-managed MX recoreds, two of which pointed to a service provider that no longer hosted its domain. Had its primary mail server died, sending SMTP servers would try the bad alternates, which would bounce the messages. Without the two bad alternate MX records, the sending SMTP servers would retry for a while. Maybe what's happening in your case is that one of the two SMTP servers is misconfigured or something. Try doing a telnet session to port 25 on each to see if you can get any clues. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kevin Cobb Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 1:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: win2k sp2 smtp server error 5.0.0 I seem to be having the same issue with Exchange not mailing some domains, while mailing others just fine. (I also seen the same from time to time with Hotmail).What I've tracked down and believe to be happening is when a primary mx record is not answering, our exchange 2000 server is not attempting to mail to the secondary server. I'm seeing this on two other exchange 2000 servers as well. I fired up the older lotus notes server and watched the logs as it attempted mailing to the bad domain. The logs show that the initial mx record was attempted and failed, but then connected to the secondary and mail is transferred. Unfortuantely I cannot find any logs of this nature in exchange to show the process, but every domain in the retry queue with Connection Dropped by the Remote Host has a primary MX record that is not responding. Anyone have any clues on what might be going on on the Exchange box there? It's set up behind an ISA server. Has local and remote DNS lookup. Can resolve NSLOOKUPs from the exchange server. It just doesn't seem to want to attempt a secondary MX record if the primary fails. Any ideas would be greatly appreciated, and would save hairs on my head! Kevin Cobb Network Manager (703) 449-7600 Updated -=20 I think I might have found the problem: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=3Dkb;en-us;Q240832 but if I set it to use HELO, I don't get the option for it to use EHLO, so I would lose the ability to send out as ESMTP?? Rob Ellis=20 Network Manager=20 Profectus IT=20 Tel 023 9224 7960=20 Mob 07974 111867 -Original Message- From: Rob Ellis=20 Sent: 26 September 2002 15:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: win2k sp2 smtp server error 5.0.0 Using a Win2K sp2 box in our DMZ running the MS smtp server, as a relay for our E2K server. All incoming traffic flows fine, but we are getting a number of NDRs such as: The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did not report a specific reason. Check the address and try again. If it still fails, contact your system administrator. mail.profectus.co.uk #5.0.0 smtp;500 Syntax error, command unrecognized this is happening for a variety of domain names, including hotmail.com (which I'm not that worried about, but some of the domains are actually 'proper' domains.) Could it be that the IP that our server sits on has been blacklisted by certain ISPs? Rob Ellis=20 Network Manager=20 Profectus IT=20 Tel 023 9224 7960=20 Mob 07974 111867 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: E2k SP3 Problem with SMTP address with a dash ?
I resolved the problem ( at least exchange is transmitting the queued mail ) as follows. First since we were using only the default SMTP connector I created one in the conectors folder and then set it to send HELO instead of EHLO, after that the mail started to flow. Now as to why ?? Thanks to the list for providing a great resource _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Microsoft's new OS
Check this site out www.mslinux.org New Linux OS from Microsoft _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2k SP3 Problem with SMTP address with a dash ?
I resolved the problem ( at least exchange is transmitting the queued mail ) as follows. First since we were using only the default SMTP connector I created one in the conectors folder and then set it to send HELO instead of EHLO, after that the mail started to flow. Now as to why ?? Thanks to the list for providing a great resource _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Microsoft's new OS
This is not a real site.if you read it you can see itÂ’s a joke Melanie -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Muqeem Syed Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 6:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Microsoft's new OS Importance: High Check this site out www.mslinux.org New Linux OS from Microsoft _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.391 / Virus Database: 222 - Release Date: 9/19/02 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.391 / Virus Database: 222 - Release Date: 9/19/02 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Microsoft's new OS
Phew... I was already planning to sue MS for taking all our monkeys... :-P -Original Message- From: Melanie Foster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 October 2002 3:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Microsoft's new OS This is not a real site.if you read it you can see it's a joke Melanie -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Muqeem Syed Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 6:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Microsoft's new OS Importance: High Check this site out www.mslinux.org New Linux OS from Microsoft _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.391 / Virus Database: 222 - Release Date: 9/19/02 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.391 / Virus Database: 222 - Release Date: 9/19/02 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organizational Forms, and PF's
Just wanted to do a quick check. When you are doing synchronization you will not be able to see the organizational forms library. Correct, and actually you won't even be able to see public folders. If you want to see the public folders you have to connect and move a copy of them to your favorites folder. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Microsoft's new OS
I think that was idea. But good job by somebody. - Original Message - From: Melanie Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 8:38 AM Subject: RE: Microsoft's new OS This is not a real site.if you read it you can see it's a joke Melanie -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Muqeem Syed Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 6:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Microsoft's new OS Importance: High Check this site out www.mslinux.org New Linux OS from Microsoft _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.391 / Virus Database: 222 - Release Date: 9/19/02 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.391 / Virus Database: 222 - Release Date: 9/19/02 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Lotus Migration
There are a few tools out there that can easily migrate mail data from Lotus to PSTs. Some tools are not perfect. For example they change the Received data of the all migrated messages to the date of migration. Also when messages are migrated, their Reply-to field could get screwed up, and when people go to reply to one of those messages they will get an NDR. I think there are some tools out there that can deal with both issues. Some of these tools cost $. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 10:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Lotus Migration I may have to do a Lotus migration to Exchange 2000 in the near future. I have worked with Lotus only where we had a Connector setup to get Address info. To do a complete migration for approx 500 people. What would be the best way to get the mail out and imported into Exchange 2000. I was thinking of just putting Outlook clients on the desktops and use personal folders to hold mail from the Notes server, then switch users over to the Exchange server to get new mail and then sift through the personal folders as to what they want to keep or have reside in the Exchange Server. Curious there is not alot of info on this on MS's site, other than their new Application tool. Any info or pointers would be appreciated. Not sure of the version of Notes. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Microsoft's new OS
