RE: Exchange 2003 & Clustering
I have worked in the past 5 months with Win2K3 and E2k3 clustering both Active/Active and Active/Passive the issues which you talk about have in large part gone. However we choose to go with Active/Passive because of lic. Issue. In active/active one needs one more lic for win2k3 and E2k3 Ent but in A/P the second lic for E2k3 is not needed. We have had a stable cluster for 60 days now (having installed the 120 day version of E2K3) and were able to do it for $4800.00 above what the cost of having no cluster would have been. I have listened to all arguments made for not clustering or why cluster so on I am happy, my boss is happy, CTO is happy as well as the CEO that we did it! An argument that WINS every other. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean Cunningham Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 9:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 & Clustering Related , but totally unreleated to the thread, just some food for thought :-) The interesting thing about clustering, is more: What are you trying to achieve? Availability, ok, why? what are your business requirements? Is it: a) the organisation *really* can't do without email for a day. b) I can't do without my diary for a day because it causes embarrassment for me not knowing what meetings I am at and who my contacts are c) something else I worked for a company that needed b). We looked at SANS and clusters and alike, priced it up and picked ourselves off the floor. Scary price but , could still justify it. We looked at other threats to the availability of exchange that a cluster may not be able to eliminate, virii, power or infrastructure failure (hmmm NY blackout springs to mind) and look at how to mitigate them. We then looked at b) again and said "how else can we get this outcome" We then came up with the idea of an Pocket PC for every person that needed their contacts and calendar. At the end of the day for every risk we identified (apart for fire or building collapse) was covered by a Pocket PC at a far cheaper price that all the high availability gear we were looking at. Nothing wrong with HA approach, but for what we wanted to achieve, it was not the only answer. cheers Dean >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/10/2003 3:23:55 p.m. >>> Far from an endorsement (from me that is), but at TechEd there's was a lot of talk from Microsoft and HP about them running E2k3 clusters in house. Steve Evans SDSU Foundation -Original Message- From: Dean Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 3:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 & Clustering http://www.swinc.com/resource/exchange2003/section8.asp >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/10/2003 9:52:54 a.m. >>> I'm sure you all remember the Micrsosoft Marketing bulletins that were issued in the past regarding Exchange 2000 Active/Active clustering and the potential prblems associated with fragmented memory and the associated failover issues. Does anyone on the list have field or lab experience with Windows Server 2003 and Exchange 2003 running Active/Active clustering. Are the noted issues inherent in the Exchange 2000 architecture and Active/Active clustering still a concern with the new technology? Wayne Peters Resurrected Exchange Architect _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** Northland State of the Environment Report 2002 now online at www.nrc.govt.nz ** NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** Northland State
RE: Exchange 2003 & Clustering
Related , but totally unreleated to the thread, just some food for thought :-) The interesting thing about clustering, is more: What are you trying to achieve? Availability, ok, why? what are your business requirements? Is it: a) the organisation *really* can't do without email for a day. b) I can't do without my diary for a day because it causes embarrassment for me not knowing what meetings I am at and who my contacts are c) something else I worked for a company that needed b). We looked at SANS and clusters and alike, priced it up and picked ourselves off the floor. Scary price but , could still justify it. We looked at other threats to the availability of exchange that a cluster may not be able to eliminate, virii, power or infrastructure failure (hmmm NY blackout springs to mind) and look at how to mitigate them. We then looked at b) again and said "how else can we get this outcome" We then came up with the idea of an Pocket PC for every person that needed their contacts and calendar. At the end of the day for every risk we identified (apart for fire or building collapse) was covered by a Pocket PC at a far cheaper price that all the high availability gear we were looking at. Nothing wrong with HA approach, but for what we wanted to achieve, it was not the only answer. cheers Dean >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/10/2003 3:23:55 p.m. >>> Far from an endorsement (from me that is), but at TechEd there's was a lot of talk from Microsoft and HP about them running E2k3 clusters in house. Steve Evans SDSU Foundation -Original Message- From: Dean Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 3:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 & Clustering http://www.swinc.com/resource/exchange2003/section8.asp >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/10/2003 9:52:54 a.m. >>> I'm sure you all remember the Micrsosoft Marketing bulletins that were issued in the past regarding Exchange 2000 Active/Active clustering and the potential prblems associated with fragmented memory and the associated failover issues. Does anyone on the list have field or lab experience with Windows Server 2003 and Exchange 2003 running Active/Active clustering. Are the noted issues inherent in the Exchange 2000 architecture and Active/Active clustering still a concern with the new technology? Wayne Peters Resurrected Exchange Architect _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** Northland State of the Environment Report 2002 now online at www.nrc.govt.nz ** NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** Northland State of the Environment Report 2002 now online at www.nrc.govt.nz ** NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2003 & Clustering
Far from an endorsement (from me that is), but at TechEd there's was a lot of talk from Microsoft and HP about them running E2k3 clusters in house. Steve Evans SDSU Foundation -Original Message- From: Dean Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 3:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 & Clustering http://www.swinc.com/resource/exchange2003/section8.asp >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/10/2003 9:52:54 a.m. >>> I'm sure you all remember the Micrsosoft Marketing bulletins that were issued in the past regarding Exchange 2000 Active/Active clustering and the potential prblems associated with fragmented memory and the associated failover issues. Does anyone on the list have field or lab experience with Windows Server 2003 and Exchange 2003 running Active/Active clustering. Are the noted issues inherent in the Exchange 2000 architecture and Active/Active clustering still a concern with the new technology? Wayne Peters Resurrected Exchange Architect _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** Northland State of the Environment Report 2002 now online at www.nrc.govt.nz ** NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Spamcop problem with this list?
