RE: smtp receives but stops sending
how is your exchange connected to internet? r u using smtp gateway for incoming and outgoing messages? how is ur dns configured for resolution? -Original Message- From: Matthew Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 6:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: smtp receives but stops sending Hi, I found a thread, titled as above, via a google, I'm just curious what the resolution was (if any) I have recently install Exchange 2003 and today, I found a bunch of messages waiting for submission. The SMTP service would not stop. I followed the threads procedure. Disable SMTP service Restart server Move messages from queue Start service feed back messages this seems to have worked, but the whole incident has spawned a constant niggling doubt. I have not done anything to change the setup, so presumably this can happen again anytime. There was talk of it being AV related, I have a trial of GFI Mail Security running, I'd like to be able to know if it is the AV product or a generic problem with the AV/Exchange interface. Any ideas ? Thanks Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. This email and any files transmitted with it is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this email in error pleaes notify the sender or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The message and attachment, if any, has been scanned for all known viruses, however we advice the recipient to check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses, UBL accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.13/1/2004 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
RE: OWA users logging into wrong Mailbox
Hello, Bug / Setup quirk: http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/support/e2k3owa.asp (posted earlier to this list by David Lemson, 11/27/03) Brent -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley [MVP] Posted At: Thursday, January 08, 2004 6:31 PM Posted To: MS Exchange List Conversation: OWA users logging into wrong Mailbox Subject: RE: OWA users logging into wrong Mailbox What bug are you aware of? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MS Exchange List Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 5:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA users logging into wrong Mailbox Hello, FWIW: We just had a situation where some users were complaining that when they logged into OWA they were getting other users Mailboxes. I'm aware of a bug like this in 2003, but we're running E2K. Turned out a WEB Cache had been put on one part of a remote network. This did not effect people who came in over https , just http non-ssl connections. Brent _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
OWA users logging into wrong Mailbox
Hello, FWIW: We just had a situation where some users were complaining that when they logged into OWA they were getting other users Mailboxes. I'm aware of a bug like this in 2003, but we're running E2K. Turned out a WEB Cache had been put on one part of a remote network. This did not effect people who came in over https , just http non-ssl connections. Brent _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
RE: MS SMTP RELAY SERVER
The Problem has been solved my exchange serve was over loaded due to which mails were queued in smtp rely server. I have changed the path for inbound mails to 2 exchange server, and the problem is solved. thanks for all your help. regards, Irf. -Original Message- From: Exchange List Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS SMTP RELAY SERVER rely and exchange server both can telnet each other. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 7:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS SMTP RELAY SERVER By any chance have you recently implemented the changes necessary to stop Open Relaying on you Exchange servers. If so, did you remember to put in the IP address for your gateway so the Exchange server will accept email from it? Just a thought. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Exchange List Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 7:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MS SMTP RELAY SERVER Dear List, I am using Microsoft IIS 5.0 as my SMTP GATEWAY,in that I have configured remote domain to forward all mails to my Exchange 2000 server. But fortunately its has stopped working every time I have to restart the services or server to empty the queue, can anyone tell me what could be the problem, The problem is only my GATEWAY is not automatically forwarding to Smart host which is my exchange 2000. any idea is apperciated. regards, irf. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email and any files transmitted with it is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this email in error pleaes notify the sender or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The message and attachment, if any, has been scanned for all known viruses, however we advice the recipient to check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses, UBL accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.1/1/2004 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Restricting User
Dear List, How can I restrict a user to send mail only to a particular users. How can I accomplish this? Is there any way of doing it? Thanks in Advance. regards, irf. This email and any files transmitted with it is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this email in error pleaes notify the sender or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The message and attachment, if any, has been scanned for all known viruses, however we advice the recipient to check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses, UBL accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.1/1/2004 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MS SMTP RELAY SERVER
The Problem has been solved my exchange serve was over loaded due to which mails were queued in smtp rely server. I have changed the path for inbound mails to 2 exchange server, and the problem is solved. thanks for all your help. regards, Irf. -Original Message- From: Exchange List Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS SMTP RELAY SERVER rely and exchange server both can telnet each other. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 7:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS SMTP RELAY SERVER By any chance have you recently implemented the changes necessary to stop Open Relaying on you Exchange servers. If so, did you remember to put in the IP address for your gateway so the Exchange server will accept email from it? Just a thought. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Exchange List Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 7:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MS SMTP RELAY SERVER Dear List, I am using Microsoft IIS 5.0 as my SMTP GATEWAY,in that I have configured remote domain to forward all mails to my Exchange 2000 server. But fortunately its has stopped working every time I have to restart the services or server to empty the queue, can anyone tell me what could be the problem, The problem is only my GATEWAY is not automatically forwarding to Smart host which is my exchange 2000. any idea is apperciated. regards, irf. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email and any files transmitted with it is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this email in error pleaes notify the sender or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The message and attachment, if any, has been scanned for all known viruses, however we advice the recipient to check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses, UBL accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.2/1/2004 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Restricting User
I forgot to mention we are using exchange 2000 sp3. yes Tony for internal users. Thanks for ur reply. regards, irf. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 01, 2004 9:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Restricting User Is this for internal email messages within your org. Which version of Exchange? From: Exchange List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Restricting User Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 12:30:08 +0500 Dear List, How can I restrict a user to send mail only to a particular users. How can I accomplish this? Is there any way of doing it? Thanks in Advance. regards, irf. This email and any files transmitted with it is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this email in error pleaes notify the sender or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The message and attachment, if any, has been scanned for all known viruses, however we advice the recipient to check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses, UBL accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.1/1/2004 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Check your PC for viruses with the FREE McAfee online computer scan. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email and any files transmitted with it is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this email in error pleaes notify the sender or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The message and attachment, if any, has been scanned for all known viruses, however we advice the recipient to check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses, UBL accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.2/1/2004 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MS SMTP RELAY SERVER
