deleting mail from server
Is there an option in outlook to leave the pop3 email on the server? In other words, don't download it and then delete it. TIA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PST Files on a network share
As an IT Manager of a decent size organization, I would say the most valuable employees get the job done with the resources at hand. There have been many articles that show too many IT Departments today are OVER-RAIDED, Over Staffed, and Over-Redundant. The idea of throwing money at something to make it 'go away', is for the uneducated. There are levels of risk and degrees of safety. The maximum is not for everybody. To go out and spend money to get a job done is simple. To get it done without spending money (or spending less) requires thinking and planning. As an example, removing the ability to send high risk files (*.pif, *.bat, etc.) within exchange drastically reduces the likelihood of getting a virus in your company. To not perform the above and to opt to get some EXPENSIVE software is doing your company an injustice. It is our duty to get the job done while keeping expenses low. All while presenting risk levels and exposure to the company owners. If they will pay for it, let them decide. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PST Files on a network share Mr. Tech, I've worked for companies with 3 employees to 130k employees. I've seen managers and CxO's focused different things at every level. I've seen small companies which were visionary in the tech spending and technology implementations and fortune 500 companies who had IT shops so bad I wouldn't piss on them when they burst into flames (and they will). There is no large company utopia of unlimited resources, one could rephrase your question and wonder where small companies come from in thinking that large organizations have unlimited resources to throw at problems and that their issues are unique to them because they are small fish. When I worked for $vbc I put in 4 requests for an enterprise AV solution ($65k) and had it turned down all four times. Only when they finally got hammered by a virus did they come to me and direct me to implement a solution to prevent it from happening again. Sure sometimes people are forced into suboptimal situations. I know of one large credit organization which allows PST files on network shares, but that doesn't make it a good idea. I for one and happy when someone warns me it will hurt to hit myself in the head with an axe before I try it. If you really want to get into an in depth discussion of budget, resource and user management I'll send you my consulting rate. But as I see it your arguments against improvements in IT process management are currently a bit weak. BTW, Exchange standard has a 16GB limit BTW, not an 18GB limit. -Original Message- From: tech [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 2:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PST Files on a network share Are the disks on your file server cheaper than the disks in your Exchange server? It is cheaper to own standard edition of Exchange than Enterprise, standard has an 18gb limit. Some companies have a freeze on upgrading, so what do you suggest to administrators that do not work in the Utopia of a large corporation with resources. Most users claim not to have the time or feel their mail is too important to delete. Yes including the Amazon special offers. Most small companies do not care about working the right way in the long run, they want to know what is the cheapest way in the short term. They might not be around next year. My feelings are that with that attitude no wonder, but many of us work for those companies and have a boss that is only looking at today and keeping his job. When you guys reply to these messages I just wonder whether you know who the audience on this list are? From the dizzy heights of Compaq it may seem odd that admins keep making the same mistakes but many admins propose the correct solution only to actually do what is approved three of four declines later. Nathan _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is it True
Is it the case that the store.exe process muse be held in real ram and not paged out? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
STORE.EXE--CONSUMING TOO MUCH MEMORY
We are running Exchange 5.5 with the latest service packs and updates. Our message store consumes more and more memory until is it shut down by Exchange. This just started happening recently. When it happens, all users are prevented from connecting via Windows Outlook Client. What could cause something like this? We are running MacAfee Virus scan and GroupShield on this machine. Could that have any effect? TIA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE--CONSUMING TOO MUCH MEMORY
We are running 4.5.572.171 -Original Message- From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 9:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE--CONSUMING TOO MUCH MEMORY What a helpful response... This might be more helpful. What versions of Virusscan Groupshield? If GS 4.5, is hotfix 7 applied? I'd recommend upgrading to GS 5.0 if you're stuck with McAfee (we are :-( ) Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 June 2002 14:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE--CONSUMING TOO MUCH MEMORY Friggin Remove them and find out. -Original Message- From: Aristotle Zoulas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: STORE.EXE--CONSUMING TOO MUCH MEMORY We are running Exchange 5.5 with the latest service packs and updates. Our message store consumes more and more memory until is it shut down by Exchange. This just started happening recently. When it happens, all users are prevented from connecting via Windows Outlook Client. What could cause something like this? We are running MacAfee Virus scan and GroupShield on this machine. Could that have any effect? TIA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE--CONSUMING TOO MUCH MEMORY
