Job Hunting

2002-06-13 Thread Chris Haaker

Best Exchange/NT/IIS/SQL job hunting web sites anyone?

TIA

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Wal Mart

2002-06-13 Thread Chris Haaker

We have account reps that go there all the time. Bentonville is quite a
place to live (not) I am told. They say it is getting better though and
they even have a movie theater now.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: IMC Queues

2002-03-25 Thread Chris Haaker

Most likely because it is a Pentium Pro 200 with 256 MB RAM hosting 60
mailboxes, IMC and Trend Interscan and Scanmail

- Original Message -
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 10:11 AM
Subject: RE: IMC Queues


 I don't have any idea why that would be the case.

 
 Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP 512.652.4500 x244
 Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne
 

  -Original Message-
  From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 7:49 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: Re: IMC Queues
 
 
  Mostly because It slows the hell out of all my
  incoming/outgoing external mail .  .  . and I dont
  particularly like the idea of someone flooding my boxes with
  bogus mail . . .
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 6:57 PM
  Subject: RE: IMC Queues
 
 
   Why would you want to stop NDRs, read and delivery receipts
  from being
   delivered to senders? If the sender is bogus the messages are
   eventually dropped.
  
   
   Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP 512.652.4500 x244
   Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne
   
  
-Original Message-
From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 11:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IMC Queues
   
   
After finally finding the answer (I think) at Trend's site . . .
   
Note that this unknown recipient problem does not occur for SMTP
servers like Exchange Internet Mail Service. When
  InterScan tries to
deliver to an unknown recipient to Exchange IMicrosoft, Exchange
does not reject the message outright, like what Sendmail
  does. Only
when the message has been accepted does Exchange find out the
recipient is bogus, and then sends the bounced mail to
  InterScan as
an outbound mail. So, this mail follows the normal outbound path.
   
my next question would be is there anything I can do to
  stop this? I
have been going into the IMS queue every couple of hours and
deleting the emails
   
TIA
   
Chris
   
- Original Message -
From: Durkee, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 5:10 PM
Subject: RE: IMC Queues
   
   
 The answer is that some spammer, pretending to send
  from a spoofed
 yahoo
address, sent spam to four bad or former addresses in
  your domain.
The messages you see are the resulting NDRs trying to go
  back to the
forged and non-existant yahoo address. Feel free to delete them,
they aren't going anywhere anyway.

 -Peter


 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 13:55
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Re: IMC Queues


 Perhaps I am dim but I can only find 1 entry with no
replies for IMS
 or
IMC
 queue has  in Originator Field.
 Any other ideas?
 The weird thing is there is something like 6 entries for
each outgoing
 address

 co.boing.com  
 co.boing.com  
 co.boing.com  
 co.boing.com  
 yahoo.com  
 yahoo.com  
 yahoo.com  
 yahoo.com  

 etc. all with the same exact timestamp . . .

 - Original Message -
 From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:53 PM
 Subject: RE: IMC Queues


  Burrow your way to the FAQ.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:45 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: IMC Queues
 
 
  Looking in the IMC Queue for Outbound Mail awaiting
delivery I see
  10-20 enteries to the same address all with  as the
originator . .
  . Has the worm struck you think?
 
  It is the province of knowledge to speak,
  and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen.
  Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer,
  physician.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  _
  List posting FAQ:
  http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:
   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
   _
   List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource

Re: IMC Queues

2002-03-25 Thread Chris Haaker

LOL okay I yield . . . I should have known better . . .

- Original Message -
From: Louis Joyce [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 12:00 PM
Subject: RE: IMC Queues


 Connected to a tape drive to load up 'Sub hunt' during quiet periods.

 Regards

 Mr Louis Joyce
 Data Support Analyst
 BT Ignite eSolutions


 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 25 March 2002 16:05
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: IMC Queues


 And its running Novell off of a boot ROM.

 -Original Message-
 From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 8:02 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: IMC Queues


 Oh, and I forgot to mention that it has no hard drive.


 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 10:59 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: IMC Queues


 Still don't see why that would have any effect, but if you believe it does
I
 won't argue the point.

  -Original Message-
  From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 9:44 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: Re: IMC Queues
 
 
  Most likely because it is a Pentium Pro 200 with 256 MB RAM
  hosting 60 mailboxes, IMC and Trend Interscan and Scanmail
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 10:11 AM
  Subject: RE: IMC Queues
 
 
   I don't have any idea why that would be the case.
  
   
   Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP 512.652.4500 x244
   Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne
   
  
-Original Message-
From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 7:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IMC Queues
   
   
Mostly because It slows the hell out of all my incoming/outgoing
external mail .  .  . and I dont particularly like the idea of
someone flooding my boxes with bogus mail . . .
   
- Original Message -
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 6:57 PM
Subject: RE: IMC Queues
   
   
 Why would you want to stop NDRs, read and delivery receipts
from being
 delivered to senders? If the sender is bogus the messages are
 eventually dropped.

 
 Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP 512.652.4500 x244
  Senior Sales
 Engineer MessageOne
 

  -Original Message-
  From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 11:34 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: Re: IMC Queues
 
 
  After finally finding the answer (I think) at Trend's
  site . . .
 
  Note that this unknown recipient problem does not
  occur for SMTP
  servers like Exchange Internet Mail Service. When
InterScan tries to
  deliver to an unknown recipient to Exchange
  IMicrosoft, Exchange
  does not reject the message outright, like what Sendmail
does. Only
  when the message has been accepted does Exchange find out the
  recipient is bogus, and then sends the bounced mail to
InterScan as
  an outbound mail. So, this mail follows the normal outbound
  path.
 
  my next question would be is there anything I can do to
stop this? I
  have been going into the IMS queue every couple of hours and
  deleting the emails
 
  TIA
 
  Chris
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Durkee, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 5:10 PM
  Subject: RE: IMC Queues
 
 
   The answer is that some spammer, pretending to send
from a spoofed
   yahoo
  address, sent spam to four bad or former addresses in
your domain.
  The messages you see are the resulting NDRs trying to go
back to the
  forged and non-existant yahoo address. Feel free to
  delete them,
  they aren't going anywhere anyway.
  
   -Peter
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 13:55
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: Re: IMC Queues
  
  
   Perhaps I am dim but I can only find 1 entry with no
  replies for IMS
   or
  IMC
   queue has  in Originator Field.
   Any other ideas?
   The weird thing is there is something like 6 entries for
  each outgoing
   address
  
   co.boing.com  
   co.boing.com

Re: IMC Queues

2002-03-24 Thread Chris Haaker

I dont know. I just know when this started happening all my MTA queues and
IMS queues had a backlog of about 300 messages each, and as soon as started
deleting all the  out of the IMS all the queues cleared out in short
order.

- Original Message -
From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 8:58 PM
Subject: RE: IMC Queues


 So, you think by doing this your mail flow will be faster?


 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 8:49 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Re: IMC Queues


 Mostly because It slows the hell out of all my incoming/outgoing external
 mail .  .  . and I dont particularly like the idea of someone flooding my
 boxes with bogus mail . . .

 - Original Message -
 From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 6:57 PM
 Subject: RE: IMC Queues


  Why would you want to stop NDRs, read and delivery receipts from being
  delivered to senders? If the sender is bogus the messages are eventually
  dropped.
 
  
  Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP 512.652.4500 x244
  Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne
  
 
   -Original Message-
   From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 11:34 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: Re: IMC Queues
  
  
   After finally finding the answer (I think) at Trend's site . . .
  
   Note that this unknown recipient problem does not occur for
   SMTP servers like Exchange Internet Mail Service. When
   InterScan tries to deliver to an unknown recipient to
   Exchange IMicrosoft, Exchange does not reject the message
   outright, like what Sendmail does. Only when the message has
   been accepted does Exchange find out the recipient is bogus,
   and then sends the bounced mail to InterScan as an outbound
   mail. So, this mail follows the normal outbound path.
  
   my next question would be is there anything I can do to stop
   this? I have been going into the IMS queue every couple of
   hours and deleting the emails
  
   TIA
  
   Chris
  
   - Original Message -
   From: Durkee, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 5:10 PM
   Subject: RE: IMC Queues
  
  
The answer is that some spammer, pretending to send from a spoofed
yahoo
   address, sent spam to four bad or former addresses in your
   domain. The messages you see are the resulting NDRs trying to
   go back to the forged and non-existant yahoo address. Feel
   free to delete them, they aren't going anywhere anyway.
   