rely and exchange server both can telnet each other. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 7:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS SMTP RELAY SERVER By any chance have you recently implemented the changes necessary to stop Open Relaying on you Exchange servers. If so, did you remember to put in the IP address for your gateway so the Exchange server will accept email from it? Just a thought. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Exchange List Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 7:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MS SMTP RELAY SERVER Dear List, I am using Microsoft IIS 5.0 as my SMTP GATEWAY,in that I have configured remote domain to forward all mails to my Exchange 2000 server. But fortunately its has stopped working every time I have to restart the services or server to empty the queue, can anyone tell me what could be the problem, The problem is only my GATEWAY is not automatically forwarding to Smart host which is my exchange 2000. any idea is apperciated. regards, irf. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MS SMTP RELAY SERVER
I have reinstalled the IIS four times but the problem is the same. Now, what I have noticed that I deleted the remote domain, created it again, restart the service, it starts working but only for sometime after that again queue starts increasing. I have search the knowledge base but unable to find any solution. SP4 is installed on both machines. any help is appreciated. regards irf. -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 7:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MS SMTP RELAY SERVER Sometimes IIS metabase gets screwed up. It's just an IIS SMTP server, so it should be relatively easy to remove and re-install IIS. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 8:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MS SMTP RELAY SERVER Dear List, I am using Microsoft IIS 5.0 as my SMTP GATEWAY,in that I have configured remote domain to forward all mails to my Exchange 2000 server. But fortunately its has stopped working every time I have to restart the services or server to empty the queue, can anyone tell me what could be the problem, The problem is only my GATEWAY is not automatically forwarding to Smart host which is my exchange 2000. any idea is apperciated. regards, irf. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MS SMTP RELAY SERVER
Dear List, I am using Microsoft IIS 5.0 as my SMTP GATEWAY,in that I have configured remote domain to forward all mails to my Exchange 2000 server. But fortunately its has stopped working every time I have to restart the services or server to empty the queue, can anyone tell me what could be the problem, The problem is only my GATEWAY is not automatically forwarding to Smart host which is my exchange 2000. any idea is apperciated. regards, irf. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: adprep /forestprep versus exchange2000
Hi all, W2kAD (w2k+sp4) Exchange2000+Sp3 We plan to upgrade both our W2KAD(native) and W2KDcs to W2K3AD and W2K3 respectively. We already have exchange2000+Sp3 already installed in our domain. Could you please tell me if this article is needed, I am not sure if this article (mangled ldapdisplay) can be ignored because of our exchange2000+SP3. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;314649Product=exch2k if the article is needed do you think that the changes can be done using adsi editor instead of the ldf? Thx -Eric _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
exchange2003 features in a Windows2000AD
Hi all, What do you think are the features I am going to lose if I deploy Exchange2003 in a Windows2000 AD(native) domain instead of a Windows2003 AD domain? So far, based on the following article I could lost the InetOrgPerson objects : http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;822591Product=exch2003 thx -Eric _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMTP Size Restriction on Per User Basis
Dear List, Setup: SMTP Gateway: Exchange 2000: I have a 2 MB smtp size restriction on gateway, one on my user wants to send 5 MB of file on 10th of every month. I don't want to increase the size on smtp gateway as it could allow all internet users to throw in mails of 5 MB. Is there a way to allow certain users to send 5MB size mails as outbound only. I hope my question is clear to all. regards, Irf. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP Size Restriction on Per User Basis
I am running IIS on SMTP Gateway ( No Exchange on this machine), I have to relax the limit there which which means it is open for everybody for inbound traffic. regards, irf -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 9:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP Size Restriction on Per User Basis Create an SMTP gateway for the one domain that the user wants to send to, set the size limitation appropriately, and allow the connector to accept mail from only that one user. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 5:33 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: SMTP Size Restriction on Per User Basis Subject: SMTP Size Restriction on Per User Basis Dear List, Setup: SMTP Gateway: Exchange 2000: I have a 2 MB smtp size restriction on gateway, one on my user wants to send 5 MB of file on 10th of every month. I don't want to increase the size on smtp gateway as it could allow all internet users to throw in mails of 5 MB. Is there a way to allow certain users to send 5MB size mails as outbound only. I hope my question is clear to all. regards, Irf. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Error 12002
Dear List, For the last few days I am receiving an error every minute, source: MsExchangeIS Category: Content Engine Event ID: 12002 Description: Error 800cce05-8000 occured while processing message from XYZ. I have search this error on MS Web sites but was unable to find any clue, can someone help me in this regards. regards, irf _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Error 12002
Thanks Buddy. -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Miles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 5:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Error 12002 http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=12002source= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Exchange List Sent: 01 December 2003 12:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Error 12002 Dear List, For the last few days I am receiving an error every minute, source: MsExchangeIS Category: Content Engine Event ID: 12002 Description: Error 800cce05-8000 occured while processing message from XYZ. I have search this error on MS Web sites but was unable to find any clue, can someone help me in this regards. regards, irf _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Connecting Dubai office