We have the same situation. We are also running the E-Policy Orchestrator on our Exchange Server. This may or may not be a good idea. We have had MEGA problems with this AV software. It's a necessary evil.-( -Original Message- From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE--CONSUMING TOO MUCH MEMORY I work on the assumption that if he's using McAfee software he has no choice in the matter :-( Therefore, we start with what he's got, patch and configure it appropriately, and see what happens. I have GS4.5 HF7 working very happily on two Exchange 5.5 servers here without letting viruses in. Cheers, Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 June 2002 14:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE--CONSUMING TOO MUCH MEMORY Well, one could put a Real AV solution in place versus some piece of shite SW that does nothing useful, but cause stress Quit yer whinin... We get enough of that from Precht! -Original Message- From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 9:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE--CONSUMING TOO MUCH MEMORY As one of Microsoft's patented Virus propagation engines? Yup, very helpful. Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 June 2002 14:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE--CONSUMING TOO MUCH MEMORY I found his response very helpful. If one removes the BAS (c) from their server, it's much more likely to function as advertised... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: STORE.EXE--CONSUMING TOO MUCH MEMORY
This discussion list can be 1/3 info and 2/3 nonsense. I am a professional and am interested in the former. For the latter, I can read a comic book and get a real laugh. -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 3:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE--CONSUMING TOO MUCH MEMORY So does Edwina. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE--CONSUMING TOO MUCH MEMORY Doug says you are usually pre-mature. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 2:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE--CONSUMING TOO MUCH MEMORY I'm Pre-Mad -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE--CONSUMING TOO MUCH MEMORY I thought he was pre-law? -Original Message- From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE--CONSUMING TOO MUCH MEMORY Listen to him, he's pre-med. -- be - MOS The decision doesn't have to be logical; it was unanimous. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE--CONSUMING TOO MUCH MEMORY Suggesting the removal of McAfee products from a server is among the most helpful responses I could possibly think of. It's solved pesky problems for thousands of administrators over the years. -Original Message- From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 8:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE--CONSUMING TOO MUCH MEMORY What a helpful response... This might be more helpful. What versions of Virusscan Groupshield? If GS 4.5, is hotfix 7 applied? I'd recommend upgrading to GS 5.0 if you're stuck with McAfee (we are :-( ) Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 June 2002 14:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE--CONSUMING TOO MUCH MEMORY Friggin Remove them and find out. -Original Message- From: Aristotle Zoulas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: STORE.EXE--CONSUMING TOO MUCH MEMORY We are running Exchange 5.5 with the latest service packs and updates. Our message store consumes more and more memory until is it shut down by Exchange. This just started happening recently. When it happens, all users are prevented from connecting via Windows Outlook Client. What could cause something like this? We are running MacAfee Virus scan and GroupShield on this machine. Could that have any effect? TIA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource
two questions
Hi All: In going through out Exchange 5.5 logs I came across the following under the security section: Special privileges assigned to new logon: User Name: XX Domain: X Logon ID: (0x0,0x1A6E02E) Assigned: SeDebugPrivilege SeBackupPrivilege SeChangeNotifyPrivilege SeRestorePrivilege SeAuditPrivilege Is this anything to worry about? Has someone increased their rights to perform any malicious act? Also, is there any way to track IP addresses in the event logs? In other words, instead of seeing so and so logged in to such and such workstation, we would like to see the IP address. I know it shows it for pop 3 clients but does it show it for Outlook clients? Many thanks.. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 5.5 and Win2K
Any important issues running these two together? We are currently on a Exchange 5.5/NT 4 system and are thinking of redoing the system. Not ready for Exchange 2000 as I believe it requires active directory. TIA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
unread mail marked read by itself ?????