I like this joke site: http://www.altgeek.org/methuselah/rtfm/ -Original Message- From: Melanie Foster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 9:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Microsoft's new OS This is not a real site.if you read it you can see it's a joke Melanie -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Muqeem Syed Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 6:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Microsoft's new OS Importance: High Check this site out www.mslinux.org New Linux OS from Microsoft _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.391 / Virus Database: 222 - Release Date: 9/19/02 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.391 / Virus Database: 222 - Release Date: 9/19/02 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Organizational Forms, and PF's
Organizational forms are automatically included during synchronization (assuming that the form is associated with an item in an offline folder). Yes, public folders need to be added to the favorites folder in order to enable offline access. -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 6:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Organizational Forms, and PF's Just wanted to do a quick check. When you are doing synchronization you will not be able to see the organizational forms library. Correct, and actually you won't even be able to see public folders. If you want to see the public folders you have to connect and move a copy of them to your favorites folder. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message path question
I have a new customer that has this setup. I don't know why, yet. :-) Senario: One Exchange 2000 Server which is NOT connected to the Internet. Users have Outlook 2002 and their profiles contain POP (from ISP) and Exchange with Exchange as default and Exchange mailbox as delivery location. Virus software is on clients with no virus software on Exchange Server. The customer was told their Internet email was being virus scanned before landing on Exchange. Question: When these users get their Internet mail using POP3 is it being scanned for viruses on their client machines before landing in their Exchange Server Mailbox?? tia _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Recovering an Event Script from a Mailbox
Fioon, call you Veritas representative and ask for an evaluation copy of the IDR (strange that there isnt an eval version, they have evals of all the other options). I've used both, and the Veritas solution is superior in every way to Arcserve (at least once CA got hold of it). Glenn - Original Message - From: Fioon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 3:57 PM Subject: RE: Recovering an Event Script from a Mailbox Hi Ed Crowley, You've got so much experience, would you like to have a few comment on ArcServe Veritas ? I've tested on the ArcServe 's DR on a testing server,it's work fine. Would like to test on Veritas, but unfortunately they dont provided any DR evaluation copy, so i can't evaluate on that. I wonder how good is Veritas's IDR. I've heared so many bad comments of ArcServe here, which make me confuse . .. worry. Now i'm can only test on the Veritas Normal Backup. Your advice is highly appreciately Thanks Fion -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 1:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovering an Event Script from a Mailbox BLB = Brick Level Backup, or backup of individual mailboxes. SMR = I am guessing that this is Single Mailbox Restore. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Fioon Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 9:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovering an Event Script from a Mailbox Hei, Recently have interested in Veritas, but quite new. May i know what is BLB SMR guys referring to ? Thanks -Original Message- From: Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2002 1:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovering an Event Script from a Mailbox Thank you very much. Fortunately, I'm not using BLB. I'll proceed with my SMR. If I can't get it back through agents tab, I'll try the decoder and/or mdbvue . I'll let you know how I made out. Thanks again, Louise -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 5:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovering an Event Script from a Mailbox It's been quite a while when I was playing with this stuff and I remember that it is not trivial. Let's see what I can remember... The Exchange 5.5 Scripting agent script itself is stored as a hidden item in the folder it is applied to (in your case: the particular mailbox on Server A). Another second config item, also hidden, is created on the server the script is supposed to be executed (in your case Server B) in the system folder Event_Config (or similar - can't remember the correct name unfortunately). So, if you just want to get the script code back then try to restore the whole mailbox store on a recovery server [1] and use either a debugging tool [2] or try to connect with Outlook and see if you can get it via the Agents tab. [1] Note that if you use BLB [3] you might not be able to restore Scripting Agents. Only if you use an Exchange backup aware product to do a full IS backup/restore you have a chance. [2] Either MicroEye ScriptDorector (http://www.microeye.com/scriptdirector) or the Microsoft Agent Editor (used to be in the Exchange 5.5 SDK or BackOffice Resource Kit 4.5) or plain mdbvu32.exe (comes with Exchange on the setup CD). But the latter needs to be used CAREFULLY. [3] BLB = Brick Level Backup like it is offered with ArcServe, Veritas and other backup software. Siegfried / -Original Message- From: Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 8:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recovering an Event Script from a Mailbox Hi all, I'm hoping you can assist me in just how to recover an event script that is associated with a particular mailbox. It seems the script just disappeared and the developer did not have a copy. The mailbox sits on server A and the script was added to it through the Agents tab. The script executes on Server B. Presently, I'm making an assumption that restoring the mailbox from server A, I should also get the script. Is this correct? Thanks in advance, Louise _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To
Exchange 2000 Mailbox Limits
I have Exchange server 2000 integrated into AD... Under Global Settings is Message Delivery and on the Defaults Tab of the properties is Receiving Message size ,I previously had this set at 5000 KB (5Mb) to limit the size of Inbound messages... How do I remove this setting.? I have it now set to No Limit - restarted services , rebooted many times..etc etc But STILL the incoming limit is 5MB... No matter what I do.., Exchange is ignoring this parameter. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Organizational Forms, and PF's