Hi Ed, I am running separate SMTP server on Microsoft IIS 5.0 with GFI Mail Essential and GFI Mail Security. We will be having 128K VPN between Dubai and Pakistan. Also, I am planning to place secondary SMTP server using send mail (secondary MX record) in dubai as part of contingency plan. regards, Irf. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2003 10:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Connecting Dubai office Define what you mean by SMTP gateway server. By that, do you mean a separate server running some other product, a dedicated server running Exchange, or an SMTP Connector on the Exchange box? Your decision should be determined by your business needs. Some companies want all their e-mail going through a single headquarters portal so that it can be content and/or virus filtered, monitored, and/or easily shut-off in the event of a crisis. Other organizations have poor wide area networks, so it makes sense for their various offices to have their own Internet presence. Some even have separate e-mail domains for their offices, such as pk.corp.com and ae.corp.com perhaps in your case, so inbound mail can be routed directly to the offices, taking the strain off their wide area network. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Exchange List Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 8:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Connecting Dubai office hi Ed, Country-A (Pakistan) andCountry-B (UAE, Dubai) 3 servers placed geographically Running Lotus Notes Separately. Also how can I make it a routeable network with respect to SMTP, Is it a good idea to place one SMTP gateway server in Dubai as MX-2 for contingency. Regards, Irf. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 7:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Connecting Dubai office From what you've described, I think it's a valid approach, but your lack of detail and changing of names (Dubai to Country-A or Country-B) doesn't give me great confidence. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Exchange List Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 12:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Connecting Dubai office Country-A Existing Environment: Windows 2000, Exchange 2000. Three mail servers placed geographically, for all outbound and inbound mails we have single point of entry. Country-B Existing Environment: Lotus Notes. I am planning to install exchange 2000 in Country-B within the same existing w2k and e2k environment, all outbound mails will use there Internet Access, for inbound I will use my SMTP placed in Country-A. I will add their old domain as a second domain in Country-A Exchange server and create their mailboxes so that they can receive mails from old domain. Please let me know if this is a correct approach. I need your input specially, on single point of entry for Internet Mails. Regards, Irf. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Connecting Dubai office
people can you please shed some light on my scenario, I will be very grateful. Please do let me know if you need any other info. regards irf. -Original Message- From: Exchange List Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 9:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Connecting Dubai office hi Ed, Country-A (Pakistan) andCountry-B (UAE, Dubai) 3 servers placed geographically Running Lotus Notes Separately. Also how can I make it a routeable network with respect to SMTP, Is it a good idea to place one SMTP gateway server in Dubai as MX-2 for contingency. Regards, Irf. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 7:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Connecting Dubai office From what you've described, I think it's a valid approach, but your lack of detail and changing of names (Dubai to Country-A or Country-B) doesn't give me great confidence. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Exchange List Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 12:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Connecting Dubai office Country-A Existing Environment: Windows 2000, Exchange 2000. Three mail servers placed geographically, for all outbound and inbound mails we have single point of entry. Country-B Existing Environment: Lotus Notes. I am planning to install exchange 2000 in Country-B within the same existing w2k and e2k environment, all outbound mails will use there Internet Access, for inbound I will use my SMTP placed in Country-A. I will add their old domain as a second domain in Country-A Exchange server and create their mailboxes so that they can receive mails from old domain. Please let me know if this is a correct approach. I need your input specially, on single point of entry for Internet Mails. Regards, Irf. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Connecting Dubai office
Country-A Existing Environment: Windows 2000, Exchange 2000. Three mail servers placed geographically, for all outbound and inbound mails we have single point of entry. Country-B Existing Environment: Lotus Notes. I am planning to install exchange 2000 in Country-B within the same existing w2k and e2k environment, all outbound mails will use there Internet Access, for inbound I will use my SMTP placed in Country-A. I will add their old domain as a second domain in Country-A Exchange server and create their mailboxes so that they can receive mails from old domain. Please let me know if this is a correct approach. I need your input specially, on single point of entry for Internet Mails. Regards, Irf. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Connecting Dubai office
hi Ed, Country-A (Pakistan) andCountry-B (UAE, Dubai) 3 servers placed geographically Running Lotus Notes Separately. Also how can I make it a routeable network with respect to SMTP, Is it a good idea to place one SMTP gateway server in Dubai as MX-2 for contingency. Regards, Irf. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 7:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Connecting Dubai office From what you've described, I think it's a valid approach, but your lack of detail and changing of names (Dubai to Country-A or Country-B) doesn't give me great confidence. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Exchange List Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 12:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Connecting Dubai office Country-A Existing Environment: Windows 2000, Exchange 2000. Three mail servers placed geographically, for all outbound and inbound mails we have single point of entry. Country-B Existing Environment: Lotus Notes. I am planning to install exchange 2000 in Country-B within the same existing w2k and e2k environment, all outbound mails will use there Internet Access, for inbound I will use my SMTP placed in Country-A. I will add their old domain as a second domain in Country-A Exchange server and create their mailboxes so that they can receive mails from old domain. Please let me know if this is a correct approach. I need your input specially, on single point of entry for Internet Mails. Regards, Irf. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
exchange2003 and msx55 diff exchnage orgs same windowsdomain
Hi all We have a NT4 domain which happens to have an exchange55 server in (exchange organization =ORGX) running on a windows2000 member server. I plan to upgrade our NT4 domain to be a windows2003AD, and run forestprep to create a new exchange organization (ORGY) to later install exchange2003, I do not plan any co-existence with the existent55, but still want to allow the MSX55 to work. Please Do you think that is possible? thx _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rcpthosts
My Dear List, I am getting this error from external domain which is @mul.paknet.com.pk. The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did not report a specific reason. Check the address and try again. If it still fails, contact your system administrator. SMTP #5.0.0 smtp; 553 sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5.7.1) Can you please help me in this regard? Regards, Irf. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PST-file backup problem
I am using outlook 2000, I usually take backup of PST after it is near to 1 Gig. what office version are you using? Irf. -Original Message- From: Tuomela Arto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 12:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PST-file backup problem Hello ! My question deals with PST-files. When backing up PST-files you always have to back up every PST-file. This is because Outlook changes the file every time it's opened etc. So you cannot take just incremental from changed files. Usually you end up backing up all PST-files.. Ok.. so what you say! The problem is that if you have to pay for every Gig you take, you end up paying a lot of money! Is there any third party tool or way to get rid of this problem? Having the same problem? Or is it just me ;) Rgs, -Arttu- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Move E2K servers between AD containers?
Hello, E2K: 2 Servers, same site/group, SP3+September'03 Rollup+recent critical security patch, Scanmail 6.1, native OS: w2K, SP4 + all critical fixes , native The powers that be would like to move all the Servers into a new OU Servers container in AD. They're trying to deploy some policies against the default Computers container the Exchange servers currently exist in, so want the Exchange Servers out of it. It seemed to work OK in the lab after moving and rebooting. I know some of the Exchange Groups can't be moved out of the Default Users container. Any problem moving Exchange Servers between containers? They are not DCs. Thank you, Brent _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OUT OF TOPIC **security policie's mmc empty.