Its pretty common with RBL's. They will blacklist a whole ISP or IP block because said ISP "supports spammers" The logic is that customers will find a new ISP and dump them because of it. I'm sure most of us know how flawed that logic is. -Original Message- From: Jeroen Peters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 5:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Spamcop problem with this list? So what I understand is that some domain hosted by xo.com is responsible for sending spam and therefore every domain hosted by xo.com is blacklisted. Nice. Regards, Jeroen Peters -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Blunt, James H (Jim) Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 8:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Spamcop problem with this list? Spamcop does not list any of those domain names as being blacklisted...from what I can see. However, "swynk.com", "sparklist.com" and your own "plasticgirl.com" are all listed on the FiveTen RBL. -Original Message- From: Jeroen Peters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Spamcop problem with this list? Hi all, All messages on this list received today were reported by Mailwasher to be blacklisted by Spamcop. I don't believe it to be a problem in Mailwasher, so it must be Spamcop. What happened? Jeroen Peters _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Spamcop problem with this list?
Hmmm... Still every message from the list is marked as blacklisted by spamcop. I guess I have to contact them. Plasticgirl.com (my domain) is blacklisted by the Fiveten RBL because it's hosted by xo.com. From the site of Fiveten: IP address 207.155.252.26 is listed here as xo.com spam-support. Please note that the following comments apply to xo.com since 207.155.252.26 seems to be owned or controlled by them. This does NOT mean that we ever received spam from 207.155.252.26. It just means that the upstream owner of that address block (which seems to be xo.com) is listed here for spam support. That upstream needs to resolve the below issues. -end quote- So what I understand is that some domain hosted by xo.com is responsible for sending spam and therefore every domain hosted by xo.com is blacklisted. Nice. Regards, Jeroen Peters -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Blunt, James H (Jim) Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 8:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Spamcop problem with this list? Spamcop does not list any of those domain names as being blacklisted...from what I can see. However, "swynk.com", "sparklist.com" and your own "plasticgirl.com" are all listed on the FiveTen RBL. -Original Message- From: Jeroen Peters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Spamcop problem with this list? Hi all, All messages on this list received today were reported by Mailwasher to be blacklisted by Spamcop. I don't believe it to be a problem in Mailwasher, so it must be Spamcop. What happened? Jeroen Peters _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Moved to new server now no OWA
I'm guessing that the problem you're having is that the old server redirects the OWA session to the new server, but your firewall doesn't allow that. If you configure the old server as a front-end server, it'll keep the OWA session and pass through (proxy) the transactions to the other mailbox server. The problem with doing that is that you still have mailboxes on the old server, and generally you don't want to configure a mailbox server to be a front-end server. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Louanne Fournier Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Moved to new server now no OWA I am in the process of moving Exchange 2000 to new hardware. I have moved my public folders and moved my users. Everybody is up and working and things seem fine except for OWA. In my firewall I have a static setup pointing to the old server. Internally when I try to access OWA from the old server it automatically redirects me to the new server. This does not seem to be happening for people outside the office. Is there anyway that you know of to have OWA working on both machines while I finish the migration, or to somehow have the external OWA requests forwarded to the new server? I will be changing the firewall once everything is tested and confirmed but didn't want to do that yet if I don't have to. Thanks in advance for any help! Louanne [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Defrag Issues
If your drive is really fragmented and you feel you need to do this, you should shut down all of the Exchange services first. -Original Message- From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 4:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Defrag Issues Are there any issues with running Windows Disk Defragmenter to defrag a Disk Array that has an exchange data base and log files on it? If this can be done I would assume that exchange should be off line. Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Defrag Issues
Are there any issues with running Windows Disk Defragmenter to defrag a Disk Array that has an exchange data base and log files on it? If this can be done I would assume that exchange should be off line. Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 2003 & Clustering
