RE: MS03-046 Exchange Critical Update

2003-10-18 Thread Freddie Soerensen
Samantha

We started getting a lot of these, several per minute :

EVENTLOG : Application
EVENT TYPE : WARNING (2)
SOURCE : MSExchangeTransport
CATEGORY : Exchange Store Driver
EVENT ID : 350
TIME :  10/16/2003 2:29:07 PM
MESSAGE :  HrGetBinary( ... IMMPID_EMP_ORIGINAL_P1_RECIPIENT_LIST ...)
800300fd  

The description for Event ID ( 350 ) in Source ( MSExchangeTransport )
cannot be found. The local computer may not have the necessary registry
information or message DLL files to display messages from a remote computer.
The following information is part of the event: HrGetBinary( ...
IMMPID_EMP_ORIGINAL_P1_RECIPIENT_LIST ...); 800300fd; .

A local consultant informed us that Microsoft created the patch very quickly
and some DLL's still need to be updated. There should be a patch for the
patch in a few days

They told us that these warnings could be safely ignored until then

Freddie


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bridges, Samantha
Sent: Freitag, 17. Oktober 2003 19:34
To: Exchange Discussions

Hello All.

Anyone seen problems when/after running the MS03-046 Exchange 2000 critical
update?  Gonna put the patch on this weekend and would like to know if
anyone had problems?

Thanks 

Samantha

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Mark appointment private in OWA - Ex2k3

2003-10-18 Thread Troels Majlandt
Hi there

In outlook you can mark an appointment as private.
Can this bee done in OWA

I´am runing Server 2K3 and Exchange 2K3 


Best regards
Troels Majlandt
Systemconstructor

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Help! Mail Queue is all blocked up...

2003-10-18 Thread Ed Crowley [MVP]
You could try this:

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;324021

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Anderson
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 6:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Help! Mail Queue is all blocked up...

Hello everyone,

I am running Exchange 2000 on an internal server.  I am publishing the SMTP
Service on my ISA Box, and I am routing all my mail to Xwall (a popular Spam
package) which in turn routes mail to the Exchange Box.
Xwall runs on Port 25, and Exchange SMTP (incoming) runs on Port 24 (so they
can both coexist on the same box).

Since Xwall has no knowledge of the users on the system, it accepts ALL
stinking e-mail messages, and then forwards them to the Exchange box.
Since spammers use blind name lists, attempting to get lucky, and hit all
the possible [EMAIL PROTECTED], the Exchange Server wants to send NDR reports
to EACH and EVERY piece of Spam mail that comes into the system.

So as you can imagine, I have thousands of messages queued up - and it takes
FOREVER for a LEGIT message, initiated from a user on the system, to
actually make it out of the system and reach the remote mail server for
delivery - because it's competing with all these outgoing NDR (and whatever
else) messages.

What can I do???  Short of running Exchange Raw - so it can deny the message
on the spot (since it has direct knowledge of the users on the system), I
don't know what else to do.

Can anybody help?  Are there other suggestions I can try, in order to reduce
my mail congestion problem?

Thanks in advance,

Mike

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Exchange 2000 and DS tolpology query

2003-10-18 Thread Ed Crowley [MVP]
The obvious answer is to add another domain controller so your AD doesn't
fail.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Timothy Schilbach
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 11:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000 and DS tolpology query

Hi All,

  How can I speed up the DS topology Query for Exchange 2000? Right now its
about every 15 minutes. When my AD fails, it takes 15 minutes for it to fail
over. Thans about 14 minutes too long for our executive staff.

  Any suggestions?

Timothy

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: [SPAM-FILT] - RE: NDR Question - Number of numbers in MIME From exceeds maximum threshold

2003-10-18 Thread Ed Crowley [MVP]
A distribution list with no members, that is.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Sadler
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 9:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: [SPAM-FILT] - RE: NDR Question - Number of numbers in MIME From
exceeds maximum threshold

Make a distribution list that goes nowhere and put those email addresses
that you are getting spammed with there.  Acts as a blackhole, eating up
junk and never gives an NDR :)



Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
WAN/Internet Specialist
913-339-6700 x194

Get a Life!  Get TWO!  Play Second Life!
http://secondlife.com/ss/?u=b4ebbfdd6af98a027fa7e89a86c55a68 


-Original Message-
From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 11:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: [SPAM-FILT] - RE: NDR Question - Number of numbers in MIME From
exceeds maximum threshold


I'm sorry , I meant blocking SMTP sender's NDR . Essentially trying to
block SPAMMERS a response for those mails which bounce back to them
because of a wrong e-mail address spelling or mail bound for someone who
no more exists with my company. As I wrote we'll manually monitor those
mails (as we already do now) in a separate exchange mailbox. 


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 12:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: [SPAM-FILT] - RE: NDR Question - Number of numbers in MIME From
exceeds maximum threshold

Why would you do that?
NDR's are a very necessary tool. How is someone that is trying to email
the CEO know that his important message did not get delivered?

-Original Message-
From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 9:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: NDR Question

Hi everyone,

I was wondering , if there is a way I can stop NDR to senders and still
have copies of NDRs sent to a mailbox within same exchange organization
? I looked all KB but couldn't find a way to do this. I'm running
Exchange 2k-SP3.

Any help or direction in this regards will be greatly appreciated,

Thanks
Kishore

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=?
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=?
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]