Hi all, The following is happeing on our DCs. (W2KAD-mixed mode) I have noticed that domain controller security policy, domains security policy and local security policy does not show any policies instead they show an empty folder called windows settings. I have also noticed that after right-click on my computer and selecting manage the system tools and storage icons do not expand. I have applied adminpack.msi and SP4 still the same problem. Please do you know what can I do to recover this mmc functionality? thx PS: both dcs were upgraded from nt4 pdc and nt4bdc respectively. The only program installed after the upgrade is dell openmanage. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA versus NTFS permissions
Hi all W2K-AD nativemode (1 forest, 1 tree, 1 domain) MSX2000+SP3 (mixedmode) running in a W2K+SP4 member server. The only account able to use OWa is the exchangeadmin account, all other users got Error: Access is Denied after 3 tries. I have followed the Microst Article Q317471 and still does not work. Any suggestions? thx _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA versus NTFS permissions
yes logon locally in place in the w2k member server were owa resides. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, October 24, 2003 3:26 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange List Server Conversation: OWA versus NTFS permissions Subject: RE: OWA versus NTFS permissions Permission granted for users to log on locally? See the archives for extensive discussion... David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Microsoft Exchange List Server Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 3:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA versus NTFS permissions Hi all W2K-AD nativemode (1 forest, 1 tree, 1 domain) MSX2000+SP3 (mixedmode) running in a W2K+SP4 member server. The only account able to use OWa is the exchangeadmin account, all other users got Error: Access is Denied after 3 tries. I have followed the Microst Article Q317471 and still does not work. Any suggestions? thx _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange2003 features versus OS matrix.
Hi all, Please do you know of any matrix of all the features available/not available for Exchange2003 versus the OS where this exchange resides, including the AD domain mode where the exchange2003 resides? For instance, what feature is not going to be available when Exchange2003 is on a W2K member server in a W2K AD in mixed mode. I have read that rpc over http is only available if exchange2003 runs on a windows2003 server which is in a Windows2003AD. thx _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RPC over HTTP support for Outlook 2003, conditionals?
Hi all, Can outlook2003 be benefit of the feature of the subject if the exchange2003 (enterprise /standard) is running on a windows2003 server standard in a W2K-AD in either rmixed or native mode? Please do you have any microsoft article --dfiferent than 822178-- which describes what is or is not to be loose when using exchange2003 in a windows2000 or windows2003 server in a W2K-AD or W2K3-AD, mixed or native. Thanks in advance _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
forestprep using standard or enterprise version?
Hi all, 1 forest, 1tree, multiple childdomains W2KAD I am planning to run exchange2003 /forestprep at the forestroot of our AD, the root will have 1 exchange2003 server (just 50 users, 1 storage group) but the childomains will have their own exchange2003 servers (some of them 10 databases). Do you see any problem if at the forestroot I run /forestprep with an exchange2003 standard version?, the childomains will get their own exchange2003 enterprise version. thx _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 restore slow
I experienced this once, and it was because the RAID card was set to NO CACHE for WRITE. A common thing done back in the olden days with Exchange, but not what you want when doing a restore. Brent -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mary McCallum Posted At: Friday, October 17, 2003 4:14 AM Posted To: MS Exchange List Conversation: Exchange 5.5 restore slow Subject: Exchange 5.5 restore slow Hi all, Exchange 5.5 SP4, Windows NT 4.0 SP 6, NT Backup I have recently run 2 test restores of my exchange server and the restore of the Information Store has been extremely slow, only .5 Gig per hour. (The store is 11 Gig.) In the past, I've been able to restore in 2.5 hours. Just wondering if anyone has come across this and has any suggestions on how to troubleshoot? Tried different tapes, tape drives and cables... Hardware used - Compaq Proliant, Dual 3 Gig Xeon Proc, 2 Gig RAM, Quantum DLT 8000 Thanks in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can't recover some deleted public folders
Hello, I've had this happen in our environment, and so far the only thing I can trace it to is PFs created pre-Exchang2K and the upgrade. There are various Q articles that'll recommend ISINTEG, and some other things. You should obviously give those a shot, but they never solved the problem for us. One thing we're able to do is to KILL the recovery process before it hits that corrupt message (or whatever it is). That recovers the folder and all of its messages up to the point you kill it off. It takes some timing and practice to maximize the number of messages you get. Of course you can also DR the PF from the last backup, etc... On Google I remember reading a post from someone that said they just kept trying and trying and it finally recovered. We did quite a bit of that without success. I haven't searched the KB since May for this issue, maybe PSS has gotten around to posting a workound by now. Good luck, if you find success please post it, Brent -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Posted At: Thursday, October 16, 2003 12:15 PM Posted To: MS Exchange List Conversation: Can't recover some deleted public folders Subject: Can't recover some deleted public folders Hi all. We are having a hard time trying to recover some public folders that have been deleted (using Tools-Recover Deleted Items) With Outlook 2000, we get an immediate error message saying that we don't have permissions to do this. (We do have all the permissions needed) With Outlook 2003, the recovery process starts and goes to ~75% and then the error message pops up telling us that we don't have permissions. Funny that while the recovery process is running, we can see the subfolder that is being recovered, and even grab some messages out of it using another instance of Outlook. But once the error message pops up - poof, the subfolder that was being recovered disappears. We know that in some cases antivirus programs could cause something like this, so we made sure to turn them off. What else could be throwing it off? Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: A new post in every Public Folder, or how to force a backfill ...