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exchange2003/section8.asp >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/10/2003 9:52:54 a.m. >>> I'm sure you all remember the Micrsosoft Marketing bulletins that were issued in the past regarding Exchange 2000 Active/Active clustering and the potential prblems associated with fragmented memory and the associated failover issues. Does anyone on the list have field or lab experience with Windows Server 2003 and Exchange 2003 running Active/Active clustering. Are the noted issues inherent in the Exchange 2000 architecture and Active/Active clustering still a concern with the new technology? Wayne Peters Resurrected Exchange Architect _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** Northland State of the Environment Report 2002 now online at www.nrc.govt.nz ** NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 2003 & Clustering
I'm sure you all remember the Micrsosoft Marketing bulletins that were issued in the past regarding Exchange 2000 Active/Active clustering and the potential prblems associated with fragmented memory and the associated failover issues. Does anyone on the list have field or lab experience with Windows Server 2003 and Exchange 2003 running Active/Active clustering. Are the noted issues inherent in the Exchange 2000 architecture and Active/Active clustering still a concern with the new technology? Wayne Peters Resurrected Exchange Architect _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Specify by E-mail Domain
No, the recipient policies allow to define local domains. He wants to define a smart host for external mail delivery I think. To do that, you need to create additional SMTP Connectors with specific address spaces. For example SMTP Connector for Yahoo.com with address space *yahoo.com and cost=1, then specify the FQDN of the smart host (or the IP address of the smart host in [] brackets) Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 4:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Specify by E-mail Domain Had me too :) The gang here sent me on the path... In the Exchange System Manager, Recipient \ Recipient Policies \ Default Policy -Original Message- From: Miller, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 14:27 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Specify by E-mail Domain All, In Exchange 5.5 on the Connections tab of an IMS you could specify by email domain an IP address of where you want these messages to go. I can not for the life of me find this corresponding setting in Exchange 2000? We have 3 domains that we do not use DNS for - so we need to map these domains to a particular host for delivery. Works like a champ in 5.5 - just cant find the setting in 2000 TIA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Specify by E-mail Domain
Had me too :) The gang here sent me on the path... In the Exchange System Manager, Recipient \ Recipient Policies \ Default Policy -Original Message- From: Miller, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 14:27 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Specify by E-mail Domain All, In Exchange 5.5 on the Connections tab of an IMS you could specify by email domain an IP address of where you want these messages to go. I can not for the life of me find this corresponding setting in Exchange 2000? We have 3 domains that we do not use DNS for - so we need to map these domains to a particular host for delivery. Works like a champ in 5.5 - just cant find the setting in 2000 TIA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Specify by E-mail Domain
All, In Exchange 5.5 on the Connections tab of an IMS you could specify by email domain an IP address of where you want these messages to go. I can not for the life of me find this corresponding setting in Exchange 2000? We have 3 domains that we do not use DNS for - so we need to map these domains to a particular host for delivery. Works like a champ in 5.5 - just cant find the setting in 2000 TIA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Multiple logons for OWA
I'm trying to set up OWA so that users can get their public folders and mailboxes but still provide the same views of those public folders as they would get in Outlook itself. This is also in conjunction with trying to make sure they have only one user name/password combo to put in place. As it is, I have it set to basic authentication (with an SSL cert on the way) for the Exchange site itself and anonymous on the public folders so that my users don't have to type their UH/PW twice. But there's no controls then on which public folders they see... If the anonymous user isn't set to be at least a reviewer they don't see the folder, especially a problem when it's supposed to be viewable only by a few users. What's the recommendation here? Use Windows Integrated logons for both? What will keep two logon screens from coming up? Thanks, Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Moved to new server now no OWA
I am in the process of moving Exchange 2000 to new hardware. I have moved my public folders and moved my users. Everybody is up and working and things seem fine except for OWA. In my firewall I have a static setup pointing to the old server. Internally when I try to access OWA from the old server it automatically redirects me to the new server. This does not seem to be happening for people outside the office. Is there anyway that you know of to have OWA working on both machines while I finish the migration, or to somehow have the external OWA requests forwarded to the new server? I will be changing the firewall once everything is tested and confirmed but didn't want to do that yet if I don't have to. Thanks in advance for any help! Louanne [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Spamcop problem with this list?