Is this possible? Several members of the firm that I am consulting for claim to have had this problem. They came in one morning several days ago and to their surprise, mail that they NEVER read was marked as being read by outlook. The firm is running Exchange 5.5 with outlook as a client . Some possibilities are: 1.)something happened to the internal database that caused this error.2.) Someone within the company tampered with the mail and read their mail, thus marking it as read. 3.) Perhaps their backup system had something to do with it. They are doing brick level back ups using Veritas 8.5. #3 does not seem like an option since only two people, albeit high level IT people, were affected. This also NEVER happened before. Any help would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: unread mail marked read by itself ?????
This is a possibility. If this was the case someone would have to sit there and scroll though each message thus marking it as read. Correct? TIA -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 10:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: unread mail marked read by itself ? I would guess someone is reading their email. They probably have OL set to mark as read when selection changes. -Original Message- From: Aristotle Zoulas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 7:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: unread mail marked read by itself ? Is this possible? Several members of the firm that I am consulting for claim to have had this problem. They came in one morning several days ago and to their surprise, mail that they NEVER read was marked as being read by outlook. The firm is running Exchange 5.5 with outlook as a client . Some possibilities are: 1.)something happened to the internal database that caused this error.2.) Someone within the company tampered with the mail and read their mail, thus marking it as read. 3.) Perhaps their backup system had something to do with it. They are doing brick level back ups using Veritas 8.5. #3 does not seem like an option since only two people, albeit high level IT people, were affected. This also NEVER happened before. Any help would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: unread mail marked read by itself ?????
Sorry to ask a dumb question but our local Exchange admin wants to know which log to look at. thanks -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 10:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: unread mail marked read by itself ? #2 is the likely suspect. Just check your logs to see who is accessing the said users accounts. -Original Message- From: Aristotle Zoulas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 7:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: unread mail marked read by itself ? Is this possible? Several members of the firm that I am consulting for claim to have had this problem. They came in one morning several days ago and to their surprise, mail that they NEVER read was marked as being read by outlook. The firm is running Exchange 5.5 with outlook as a client . Some possibilities are: 1.)something happened to the internal database that caused this error.2.) Someone within the company tampered with the mail and read their mail, thus marking it as read. 3.) Perhaps their backup system had something to do with it. They are doing brick level back ups using Veritas 8.5. #3 does not seem like an option since only two people, albeit high level IT people, were affected. This also NEVER happened before. Any help would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: unread mail marked read by itself ?
What are the common ways for people to read other people's email? They have OWA turned off. I will also assume that they did not leave their workstations logged in. 5 (?'s) omitted --) -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: unread mail marked read by itself ? Exchange Administrator - a sign of a diseased mind. - Amit Hanji -Original Message- From: Herold Heiko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 8:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: unread mail marked read by itself ? Multiple exclamation marks... a sign of a diseased mind. Terry Pratchett Maskerade Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907087 -- ITALY -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 4:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: unread mail marked read by itself ? I sure do !!! -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: unread mail marked read by itself ? No. I find them annoying as well. Anyone else find them annoying? :) Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 January 2002 15:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: unread mail marked read by itself ? It is also possible that the users themselves do it without knowing. Another possibility is that if they have a delegate, the delegate might have had their Inbox open in a separate window. Since these two people are higher up in the company it is quite possible that they have a number of delegates that manage their calendar, and maybe even respond to their messages. S. PS: Am I the only one who finds multiple question marks extremely irritating? -Original Message- From: Aristotle Zoulas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 10:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: unread mail marked read by itself ? This is a possibility. If this was the case someone would have to sit there and scroll though each message thus marking it as read. Correct? TIA -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 10:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: unread mail marked read by itself ? I would guess someone is reading their email. They probably have OL set to mark as read when selection changes. -Original Message- From: Aristotle Zoulas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 7:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: unread mail marked read by itself ? Is this possible? Several members of the firm that I am consulting for claim to have had this problem. They came in one morning several days ago and to their surprise, mail that they NEVER read was marked as being read by outlook. The firm is running Exchange 5.5 with outlook as a client . Some possibilities are: 1.)something happened to the internal database that caused this error.2.) Someone within the company tampered with the mail and read their mail, thus marking it as read. 3.) Perhaps their backup system had something to do with it. They are doing brick level back ups using Veritas 8.5. #3 does not seem like an option since only two people, albeit high level IT people, were affected. This also NEVER happened before. Any help would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives
RE: unread mail marked read by itself ?????