-Peter
   
   
-Original Message-
From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 13:55
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IMC Queues
   
   
Perhaps I am dim but I can only find 1 entry with no
   replies for IMS
or
   IMC
queue has  in Originator Field.
Any other ideas?
The weird thing is there is something like 6 entries for
   each outgoing
address
   
co.boing.com  
co.boing.com  
co.boing.com  
co.boing.com  
yahoo.com  
yahoo.com  
yahoo.com  
yahoo.com  
   
etc. all with the same exact timestamp . . .
   
- Original Message -
From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:53 PM
Subject: RE: IMC Queues
   
   
 Burrow your way to the FAQ.

 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:45 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: IMC Queues


 Looking in the IMC Queue for Outbound Mail awaiting
   delivery I see
 10-20 enteries to the same address all with  as the
   originator . .
 . Has the worm struck you think?

 It is the province of knowledge to speak,
 and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen.
 Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer, physician.






 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 



 _
 List posting

Re: IMC Queues

2002-03-23 Thread Chris Haaker

After finally finding the answer (I think) at Trend's site . . .

Note that this unknown recipient problem does not occur for SMTP servers
like Exchange Internet Mail Service. When InterScan tries to deliver to an
unknown recipient to Exchange IMicrosoft, Exchange does not reject the
message outright, like what Sendmail does. Only when the message has been
accepted does Exchange find out the recipient is bogus, and then sends the
bounced mail to InterScan as an outbound mail. So, this mail follows the
normal outbound path.

my next question would be is there anything I can do to stop this? I have
been going into the IMS queue every couple of hours and deleting the emails

TIA

Chris

- Original Message -
From: Durkee, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 5:10 PM
Subject: RE: IMC Queues


 The answer is that some spammer, pretending to send from a spoofed yahoo
address, sent spam to four bad or former addresses in your domain. The
messages you see are the resulting NDRs trying to go back to the forged and
non-existant yahoo address. Feel free to delete them, they aren't going
anywhere anyway.

 -Peter


 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 13:55
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Re: IMC Queues


 Perhaps I am dim but I can only find 1 entry with no replies for IMS or
IMC
 queue has  in Originator Field.
 Any other ideas?
 The weird thing is there is something like 6 entries for each outgoing
 address

 co.boing.com  
 co.boing.com  
 co.boing.com  
 co.boing.com  
 yahoo.com  
 yahoo.com  
 yahoo.com  
 yahoo.com  

 etc. all with the same exact timestamp . . .

 - Original Message -
 From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:53 PM
 Subject: RE: IMC Queues


  Burrow your way to the FAQ.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:45 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: IMC Queues
 
 
  Looking in the IMC Queue for Outbound Mail awaiting delivery I see 10-20
  enteries to the same address all with  as the originator . . .
  Has the worm struck you think?
 
  It is the province of knowledge to speak,
  and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen.
  Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer, physician.
 
 
 
 
 
 
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

 --
 
  The information contained in this email message is privileged and
 confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
 entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
 intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
 distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
 received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
 Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.
 
 


 ==
 
 
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 



 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 __
 This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
 person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
 and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
 this message to anyone else.



 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: IMC Queues

2002-03-23 Thread Chris Haaker

Mostly because It slows the hell out of all my incoming/outgoing external
mail .  .  . and I dont particularly like the idea of someone flooding my
boxes with bogus mail . . .

- Original Message -
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 6:57 PM
Subject: RE: IMC Queues


 Why would you want to stop NDRs, read and delivery receipts from being
 delivered to senders? If the sender is bogus the messages are eventually
 dropped.

 
 Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP 512.652.4500 x244
 Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne
 

  -Original Message-
  From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 11:34 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: Re: IMC Queues
 
 
  After finally finding the answer (I think) at Trend's site . . .
 
  Note that this unknown recipient problem does not occur for
  SMTP servers like Exchange Internet Mail Service. When
  InterScan tries to deliver to an unknown recipient to
  Exchange IMicrosoft, Exchange does not reject the message
  outright, like what Sendmail does. Only when the message has
  been accepted does Exchange find out the recipient is bogus,
  and then sends the bounced mail to InterScan as an outbound
  mail. So, this mail follows the normal outbound path.
 
  my next question would be is there anything I can do to stop
  this? I have been going into the IMS queue every couple of
  hours and deleting the emails
 
  TIA
 
  Chris
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Durkee, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 5:10 PM
  Subject: RE: IMC Queues
 
 
   The answer is that some spammer, pretending to send from a spoofed
   yahoo
  address, sent spam to four bad or former addresses in your
  domain. The messages you see are the resulting NDRs trying to
  go back to the forged and non-existant yahoo address. Feel
  free to delete them, they aren't going anywhere anyway.
  
   -Peter
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 13:55
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: Re: IMC Queues
  
  
   Perhaps I am dim but I can only find 1 entry with no
  replies for IMS
   or
  IMC
   queue has  in Originator Field.
   Any other ideas?
   The weird thing is there is something like 6 entries for
  each outgoing
   address
  
   co.boing.com  
   co.boing.com  
   co.boing.com  
   co.boing.com  
   yahoo.com  
   yahoo.com  
   yahoo.com  
   yahoo.com  
  
   etc. all with the same exact timestamp . . .
  
   - Original Message -
   From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:53 PM
   Subject: RE: IMC Queues
  
  
Burrow your way to the FAQ.
   
-Original Message-
From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IMC Queues
   
   
Looking in the IMC Queue for Outbound Mail awaiting
  delivery I see
10-20 enteries to the same address all with  as the
  originator . .
. Has the worm struck you think?
   
It is the province of knowledge to speak,
and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen.
Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer, physician.
   
   
   
   
   
   
_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: IMC Queues

2002-03-23 Thread Chris Haaker

I did. Thanks. My mom would be proud of you.

- Original Message -
From: Daniel Chenault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 7:29 PM
Subject: Re: IMC Queues


 Again, READ RFC-821/2821.

 - Original Message -
 From: Chris Haaker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 11:34 AM
 Subject: Re: IMC Queues


  After finally finding the answer (I think) at Trend's site . . .
 
  Note that this unknown recipient problem does not occur for SMTP servers
  like Exchange Internet Mail Service. When InterScan tries to deliver to
an
  unknown recipient to Exchange IMicrosoft, Exchange does not reject the
  message outright, like what Sendmail does. Only when the message has
been
  accepted does Exchange find out the recipient is bogus, and then sends
the
  bounced mail to InterScan as an outbound mail. So, this mail follows the
  normal outbound path.
 
  my next question would be is there anything I can do to stop this? I
have
  been going into the IMS queue every couple of hours and deleting the
 emails
 
  TIA
 
  Chris
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Durkee, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 5:10 PM
  Subject: RE: IMC Queues
 
 
   The answer is that some spammer, pretending to send from a spoofed
yahoo
  address, sent spam to four bad or former addresses in your domain. The
  messages you see are the resulting NDRs trying to go back to the forged
 and
  non-existant yahoo address. Feel free to delete them, they aren't going
  anywhere anyway.
  
   -Peter
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 13:55
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: Re: IMC Queues
  
  
   Perhaps I am dim but I can only find 1 entry with no replies for IMS
or
  IMC
   queue has  in Originator Field.
   Any other ideas?
   The weird thing is there is something like 6 entries for each outgoing
   address
  
   co.boing.com  
   co.boing.com  
   co.boing.com  
   co.boing.com  
   yahoo.com  
   yahoo.com  
   yahoo.com  
   yahoo.com  
  
   etc. all with the same exact timestamp . . .
  
   - Original Message -
   From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:53 PM
   Subject: RE: IMC Queues
  
  
Burrow your way to the FAQ.
   