Spamcop does not list any of those domain names as being blacklisted...from what I can see. However, "swynk.com", "sparklist.com" and your own "plasticgirl.com" are all listed on the FiveTen RBL. -Original Message- From: Jeroen Peters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Spamcop problem with this list? Hi all, All messages on this list received today were reported by Mailwasher to be blacklisted by Spamcop. I don't believe it to be a problem in Mailwasher, so it must be Spamcop. What happened? Jeroen Peters _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Spamcop problem with this list?
We use the SpamCop RBL and it is not picking up any messages from here... -Original Message- From: Jeroen Peters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 12:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Spamcop problem with this list? Hi all, All messages on this list received today were reported by Mailwasher to be blacklisted by Spamcop. I don't believe it to be a problem in Mailwasher, so it must be Spamcop. What happened? Jeroen Peters _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Spamcop problem with this list?
Hi all, All messages on this list received today were reported by Mailwasher to be blacklisted by Spamcop. I don't believe it to be a problem in Mailwasher, so it must be Spamcop. What happened? Jeroen Peters _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: adding a dist group to another dist group
Is it local, global, or universal? Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: David Prowak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: adding a dist group to another dist group The allUsers group is a EMail enabled Security Group. When I check the properties of allUsers, and I go into the Members tab, what shows us is a list of Users, Computers and Contacts. Groups (either Security or Distribution) do not show up. How do I add groups to allUsers? Thanks, Dave --- "TWU-Durham, Ryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I did something similar to that about a week ago. > What I had to do in > order to add groups was make the Allusers group a > mail enabled security > group so that I could add the other groups. I set > it up this way to get > rid of having two separate sets of group to deal > with. So when I add a > user to their department group (which is a mail > enabled security group) > they have access to the files for that department, > can get e-mails that > are sent to that department, and are automatically > included in the > AllUsers group. > > R > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 10:14 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: adding a dist group to another dist group > > Hi, > > OK, so I'm trying to create a group that will exist > of > all Exchange users, called allUsers. > > Given the advice that I've received here (THANKS!), > the allUsers group will consist of each individual > departmental group (either distribution group or an > Email enabled security group). > > Here's the rub: After I create allUsers, when I go > into it's properties, to define it's members, the > list > that comes up does not include other groups, only > individual users & computers. > > How do make the department groups members of the > allUSers group? > > TIA, > Dave > > _ > List posting FAQ: > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; > lang=english > To unsubscribe: > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english > To unsubscribe: > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: adding a dist group to another dist group
The allUsers group is a EMail enabled Security Group. When I check the properties of allUsers, and I go into the Members tab, what shows us is a list of Users, Computers and Contacts. Groups (either Security or Distribution) do not show up. How do I add groups to allUsers? Thanks, Dave --- "TWU-Durham, Ryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I did something similar to that about a week ago. > What I had to do in > order to add groups was make the Allusers group a > mail enabled security > group so that I could add the other groups. I set > it up this way to get > rid of having two separate sets of group to deal > with. So when I add a > user to their department group (which is a mail > enabled security group) > they have access to the files for that department, > can get e-mails that > are sent to that department, and are automatically > included in the > AllUsers group. > > R > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 10:14 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: adding a dist group to another dist group > > Hi, > > OK, so I'm trying to create a group that will exist > of > all Exchange users, called allUsers. > > Given the advice that I've received here (THANKS!), > the allUsers group will consist of each individual > departmental group (either distribution group or an > Email enabled security group). > > Here's the rub: After I create allUsers, when I go > into it's properties, to define it's members, the > list > that comes up does not include other groups, only > individual users & computers. > > How do make the department groups members of the > allUSers group? > > TIA, > Dave > > _ > List posting FAQ: > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; > lang=english > To unsubscribe: > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Web Interface: > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english > To unsubscribe: > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: adding a dist group to another dist group