I think this works for one email but not for more than one without user intervention. -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 11:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: unread mail marked read by itself ? They have the preview pane turned on and left their clients up. Mail comes in, preview pane reads it, it times out (default is five seconds I believe) and the message is marked read. - Original Message - From: Aristotle Zoulas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 9:16 AM Subject: unread mail marked read by itself ? Is this possible? Several members of the firm that I am consulting for claim to have had this problem. They came in one morning several days ago and to their surprise, mail that they NEVER read was marked as being read by outlook. The firm is running Exchange 5.5 with outlook as a client . Some possibilities are: 1.)something happened to the internal database that caused this error.2.) Someone within the company tampered with the mail and read their mail, thus marking it as read. 3.) Perhaps their backup system had something to do with it. They are doing brick level back ups using Veritas 8.5. #3 does not seem like an option since only two people, albeit high level IT people, were affected. This also NEVER happened before. Any help would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: unread mail marked read by itself ?
No, the Exchange admin has it turned off. -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 11:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: unread mail marked read by itself ? What do you mean by 'they have OWA turned off?'. Do you mean the users administer the OWA server? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Aristotle Zoulas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 January 2002 16:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: unread mail marked read by itself ? What are the common ways for people to read other people's email? They have OWA turned off. I will also assume that they did not leave their workstations logged in. 5 (?'s) omitted --) -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: unread mail marked read by itself ? Exchange Administrator - a sign of a diseased mind. - Amit Hanji -Original Message- From: Herold Heiko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 8:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: unread mail marked read by itself ? Multiple exclamation marks... a sign of a diseased mind. Terry Pratchett Maskerade Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907087 -- ITALY -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 4:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: unread mail marked read by itself ? I sure do !!! -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: unread mail marked read by itself ? No. I find them annoying as well. Anyone else find them annoying? :) Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 January 2002 15:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: unread mail marked read by itself ? It is also possible that the users themselves do it without knowing. Another possibility is that if they have a delegate, the delegate might have had their Inbox open in a separate window. Since these two people are higher up in the company it is quite possible that they have a number of delegates that manage their calendar, and maybe even respond to their messages. S. PS: Am I the only one who finds multiple question marks extremely irritating? -Original Message- From: Aristotle Zoulas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 10:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: unread mail marked read by itself ? This is a possibility. If this was the case someone would have to sit there and scroll though each message thus marking it as read. Correct? TIA -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 10:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: unread mail marked read by itself ? I would guess someone is reading their email. They probably have OL set to mark as read when selection changes. -Original Message- From: Aristotle Zoulas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 7:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: unread mail marked read by itself ? Is this possible? Several members of the firm that I am consulting for claim to have had this problem. They came in one morning several days ago and to their surprise, mail that they NEVER read was marked as being read by outlook. The firm is running Exchange 5.5 with outlook as a client . Some possibilities are: 1.)something happened to the internal database that caused this error.2.) Someone within the company tampered with the mail and read their mail, thus marking it as read. 3.) Perhaps their backup system had something to do with it. They are doing brick level back ups using Veritas 8.5. #3 does not seem like an option since only two people, albeit high level IT people, were affected. This also NEVER happened before. Any help would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives
deleting public folders
How do you delete public folders in exchange 5.5? TIA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