-Original Message-
From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IMC Queues
   
   
Looking in the IMC Queue for Outbound Mail awaiting delivery I see
 10-20
enteries to the same address all with  as the originator . . .
Has the worm struck you think?
   
It is the province of knowledge to speak,
and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen.
Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer, physician.
   
   
   
   
   
   
_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
  
 

 --
   
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
   confidential information intended only for the use of the individual
or
   entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not
 the
   intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
   distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you
 have
   received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
   Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
   ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.
   
   
  
 


   ==
   
   
_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
  
  
  
   _
   List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
   Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
   To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
   __
   This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
   person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
   and notify me immediately, and please do

Re: IMC Queues

2002-03-23 Thread Chris Haaker

where can I lay hands on that?

- Original Message -
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 7:32 PM
Subject: RE: IMC Queues


 Also read Fish Tacos from Heaven

 -Original Message-
 From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 4:30 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Re: IMC Queues


 Again, READ RFC-821/2821.

 - Original Message -
 From: Chris Haaker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 11:34 AM
 Subject: Re: IMC Queues


  After finally finding the answer (I think) at Trend's site . . .
 
  Note that this unknown recipient problem does not occur for SMTP
  servers like Exchange Internet Mail Service. When InterScan tries to
  deliver to an unknown recipient to Exchange IMicrosoft, Exchange does
  not reject the message outright, like what Sendmail does. Only when
  the message has been accepted does Exchange find out the recipient is
  bogus, and then sends the bounced mail to InterScan as an outbound
  mail. So, this mail follows the normal outbound path.
 
  my next question would be is there anything I can do to stop this? I
  have been going into the IMS queue every couple of hours and deleting
  the
 emails
 
  TIA
 
  Chris
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Durkee, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 5:10 PM
  Subject: RE: IMC Queues
 
 
   The answer is that some spammer, pretending to send from a spoofed
   yahoo
  address, sent spam to four bad or former addresses in your domain. The
  messages you see are the resulting NDRs trying to go back to the
  forged
 and
  non-existant yahoo address. Feel free to delete them, they aren't
  going anywhere anyway.
  
   -Peter
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 13:55
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: Re: IMC Queues
  
  
   Perhaps I am dim but I can only find 1 entry with no replies for IMS
   or
  IMC
   queue has  in Originator Field.
   Any other ideas?
   The weird thing is there is something like 6 entries for each
   outgoing address
  
   co.boing.com  
   co.boing.com  
   co.boing.com  
   co.boing.com  
   yahoo.com  
   yahoo.com  
   yahoo.com  
   yahoo.com  
  
   etc. all with the same exact timestamp . . .
  
   - Original Message -
   From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:53 PM
   Subject: RE: IMC Queues
  
  
Burrow your way to the FAQ.
   
-Original Message-
From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IMC Queues
   
   
Looking in the IMC Queue for Outbound Mail awaiting delivery I see
 10-20
enteries to the same address all with  as the originator . . .
Has the worm struck you think?
   
It is the province of knowledge to speak,
and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen.
Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer, physician.
   
   
   
   
   
   
_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
  
 
  --
  
   
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
   confidential information intended only for the use of the individual
   or entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is
   not
 the
   intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
   distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you
 have
   received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis
   Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or
   email
   ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.
   
   
  
 


   ==
   
   
_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
  
  
  
   _
   List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
   Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
   To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Move Mailbox

2002-03-22 Thread Chris Haaker

Does anyone know the impact of moving a user's mailbox while they hae it
open in Outlook? I am sure it is not preferred, but we have one user we
cannot get ahold of . . .

It is the province of knowledge to speak,
and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen.
Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer, physician.






_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Haiku Friday 1st Attempt be nice :)

2002-03-22 Thread Chris Haaker

Cannot migrate now
Why explain the obvious
Die CIO die

It is the province of knowledge to speak,
and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen.
Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer, physician.






_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



IMC Queues

2002-03-22 Thread Chris Haaker

Looking in the IMC Queue for Outbound Mail awaiting delivery I see 10-20
enteries to the same address all with  as the originator . . .
Has the worm struck you think?

It is the province of knowledge to speak,
and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen.
Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer, physician.






_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: IMC Queues

2002-03-22 Thread Chris Haaker

on my way gopher boy

- Original Message -
From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:53 PM
Subject: RE: IMC Queues


 Burrow your way to the FAQ.

 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:45 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: IMC Queues


 Looking in the IMC Queue for Outbound Mail awaiting delivery I see 10-20
 enteries to the same address all with  as the originator . . .
 Has the worm struck you think?

 It is the province of knowledge to speak,
 and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen.
 Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer, physician.






 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 --

 The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.



==


 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: IMC Queues

2002-03-22 Thread Chris Haaker

Perhaps I am dim but I can only find 1 entry with no replies for IMS or IMC
queue has  in Originator Field.
Any other ideas?
The weird thing is there is something like 6 entries for each outgoing
address

co.boing.com  
co.boing.com  
co.boing.com  
co.boing.com  
yahoo.com  
yahoo.com  
yahoo.com  
yahoo.com  

etc. all with the same exact timestamp . . .

- Original Message -
From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:53 PM
Subject: RE: IMC Queues


 Burrow your way to the FAQ.

 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:45 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: IMC Queues


 Looking in the IMC Queue for Outbound Mail awaiting delivery I see 10-20
 enteries to the same address all with  as the originator . . .
 Has the worm struck you think?

 It is the province of knowledge to speak,
 and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen.
 Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer, physician.






 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 --

 The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.



==


 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: IMC Queues

2002-03-22 Thread Chris Haaker

I am sorry, the first sentence is in regards to searching the FAQ at Swynk

- Original Message - 
From: Thomas Di Nardo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 5:06 PM
Subject: RE: IMC Queues


Have you looked in the FAQ yet?

-Original Message-
From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 4:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: IMC Queues

Perhaps I am dim but I can only find 1 entry with no replies for IMS or
IMC
queue has  in Originator Field.
Any other ideas?
The weird thing is there is something like 6 entries for each outgoing
address

co.boing.com  
co.boing.com  
co.boing.com  
co.boing.com  
yahoo.com  
yahoo.com  
yahoo.com  
yahoo.com  

etc. all with the same exact timestamp . . .

- Original Message -
From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:53 PM
Subject: RE: IMC Queues


 Burrow your way to the FAQ.

 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:45 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: IMC Queues


 Looking in the IMC Queue for Outbound Mail awaiting delivery I see
10-20
 enteries to the same address all with  as the originator . . .
 Has the worm struck you think?

 It is the province of knowledge to speak,
 and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen.
 Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer, physician.






 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--

 The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not
the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you
have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.




==


 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



OT: Lookiing for Document

2002-03-21 Thread Chris Haaker

Anyone know a link to a document comparing Windows 2K SVR to Windows NT4
SVR?
I have been looking to no avail . . .

It is the province of knowledge to speak,
and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen.
Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer, physician.






_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Lookiing for Document

2002-03-21 Thread Chris Haaker

ya know, I ask myself that all the time but I am sure you can all guess why
I need it without me saying another word . . .
 The answer is an acronym 3 letters long . . .

- Original Message -
From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:37 AM
Subject: RE: Lookiing for Document


 What is there to compare?


 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:35 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: OT: Lookiing for Document


 Anyone know a link to a document comparing Windows 2K SVR to Windows NT4
 SVR?
 I have been looking to no avail . . .

 It is the province of knowledge to speak,
 and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen.
 Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer, physician.






 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 --

 The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.



==


 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Lookiing for Document

2002-03-21 Thread Chris Haaker

You would think . . . but I have been searching for 3 days and can only find
a few blurbs in different places

- Original Message -
From: missy koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:47 AM
Subject: Re: Lookiing for Document


 This information should be readily available on MS's web site.
 - Original Message -
 From: Chris Haaker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:41 AM
 Subject: Re: Lookiing for Document


 ya know, I ask myself that all the time but I am sure you can all guess
 why
 I need it without me saying another word . . .
  The answer is an acronym 3 letters long . . .