Hello, You're catching up on List posts. :-) I ended up dragging a message into every un-synced folder on the Source server. With a list of every bad PF, it was probably only a couple seconds per folder to drag and drop. Backfill then fired off within an hour or so and everything was fine. If we were at 9,000 PFs we might have accidentally suffered and unrecoverable disaster on the PF store. Especially if it was a sunny day outside. :-) Thank you, Brent -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dumke, Jane Posted At: Monday, October 13, 2003 1:31 PM Posted To: MS Exchange List Conversation: A new post in every Public Folder, or how to force a backfill ... Subject: RE: A new post in every Public Folder, or how to force a backfill ... I found that the only way I could get this done on our site was to dump a listing of the PFs and the # of items in each one for each server, pull them up side by side in Excel and figure out which server had the more complete copy. Then I removed the replica off the incomplete server, and then rereplicated. Horrendous job with 9000+ PFs, but it worked to get them back in sync. Jane Dumke Messaging Manager University of Wisconsin - Stevens Point mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] phone:(715)346-2463 fax:(715)346-4577 -Original Message- From: MS Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 6:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: A new post in every Public Folder, or how to force a backfill ... Hello, E2K (Source Target): SP3+September'03 Rollup, Scanmail 6.1, native OS: w2K, SP3 + all critical fixes , native I'm doing the Ed Crowley Server move. I've got 400 of 1500 Public Folders that haven't replicated completely. It has been over 2 weeks. One thing that seems to force a backfill on a PF is to put a new message/post into the PF. It then seems to figure out it's not up to date and a backfill is kicked off that evening. Most of these PFs do not have an Email address, and are not visible to the Address Book. Any tips on how to send a message to a large number of such folders, or how to force a backfill on them? Notes: -Turning off virus scanning on the Public Folders a week or so ago improved things greatly. -PFs not in sync vary between no messages to just a couple messages off. -No size restrictions on PFs or SMTP. -Active PFs (like this list at 40,000+ messages) sync up just fine. -Source and Target Servers are in the same Server room, plugged into the same Switch. -Hierarchy came across just fine. Just message content has problems. I've done: -ISINTEG and Defrag for Source PF store. -Checked that both Public Folder Stores have proxy addresses set (Q286356) -On the top level folders set propagate settings of Replicas, Replication message priority, and Replication Schedule. Replication Interval is: always run, and Replication message priority is: urgent. With logging turned up I get a lot of these: = Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Public Store Event Category: Replication Errors Event ID: 3093 Date: 9/2/2003 Time: 7:41:51 PM User: N/A Computer: EXCHANGE Description: Error -2147221233 reading property 0x674b0014 on object type tbtMsgFolder from database First Storage Group\Public Information Store (EXCHANGE). == Thanks, Brent _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Server Replacement
Hello, That reminds me a couple other things the FAQ didn't go into (e2K): -If you set the old server's mailbox stores to point to the new server's PF, then any remaining users in the old Mailbox store will be unable to see the PFs thru OWA. There are several Q articles on this. -Outlook users that are remote and in off-line mode don't automatically find their moved mailbox. If you can get them to just connect once on-line after the move everything works out. An issue if you've got a lot of remote users. Good Luck, Brent -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MSXLIST (MSX Discussions List) Posted At: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 12:43 AM Posted To: MS Exchange List Conversation: Exchange 2000 Server Replacement Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Server Replacement If you're using public folders, make sure you set the Private Information Store setting to point to the PF server as well. The trick here, as well as the obvious job of setting the new server to point to itself as the PF server, is also to do the less obvious job of setting the old (now empty of mailboxes and PFs server) to also point to the new server as its PF server. -Original Message- From: Dean Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 October 2003 04:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Server Replacement So long as the server there were homed on is not removed before *all* client profiles on all machines have had outlook opened on them. It goes like this User logs in and runs up outlook (Outlook reads its configuration info Oulook connects to old home server and asks to connect to mailbox Old server says clear off and talk to this new server Outlook talks to new server and gets mailbox Outlook writes new mailbox location to outlook profile. If old mail server is removed and user has not logged in yet, When user goes to log on , outlook can't find the old server and has no idea about the new one. All it means is ya go into outlook/services and put the new server name in. cheers Dean If the old server is the first exchange server check the FAQ for Ed's move server method. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1/10/2003 9:38:46 a.m. No need to reconfigure clients. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Jeremy T. Slater [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 5:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Server Replacement Greetings! I am going to throw out a question, showing my obvious exchange ignorance. We have 4 Exchange Mail Servers in our Organization and we need to replace one of them, as the box is old and slow. This server serves about 100 mailboxes. I am assuming I can build out the new server, install exchange and just move the mailboxes to the new server. The only problem I see with this, is having to reconfigure all of the clients to point to the new server. I would really like to keep the server name the same, but don't think it is possible. Any ideas? Thanks, Jeremy --- Jeremy T. Slater Network Administrator MMA Financial, LLC - http://www.mmafin.com 727.373.8153 - Direct 727.461.4801 - Receptionist 727.443.6067 - Fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Server Replacement
Hello, Some of the things I've encountered with the faq move, and received no help from the faq or list :-): -Some Public Folders not fully syncing. I THINK this was because of Trend Scanmail mucking things up. To resolve things I turned off PF Scanning on both source and target , and then dropped a message in every damn PF (source side) that wasn't synced up. You should allow a couple days for the initial sync. I waited over a week, etc... But, things synced up in a couple hours after dropping in messages. In ESM, Server, Store, PF, you can export the PF item count and bring into Excel. -Some mailboxes won't move. Less than 1%. Corrupt messages usually. ISINTEG doesn't fix things. Track down the messages and delete (get creative in how to delete: OWA, IMAP, Virus scanning turned off,...). -A lot of configuration to copy over (store limits, Maintenance times, SMTP, OWA, Monitors, Backups,...) -Blackberry users have been an annoyance. I've just started testing with those users. Not much written up, guess it's just suppose to work. Would be nice if they'd pay for maintenance! Rights at the Sever level for the Blackberry Admin account are very different between the new and old server... The faq, and it's links, covered the rest that I can recall. A DR server move would've been easier and quicker, but we've been doing that since Exchange 3.0, and we were just looking to leave some of the cruft behind. Good Luck, Brent -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Posted At: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 3:44 PM Posted To: MS Exchange List Conversation: Exchange 2000 Server Replacement Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Server Replacement http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxa.htm Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeremy T. Slater Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Server Replacement This will occur at the same time that we are physically moving these folks in to a new office, so maybe its not the best time to go testing DR plans. :o) -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 5:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Server Replacement They will move with MAPI, however if you really wanted to keep the same server name, this sounds like a great time to test your DR plans and procedures. -Original Message- From: Jeremy T. Slater [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 5:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Server Replacement Greetings! I am going to throw out a question, showing my obvious exchange ignorance. We have 4 Exchange Mail Servers in our Organization and we need to replace one of them, as the box is old and slow. This server serves about 100 mailboxes. I am assuming I can build out the new server, install exchange and just move the mailboxes to the new server. The only problem I see with this, is having to reconfigure all of the clients to point to the new server. I would really like to keep the server name the same, but don't think it is possible. Any ideas? Thanks, Jeremy --- Jeremy T. Slater Network Administrator MMA Financial, LLC - http://www.mmafin.com 727.373.8153 - Direct 727.461.4801 - Receptionist 727.443.6067 - Fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web
