RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note
Seriously, Siegfried, Andy, at least half the time I access the PFs (of which I am owner) using OL2002 I get a logon prompt box in which I enter my same logon credentials (THREE times because it rejects them each time) and then goes ahead and let's me in the PF with appropriate access. Yes, I know the scripts should be rewritten. Terry L. Beavers Technology Assessment Application Information Technologies University of South Florida Tampa, Florida _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note
Jeez, how is that an upside? After we spent the resources to develop this stuff to make it work right during the 5.5 era, now we're told to rewrite everything. So where does this leave us? In another 2 years, given Microsoft's penchant for change, none of it will work with Yukon and here we are again. Yes this is great for system integrators, consultants, etc. but we can't just charge our customers (students) more money to cover all these redevelopment costs. I won't argue about the fact that maybe the scripts should be updated. But that would be a lot of work. And in these times of tight budgets and layoffs (my team has less than HALF the staff we had this time last year but several new major development projects), it doesn't get a chance to boil up in the priority lists and instead becomes a major pain in the derriere and another reason for people to question Microsoft's customer/developer commitment. This is a major problem in an environment (academic) where you have to sell Microsoft to management and users as a server environment (as you know, the sun never stops shining in academia, if you know what I mean) I know, not your problem. We have the same issue with Peoplesoft (at least their backward compatibility is somewhat better, though) and who knows what oracle will do with that. Terry L. Beavers Technology Assessment Application Information Technologies University of South Florida Tampa, Florida -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2003 1:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note Well, then at least there's some room for improvement with the server side code. That's an upside I suppose. :) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 SP3 available
I know the url states fixes in Microsoft Exchange Server SP3 But the title of the page is: List of Fixes in Microsoft Exchange 2000 Server SP2 and the Q articles mentioned in it include fixes found in SP2. Terry L. Beavers Technology Assessment Application Information Technologies University of South Florida Tampa, Florida -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2002 8:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 SP3 available http://support.microsoft.com/common/canned.aspx?R=dH=List%20 of%20Fixes %20in%20Microsoft%20Exchange%202000%20Server%20SP3LL=support Sz=kbexcha nge2000sp3fixCDID=EN-US-KBLCID=1033 Helluva URL, that. But it works. I'll cut paste the text of the thing so you don't have to screw with URLs. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Sunday, July 21, 2002 7:04 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Exchange 2000 SP3 available Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 SP3 available Anyone know what it fixes or adds? The MS page is giving me a Internal Server Error page _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CDO/ IIS force through Exchange
Whoa!!! That's a whole lot more elegant than my oMsg.Configuration.Fields(http://schemas.microsoft.com/cdo/configuration/sm tpserver) = myservername.mydomain.com oMsg.Configuration.Fields(http://schemas.microsoft.com/cdo/configuration/se ndusing) = 2 oMsg.Configuration.Fields.Update Terry Beavers USF IT/TAA -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 3:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: CDO/ IIS force through Exchange As I mentioned. CDOSYS (CDO for Windows 2000) comes with Windows 2000/.NET Server (and Windows XP BTW) and offers such features. To send a message with CDOSYS via a remote SMTP server you just need to set it like this: Set objConfiguration = CreateObject(CDO.Configuration) Set objFields = objConfiguration.Fields With objFields .Item(cdoSendUsingMethod) = cdoSendUsingPort .Item(cdoSMTPServerPort) = 25 .Item(cdoSMTPServer) = myservername.mydomain.com .Update End With Set objMessage = CreateObject(CDO.Message) With objMessage Set .Configuration = objConfiguration .From = [EMAIL PROTECTED] .To = [EMAIL PROTECTED] .Subject = Here comes a Subject .TextBody = Here is a text body .Send End With It is BTW pretty well documented on MSDN. Siegfried / _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Hi
I remember Elaine well. She was one great resource in those pre-Ex4.0 days. In those days, daily conversations with Elaine Sharp, Robert Shurtleff, and, yes, even Brian Valentine were standard procedure. I guess I started using the list just about the time Peter started the list. We got the Beta 2 cd around October right after I got back from a Gartner ITExpo telling everyone (1) the web is a passing fancy so don't get too involved and (2) this exchange thing is just vaporware that will likely never be competitive with Notes. Terry Beavers Technology Specialist Information Technologies University of South Florida Tampa Florida -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hi Elaine started it, then Peter Bowyer took it over. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hi Yes to Bravehearts and No to Elaine. Another old timer question, Who was the original Sponser of the Exchange list? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 ...the words that I remember from my childhood still are true, that there are none so blind as those who will not see --The Moody Blues (I know you're out there) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: command line directory import
All the imports I have ever done were to a container other than Recipients. For example, use the /o parameter on the admin.exe command: /o del.txt where del.txt looks something like this: [Import] Basepoint=/o=MyOrg/ou=MySite/cn=MyContainer Terry L Beavers USF IT/TAA -Original Message- From: Smith, Calvin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 7:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: command line directory import Has anybody done a directory import to a folder other than Recipients from the command line? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mac Outlook 2001
Doesn't appear to be. I have a user that routinely switches between clients with no problem. Terry Beavers University of South Florida Information Technologies Technology Assessment Application Tampa, Florida -Original Message- From: Brannon, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 11:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mac Outlook 2001 Interesting! http://www.microsoft.com/mac/products/outlook/outlook_default.asp I remember that at one time if a Windows Outlook user opened a Mac Outlook mailbox on Exchange 5.5, then the Mac client could no longer open the mailbox. Is this still an issue? With Mac Outlook 2001? Exchange 5.5 sp4? Thanks, Chip Brannon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