I did something similar to that about a week ago. What I had to do in order to add groups was make the Allusers group a mail enabled security group so that I could add the other groups. I set it up this way to get rid of having two separate sets of group to deal with. So when I add a user to their department group (which is a mail enabled security group) they have access to the files for that department, can get e-mails that are sent to that department, and are automatically included in the AllUsers group. R -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: adding a dist group to another dist group Hi, OK, so I'm trying to create a group that will exist of all Exchange users, called allUsers. Given the advice that I've received here (THANKS!), the allUsers group will consist of each individual departmental group (either distribution group or an Email enabled security group). Here's the rub: After I create allUsers, when I go into it's properties, to define it's members, the list that comes up does not include other groups, only individual users & computers. How do make the department groups members of the allUSers group? TIA, Dave _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: adding a dist group to another dist group
your "allusers" group IS a universal distribution group? right? Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 11:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: adding a dist group to another dist group Hi, OK, so I'm trying to create a group that will exist of all Exchange users, called allUsers. Given the advice that I've received here (THANKS!), the allUsers group will consist of each individual departmental group (either distribution group or an Email enabled security group). Here's the rub: After I create allUsers, when I go into it's properties, to define it's members, the list that comes up does not include other groups, only individual users & computers. How do make the department groups members of the allUSers group? TIA, Dave _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
adding a dist group to another dist group
Hi, OK, so I'm trying to create a group that will exist of all Exchange users, called allUsers. Given the advice that I've received here (THANKS!), the allUsers group will consist of each individual departmental group (either distribution group or an Email enabled security group). Here's the rub: After I create allUsers, when I go into it's properties, to define it's members, the list that comes up does not include other groups, only individual users & computers. How do make the department groups members of the allUSers group? TIA, Dave _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: exchange smtp stops responding
Check the available space on the drive...otherwise details would be nice -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Carpenter Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: exchange smtp stops responding every few days exchange stops sending emails, if i reboot the server everything is ok for a few days then it starts happening again any ideas? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2003 Upgrade
For the Symantec question, just did this myself. You'll want to run Symantec Mail Security 4.0 (build 456) for proper support for Windows 2003 / Exchange 2003. Make sure you get the SN to get the license file from your TAM/vendor *before* you upgrade tho, or you'll be manually updating definitions with intelligent updater files and the like until you get it (d'oh - Live Update needs the license file to work). I wouldn't run SAVMse 3.0 on a Win2k3/Ex2k3 box. Just confirmed this on the Platinum support site (checking SAVMse 3.0 build 109) "Build 109 addresses a memory issue and several scan fixes. Details of fixes and enhancements included in this and previous builds are in the inline release notes. This version is not supported on Windows 2003 and Exchange 2003." For SMS4.0, there are a couple issues with running it on Win2k3 systems, most notably that the enhanced IE security settings by default keep you from accessing the server admin UI on the server itself (add the URL to the Intranet zone in IE to allow this), and distribution of virus defs and license files from the admin console requires WebDAV, which may be disabled during the default install of Win2k3 (just open the server with IIS Manager, select the Web Service Extensions, select WebDAV and then click the Allow button). Scott Scott Pease Senior Specialist, IT - Messaging Architect Sapient 200 West Adams, Suite 2700 Chicago, IL 60606 312.458.1863 desk 312.961.8216 mobile http://www.sapient.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin Lape Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 1:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2003 Upgrade Building a new server... Windows 2003 Server Exchange 2003 Server Currently have one server running Windows 2000 Server with Exchange 2000 Server. On the new server I want to migrate things such as AD, Exchange mailboxes and public folders from the Windows 2000 box to the Windows 2003 box. What is the best way to migrate all of the data since I am not performing an upgrade to both products on the same server? Also, does anybody know if Symantec Antivirus Filtering 3.0 for Exchange will work with Windows 2003 and Exchange 2003? I went to Symantec's site looking for answers and even their new version called Mail Security for Exchange Server says it is for Exchange 2000. Please advise. Thanks. J _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: exchange smtp stops responding