 - Original Message -
 From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:37 AM
 Subject: RE: Lookiing for Document


  What is there to compare?
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:35 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: OT: Lookiing for Document
 
 
  Anyone know a link to a document comparing Windows 2K SVR to Windows
 NT4
  SVR?
  I have been looking to no avail . . .
 
  It is the province of knowledge to speak,
  and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen.
  Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer, physician.
 
 
 
 
 
 
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  --
 
 
  The information contained in this email message is privileged and
 confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
 entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not
 the
 intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
 distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you
 have
 received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
 Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.
 
 
 
 
 ==
 
 
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 



 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



OWA Settings

2002-03-21 Thread Chris Haaker

Does anyone know how to change the mail server OWA goes to for info without
re-installing? During install it asks which Exchange server you want to talk
to . . .

TIA

It is the province of knowledge to speak,
and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen.
Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer, physician.






_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: OWA Settings

2002-03-21 Thread Chris Haaker

that did it! Gracias!

- Original Message - 
From: paragon400 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 12:50 PM
Subject: RE: OWA Settings


 Chris,
 
 If I remember correctly it is located in the registry at:
 
 HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\MSExchangeWEB\Parameters
 
 There is a server object under Parameters and all you would need to do
 is point it to the correct server.  I am assuming you are talking about
 OWA 5.5.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:29 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: OWA Settings
 
 
 Does anyone know how to change the mail server OWA goes to for info
 without re-installing? During install it asks which Exchange server you
 want to talk to . . .
 
 TIA
 
 It is the province of knowledge to speak,
 and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen.
 Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer, physician.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Getting OWA INBOX Problem

2002-03-20 Thread Chris Haaker

Anyone have experience with:

XWEB: Suddenly and Permanently Unable to Reach Inbox Using Outlook Web
Access (Q248081)

I can get him logged in if he enters first name last name in the box instead
of his alias, but then he is screwed using our extranet as the NT Domain
login passes the username (which matches his alais) for the OWA login. So
using the extranet he cannot access Public Folders which are rendered via
OWA.

The fixes in the article do not seem to do the trick. THe only thing I
havent done is take the OWA box to SP4.
The articles says this applies to XCH 5.5 SP3 so perhaps this will do the
trick?

OWA is on XCH2000 SVR SP2, XCH SP3
all other XCH SVRs are 5.5 SP4

Any other ideas?

TIA

It is the province of knowledge to speak,
and it is the privilege of wisdom to listen.
Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. (1809-94); U.S. writer, physician.






_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Organizational Forms Library

2002-02-26 Thread Chris Haaker

Is there a way to syncronize a form to use from the organizational forms
library so it can be used off-line from an OST?

TIA

Chris


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Organizational Forms Library

2002-02-26 Thread Chris Haaker

unfortuntily no. I get no error upon sync. But when I go offline I see all
the options from the drop-down menu for choosing a form EXCEPT the
Organizational Forms Library.

- Original Message -
From: Soysal, Serdar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 12:55 PM
Subject: RE: Organizational Forms Library


 Could you be suffering from the problem in Q162703?

 Serdar Soysal


 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 12:47 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Re: Organizational Forms Library


 Seems to synch all forms EXCEPT forms in the Organizational Forms Library.
 Any other ideas?

 - Original Message -
 From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 12:13 PM
 Subject: RE: Organizational Forms Library


  Yup.. Its one of the options when downloading your offline address
  book, I believe.
 
  --
  Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
  Sr. Systems Administrator
  Peregrine Systems
  Atlanta, GA
 
 
   -Original Message-
   From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:56 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: Organizational Forms Library
  
  
   Is there a way to syncronize a form to use from the organizational
   forms library so it can be used off-line from an OST?
  
   TIA
  
   Chris
  
  
   _
   List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
   Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
   To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Customizing OWA logon page

2002-02-19 Thread Chris Haaker

This kicks arse! IMHO

- Original Message -
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 9:15 PM
Subject: Customizing OWA logon page


 Please excuse the vendor like nature of this announcement.[1] I wanted to
 let everyone know about a project I've been working on with one of our
 graphic developers. It's a free wizard which allows you to choose from
one
 of several custom Exchange 5.5 OWA logon pages.[2]

 Here's the URL: http://www.messageone.com/m1owa

 Chris Magdelain[3] created a kickin OWA start page for our internal users
 and I suggested that it'd be cool if we could figure out a way to help
 everyone replace the default[4] OWA logon pages. For some strange reason,
 people actually listened to my suggestion and the above URL is the end
 result. After you complete the wizard, there's an e-mail address listed
for
 feedback... if you have an idea for a new design, use the feedback alias
and
 I'll bug Chris to add some new templates.

 Hope y'all enjoy it.

 [1] Or not...
 [2] #insert std_disclaim.h
 [3] Our rocking graphics guy
 [4] Butt ugly [5]
 [5] Yes, that's the technical term.

 Chris
 --
 Chris Scharff
 Senior Sales Engineer
 MessageOne
 If you can't measure, you can't manage!

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



OT: Reg Hack to Minimize Outlook XP

2002-02-18 Thread Chris Haaker

I used to know a reg hack for Outlook 2002 that would allow you to minimize
it to the sys tray. I cannot find it anymore. Anyone know a link?

Much Thanks!

Destiny...is not a matter of chance, it is a matter of choice;
   it is not a thing to be waited for, it is a thing to be achieved.
   William Jennings Bryan (1860 - 1925); American lawyer and politician.




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Reg Hack to Minimize Outlook XP

2002-02-18 Thread Chris Haaker

I know what you mean. My company is owned by a Japanese company and all 4000
of them can at least speak passable english. I know about 3 Japanese words.
Makes me feel really lazy sometimes!

- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 9:03 AM
Subject: RE: Reg Hack to Minimize Outlook XP



 Kim,

 Chris wanted a hack to minimize OL2002 to the systray- I searched on
Google
 and found the link. My statement was kind of a disclaimer; I couldn't tell
 by the conversation if the hack worked or not.

 Here's the bit I was looking at-

 [quote[ Heel mooi die Outlook functie... Ik had al een ander proggie
 gedowned ervoor [/quote[
 Euh.. Proggie?
 Dat is gewoon een registry entry

 [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outlook\Preferences]
 MinToTray=dword:0001

 sim-pel

  Gepost door mbvisiontt Woensdag 12 December 2001 - 19:43 Score: 1
 (Gemodereerd)
 Ja juist ja, en dat werkt niet omdat er bij mij onder 10.0 geen outlook
 staat...


 Paul

 I know I'm a terrible American illiterate :(  Have some good friends in
 Sittard, we are lucky enough to see them almost every year.  They are
fluent
 in four languages and can get by in at least three more!


 -Original Message-
 From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 8:56 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Reg Hack to Minimize Outlook XP


 what do you want to know?

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 18 February, 2002 2:43 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Reg Hack to Minimize Outlook XP


 http://www.tweakers.net/meuktracker/1362

 Came up on google, but I can't read Dutch :)

 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 8:32 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: OT: Reg Hack to Minimize Outlook XP


 I used to know a reg hack for Outlook 2002 that would allow you to
 minimize
 it to the sys tray. I cannot find it anymore. Anyone know a link?

 Much Thanks!

 Destiny...is not a matter of chance, it is a matter of choice;
it is not a thing to be waited for, it is a thing to be achieved.
William Jennings Bryan (1860 - 1925); American lawyer and politician.




 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Reg Hack to Minimize Outlook XP

2002-02-18 Thread Chris Haaker

I finally found it in English

http://www.windowplanet.net/articles/default.asp?article=78

Thanks for all of your help!!

- Original Message - 
From: Kim Schotanus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 9:31 AM
Subject: RE: Reg Hack to Minimize Outlook XP


basically the conversation says that this is a program (proggie = slang)
that actually works, and thet he's tried others before...
This is only the translation, don't know the tool...

Cheers

-Original Message-
From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 February, 2002 3:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Reg Hack to Minimize Outlook XP


I know what you mean. My company is owned by a Japanese company and all
4000
of them can at least speak passable english. I know about 3 Japanese
words.
Makes me feel really lazy sometimes!

- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 9:03 AM
Subject: RE: Reg Hack to Minimize Outlook XP



 Kim,

 Chris wanted a hack to minimize OL2002 to the systray- I searched on
Google
 and found the link. My statement was kind of a disclaimer; I couldn't
tell
 by the conversation if the hack worked or not.

 Here's the bit I was looking at-

 [quote[ Heel mooi die Outlook functie... Ik had al een ander proggie
 gedowned ervoor [/quote[
 Euh.. Proggie?
 Dat is gewoon een registry entry

 [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outlook\Preferences]
 MinToTray=dword:0001

 sim-pel

  Gepost door mbvisiontt Woensdag 12 December 2001 - 19:43 Score: 1
 (Gemodereerd)
 Ja juist ja, en dat werkt niet omdat er bij mij onder 10.0 geen
outlook
 staat...


 Paul

 I know I'm a terrible American illiterate :(  Have some good friends
in
 Sittard, we are lucky enough to see them almost every year.  They are
fluent
 in four languages and can get by in at least three more!


 -Original Message-
 From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 8:56 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Reg Hack to Minimize Outlook XP


 what do you want to know?

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 18 February, 2002 2:43 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Reg Hack to Minimize Outlook XP


 http://www.tweakers.net/meuktracker/1362

 Came up on google, but I can't read Dutch :)

 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 8:32 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: OT: Reg Hack to Minimize Outlook XP


 I used to know a reg hack for Outlook 2002 that would allow you to
 minimize
 it to the sys tray. I cannot find it anymore. Anyone know a link?

 Much Thanks!

 Destiny...is not a matter of chance, it is a matter of choice;
it is not a thing to be waited for, it is a thing to be achieved.
William Jennings Bryan (1860 - 1925); American lawyer and
politician.




 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp

Re: Backups Checklist

2002-02-12 Thread Chris Haaker

I always thought that if you backed up priv.edb at midnight and then
priv.edb goes down at say noon the next day, that rolling back the log files
from midnight to noon when the failure occured would allow you to reclaim
the mail that is not in that restored version of priv.edb?

- Original Message -
From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:07 PM
Subject: RE: Backups Checklist


 If you are doing an online backup, why backup the log files?


 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:07 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Backups Checklist


 NTBackup in XCH2K recognizes an Exchange Install as it does in NT4. So if
I
 backup System State, IS and DS through the Exchange Server Checkbox and
then
 the drive with the log files I should be all set for a full restore no?
The
 Exchange server folder on C:\ is all binaries right? I have those on C:,
 logfiles on D: and the stores on E:. Anything I am missing? I have never
had
 to do a restore before but soon will have to for DR practice pursposes.
 Besides documentation on all my settings and options, am I missing
anything
 all of you tried and true backup gurus know of?

 Did I mention I HATE BACKUPS!!

 TIA

 Chris

 Destiny...is not a matter of chance, it is a matter of choice;
it is not a thing to be waited for, it is a thing to be achieved.
William Jennings Bryan (1860 - 1925); American lawyer and politician.




 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 --

 The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.



==


 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Backups Checklist

2002-02-12 Thread Chris Haaker

Thanks for the feedback. I do have 3 physical arrays on 2 different
controllers (1 with 2 channels)

C: mirror - OS
D: mirror - Logs
E: Raid5 - DBs

So it seems I can just do a full online backup of the stores via the
exchange aware ntbackup. If I lose the store, I can put new disks in my
raid5 array, restore the db and then play back my log files from D:.

Thanks!

Oh yeah, and FLUSH THOSE COMMITTED LOGS ;) he he

- Original Message -
From: Mood, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:54 PM
Subject: RE: Backups Checklist


 The point would be that if the priv or pub got trashed (assuming hardware
 failure of some sort on the drive with those files) while the system was
 running you could restore the priv or pub from the previous night and
replay
 the current days log files that are on a different drive (recommended
 configuration) to get it back to its most current state.  As I understand
 it.

 If you have a corrupt db that required you to go back several days you
would
 not want to replay the log files as you would in essence replay the
 corruption.

 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:48 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Re: Backups Checklist


 THANKS! That was a most excellent slide deck and answers most of my
 questions. Only other thing is:
 if I am then doing FULL ONLINE backups every night do I need to worry
about
 turning off circular logging as I will be deleting the log files each
night
 after they are backed up? Correct?

 - Original Message -
 From: Mood, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:27 PM
 Subject: RE: Backups Checklist


  And a cool PPT of the whole thing I found while confirming the log file
  thing (I was thinking of trying to replay the log files in event of
  longstanding corruption which would be a useless thing to do).
 
  I always work better with big pretty pictures.
 
  http://www.exchangeserverboston.com/archives/DBMgmt.ppt
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:08 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Backups Checklist
 
 
  If you are doing an online backup, why backup the log files?
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:07 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: Backups Checklist
 
 
  NTBackup in XCH2K recognizes an Exchange Install as it does in NT4. So
if
 I
  backup System State, IS and DS through the Exchange Server Checkbox and
 then
  the drive with the log files I should be all set for a full restore no?
 The
  Exchange server folder on C:\ is all binaries right? I have those on C:,
  logfiles on D: and the stores on E:. Anything I am missing? I have never
 had
  to do a restore before but soon will have to for DR practice
pursposes.
  Besides documentation on all my settings and options, am I missing
 anything
  all of you tried and true backup gurus know of?
 
  Did I mention I HATE BACKUPS!!
 
  TIA
 
  Chris
 
  Destiny...is not a matter of chance, it is a matter of choice;
 it is not a thing to be waited for, it is a thing to be achieved.
 William Jennings Bryan (1860 - 1925); American lawyer and politician.
 
 
 
 
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

 --
 --
  --
  The information contained in this email message is privileged and
  confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
  entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not
the
  intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
  distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you
have
  received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
  Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
  ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.
 
 


  ==
 
 
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe

Re: Backups Checklist

2002-02-12 Thread Chris Haaker

you mean the one log file that is being written to at the time of the
backup? Magic, of course! Hmmm
Good question . . . Open File Agent? But then I need ArcServe or BE right?
Do *you* know the answer? Besides an OFFLINE backup?

LOL

- Original Message -
From: Drewski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 3:11 PM
Subject: RE: Backups Checklist


 Again -- how are you going to back up the log files while they're in use?

 -- Drew
 
 Visit http://www.drewncapris.net!  Go!  Go there now!
 Ook. - The Librarian.

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mood, Steve
 Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 1:55 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Backups Checklist


 The point would be that if the priv or pub got trashed (assuming hardware
 failure of some sort on the drive with those files) while the system was
 running you could restore the priv or pub from the previous night and
replay
 the current days log files that are on a different drive (recommended
 configuration) to get it back to its most current state.  As I understand
 it.

 If you have a corrupt db that required you to go back several days you
would
 not want to replay the log files as you would in essence replay the
 corruption.

 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:48 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Re: Backups Checklist


 THANKS! That was a most excellent slide deck and answers most of my
 questions. Only other thing is:
 if I am then doing FULL ONLINE backups every night do I need to worry
about
 turning off circular logging as I will be deleting the log files each
night
 after they are backed up? Correct?

 - Original Message -
 From: Mood, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:27 PM
 Subject: RE: Backups Checklist


  And a cool PPT of the whole thing I found while confirming the log file
  thing (I was thinking of trying to replay the log files in event of
  longstanding corruption which would be a useless thing to do).
 
  I always work better with big pretty pictures.
 
  http://www.exchangeserverboston.com/archives/DBMgmt.ppt
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:08 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Backups Checklist
 
 
  If you are doing an online backup, why backup the log files?
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:07 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: Backups Checklist
 
 
  NTBackup in XCH2K recognizes an Exchange Install as it does in NT4. So
if
 I
  backup System State, IS and DS through the Exchange Server Checkbox and
 then
  the drive with the log files I should be all set for a full restore no?
 The
  Exchange server folder on C:\ is all binaries right? I have those on C:,
  logfiles on D: and the stores on E:. Anything I am missing? I have never
 had
  to do a restore before but soon will have to for DR practice
pursposes.
  Besides documentation on all my settings and options, am I missing
 anything
  all of you tried and true backup gurus know of?
 