More or less, correct. Org forms can be included in the sync process (at least in OL2k and OLXP). You do have to have PF's included in your favorites to be able to sync them -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Organizational Forms, and PF's Just wanted to do a quick check. When you are doing synchronization you will not be able to see the organizational forms library. Correct, and actually you won't even be able to see public folders. If you want to see the public folders you have to connect and move a copy of them to your favorites folder. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Meeting Request not showing responses
Anyone? -Original Message- From: Stephens, Tara Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Meeting Request not showing responses I have an active/passive W2K sp2 E2K Sp2 cluster that usually runs without any problems. Today, one of the users called and said our meeting requests are no longer showing how many accepted the request and how many declined. This was working up until today as far as I know. I'm the only person who has rights to make any changes to the server. I've looked on MS knowledgebase, but couldn't find anything that matched. The event log hasn't logged any problems to help me out. Any ideas what to check? Thanks. Tara _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Message path question
It's only being scanned if the ISP is doing the scanning or if the software on the client does POP3 scanning. Thanks William -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 5:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Message path question I have a new customer that has this setup. I don't know why, yet. :-) Senario: One Exchange 2000 Server which is NOT connected to the Internet. Users have Outlook 2002 and their profiles contain POP (from ISP) and Exchange with Exchange as default and Exchange mailbox as delivery location. Virus software is on clients with no virus software on Exchange Server. The customer was told their Internet email was being virus scanned before landing on Exchange. Question: When these users get their Internet mail using POP3 is it being scanned for viruses on their client machines before landing in their Exchange Server Mailbox?? tia _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Message path question
It may be scanned at the ISP. You would have to ask them. But I would always make sure it is also scanned and the client level. - Original Message - From: Charles Marriott [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 4:50 PM Subject: Message path question I have a new customer that has this setup. I don't know why, yet. :-) Senario: One Exchange 2000 Server which is NOT connected to the Internet. Users have Outlook 2002 and their profiles contain POP (from ISP) and Exchange with Exchange as default and Exchange mailbox as delivery location. Virus software is on clients with no virus software on Exchange Server. The customer was told their Internet email was being virus scanned before landing on Exchange. Question: When these users get their Internet mail using POP3 is it being scanned for viruses on their client machines before landing in their Exchange Server Mailbox?? tia _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2
Elaborate: I called McAfee about the product once for help with a problem, they charged us for the help then transferred us. The next guy that came on the phone said that the product was no longer supported. We had tons of problems with it, service was always stopping, updates we slow coming when compared to other products, tons of technical problem. we dumped it. We are running Symantec no, no problems. -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 3:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Can someone elaborate? We've been using it for 2 years and never had any problems. We're about to renew our subscription (not sure if we did already), as well as installing the management console (they call it e-policy orchestrator nowadays..) on a new server If it's so crap, we'll consider switching... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 October 2002 8:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 That will eventually change. They you will come back to the good side. -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 We use McAfee throughout... Never had any problems (apart from constantly trying to remember if it's called McAffee or McAfee or McAffe).. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 October 2002 4:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Or not... -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 7:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Or Symantec... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 00:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 or GFI? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 8:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 How about Sybari or Trend? -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 11:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 HA! I know, I get grief from people all the time over it, but its my only choice right now until I can get NAV implemented. -- From: Andy David Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Friday, October 4, 2002 10:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Ah! Groupshield! I'm melting... -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 9:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Anyone ever have problems with McAfee GSE 5.2 and it not being able to open the private information store? I get the following error in Event Viewer: McAfee GroupShield Exchange failed to open private message store. Then I also get this error: Alert Manager Event Log Alert: An internal error occurred in Groupshield - please check the log for details.(from ServerName Serial# 3) IP IPAddress user SYSTEM running GroupShield 5.20.664.0 odcmd) I have defragged the private store and I have uninstalled/reinstalled GSE but I cannot figure out why this is happening. Any help is appreciated. ~!M _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- --- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. === === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Mailbox Limits
What is your SMTP Virtual Server limit set to? The SMTP Virtual Server limit is separate from the one in Global Settings. -Original Message- From: Steve Aspindle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 9:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Mailbox Limits I have Exchange server 2000 integrated into AD... Under Global Settings is Message Delivery and on the Defaults Tab of the properties is Receiving Message size ,I previously had this set at 5000 KB (5Mb) to limit the size of Inbound messages... How do I remove this setting.? I have it now set to No Limit - restarted services , rebooted many times..etc etc But STILL the incoming limit is 5MB... No matter what I do.., Exchange is ignoring this parameter. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Mailbox Limits
um...oops... mis-read.. :( -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 11:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Mailbox Limits What is your SMTP Virtual Server limit set to? The SMTP Virtual Server limit is separate from the one in Global Settings. -Original Message- From: Steve Aspindle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 9:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Mailbox Limits I have Exchange server 2000 integrated into AD... Under Global Settings is Message Delivery and on the Defaults Tab of the properties is Receiving Message size ,I previously had this set at 5000 KB (5Mb) to limit the size of Inbound messages... How do I remove this setting.? I have it now set to No Limit - restarted services , rebooted many times..etc etc But STILL the incoming limit is 5MB... No matter what I do.., Exchange is ignoring this parameter. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IS 70GB and growing....