MIME
Dear List, I have seen lots of mails in my badmail folder all containing a text This is multi-part message in MIME format. Why are they in badmail folder, as the recipients email address is right, what could be the problem. I am using windows 2000 and exchange 2000. Cheers, Irf. Malik Irfan Ahmed. System Engineer United Bank Limited. Voice: +92 21 90332286-85 Fax: +92 21 2449985004 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MIME
Thanks andrey. -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 10:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MIME They are not in badmail folder because of MIME. They are in badmail folder because they are NDRs that could not be bounced back to the originator addresses because the originrator addresses were bad. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 6:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MIME Dear List, I have seen lots of mails in my badmail folder all containing a text This is multi-part message in MIME format. Why are they in badmail folder, as the recipients email address is right, what could be the problem. I am using windows 2000 and exchange 2000. Cheers, Irf. Malik Irfan Ahmed. System Engineer United Bank Limited. Voice: +92 21 90332286-85 Fax: +92 21 2449985004 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=?=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Nested Public Folders; recovery of deleted items therein
Hello, Does it start to recovery at all before giving you that error? I had a situation where recovering a deleted PF would begin recovery and then error out. I was able to get most of it back, just by canceling the Recovery before it would error out. Took a couple attempts to get the timing just right. I found one post in Google where a user said they tried and tried and finally it worked out. It never did for me. One post back to the list on my problem said they were never able to recover the PF, and finally went back to tape. Good Luck, Brent -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Matteson Posted At: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 9:44 AM Posted To: MS Exchange List Conversation: Nested Public Folders; recovery of deleted items therein Subject: Nested Public Folders; recovery of deleted items therein Good afternoon all: I have a user that has deleted a public folder that had more than one sub-folder. Deleted items retention was set on the public folder store. (E2K with sp's running on top of Win2K SP4) I can see the folder that she deleted when using the Recover Deleted Items tool, but I get an error message saying that I don't have the permissions necessary. I've even gone through the process outlined in KB 811385, but that hasn't worked. Anyone have any suggestions? The folder was replicated to other servers, but I get the same thing when I use a mailbox on the other servers to attempt to recover the public folders. TIA. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Automatic Deletion
Thanks. Regards, Irf. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 7:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Automatic Deletion Mailbox cleanup agent will do it as well, I believe. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Automatic Deletion Off the top of my head - ExMerge is one way. Set the INI file and give it the list of mailboxes and let it rip in batch mode via an AT schedule. ExMerge has a pretty good manual that explains all these things. Another way is to use Exchange's own Mailbox Manager. Just create a recipient policy that would match the user(s) whose mailbox(es) need to be cleaned, set up Mailbox Manager's schedule and let it run. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 1:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Automatic Deletion Thanks for your reply, how can we do that? -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 6:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Automatic Deletion yes -Original Message- From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 2:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Automatic Deletion Hi, Is there anyway to set an automatic deletion of mails after certain time/mailbox size on per user basis. Regards, Irf. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=? =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=? =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=?=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automatic Deletion
Hi, Is there anyway to set an automatic deletion of mails after certain time/mailbox size on per user basis. Regards, Irf. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public folder Errors
Hello, Since you're quoting Q numbers in other posts, I'm guessing you did the steps in Q307917. This isn't going to help you recover, but I've been moving to a new server myself and although the entire Public Hierarchy came across just fine, some Public Folder content didn't. From ESM I'd export the item count for each PF store and then go into to Excel to see how things matched up. A follow up with OUTLOOK accounts to the different stores verified some didn't sync at all, some were missing a couple messages, etc... It APPEARS that having PF virus scanning on screwed-up the initial Sync of content. For folders that didn't replicate content completely I can drop a message in the PF, and then a backfill will be fired off that evening, and everything is synced up (I'm running with PF Virus scanning turned off currently). FWIW, Brent -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erick Thompson Posted At: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 5:00 PM Posted To: MS Exchange List Conversation: Public folder Errors Subject: Public folder Errors First, a little background. I installed Exchange 2000 on a new LAN server, which was the only server in the domain. After some testing, we realized that the server would become quickly overloaded. So, I moved a new server into the domain, made it a domain controller, and installed Exchange but did not transfer the FSMO roles (the first DC is still the file/print server). I moved all the mailboxes over, and turned on replication for the public folders (but I missed some). After a day, I removed Exchange from the first server. However, I think the removal did not go cleanly, as I'm now running into a bunch of errors. Someone on the Exchange gets the following error in Outlook (2000). Unable to update public free/busy data. I've taken a look at the server, and it appears the public folder that stores the info (can't remember the name at the moment) is gone. How can I recreate it? In the event log, I have the error 9127 from MSExchangeSA: OALGen encountered error [0x80004005] while calculating the OALs. This appears to be due to the lack of a Offline Address Book (OAB). How can I recreate it? User created public folders are only available in System Manager on the server, not on any workstation with Exchange tools installed. System Manager on a workstation doesn't display any public folders (including Internet Newsgroups) under First Admin Group-Folders-Public Folders. Under First Admin Group-..-Public Folders Store-Public Folders, I can see the folders, but if I select them, I get class not registered. ID no 80040154 Exchange system manager. The folders don't have much in them, so I can delete them and start over, but I'd like to know what's going on. These folders were replicated from the old server. Thanks, Erick _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Automatic Deletion
Thanks for your reply, how can we do that? -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 6:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Automatic Deletion yes -Original Message- From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 2:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Automatic Deletion Hi, Is there anyway to set an automatic deletion of mails after certain time/mailbox size on per user basis. Regards, Irf. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=?=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
A new post in every Public Folder, or how to force a backfill ...