  Did I mention I HATE BACKUPS!!
 
  TIA
 
  Chris
 
  Destiny...is not a matter of chance, it is a matter of choice;
 it is not a thing to be waited for, it is a thing to be achieved.
 William Jennings Bryan (1860 - 1925); American lawyer and politician.
 
 
 
 
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

 --
 --
  --
  The information contained in this email message is privileged and
  confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
  entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not
the
  intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
  distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you
have
  received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
  Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
  ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.
 
 


  ==
 
 
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Stupid Question

2002-02-08 Thread Chris Haaker

My boss is looking for the definitive answer. I KNOW the answer for XCH 5.5.
but in XCH 2K does MS support the use of brick - level backups (ducks
quickly)

Thanks!

I know Ed's EMail signature *should* say it all; I have even passed it along
to my boss!

Destiny...is not a matter of chance, it is a matter of choice;
   it is not a thing to be waited for, it is a thing to be achieved.
   William Jennings Bryan (1860 - 1925); American lawyer and politician.




_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Backing up with Windows 2000

2002-02-05 Thread Chris Haaker

Does anyone have a batch file or command line they would be willing to send
me for using Windows 2000 backup.exe to back up my Exchange 5.5 server?

Also, IF (hold on to your phasers this is only theoretical) someone were
dumb enough to do brick-level backups with someone's Exchange Agent, would
they be able to do that to Public Folders as well or just mailboxes? Does
this also hold true for Exchange 2000 or does everything change then?

flinching

Thanks!

Chris


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Backing up with Windows 2000

2002-02-05 Thread Chris Haaker

I would love to. I was mainly looking for the switches, etc. for the backup
job. I use one with backup.exe for my Exchange 5.5 on NT4, but I cannot
figure out if anything changes in backup.exe in Windows 2000. Thought
someone might have been there already.

Right now I use:
ntbackup backup ds \\mail1 is \\mail1 f:\ /b /t normal /l
c:\winnt\backup.log /e

Thanks!

- Original Message -
From: missy koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:10 PM
Subject: Re: Backing up with Windows 2000


 Why not just schedule the job?

 I'm so not going to answer your second question.  :)
 - Original Message -
 From: Chris Haaker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 12:39 PM
 Subject: Backing up with Windows 2000


 Does anyone have a batch file or command line they would be willing to
send
 me for using Windows 2000 backup.exe to back up my Exchange 5.5 server?

 Also, IF (hold on to your phasers this is only theoretical) someone were
 dumb enough to do brick-level backups with someone's Exchange Agent, would
 they be able to do that to Public Folders as well or just mailboxes? Does
 this also hold true for Exchange 2000 or does everything change then?

 flinching

 Thanks!

 Chris


 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



ScanMail

2002-01-31 Thread Chris Haaker

Anyone with Trend ScanMail experience or perhaps you just know the
difference  . . . the latest version of ScanMail comes in 2 flavors:
ESE API or
MAPI/VAPI

Can anyone nutshell the differences and which is recommended?

Much Thanks!
Chris


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Installing XCH 5.5 on a 2000 Server

2002-01-29 Thread Chris Haaker

I was told this is possible. The server is a member server in a NT4 domain.
I am logged on to the server with a domain account (Domain Admin privs)
trying to install XCH. Get the error Must be a member of an NT domain .  .
. Ideas?

Thanks!

Chris


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Installing XCH 5.5 on a Windows 2K Server

2002-01-29 Thread Chris Haaker

BOINK ME!

Didnt find it on my first 3 searches, but the fourth was the lucky charm!

Thanks anyhoo, sorry for wasting y'alls bandwidth!

:)\

Chris


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Installing XCH 5.5 on a Windows 2K Server

2002-01-29 Thread Chris Haaker

I neglected to mention that I was installing via the 2 user terminal server
admin mode. When installing Exchange server in this fashion the registry
key points to the local machine name for the domain, so Exchange cannot tell
it is in a domain.

So you modify:

HKLM/Software/Microsoft/WindowsNT/CurrentVersion/Winlogon/DefaultDomainName
to the domain name instead of the machine name.

Viola!

:)

- Original Message -
From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 2:00 PM
Subject: RE: Installing XCH 5.5 on a Windows 2K Server


 Well Share then!


 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 1:56 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Installing XCH 5.5 on a Windows 2K Server


 BOINK ME!

 Didnt find it on my first 3 searches, but the fourth was the lucky charm!

 Thanks anyhoo, sorry for wasting y'alls bandwidth!

 :)\

 Chris


 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 --

 The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.



==


 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Installing XCH 5.5 on a Windows 2K Server

2002-01-29 Thread Chris Haaker

NP.

XADM: Error Message: You Must Be Logged Into an NT Domain to Run Microsoft
Exchange Server Setup (Q251177)

This error can also occur if you are installing a new service pack through
a terminal server session on a member server in a NT domain.

Although I was installing Exchange itself, not a Service Pack.

Chris

- Original Message -
From: Kevin Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 3:15 PM
Subject: RE: Installing XCH 5.5 on a Windows 2K Server


 Since when? I have built a good number of exchange serves from A TS
 NEVER had a problem?? Is there a Q on that?? Please share?

 --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
 Did I just say that out loud?


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Haaker
 Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 12:08 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Re: Installing XCH 5.5 on a Windows 2K Server


 I neglected to mention that I was installing via the 2 user terminal
 server admin mode. When installing Exchange server in this fashion the
 registry key points to the local machine name for the domain, so
 Exchange cannot tell it is in a domain.

 So you modify:

 HKLM/Software/Microsoft/WindowsNT/CurrentVersion/Winlogon/DefaultDomainN
 ame
 to the domain name instead of the machine name.

 Viola!

 :)

 - Original Message -
 From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 2:00 PM
 Subject: RE: Installing XCH 5.5 on a Windows 2K Server


  Well Share then!
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 1:56 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: Installing XCH 5.5 on a Windows 2K Server
 
 
  BOINK ME!
 
  Didnt find it on my first 3 searches, but the fourth was the lucky
  charm!
 
  Thanks anyhoo, sorry for wasting y'alls bandwidth!
 
  :)\
 
  Chris
 
 
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  --
  
 
  The information contained in this email message is privileged and
 confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
 entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not
 the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
 distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you
 have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis
 Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.
 
 
 
 
 ==
 
 
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 _

 Do You Yahoo!?

 Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



ORBZ Question . . .

2002-01-10 Thread Chris Haaker

Just Curious . . . Anyone know the difference between INPUTS and OUTPUTS in
the ORBZ listing? Or what they even are?

ORBZ Database Information
IP: XX.XXX.XX.XXX
State: clean
Listed in inputs: no
Listed in outputs: no

TIA

To keep your secret is wisdom; but to expect others to keep it is folly.
 Samuel Johnson (1709-84); English author, lexicographer.





_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Public Folder Default Permissions

2002-01-07 Thread Chris Haaker

By default are Public Folder permissions applied only to Users in the Site
the Server holding the public folders resides in? For example Default and
Anonymous? Org-wide or Site-wide?

TIA!

To keep your secret is wisdom; but to expect others to keep it is folly.
 Samuel Johnson (1709-84); English author, lexicographer.





_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Trend e-manager opinions/caveats/complexity?

2002-01-05 Thread Chris Haaker

We use it on our DMZ smtp box along with Interscan.
It works great and we get about 1 or 2 false positives a day. My only gripe
with the product is that there is no remote way to release a quaratined
mail, like a central console or something. I have to VNC into the server
that has it, sift through the log and then release it. A central web-console
were I could manage all my e-manager boxes would be nice . . .

- Original Message -
From: Smith, Ronni [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 1:02 PM
Subject: Trend e-manager opinions/caveats/complexity?