you might want to give us a bit more detail... example... 1.)I can not send/rec external-internet e-mail 2.) Clients running OL...just kinda of lock up... 3.) Any info in your log's??? sorry your statement is a bit vague exchange version? server version? Av software? BU software? service pack levels? anything else on the box? 2 cents bill -Original Message- From: Eric Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 10:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: exchange smtp stops responding every few days exchange stops sending emails, if i reboot the server everything is ok for a few days then it starts happening again any ideas? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
exchange smtp stops responding
every few days exchange stops sending emails, if i reboot the server everything is ok for a few days then it starts happening again any ideas? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New AV Gateway Recommendations
You are going to find out real fast that while the AV portion will work quite well, the content filtering isn't worth the CD that it was produced on. Sure, there are lots of options. Sure, you can quarantine stuff. What happens if it quarantines a false-positive? Oh, sorry. It completely mangles it so you can't get it back into the original format. Sure, the content dictionary works, but the fact is that quarantining potential spam completely breaks the message, whether it is spam or not, irritates the heck out of me. We had to completely turn off the content filtering portion and set up a separate server as a gateway to do spam scanning. Now, luckily when you buy the Enterprise edition, it includes both Corp. edition and the Mail/Gateway scanning pieces, but you get the picture. I'm not too happy with Symantec right now. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, October 02, 2003 4:24 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: New AV Gateway Recommendations Subject: RE: New AV Gateway Recommendations Okay, the word "agent" was probably unjust as its not called that. We brought corporate edition Norton and in the pack we got a CD called "Virus Protection for Mail Servers" it included :- Symantec AntiVirus/Filtering for Microsoft(r) Exchange 2000 Version: 3.05.10.105 Copyright (c) 2001 Symantec Corporation. All rights reserved. We think the software is great, there are loads of options, a content dictionary search, loads of spam options. Weve not really taken advantage of them, just the Virus scanning. But sorry yeah, its not called an agent, it's the antivirus/filtering for exchange 2000. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 October 2003 18:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New AV Gateway Recommendations There is no additional "agent" for Exchange. If you buy Corp. Ed., it does not include the AV/Filtering for Exchange. And, IMHO, it sucks rocks. I like Corp. ed., but the Exchange server piece bites, and I have told them that plenty of times. The A/V scanning is fine, but the content filtering leaves a LOT to be desired. It is also not a gateway piece (though they have one available which was mentioned earlier). Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: DL.Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 12:30 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: New AV Gateway Recommendations Subject: RE: New AV Gateway Recommendations Are you referring to an additional agent for Norton (Symantec) corporate antivirus, or the Norton (Symantec) antivirus filter? The avf we have is only able to filter by sender/subject line or set 'content types', in other words, quite limited... If you are talking about an additional agent, do you happen to have a link lying around for product information? TIA Thank you, Mitchell D. Lawrence ** (Pick Two)** -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Neil Doody Posted At: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 12:22 PM Posted To: ~Exchange Discussion~ Conversation: New AV Gateway Recommendations Subject: RE: New AV Gateway Recommendations I must recommend the Exchange agent by Symantec, you buy Norton Corporate and get the Exchange agent separate, install this, you get a nice web GUI, and viruses should never land in your users mailboxes ever again. Very customizable, you can have it mail all people involved, it can set size limits, it can be told not to allow unscanable (encrypted) items, but that is a pain in the arse if its genuine! Its good. -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 October 2003 17:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New AV Gateway Recommendations Symantec's gateway will do *most* of that. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New AV Gateway Recommendations I'm looking for a new AV gateway product. I'm looking for something that has the following features. Right now we use NAI Websheild SMTP gateway which does a pretty good job but is getting rather dated and it does not appear that this program will updated past its 4.5 version. The program has some nice features, but anything NAI blows, the support gets worse by the day, so I want to move on. The current setup I have is a single server that receives to WebSheild for AV scanning and keyword content filtering. Then it passes it on via port 26 to my MailFrontier for antispam scanning (both run on the same box) which then finally passes it on to the Exchange server boxen on port 25 just like usual. Here are the features I am looking for
Re: MSExchangeMTA Mystery Error