Hello, E2K (Source Target): SP3+September'03 Rollup, Scanmail 6.1, native OS: w2K, SP3 + all critical fixes , native I'm doing the Ed Crowley Server move. I've got 400 of 1500 Public Folders that haven't replicated completely. It has been over 2 weeks. One thing that seems to force a backfill on a PF is to put a new message/post into the PF. It then seems to figure out it's not up to date and a backfill is kicked off that evening. Most of these PFs do not have an Email address, and are not visible to the Address Book. Any tips on how to send a message to a large number of such folders, or how to force a backfill on them? Notes: -Turning off virus scanning on the Public Folders a week or so ago improved things greatly. -PFs not in sync vary between no messages to just a couple messages off. -No size restrictions on PFs or SMTP. -Active PFs (like this list at 40,000+ messages) sync up just fine. -Source and Target Servers are in the same Server room, plugged into the same Switch. -Hierarchy came across just fine. Just message content has problems. I've done: -ISINTEG and Defrag for Source PF store. -Checked that both Public Folder Stores have proxy addresses set (Q286356) -On the top level folders set propagate settings of Replicas, Replication message priority, and Replication Schedule. Replication Interval is: always run, and Replication message priority is: urgent. With logging turned up I get a lot of these: = Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Public Store Event Category: Replication Errors Event ID: 3093 Date: 9/2/2003 Time: 7:41:51 PM User: N/A Computer: EXCHANGE Description: Error -2147221233 reading property 0x674b0014 on object type tbtMsgFolder from database First Storage Group\Public Information Store (EXCHANGE). == Thanks, Brent _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
New E2K Roll-up fix working OK
Hello, FWIW, the newly released E2K post-SP3 Roll-up fix has been working fine on a production techie server for over a day now. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;813840 E2K: Native, Scanmail 6.1 OS: w2K, SP3 + all critical fixes , native OUTLOOK/MAPI, OWA, POP, IMAP used regularly on this server. YMMV, Brent _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mdeamon on my Network!
Right I agree, but this is when you come to know that somebody is using your e2k
server.
Irf.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 4:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mdeamon on my Network!
Yep this is what I suggested yesterday. I believe it won't deny them all access to the
exchange server, just via the SMTP server, so they will still be able to use outlook
in a client/server config.
-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 September 2003 12:31
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mdeamon on my Network!
You could, if you wish to make this persons life miserable,
simply put the IP address for his/her Mdaemon server in the
deny access to the E2K SMTP Virtual Server. Then they
will/should get no access to the E2K server.
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
--
From: Exchange List
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: Tuesday, September 2, 2003 12:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Mdeamon on my Network!
So the conclusion is that any LAN user can use my server as
gateway, I
have send mail server as well but to use e2k as a gateway I have to
add the IP address for relay through my e2k server. Why Mdeamon is
bypassing this security?
Guys, don't worry I have to kill him ;)
Irf.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Molkentin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 4:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mdeamon on my Network!
That's absolutely right - to quote the Great Ed...
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioural
problems
A length of 2x4 is hardly technological, and supremely satisfying
wielded in the hands of a frustrated IT admin. Win - Win!
themolk.
-Original Message-
From: Michael L. Callahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 2 September 2003 9:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mdeamon on my Network!
In all seriousness, this is a policy issue. If you don't have an
acceptable use policy for your internal network and applications,
then get one, get sign off by management, publish it and
enforce it.
If you have one and it doesn't cover this, amend it so
that it will.
As someone wise on this list has mentioned, technology is
not a cure
for bad behavior. A 2x4, however, is.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert
Moir
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 3:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mdeamon on my Network!
I can see a recurring theme in all our replies...
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 01/09/2003 19:44
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: RE: Mdeamon on my Network!
Grab a baseball bat and pay the user a visit.
-Original Message-
From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, September 01, 2003 5:27 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Mdeamon on my Network!
Subject: Mdeamon on my Network!
Hello there, I have E2k and W2k environment, what I
have seen
today is
that one of our user installed Mdeamon mail server
used my
E2k as a
gateway to send mails to internals users with a different
domain name.
How can I restrict this kind of activity?
Hope you gurus out there can have some idea on this.
Regards,
Irf.
_
List posting FAQ:
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl? enter=exchangetext_mode
=
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.ryirrÊ|
.+x
)r뺷yiu)٥+rrʸW{j
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl? enter=exchangetext_mode
=?=e
nglish
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl? enter=exchangetext_mode
=la
ng=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Mdeamon on my Network!
Yes he is delivering it. But isn't this a security breach, is there any patch or
something to control this by default.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 5:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mdeamon on my Network!
He's not relaying, he's delivering inbound right?[1] You could control what servers
are allowed to communicate on port 25 to your Exchange server, but it's a lot more
effort than a few minutes in a closed room with the offender... unless you think this
is the tip of the assberg, in which case it may make sense to go further lock things
down.
[1] Although authenticated relay is generally enabled by default since one usually
'trusts' people with authentication rights not to be complete maroons.
-Original Message-
From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 12:03 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Mdeamon on my Network!
Subject: RE: Mdeamon on my Network!
So the conclusion is that any LAN user can use my server as gateway, I have send mail
server as well but to use e2k as a gateway I have to add the IP address for relay
through my e2k server. Why Mdeamon is bypassing this security?
Guys, don't worry I have to kill him ;)
Irf.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Molkentin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 4:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mdeamon on my Network!
