RE: Dual Processor EXCH2K/SVR2K
I don't care who you are. That's *FUNNY* right there! Barry J. Horner NT Server/Exchange/WWW Administrator Central Community College - Grand Island, NE (V) 308.398.7361(F) 308.398.7399 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 7:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Dual Processor EXCH2K/SVR2K You are not allowed to thank Robert per the Decklerheitsgebot Purity Laws of IT Ethics. -Original Message- From: Exchange Discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Dual Processor EXCH2K/SVR2K Cheers Robert as I said I just wanted it confirmed ;-) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Moir Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 12:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Dual Processor EXCH2K/SVR2K Yes of course it can. -- Robert Moir Microsoft MVP Senior IT Systems Engineer Luton Sixth Form College RM Eunt Domus -Original Message- From: Exchange Discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 December 2003 12:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Dual Processor EXCH2K/SVR2K I would be grateful if anyone would be able to confirm that Exchange 2k is able to utilise dual processor technology on W2k server. Regards David Registered Office: Hillfields, Burghfield Common, Reading, Berkshire, RG7 3YG Registered Charity No. 209617 A company limited by guarantee Registered in England Company No. 291646 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics
Greg, you wrote: First, I never said I was a master logician. This is simply another in a long line of dozens of mischaracterizations of my posts that proves the fact that you either cannot read, cannot comprehend what you read, choose to embellish what you read or assume things about what you read. So you are going to quibble with things that I said? You people are so whacked out that it is utterly incomprehensible. So where were you when I was called a liar or a wife beater or stupid or idiot or that I starve children. All of that is OK in your whacky bizarro world, but explaining to someone that if you start a fight (in email for Christ's sake) that I will finish that fight. Oh that is TERRIBLE! How could you SAY such a thing. Never mind the liar, stupid, idiot stuff, THAT, sir, is uncalled for. People mis-characterize and read things into my posts that are not there. Personal attacks are generally the clearest sign that someone has lost an argument and has nothing better to say. So now I am a wife beater, a liar, I starve children and I get beat up a lot. I keep learning things about myself that I never knew before, I love this list. And, I just gotta say...a starving child reference?!?!?! I mean...what? So now I'm taking food out of the mouths of children because I believe that accepting a vendor honorarium is unethical? I...I...I literally don't even know what to say to something that incredibly inane. That one takes the cake. The original question I posed to you was: Oh - are you an MCSE? Would having those initials behind your name enhance your credibility, marketability, business ventures and/or profits? Would obtaining such a title be unethical and wrong? If having those credentials put food in your children's mouths and a roof over their heads, would your attitude change any? Did I state you starved children? Speaking of mischaracterizations, choosing to embellish, assuming things about what you read and not comprehending I asked you if having a specific vendor-based credential put food in to YOUR children's mouths, would your attitude change? You can mischaracterize, embellish, whatever to suit your needs. You should be absolutely exhausted by now from all the running in circles you do. Stick to your guns and stay stuck or as someone else so eloquently stated, STFU. Actually, you remind me a singing and dancing Charles Durning from the Best Little Wh0rehouse in Texas. O - I love to dance a little sidestep.. You're shucking and jiving so much trying to win your arguments you're doing the same things you accuse others of which results in serious damage to any credibility you may have had. I originally gave you credit for sticking to your beliefs but now must retract that statement. Doctors screw up and someone dies. Lawyers screw up and someone goes to prison or is freed to commit further crimes [you write the final chapter on this one]. Any person involved with the medical, dental, physical, psychological arenas [and their assistants, etc] screw up and a life is on the line. That's the reason for federal and/or congressional intervention along with written laws and ethics - to guide behavior so as to NOT put a life in jeopardy. You know what happens when I screw up? Pamela the personal assistant doesn't get her e-mail from Aunt Betty about what pie to bake for their holiday dinner. Just have Aunt Betty send her recipe right after I get the mail server running again. Professionalism, honesty, competence, experience and skill count and go a long way in this business. Being professional means policing your own, being proficient, earning respect and being an example for others to emulate and from there you can create the infrastructure of ethics. You'd better hit the silk now because your plane has way too many holes in it to fly and the hole you're landing yourself in apparently has no room for the traits I just mentioned.. Our profession hasn't been around long enough to begin this debate and if you think otherwise, then go ahead and label yourself ahead of your time - your ego can handle it. There's entirely too much cutthroat activity in this business to sit at one table and hammer this all out so for this generation at least, it's live and let live. Let it go, man. Barry J. Horner NT Server/Exchange/WWW Administrator Central Community College - Grand Island, NE (V) 308.398.7361(F) 308.398.7399 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: WAS Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