Any other errors in the event logs? - Original Message - From: "Paul X. Christopher (UCL-MSD)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 7:07 AM Subject: MSExchangeMTA Mystery Error Hi, Anyone know what the error below means - or what should be done about it? TIA Paul Christopher Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeMTA Event Category: Directory Access Event ID: 9302 Date: 02/10/2003 Time: 12:05:19 User: N/A Computer: S1-ADM Description: The transport configuration type 4 for the directory entry CN=MICROSOFT MTA,CN=S1-ADM,CN=SERVERS,CN=ADM,CN=ADMINISTRATIVE GROUPS,CN=UCL EXCHANGE,CN=MICROSOFT EXCHANGE,CN=SERVICES,CN=CONFIGURATION,DC=UCL,DC=AC,DC=UK is not one of the supported values. Reconfigure the transport configuration type in the identified directory entry. [BASE IL OPERATOR 24 217] (8) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MSExchangeMTA Mystery Error
Hi, Anyone know what the error below means - or what should be done about it? TIA Paul Christopher Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeMTA Event Category: Directory Access Event ID: 9302 Date: 02/10/2003 Time: 12:05:19 User: N/A Computer: S1-ADM Description: The transport configuration type 4 for the directory entry CN=MICROSOFT MTA,CN=S1-ADM,CN=SERVERS,CN=ADM,CN=ADMINISTRATIVE GROUPS,CN=UCL EXCHANGE,CN=MICROSOFT EXCHANGE,CN=SERVICES,CN=CONFIGURATION,DC=UCL,DC=AC,DC=UK is not one of the supported values. Reconfigure the transport configuration type in the identified directory entry. [BASE IL OPERATOR 24 217] (8) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New AV Gateway Recommendations
Okay, the word "agent" was probably unjust as its not called that. We brought corporate edition Norton and in the pack we got a CD called "Virus Protection for Mail Servers" it included :- Symantec AntiVirus/Filtering for Microsoft(r) Exchange 2000 Version: 3.05.10.105 Copyright (c) 2001 Symantec Corporation. All rights reserved. We think the software is great, there are loads of options, a content dictionary search, loads of spam options. Weve not really taken advantage of them, just the Virus scanning. But sorry yeah, its not called an agent, it's the antivirus/filtering for exchange 2000. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 October 2003 18:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New AV Gateway Recommendations There is no additional "agent" for Exchange. If you buy Corp. Ed., it does not include the AV/Filtering for Exchange. And, IMHO, it sucks rocks. I like Corp. ed., but the Exchange server piece bites, and I have told them that plenty of times. The A/V scanning is fine, but the content filtering leaves a LOT to be desired. It is also not a gateway piece (though they have one available which was mentioned earlier). Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner & White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: DL.Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 12:30 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: New AV Gateway Recommendations Subject: RE: New AV Gateway Recommendations Are you referring to an additional agent for Norton (Symantec) corporate antivirus, or the Norton (Symantec) antivirus filter? The avf we have is only able to filter by sender/subject line or set 'content types', in other words, quite limited... If you are talking about an additional agent, do you happen to have a link lying around for product information? TIA Thank you, Mitchell D. Lawrence ** (Pick Two)** -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Neil Doody Posted At: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 12:22 PM Posted To: ~Exchange Discussion~ Conversation: New AV Gateway Recommendations Subject: RE: New AV Gateway Recommendations I must recommend the Exchange agent by Symantec, you buy Norton Corporate and get the Exchange agent separate, install this, you get a nice web GUI, and viruses should never land in your users mailboxes ever again. Very customizable, you can have it mail all people involved, it can set size limits, it can be told not to allow unscanable (encrypted) items, but that is a pain in the arse if its genuine! Its good. -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 October 2003 17:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New AV Gateway Recommendations Symantec's gateway will do *most* of that. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New AV Gateway Recommendations I'm looking for a new AV gateway product. I'm looking for something that has the following features. Right now we use NAI Websheild SMTP gateway which does a pretty good job but is getting rather dated and it does not appear that this program will updated past its 4.5 version. The program has some nice features, but anything NAI blows, the support gets worse by the day, so I want to move on. The current setup I have is a single server that receives to WebSheild for AV scanning and keyword content filtering. Then it passes it on via port 26 to my MailFrontier for antispam scanning (both run on the same box) which then finally passes it on to the Exchange server boxen on port 25 just like usual. Here are the features I am looking for * Keyword Blocking * The ability to turn anti spam off and just use keyword blocking. * AV scanner * Ability to pass the mail on another port (such as when an AV gateway and an Antispam gateway are on the same box) * Recipient Exclusion * Sender exclusion (allow mail to pass directly from specified email addresses without scanning for content or virus's) * Originator Blocking (just dump any email that comes from specified persons) * A bonus would be that if it could do a lookup against my GAL and just dump any email for an address that does not exist * Must run on Wintel platform * Customizeable NDR's for content filtering, etc Martin Blackstone Director, Information Technologies Microsoft Exchange MVP Superior Access Insurance Services 949.470.2111 x279 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange Li