I'd be more tempted to look at things like storage limits. 500 users and 70gig, seriously who needs to save that much email? Your email shouldn't be a file server. -Original Message- From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 3:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing Would be tempted to look at things like restore time SLA, backup window time etc. -Original Message- From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 04 October 2002 09:36 Posted To: Exchange List Conversation: IS 70GB and growing Subject: Re: IS 70GB and growing I am reading all this thread, and still can't find which part made you so angry. How should the question be asked, so you would be so nice, to provide some information.. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 5:25 AM Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing Heaven help him. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Hanji Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 1:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IS 70GB and growing Hi. It may be some one you know. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 6:39 PM Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing Heaven help the consultant Hanji hires. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu Jones Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 5:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing I vote Hanji hires a consultant to fix the problem. He's not showing much improvement... (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Couch, Nate Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 6:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing I vote for two servers. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Great Cthulhu Jones Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 20:20 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing Who cares about it, though? If you need two servers, you need two servers. If not, buy more hard drives. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sakti Chakravarty (Senteq) Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 6:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing If I recall correctly, using the Move Mailbox utility retains SIS. -Original Message- From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 30 September 2002 6:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IS 70GB and growing Hi guys. I have an exchange 5.5 on a strong machine. The IS is over 73GB (total of 500 users). I am thinking whether it is the right move to split this box into two servers. The main problem is that I will loose SIS... On the other hand, I will have two smaller databases. I am sure some of you had this scenario in the past. I would like to hear your opinions. In case it is important, the IS is going to be moved to EMC box in 3 months (part of storage project). I am mostly intersted hearing from happy users with such big IS (are there?!) Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL
RE: Exchange 2000 Mailbox Limits
have you checked under 'Global Settings-Message Delivery-properties-Defaults' ? -Original Message- From: Steve Aspindle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 8:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Mailbox Limits I have Exchange server 2000 integrated into AD... Under Global Settings is Message Delivery and on the Defaults Tab of the properties is Receiving Message size ,I previously had this set at 5000 KB (5Mb) to limit the size of Inbound messages... How do I remove this setting.? I have it now set to No Limit - restarted services , rebooted many times..etc etc But STILL the incoming limit is 5MB... No matter what I do.., Exchange is ignoring this parameter. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Message path question
Probably depends on their AV app. Chances are that is is, however. Most of the client side AV for POP clients act as POP proxies, passing through the virus scanner before being handed off to the mail client. Still, scarry setup. Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 5:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Message path question I have a new customer that has this setup. I don't know why, yet. :-) Senario: One Exchange 2000 Server which is NOT connected to the Internet. Users have Outlook 2002 and their profiles contain POP (from ISP) and Exchange with Exchange as default and Exchange mailbox as delivery location. Virus software is on clients with no virus software on Exchange Server. The customer was told their Internet email was being virus scanned before landing on Exchange. Question: When these users get their Internet mail using POP3 is it being scanned for viruses on their client machines before landing in their Exchange Server Mailbox?? tia _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Messages stuck in Awaiting Directory Lookup queue
Is the email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] explicitly associated with the mail enabled group? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Messages stuck in Awaiting Directory Lookup queue Hi all. I have Exchange 2000 SP2. Once in a while I see messages stuck in the queue Messages Awaiting Directory Lookup of one of my back-end Exchange servers. The messages that get stuck are sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a global security group and it is mail-enabled. customerXYZ.com is a domain hosted locally on the Exchange server. For what it's worth, the MX records for customerXYZ.com are pointing to the front-end Exchange servers. The mailbox alias of the group is just AllUsers. There are other customers that have similarly named groups and they all have mailbox aliases AllUsers. I think that Exchange has a difficult time telling difference between this AllUsers and other AllUsers. I tried to make it a bit different by setting LegacyExchangeDN field to be unique. But it did not help. Has anyone else seen something like this? Thanks! Andrey Fyodorov _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Meeting Request not showing responses
Have you verified that it effects everyone, or just specific people? Has the cluster failed over to the standby node? Have you run Outlook with the /cleanfreebusy switch for the effected users? Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Stephens, Tara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Meeting Request not showing responses Anyone? -Original Message- From: Stephens, Tara Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Meeting Request not showing responses I have an active/passive W2K sp2 E2K Sp2 cluster that usually runs without any problems. Today, one of the users called and said our meeting requests are no longer showing how many accepted the request and how many declined. This was working up until today as far as I know. I'm the only person who has rights to make any changes to the server. I've looked on MS knowledgebase, but couldn't find anything that matched. The event log hasn't logged any problems to help me out. Any ideas what to check? Thanks. Tara _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Messages stuck in Awaiting Directory Lookup queue