 Hello all,

 We are looking at getting Trend's E-Manager content filter as an add on to
 our Scanmail a/v product to start screening out spam. If you have or are
 using E-Manager for Scanmail could you let me know if you would recommend
 for or against it and if there are any caveats I need to be aware of? I
have
 searched my archives of this list for E-Manager and not found much other
 than some people who use it and one person who noted an issue but never
 mentioned what it turned out to be due to. I also searched just on content
 filtering and spam filtering among others but still didn't see all the
info
 I am after.

 We are running Exchange 5.5 SP4 and ScanMail 3.5 on WinNT4 in a single
 domain. Although this quarter I plan to get the domain up to Win2k so if
 there are issues with Win2k I'd like to know that too. The price for
 E-Manager is in our range whereas Mailsweeper etc appear not to be and I
am
 very happy with our Scanmail product but want to get a feel for any issues
 with E-Manager.

 I also am curious as to the time it takes to baby sit this. If those of
you
 using content scanning software (particularly E-Manager but it's probably
 similar for all of them) could estimate how much time is required to sort
 out the non-spam mail that gets caught in the filters and see that it is
 forwarded on to the user it was intended for that would be a big help. I'm
 guessing that it takes a bit of tuning of the filters to minimize that but
 I've no idea if I'm talking about adding a 5 minutes a week task to my job
 or a 5 hours a week (or more) task.

 Thanks very much,

 Ronni

 *
 The pursuit of truth and beauty is a sphere of activity in which we are
 permitted to remain children all our lives. -Albert Einstein
 -

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Documenting Exchange 5.5 Public Folders

2001-11-29 Thread Chris Haaker

I know there are 3rd party apps you can buy to do this, but is there a res
kit or other (read MS or free) utility that will allow me to list all my Pub
Folder hierarchy? If someone says screen shots I will hunt you down grin

TIA

Chris

One never notices what has been done;
  one can only see what remains to be done.
  Marie Curie (1867-1934)


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



LDAP Syntax to Query an Exchange Server

2001-10-25 Thread Chris Haaker

I am trying to write an LDAP query to get the department and phone extension
of all of my Exchange users.
I looked at this Q article: Q223049 but not being a programmer, my brain was
sweating too much ;)

Does anyone know of a way query using ldap://syntax OR are there switches
that tell the directory export to get more info than it does? I couldnt find
any info on it in the KB . . . but searching that is an art more than a
science!

TIA

Chris

-
The Future is in Beta
-


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: OFF TOPIC - ANYONE ABLE TO ACCESS AOLS WEBSITE?

2001-09-26 Thread Chris Haaker

I can access and log in just fine . . .

- Original Message - 
From: .DL Helpdesk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 12:00 PM
Subject: OFF TOPIC - ANYONE ABLE TO ACCESS AOLS WEBSITE?


 Subject line says it all!
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: OFF TOPIC - ANYONE ABLE TO ACCESS AOLS WEBSITE?

2001-09-26 Thread Chris Haaker

hey, I dont like it anymore than you do, but my wife enjoys it so what can I
do? I dont think the courts have it on the books yet as grounds for divorce
. . .

- Original Message -
From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 12:28 PM
Subject: RE: OFF TOPIC - ANYONE ABLE TO ACCESS AOLS WEBSITE?


 I wouldn't go around admitting that
 My question is: Does AOL require a keyboard without a Caps Lock?

 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Haaker
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Sent: 9/26/01 11:14 AM
 Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC - ANYONE ABLE TO ACCESS AOLS WEBSITE?

 I can access and log in just fine . . .

 - Original Message -
 From: .DL Helpdesk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 12:00 PM
 Subject: OFF TOPIC - ANYONE ABLE TO ACCESS AOLS WEBSITE?


  Subject line says it all!

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: stationery disabling?

2001-09-26 Thread Chris Haaker

is that similar to Old Spice?

- Original Message -
From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 12:08 PM
Subject: RE: stationery disabling?


 The Great One was Jackie Gleason.  I am Curmudgeon
 Spice.

 Ed Crowley
 Compaq Computer

 --- Heather Bellson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  thanks oh great ones (ed and cthulhu).
 
  i figured there wasn't a one-stop solution!
 
  heather
 
 
 _
  List posting FAQ:
  http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:
  http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe:
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Get email alerts  NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo!
Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Forwarding emails to an external address

2001-09-26 Thread Chris Haaker

create a custom recipient for the external email address and then modify the
delivery options to send the mail to this address as well.

- Original Message -
From: Khandu Veer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 8:12 AM
Subject: RE: Forwarding emails to an external address


 How does one do this in Exchange 5.5? Thanks

 Warm Regards,
 - Khandu
 __
 Khandu Veer
 Formulasys
 Sai Chambers, 16, Mumbai-Pune Road, Wakdewadi, Pune 411 003
 Tel:  +91-20-553 8611 (x302); Direct: 020-553 2525 Mobile: 098220-16327
 Fax: +91-20-553 6480; e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 www.formulasys.com



 -Original Message-
 From: Huot, Denyse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 12:28 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Forwarding emails to an external address


 Your assumption was correct and it worked beautifully, thanks again.

 Denyse

 -Original Message-
 From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 1:53 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Forwarding emails to an external address

 You mean for single addresses, not for the entire domain, right?  (That
 would kind of make the Exchange server useless.)  If my assumption is
 correct, you're looking to create a mail-enabled contact.

 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
 Tech Consultant
 Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
 All your base are belong to us.


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Huot, Denyse
 Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 10:32 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Forwarding emails to an external address


 I'm running Exchange 2000 in an AD environment, and I would like to be
able
 to forward emails coming into the company to an external address.  As
simple
 as this sounds, I can't seem to find anything on this.  Can anyone help or
 point me into the right direction?

 Much appreciated,

 Denyse

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: moving mailboxes

2001-09-25 Thread Chris Haaker

if both exchange servers are in the same site it should resolve the new
server location for you. At least that has been my experience.

- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:50 AM
Subject: moving mailboxes


 I´m about to move some mailboxes from one exchangeserver to another in the
 same site.. Do I have to specify the new exchange server on every client,
 or is it taken care of automatically?

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



MEC

2001-09-25 Thread Chris Haaker

Is MEC still on? I have heard rumors . . . 


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MEC

2001-09-25 Thread Chris Haaker

I got that as well. My boss called to cancel his registration yesterday as
he was not willing to fly down there after recent events. They told him they
would be releasing an email yesterday as a large number of people have been
canceling . . . just curious if someone had an inside scoop or heard
anything yet . . .

- Original Message -
From: Crumbaker, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:19 PM
Subject: RE: MEC


Yes.  Still on.
Here is what I got from them:
September 11 was a day of shock and sadness for people around the world.
Our hearts go out to all those who have been affected by this terrible
tragedy.

As you know, President Bush and other global and national leaders urged
that the business and economic activities of this nation and the global
economy must continue, even as we all work together to address the
terrible human costs of the September 11th tragedy.  The reopening of
the financial markets is just one step in resuming the economic
activities of our nation.  After long consideration, we have decided to
move forward with the MEC 2001 in Orlando, Florida, on September 30th
through October 4th as scheduled.

Based on input from travel industry and government officials, we
strongly believe that national and international air transportation,
hotels and other support services will be fully operational before the
MEC 2001 conference opens.  All MEC 2001 keynotes, sessions, functions
and special events will take place as scheduled.  We are working closely
with state and local authorities to ensure every possible security
measure is in place.

All of us at Microsoft are keeping the victims of this tragedy in our
thoughts and prayers. We hope to see you in Orlando as we carry on our
lives full of pride in our values and our country.

Please direct inquiries to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sincerely,
The MEC 2001 Team

Thank you,

Ron Crumbaker, MCP
Network Specialist
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company
Office 270-685-6381
Fax 270-685-6212





-Original Message-
From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MEC


Is MEC still on? I have heard rumors . . .


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



default IMC behavior in 5.5

2001-09-14 Thread Chris Haaker

The IMC in xch 5.5 is configured to send mail via DNS, and on the
Connections tab, under Message Delivery, Specify by Email Domain, you enter
mycompany.com and the ip of the internal, private mail server to forward
mail to for mycompany.com (another site in this org). Will ALL mail get
forwarded to this domain? I would think only mycompany.com mail would and
the rest would go to the 'net for DNS delivery, but it seems all mail is
going to mycompany.com server. And of course, all mail that is not
mycompany.com is getting kicked for no relay . . .