See, Greg? There's a point to be gleaned from your response which numerous individuals have been trying to make and I happen to agree. From what I can see, you verbally accosted Jim without prior provocation and then recanted. Sorry doesn't cut it and neither does your extremely poor attempt at humor to lighten the mood. Ya...I see your Schwartz is as big as mine.. [no shot at you, Jim!] I am aware of Jim, his career, his professionalism, his reputation [from this and other lists] and happen to know he is a member of two different professions [one being IT], each with their own professional codes of ethics [written or unwritten] and the two worlds don't collide. As I see things, the two professions work very well with each other, can't really operate without each other and the two arenas apparently have no problems with titles, honorary or otherwise, ethics and, in fact, encourage certifications and memberships in elite groups. Could that include being an MVP? Sure! Would obtaining MSCE credentials help in the IT arena? Of course! Would those memberships have any negative impact on either of the worlds Jim or numerous others work in? No. Like many others on this list, I care not if Jim, Ed, or hundreds of others [Hi Missy!] are green, pink or live in Sunken R'lyeh - the knowledge these highly experienced and helpful individuals carry and impart to others for, well, NOTHING, is worth the price of this list's membership. Experience speaks volumes over titles and certifications yet titles can and do boost credibility in many cases. If helping others deploy and maintain a Microsoft product while *NOT* being on Microsoft's payroll and said individual is honored with a title of MVP [one doesn't sign up or ask for that, ya know - it's given] and *IF* named MVP gets a key chain or a kewpie doll dressed like Bill Gates or a CD case with my grandmother's picture on it for his or her time and trouble, then I say why not. Unethical? Hell no. Vendor whore? Maybe - and I really don't mind at all. Doesn't change my attitude nor does it impact my respect for these folks. Does that make me unethical for not agreeing with you about someone else's ethics? I don't care to know your answer because I, and those who know me, know better than you. Nothing more to see here - citizens move along. I've been on this list for 4 or 5 years and whether you were around at inception, I have no knowledge. What I *do* know is every time you post to a thread you impose your theory of professional IT ethics, imply or outright accuse individuals of being unethical and wrong according to your standards, the topic goes south and for the next 3 days it's all about you and your semantics. I'll give you credit for standing your ground but we've all heard it ad nauseum and I don't believe any amount of rhetoric on your part is going to change any minds so would you please do us all a favor and either drop the drama queen/diva attitude or drop off to Sunken R'lyeh? Oh - are you an MCSE? Would having those initials behind your name enhance your credibility, marketability, business ventures and/or profits? Would obtaining such a title be unethical and wrong? If having those credentials put food in your children's mouths and a roof over their heads, would your attitude change any? Splash. Out. Barry J. Horner NT Server/Exchange/WWW Administrator Central Community College - Grand Island, NE (V) 308.398.7361(F) 308.398.7399 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 2:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 I apologize. I responded and did not pay attention to the actual from address. I thought that you were that yoda guy. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Deny Permission on mailboxes....
Search TechNet for full mailbox access filtered through the exchange kb. You'll find a few applicable topics depending on your exact situation. Try Q262054 for starters. Barry J. Horner NT Server/Exchange/WWW Administrator Central Community College - Grand Island, NE (V) 308.398.7361(F) 308.398.7399 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bridges, Samantha Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Deny Permission on mailboxes Hello. I just upgraded to AD from NT 4.0. I see a deny permission on full mailbox access for my Exchange mailbox in AD. I know it is being inherited from somewhere but I can't see where. My account name is not in the permissions at the Parent (User). I also checked at the Org. level and my account does not appear there either. Arrrggghhh.where is the Deny permission coming from. Please help. Samantha Bridges _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 Server hammer-age.
I'll wager it's an XP connectivity issue with your 5.5 box as that's what I saw here during our migration. On the client side we got rid of NetBios, made sure DNS was properly configured [on both client and server!!] and then dropped an lmhost file on the machine. The lmhost file worked like a charm for our XP clients but had no effect on our W2K clients as those systems worked right the first time and really didn't need any tweaking. WINS may also be a good replacement for the lmhost file - whichever suits your needs best. Barry Barry J. Horner NT Server/Exchange/WWW Administrator Central Community College - Grand Island, NE (V) 308.398.7361(F) 308.398.7399 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 8:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Exchange 5.5 Server hammer-age. Run the Task Manager on your Exchange Server and see what's eating up all the CPU Pocesses. We have this problem occasionally with mssdmn.exe running 100% utilization. We just kill this process and things go back to normal. As of yet, no one at MS has been able to explain why this occurs. Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA WAN/Internet Specialist 913-339-6700 x194 Get a Life! Get TWO! Play Second Life! http://secondlife.com/ss/?u=b4ebbfdd6af98a027fa7e89a86c55a68 -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 Server hammer-age. Until recently, our Exchange 5.5 Server has been running smoothly. Lately however, it has been running S..L..O..W on occasions. Our server is older (Dell 6300 with Dual 400 MHZ processors and 1.5 GB of memory. 700 users). The only thing that's changed is we have recently started upgrading some of our NT 4.0 workstations to Windows XP workstations. Almost all those users receive the following message the first time they logon Outlook is retrieving data from the Microsoft Exchange Server Exchange. You can cancel the request or minimize this message to the Windows taskbar until Outlook closes the message automatically. Some of them receive the message more frequently. Maybe the two issues aren't related, but I thought I'd start here, since it's the only thing that's changed recently. Is anybody else having issues using XP Professional with Exchange 5.5? Thanks. Robert *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE *** This electronic mail message and any attachments to this electronic mail message contain confidential information belonging to the originator, and may be attorney client privileged or constitute inside information. It is intended only for the use of the individual(s) listed as the recipient(s). If you are not one of the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the electronically mailed information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail message in error, please forward the electronic mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and then remove all traces of the electronic mail message from your system. *** The Dayton Power Light Company. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM
Check for journaling set to on. Turn it off and show the user how to clear all the previous entries out by hand. They'll leave you alone for a while and will be happy to send mail again. Barry J. Horner NT Server/Exchange/WWW Administrator Central Community College - Grand Island, NE (V) 308.398.7361(F) 308.398.7399 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 1:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:MailBox LIMIT PROBLEM I HAVE SOME USERS THAT DON'T HAVE BARELY ANY MAIL IN THEIR INBOX, AND YET WHEN THEY TRY TO SEND IT GIVES THE A MAILBOX STORAGE ERROR, AND THEY CAN'T SEND. I HAVE CHECKED THE SERVER SIDE OF IT AND THIER ARE NO LIMITATIONS.I went to the mailbox resources and it read total k is 47,111. How can this be when they have nothing in thier inbox . Any help would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Event ID 9322 questions
Q279537? Barry J. Horner [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Event ID 9322 questions Hello Got 3.5ft of snow in the my drivewayanyway I have been seeing a increase in event id 9322 in my invisible smtp server a lot lately. Every event has the same details, as follows.. An interface error has occurred. An MtaBindBack over RPC has failed. Locality Table (LTAB) index: 13, NT/MTA error code: 1722. Comms error 1722, Bind error 0, Remote Server Name POSTOFFICE02, Protocol String ncacn_ip_tcp:postoffice02.aruplab.com[1052] [BASE IL INCOMING RPC 41 507] (14) postoffice02 is my registered smtp server and the IMS on it has a trust level of 1 while my invisible smtp(postoffice03) server has a trust level of 10. I have a 3rd server that has all my mailboxes on it but I never see its name pop up in the event 9322 details. The 01 and 02 servers have no errors or relevant events. I checked the kbase and found 7 articles covering that event, 3 of them were RAS related(we don't use ras), 1 was multi site(we use single site), 1 firewall(servers are behind firewall together), and 1 was exchange 2000 nt/mta error 5 related(I only have exch 5.5). the last item said that I should put more memory in my postoffice but I find it hard to believe that a server running 2 p3 800's with 1.5 gig of memory and a ISpriv size of 257meg is going to have overhead problems. Any ideas short of calling pss? I'm lost e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MSN
Their server[s] = out of disk space. Or so states the error messages returned from them. Barry -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 1:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:MSN Is anyone else having problems sending mail to msn.com today? An MX lookup for msn.com returns: cpimssmtpa12.msn.com smtp-gw-4.msn.com I can't seem to establish an SMTP connection to either. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Plain Text Only
http://support.ati.com/drivers/win98/win98_4112560.html I'm betting on a driver issue since you can't seem to change the settings. Barry J. Horner NT Server/Exchange/WWW Administrator Central Community College - Grand Island, NE (V) 308.398.7361(F) 308.398.7399 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ewart, Vicki L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 1:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Plain Text Only This user is not competent enough to use OWA (really, I kid you not!). Yes, I have connected this computer to a different monitor, and yes I have the some problem; therefore, it must be in the software somewhere. As I said earler, suspect the BIOS. This is supposed to be an MMX machine, but it sure doesn't behave like one. I cannot reduce the refresh rates any further than they already are. It is set as low as it will go. In fact, I cannot change any of the settings from the Display control panel. (Well, you can change them, but they won't take). Rather than spend all my time trying to chase down this stupid problem, it's just easier to send him stuff in Rich Text or Plain Text. That's why I asked if it was possible to set the user up so that everything automatically defaults to plain text for viewing. So all I really need is a yes or no answer on the original question. Is it possible? ve -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 11:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Plain Text Only Does this user have the same problem opening a web page in Internet Explorer? If not, have him connect to his mailbox using OWA in the meantime, or by mapping a drive directly to his mailbox on ExIFS and opening messages using a browser. Either way, without a lot more info I have a hard time believing that this is a hardware issue - unless possibly directly related to the monitor and not to the machine hardware. Have you tried to connect this computer to a different monitor with same results? If monitor is found to be the suspect, you may want to reduce the refresh rates and/or color depths by right-clicking an open area on the desktop and selecting properties. Also, if it's an older monitor you may want to contact the manufacturer to make sure you have any drivers that may exist for it. Not all monitors have drivers and most don't need them regardless. However monitor limitations in display refresh rates, color depth and resolution are often made aware to the system using these drivers. If all this fails, address the way you're re-baselining the workstation. Are you using a Ghosted image? If so, maybe there is a problem with the image that effects just this hardware. Try manually re-installing operating system and applications (reaching here). Good luck. Eric Original Message --- From: Ewart, Vicki L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 09:51:47 -0700 I have a user who can't read HTML due to a hardware problem that is unresolved. Is there a way to set up a user so that they receive mail only in plain text? V. Ewart *** Never try to teach a pig to sing. It wastes your time and annoys the pig. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