Yes it is. The e-mail address is generated by the recipient policy. And Exchange organization is responsible for all mail delivery to this address. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 12:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Messages stuck in Awaiting Directory Lookup queue Is the email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] explicitly associated with the mail enabled group? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Messages stuck in Awaiting Directory Lookup queue Hi all. I have Exchange 2000 SP2. Once in a while I see messages stuck in the queue Messages Awaiting Directory Lookup of one of my back-end Exchange servers. The messages that get stuck are sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a global security group and it is mail-enabled. customerXYZ.com is a domain hosted locally on the Exchange server. For what it's worth, the MX records for customerXYZ.com are pointing to the front-end Exchange servers. The mailbox alias of the group is just AllUsers. There are other customers that have similarly named groups and they all have mailbox aliases AllUsers. I think that Exchange has a difficult time telling difference between this AllUsers and other AllUsers. I tried to make it a bit different by setting LegacyExchangeDN field to be unique. But it did not help. Has anyone else seen something like this? Thanks! Andrey Fyodorov _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
No OWA
Hi, I have just conpleted an installation of exchange 2000. Basically, a member server residing within a w2k domain. The problems are: - Outlook client seems to be working fine, however OWA does not work from a client machine, get the three attempts before getting an Access Denied error. However if I try this logged into the exchange server everything seems ok. I have applied all the necessary patches,without sucess. Has anyone expereinced thsi problem before. Amos. /'^'\ ( o o ) ---oOOO-OOOo-- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Command line Backup of Ex2k
Naw, it's still there, you just can't backup Exchange directly - you have to create a selection file for it. The simplest way to see what you need is to run ntbackup, pick your Exchange stores, then tell ntbackup to schedule the job instead of running it now. Ntbackup will prompt you to save the selection file. Go to Control Panel, Scheduled Tasks and examine the run string for the backup job you just created. That, and ntbackup /? will show you all you need to know. There are some other gotcha's with NT backup from a command line - like it's sometimes too stupid to look and see if there is a tape in the drive. See Q267574 for the gory details... A caveat: I *think* ntbackup selection files are unicode (log files definitely are), so use notepad to edit them. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 1:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Command line Backup of Ex2k I think it's gone. But you don't need it as much because NTBACKUP now has a basic scheduler. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Exchange List Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Command line Backup of Ex2k Err how is it done using ntbackup? Can't use ntbackup /IS servername anymore. I know to use the systemstate parameter, but don't know how to get the IS storage groups backed up. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: No OWA
It may be an authentication thing. We found for a lot of clients that they had to put in their username as domain\username instead of just the user name. If your Exch server only hosts 1 e-mail domain you can set that as the default domain under the OWA site properties in IIS and then you don't need to add the Domain name at logon. Jeff Hague -Original Message- From: Amos Eka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: No OWA Hi, I have just conpleted an installation of exchange 2000. Basically, a member server residing within a w2k domain. The problems are: - Outlook client seems to be working fine, however OWA does not work from a client machine, get the three attempts before getting an Access Denied error. However if I try this logged into the exchange server everything seems ok. I have applied all the necessary patches,without sucess. Has anyone expereinced thsi problem before. Amos. /'^'\ ( o o ) ---oOOO-OOOo-- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stupid newbie question-what is EHLO?
I am getting the following errors in my firewall logs? smtp[3041]: 334 Warning: Denied access to command 'EHLO logonlvm01.logonlv.com' from [66.93.249.102] What does this mean? And it is a problem with my firewall? Or the way I have my exchange setup? Thank You, Robert Williams Senior Network Administrator Raypak, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone - 805-278-5363 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: No OWA
Q317471: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q317471 In case you have a proxy between your users and exchange: Q292723: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q292723 Rump -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Amos Eka Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 18:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: No OWA Hi, I have just conpleted an installation of exchange 2000. Basically, a member server residing within a w2k domain. The problems are: - Outlook client seems to be working fine, however OWA does not work from a client machine, get the three attempts before getting an Access Denied error. However if I try this logged into the exchange server everything seems ok. I have applied all the necessary patches,without sucess. Has anyone expereinced thsi problem before. Amos. /'^'\ ( o o ) ---oOOO-OOOo-- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Stupid newbie question-what is EHLO?
The EHLO verb and SMTP extensions - http://cr.yp.to/smtp/ehlo.html EHLO is just like HELO except that the server's response text provides computer-readable information about the server's abilities. Here is what happens if the server accepts EHLO (required code 250). On the first response line, the text begins with the server's name. On each response line past the first, the text is an extension, followed optionally by a space and an argument, followed optionally by a space and another argument, etc. The extension is a nonempty string of letters, digits, and hyphens. Each argument is a nonempty string of graphical ASCII characters. -Original Message- From: Robert Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 1:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Stupid newbie question-what is EHLO? I am getting the following errors in my firewall logs? smtp[3041]: 334 Warning: Denied access to command 'EHLO logonlvm01.logonlv.com' from [66.93.249.102] What does this mean? And it is a problem with my firewall? Or the way I have my exchange setup? Thank You, Robert Williams Senior Network Administrator Raypak, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone - 805-278-5363 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Stupid newbie question-what is EHLO?