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: default IMC behavior in 5.5

2001-09-14 Thread Chris Haaker

sorry if I was unclear . . . ALL the mail is getting sent to the address
specified for the mycompany.com domain regardless of it being addressed to
that domain or not. Is that the correct behavior when you set delivery via
DNS? I would think only mail for mycompany.com would go there and the rest
would go out to the internet for dns resolution and delivery . . .

Correct?

- Original Message -
From: Mike Morrison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 2:16 PM
Subject: RE: default IMC behavior in 5.5


 The statements you make look correct to me. Is there a question there
 somewhere?

 Mike Morrison
 NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator
 Ben  Jerry's Homemade, Inc.


 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 2:07 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: default IMC behavior in 5.5


 The IMC in xch 5.5 is configured to send mail via DNS, and on the
 Connections tab, under Message Delivery, Specify by Email Domain, you
enter
 mycompany.com and the ip of the internal, private mail server to forward
 mail to for mycompany.com (another site in this org). Will ALL mail get
 forwarded to this domain? I would think only mycompany.com mail would and
 the rest would go to the 'net for DNS delivery, but it seems all mail is
 going to mycompany.com server. And of course, all mail that is not
 mycompany.com is getting kicked for no relay . . .


 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: OWA and Authentication

2001-09-13 Thread Chris Haaker

are you using ms-chap authentication? Netscape does not support that . . .

- Original Message - 
From: James Liddil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 9:57 AM
Subject: OWA and Authentication


I used the IIS lockdown utility and found that I was getting the
authorization failed message with Netscape 4.78 afterwards. I dug up  KB
Q300512 and followed the procedure, and still I am getting this message.
What am I missing.

Jim Liddil M.S.
Lab/IT Manager
Phytoceutica Inc.
(203)781-2544 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



XCH 2000 OWA

2001-09-07 Thread Chris Haaker

Does anyone know if I can take a stand-alone IIS server and put XCH 2K OWA
on it BUT connect to a XCH 5.5 backend?

TIA . . .
Chris


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: XCH 2000 OWA

2001-09-07 Thread Chris Haaker

OWA only comes with the Enterprise Edition?

- Original Message - 
From: Siegfried Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 8:57 AM
Subject: RE: XCH 2000 OWA


1. To put OWA 2000 on a stand-alone server you need to purchase an
Exchange 2000 Server Enterprise Edition
2. OWA 2000 cannot connect to an Exchange 5.5 Server

Siegfried /

 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 2:23 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: XCH 2000 OWA
 
 Does anyone know if I can take a stand-alone IIS server and put XCH 2K
OWA
 on it BUT connect to a XCH 5.5 backend?
 
 TIA . . .
 Chris
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: XCH 2000 OWA

2001-09-07 Thread Chris Haaker

okay, bear with me here . . .

assuming it installs in roughly the same way xch 5.5 owa does, I only
install that owa component on the front-end iis server or do you have to do
an exchange 2k install now + xch 2k owa? Or do you simply have to blow a
XCH 2k EE license for any machine running owa in a front-end/back-end
enterprise strength configuration?

- Original Message -
From: Siegfried Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 9:13 AM
Subject: RE: XCH 2000 OWA


No, but to put OWA 2000 on a stand-alone Server you need to implement a
Frontend/Backend solution which requires at least one Enterprise Edition
for the Frontend server machine.

Siegfried /

 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 3:09 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Re: XCH 2000 OWA

 OWA only comes with the Enterprise Edition?

 - Original Message -
 From: Siegfried Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 8:57 AM
 Subject: RE: XCH 2000 OWA


 1. To put OWA 2000 on a stand-alone server you need to purchase an
 Exchange 2000 Server Enterprise Edition
 2. OWA 2000 cannot connect to an Exchange 5.5 Server

 Siegfried /

  -Original Message-
  From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 2:23 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: XCH 2000 OWA
 
  Does anyone know if I can take a stand-alone IIS server and put XCH
2K
 OWA
  on it BUT connect to a XCH 5.5 backend?
 
  TIA . . .
  Chris
 
 
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



importing 2nd SMTP address

2001-08-20 Thread Chris Haaker

I need to import 2nd smtp address (same domain, different username format).
I exported the recipient info, and am going to add it back in and I get an
error that an address of that type already exists. I am using SMTP:
So I need to use a different tag ? Isnt there also a switch when importing
to tell it to do all fields?

TIA!

-
I was thinking about how people seem to read the Bible a whole lot more as
they get older, then it dawned on me...they were cramming for their
finals...
-


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: IMS Queue

2001-08-20 Thread Chris Haaker

Orlando FLA
-
I was thinking about how people seem to read the Bible a whole lot more as
they get older, then it dawned on me...they were cramming for their
finals...
-
- Original Message -
From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 2:05 PM
Subject: RE: IMS Queue


 Where is MEC this year?



 Andy David
 J Muller International




 -Original Message-
 From: Rocky Stefano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 1:59 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: IMS Queue



 All,

 I have a whole bunch of emails piling up in my IMS.  The Orignator of all
 these messages sayWith nothing in between the perenthesis.  What
is
 this telling me?  And should I just axe them?


 Its a method used to cause a denial of service by filling up your outgoing
 queues


 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: IMS Queue

2001-08-20 Thread Chris Haaker

no, wait, that was a joke, right?
okay, it *is* Monday . . .
-
I was thinking about how people seem to read the Bible a whole lot more as
they get older, then it dawned on me...they were cramming for their
finals...
-
- Original Message -
From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 2:05 PM
Subject: RE: IMS Queue


 Where is MEC this year?



 Andy David
 J Muller International




 -Original Message-
 From: Rocky Stefano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 1:59 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: IMS Queue



 All,

 I have a whole bunch of emails piling up in my IMS.  The Orignator of all
 these messages sayWith nothing in between the perenthesis.  What
is
 this telling me?  And should I just axe them?


 Its a method used to cause a denial of service by filling up your outgoing
 queues


 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: importing 2nd SMTP address

2001-08-20 Thread Chris Haaker

got it. I forgot the trailing semicolon on the field
-
I was thinking about how people seem to read the Bible a whole lot more as
they get older, then it dawned on me...they were cramming for their
finals...
-
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 2:24 PM
Subject: RE: importing 2nd SMTP address


This is vague??

quote
3.21 Q: How do I add another SMTP address?

A: Export to CSV, Edit with Excel, Import from CSV.

3.22 Q: But I can't figure out the Edit part...

A: Use the header.exe tool from the Exchange CD (clue:
Secondary-Proxy-Addresses).

A2: Greg Deckler has some nifty Excel formulas for dealing with the S-P-A
string:
http://www.ncgroup.com/abu/exchange/formulas - see Magic E-Mail Address
Parsing Formula.
/quote

ps.  the link works for me.

-Michèle
Immigration site:  http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
Our new 2001 Miata:  http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley
Tiggercam:  http://www.tiggercam.co.uk
-
If life gives you lemons, squeeze the juice into a water gun and shoot other
people in the eyes.
-


-Original Message-
From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 2:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: importing 2nd SMTP address


thanks. 3.21 and 3.22 couldnt be *more* vague . . . and the link doesnt work
anymore . . . for me at least.

-
I was thinking about how people seem to read the Bible a whole lot more as
they get older, then it dawned on me...they were cramming for their
finals...
-
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 2:07 PM
Subject: RE: importing 2nd SMTP address


 faq 3.21 and 3.22
  http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm


 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 2:03 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: importing 2nd SMTP address


 I need to import 2nd smtp address (same domain, different username
format).
 I exported the recipient info, and am going to add it back in and I get an
 error that an address of that type already exists. I am using SMTP:
 So I need to use a different tag ? Isnt there also a switch when importing
 to tell it to do all fields?

 TIA!

 -
 I was thinking about how people seem to read the Bible a whole lot more as
 they get older, then it dawned on me...they were cramming for their
 finals...
 -


 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]