It means that your firewall is blocking Extended SMTP (ESMTP) commands. That's not necessarily bad, but in reality its not necessary to block it. I'm guessing you have a Cisco PIX firewall? If so, you want to disable the Mailguard feature, which will fix that. I believe the command is no fixup smtp 25 -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Robert Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 1:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Stupid newbie question-what is EHLO? I am getting the following errors in my firewall logs? smtp[3041]: 334 Warning: Denied access to command 'EHLO logonlvm01.logonlv.com' from [66.93.249.102] What does this mean? And it is a problem with my firewall? Or the way I have my exchange setup? Thank You, Robert Williams Senior Network Administrator Raypak, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone - 805-278-5363 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Stupid newbie question-what is EHLO?
Thanks for the fast reply Thank You, Robert Williams Senior Network Administrator Raypak, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone - 805-278-5363 -Original Message- From: Vans Evers, Frank W. SAIC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stupid newbie question-what is EHLO? The EHLO verb and SMTP extensions - http://cr.yp.to/smtp/ehlo.html EHLO is just like HELO except that the server's response text provides computer-readable information about the server's abilities. Here is what happens if the server accepts EHLO (required code 250). On the first response line, the text begins with the server's name. On each response line past the first, the text is an extension, followed optionally by a space and an argument, followed optionally by a space and another argument, etc. The extension is a nonempty string of letters, digits, and hyphens. Each argument is a nonempty string of graphical ASCII characters. -Original Message- From: Robert Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 1:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Stupid newbie question-what is EHLO? I am getting the following errors in my firewall logs? smtp[3041]: 334 Warning: Denied access to command 'EHLO logonlvm01.logonlv.com' from [66.93.249.102] What does this mean? And it is a problem with my firewall? Or the way I have my exchange setup? Thank You, Robert Williams Senior Network Administrator Raypak, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone - 805-278-5363 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Stupid newbie question-what is EHLO?
I just installed a Symantec Velociraptor. And yes I have ESMPT turned of by default, What are the implications of enabling this as far as server protection is concerned? Thank You, Robert Williams Senior Network Administrator Raypak, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone - 805-278-5363 -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stupid newbie question-what is EHLO? It means that your firewall is blocking Extended SMTP (ESMTP) commands. That's not necessarily bad, but in reality its not necessary to block it. I'm guessing you have a Cisco PIX firewall? If so, you want to disable the Mailguard feature, which will fix that. I believe the command is no fixup smtp 25 -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Robert Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 1:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Stupid newbie question-what is EHLO? I am getting the following errors in my firewall logs? smtp[3041]: 334 Warning: Denied access to command 'EHLO logonlvm01.logonlv.com' from [66.93.249.102] What does this mean? And it is a problem with my firewall? Or the way I have my exchange setup? Thank You, Robert Williams Senior Network Administrator Raypak, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone - 805-278-5363 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Messages stuck in Awaiting Directory Lookup queue
Can you send to others in the email domain customerxyz.com that belong to that group. Permissions set on Allusers? - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 11:28 AM Subject: RE: Messages stuck in Awaiting Directory Lookup queue Yes it is. The e-mail address is generated by the recipient policy. And Exchange organization is responsible for all mail delivery to this address. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 12:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Messages stuck in Awaiting Directory Lookup queue Is the email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] explicitly associated with the mail enabled group? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Messages stuck in Awaiting Directory Lookup queue Hi all. I have Exchange 2000 SP2. Once in a while I see messages stuck in the queue Messages Awaiting Directory Lookup of one of my back-end Exchange servers. The messages that get stuck are sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a global security group and it is mail-enabled. customerXYZ.com is a domain hosted locally on the Exchange server. For what it's worth, the MX records for customerXYZ.com are pointing to the front-end Exchange servers. The mailbox alias of the group is just AllUsers. There are other customers that have similarly named groups and they all have mailbox aliases AllUsers. I think that Exchange has a difficult time telling difference between this AllUsers and other AllUsers. I tried to make it a bit different by setting LegacyExchangeDN field to be unique. But it did not help. Has anyone else seen something like this? Thanks! Andrey Fyodorov _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Stupid newbie question-what is EHLO?
Zero, realistically. ESMTP isn't any more vulnerable than SMTP is these days. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Robert Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 1:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stupid newbie question-what is EHLO? I just installed a Symantec Velociraptor. And yes I have ESMPT turned of by default, What are the implications of enabling this as far as server protection is concerned? Thank You, Robert Williams Senior Network Administrator Raypak, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone - 805-278-5363 -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stupid newbie question-what is EHLO? It means that your firewall is blocking Extended SMTP (ESMTP) commands. That's not necessarily bad, but in reality its not necessary to block it. I'm guessing you have a Cisco PIX firewall? If so, you want to disable the Mailguard feature, which will fix that. I believe the command is no fixup smtp 25 -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Robert Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 1:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Stupid newbie question-what is EHLO? I am getting the following errors in my firewall logs? smtp[3041]: 334 Warning: Denied access to command 'EHLO logonlvm01.logonlv.com' from [66.93.249.102] What does this mean? And it is a problem with my firewall? Or the way I have my exchange setup? Thank You, Robert Williams Senior Network Administrator Raypak, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone - 805-278-5363 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EX5.5 Move Mailbox only works in one direction???
Same organization, same site, same domain, just different locations so the inbound and outbound internet mail can be controlled. Both exchange servers services are using the same logon (a domain account). No security events are being logged when this fails, and all security failures are set to log. I sucessfully moved all the accounts for the remote users last Friday by doing it from the first site. Tom -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 3:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EX5.5 Move Mailbox only works in one direction??? Tom, Sounds like a permissions issue, either NT or Exchange. Is the remote office in the same domain as you are? Is the remote office in a different site/organization? Jim -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 12:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: EX5.5 Move Mailbox only works in one direction??? I just added a second exchange 5.5 server to our organization. At first I had it in the lab and just moved my own mailbox to is as a guinea pig. They were both in this building. I then moved my mailbox back to the first server and shipped the second one to a remote office connected by a VPN. At first NAV for exchange wasn't starting due to the changed IP address (they are on a different subnet). I found the old IP in the registry and changed it and now NAV starts. I moved one user right away with no problems but forget which server I did the move on (I remote control the other server). Now today when I tried to move some more users, the progress screen would just flash on the screen for a second and go away. In the event log it just had an ID 1800 error (could not move user doe, john) and no other information or errors. I tried a couple of mailboxes and got the same result (this was on the remote server). I then tried it on the first server and it worked just fine there. Very strange... Tom Alverson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Meeting Request not showing responses
Try /cleanfreebusy on someone and see what happens. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Stephens, Tara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 2:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Meeting Request not showing responses It appears to be everyone, so I haven't run the /cleanfreebusy. We haven't failed over, but are planning to try that this week. Assuming that doesn't work, is there anything else I can look at? Tara -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Meeting Request not showing responses Have you verified that it effects everyone, or just specific people? Has the cluster failed over to the standby node? Have you run Outlook with the /cleanfreebusy switch for the effected users? Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Stephens, Tara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 11:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Meeting Request not showing responses Anyone? -Original Message- From: Stephens, Tara Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Meeting Request not showing responses I have an active/passive W2K sp2 E2K Sp2 cluster that usually runs without any problems. Today, one of the users called and said our meeting requests are no longer showing how many accepted the request and how many declined. This was working up until today as far as I know. I'm the only person who has rights to make any changes to the server. I've looked on MS knowledgebase, but couldn't find anything that matched. The event log hasn't logged any problems to help me out. Any ideas what to check? Thanks. Tara _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2
Here is a MS KB article on it: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;q319011; -Mike -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Elaborate: I called McAfee about the product once for help with a problem, they charged us for the help then transferred us. The next guy that came on the phone said that the product was no longer supported. We had tons of problems with it, service was always stopping, updates we slow coming when compared to other products, tons of technical problem. we dumped it. We are running Symantec no, no problems. -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 3:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Can someone elaborate? We've been using it for 2 years and never had any problems. We're about to renew our subscription (not sure if we did already), as well as installing the management console (they call it e-policy orchestrator nowadays..) on a new server If it's so crap, we'll consider switching... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 October 2002 8:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 That will eventually change. They you will come back to the good side. -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 We use McAfee throughout... Never had any problems (apart from constantly trying to remember if it's called McAffee or McAfee or McAffe).. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 October 2002 4:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Or not... -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 7:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Or Symantec... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 00:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 or GFI? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 8:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 How about Sybari or Trend? -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 11:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 HA! I know, I get grief from people all the time over it, but its my only choice right now until I can get NAV implemented. -- From: Andy David Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Friday, October 4, 2002 10:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Ah! Groupshield! I'm melting... -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 9:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Anyone ever have problems with McAfee GSE 5.2 and it not being able to open the private information store? I get the following error in Event Viewer: McAfee GroupShield Exchange failed to open private message store. Then I also get this error: Alert Manager Event Log Alert: An internal error occurred in Groupshield - please check the log for details.(from ServerName Serial# 3) IP IPAddress user SYSTEM running GroupShield 5.20.664.0 odcmd) I have defragged the private store and I have uninstalled/reinstalled GSE but I cannot figure out why this is happening. Any help is appreciated. ~!M _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- --- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. === ===
RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2
I haven't had any problems with Groupshield either. Maybe not because it is great, but the fact that it gives you the ability to use the Blackstone list - which has protected us from every virus that has come up lately. I love Epolicy and would recommend it to anyone. Centralized, hierarchical control of all of you virus apps, saves me hours every week and every outbreak. -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 4:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Here is a MS KB article on it: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;q319011; -Mike -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Elaborate: I called McAfee about the product once for help with a problem, they charged us for the help then transferred us. The next guy that came on the phone said that the product was no longer supported. We had tons of problems with it, service was always stopping, updates we slow coming when compared to other products, tons of technical problem. we dumped it. We are running Symantec no, no problems. -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 3:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Can someone elaborate? We've been using it for 2 years and never had any problems. We're about to renew our subscription (not sure if we did already), as well as installing the management console (they call it e-policy orchestrator nowadays..) on a new server If it's so crap, we'll consider switching... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 October 2002 8:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 That will eventually change. They you will come back to the good side. -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 We use McAfee throughout... Never had any problems (apart from constantly trying to remember if it's called McAffee or McAfee or McAffe).. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 October 2002 4:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Or not... -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 7:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Or Symantec... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 00:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 or GFI? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 8:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 How about Sybari or Trend? -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 11:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 HA! I know, I get grief from people all the time over it, but its my only choice right now until I can get NAV implemented. -- From: Andy David Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Friday, October 4, 2002 10:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Ah! Groupshield! I'm melting... -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 9:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Anyone ever have problems with McAfee GSE 5.2 and it not being able to open the private information store? I get the following error in Event Viewer: McAfee GroupShield Exchange failed to open private message store. Then I also get this error: Alert Manager Event Log Alert: An internal error occurred in Groupshield - please check the log for details.(from ServerName Serial# 3) IP IPAddress user SYSTEM running GroupShield 5.20.664.0 odcmd) I have defragged the private store and I have uninstalled/reinstalled GSE but I cannot figure out why this is happening. Any help is appreciated. ~!M _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- --- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the
RE: Exchange 5.5 with W2K SP3?
Nope, no problems here...but we do have a very simple setup. -Original Message- From: Wayne A. Dockery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 3:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Exchange 5.5 with W2K SP3? Has anyone encountered any problems with Exchange 5.5 running on Win2K with SP3? We have 5.5 running on W2K SP2 now. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IS 70GB and growing....
Do you think 140MB mailbox is big?!?! The exchange server is 3 years old - Original Message - From: Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 6:08 PM Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing I'd be more tempted to look at things like storage limits. 500 users and 70gig, seriously who needs to save that much email? Your email shouldn't be a file server. -Original Message- From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 3:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing Would be tempted to look at things like restore time SLA, backup window time etc. -Original Message- From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 04 October 2002 09:36 Posted To: Exchange List Conversation: IS 70GB and growing Subject: Re: IS 70GB and growing I am reading all this thread, and still can't find which part made you so angry. How should the question be asked, so you would be so nice, to provide some information.. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 5:25 AM Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing Heaven help him. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Hanji Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 1:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IS 70GB and growing Hi. It may be some one you know. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 6:39 PM Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing Heaven help the consultant Hanji hires. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu Jones Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 5:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing I vote Hanji hires a consultant to fix the problem. He's not showing much improvement... (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Couch, Nate Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 6:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing I vote for two servers. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Great Cthulhu Jones Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 20:20 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing Who cares about it, though? If you need two servers, you need two servers. If not, buy more hard drives. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sakti Chakravarty (Senteq) Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 6:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing If I recall correctly, using the Move Mailbox utility retains SIS. -Original Message- From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 30 September 2002 6:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IS 70GB and growing Hi guys. I have an exchange 5.5 on a strong machine. The IS is over 73GB (total of 500 users). I am thinking whether it is the right move to split this box into two servers. The main problem is that I will loose SIS... On the other hand, I will have two smaller databases. I am sure some of you had this scenario in the past. I would like to hear your opinions. In case it is important, the IS is going to be moved to EMC box in 3 months (part of storage project). I am mostly intersted hearing from happy users with such big IS (are there?!) Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
RE: IS 70GB and growing....
140MB is big, but it's not uncommon to see mailboxes greater than 1GB in size. -Original Message- From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 8 October 2002 1:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IS 70GB and growing Do you think 140MB mailbox is big?!?! The exchange server is 3 years old - Original Message - From: Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 6:08 PM Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing I'd be more tempted to look at things like storage limits. 500 users and 70gig, seriously who needs to save that much email? Your email shouldn't be a file server. -Original Message- From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 3:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing Would be tempted to look at things like restore time SLA, backup window time etc. -Original Message- From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 04 October 2002 09:36 Posted To: Exchange List Conversation: IS 70GB and growing Subject: Re: IS 70GB and growing I am reading all this thread, and still can't find which part made you so angry. How should the question be asked, so you would be so nice, to provide some information.. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 5:25 AM Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing Heaven help him. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Hanji Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 1:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IS 70GB and growing Hi. It may be some one you know. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 6:39 PM Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing Heaven help the consultant Hanji hires. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu Jones Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 5:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing I vote Hanji hires a consultant to fix the problem. He's not showing much improvement... (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Couch, Nate Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 6:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing I vote for two servers. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Great Cthulhu Jones Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 20:20 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing Who cares about it, though? If you need two servers, you need two servers. If not, buy more hard drives. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sakti Chakravarty (Senteq) Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 6:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing If I recall correctly, using the Move Mailbox utility retains SIS. -Original Message- From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 30 September 2002 6:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IS 70GB and growing Hi guys. I have an exchange 5.5 on a strong machine. The IS is over 73GB (total of 500 users). I am thinking whether it is the right move to split this box into two servers. The main problem is that I will loose SIS... On the other hand, I will have two smaller databases. I am sure some of you had this scenario in the past. I would like to hear your opinions. In case it is important, the IS is going to be moved to EMC box in 3 months (part of storage project). I am mostly intersted hearing from happy users with such big IS (are there?!) Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