That's absolutely right - to quote the Great Ed...
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioural problems
A length of 2x4 is hardly technological, and supremely satisfying
wielded in the hands of a frustrated IT admin. Win - Win!
themolk.
-Original Message-
From: Michael L. Callahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 2 September 2003 9:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mdeamon on my Network!
In all seriousness, this is a policy issue. If you don't
have an acceptable use policy for your internal network and
applications, then get one, get sign off by management,
publish it and enforce it. If you have one and it doesn't
cover this, amend it so that it will.
As someone wise on this list has mentioned, technology is not
a cure for bad behavior. A 2x4, however, is.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Moir
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 3:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mdeamon on my Network!
I can see a recurring theme in all our replies...
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 01/09/2003 19:44
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: RE: Mdeamon on my Network!
Grab a baseball bat and pay the user a visit.
-Original Message-
From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, September 01, 2003 5:27 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Mdeamon on my Network!
Subject: Mdeamon on my Network!
Hello there, I have E2k and W2k environment, what I
have seen today is
that one of our user installed Mdeamon mail server
used my E2k as a
gateway to send mails to internals users with a
different domain name.
How can I restrict this kind of activity?
Hope you gurus out there can have some idea on this.
Regards,
Irf.
_
List posting FAQ:
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.ryirrʦ
.+x
)r뺷yiu)٥+rrʸW{j
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=?=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=?=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=?=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This email and any files transmitted with it is confidential and intended solely
RE: Mdeamon on my Network!
So the conclusion is that any LAN user can use my server as gateway, I have send mail
server as well but to use e2k as a gateway I have to add the IP address for relay
through my e2k server. Why Mdeamon is bypassing this security?
Guys, don't worry I have to kill him ;)
Irf.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Molkentin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 4:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mdeamon on my Network!
That's absolutely right - to quote the Great Ed...
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioural problems
A length of 2x4 is hardly technological, and supremely satisfying
wielded in the hands of a frustrated IT admin. Win - Win!
themolk.
-Original Message-
From: Michael L. Callahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 2 September 2003 9:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mdeamon on my Network!
In all seriousness, this is a policy issue. If you don't
have an acceptable use policy for your internal network and
applications, then get one, get sign off by management,
publish it and enforce it. If you have one and it doesn't
cover this, amend it so that it will.
As someone wise on this list has mentioned, technology is not
a cure for bad behavior. A 2x4, however, is.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Moir
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 3:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mdeamon on my Network!
I can see a recurring theme in all our replies...
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 01/09/2003 19:44
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: RE: Mdeamon on my Network!
Grab a baseball bat and pay the user a visit.
-Original Message-
From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, September 01, 2003 5:27 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Mdeamon on my Network!
Subject: Mdeamon on my Network!
Hello there, I have E2k and W2k environment, what I
have seen today is
that one of our user installed Mdeamon mail server
used my E2k as a
gateway to send mails to internals users with a
different domain name.
How can I restrict this kind of activity?
Hope you gurus out there can have some idea on this.
Regards,
Irf.
_
List posting FAQ:
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.ryirrʦ
.+x
)r뺷yiu)٥+rrʸW{j
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=?=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Some Public Folders not Replicating content
Hello, E2K: SP3+March Rollup, Scanmail 6.0 (6.1 on server #2), native OS: w2K, SP3 + all critical fixes , native Single Domain, Single site, Same server room, servers only separated by a Gigabit switch. I've brought up a Second E2K server (Target)and am having problems with Public Folder replication to it. The hierarchy appears to have come across just fine from the Source server. But, some folders have content, and some don't. It has been over 30 hours. I've done: -ISINTEG and Defrag for Source PF store. -Checked that both Public Folder Stores have proxy addresses set (Q286356) -On the top level folders set propagate settings of Replicas, Replication message priority, and Replication Schedule. Replication Interval is: always run, and Replication message priority is: urgent. Looking at the Properties on some of the Folders that haven't replicated content, REPLICATION / DETAILS , it'll show (when looking at Source): SOURCE In Sync , Target Local Modified (when looking at Target): Source Remote Modified, Target In Sync. But, there are no times listed for last received or Avg. Trans. time With logging turned up to maximum I do see the following error regularly: = Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeIS Public Store Event Category: Replication Errors Event ID: 3093 Date: 9/2/2003 Time: 7:41:51 PM User: N/A Computer: EXCHANGE Description: Error -2147221233 reading property 0x674b0014 on object type tbtMsgFolder from database First Storage Group\Public Information Store (EXCHANGE). == Searching Google Groups, it seems like this is an error that can be ignored. I have also come across a couple Google Group posts very similar to my plight, and of course they've gone unresolved. I haven't tried turning off Scanmail, and given the current mass of viruses being sent to us not something I could try and keep the servers available. Thanks, Brent _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mdeamon on my Network!
Hello there, I have E2k and W2k environment, what I have seen today is that one of our user installed Mdeamon mail server used my E2k as a gateway to send mails to internals users with a different domain name. How can I restrict this kind of activity? Hope you gurus out there can have some idea on this. Regards, Irf. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
optoins to populate the GAL
Hi all, W2KAD+sp4 - 1 forest-1tree MSX2000+sp3 Using outlook client we can see the list of members of our *users* OU and send messages to them. How can we see a list of other users in another forests? any other way to populate our gal maybe based on public folder? or another views? thx _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
relay server in DMZ
Subject: relay server in DMZ Dear all, Need your help, I have recently placed MS SMTP server in DMZ, server is configured to receive and send mails, with GFI security. Now the problem that I am having is, the mail server could not send mails to external domains, it stuck in the Exchange 2000 mail queue saying that Unable to bind destination in DNS when I provide the DNS of the SMTP relay server its start sending the mail to external domains. What I understand is, that every mail server needs DNS, which has Internet presence. But how can I avoid this as I have servers on WAN do I have to give them the access of the DNS of SMTP server placed DMZ or is there in anything I am missing. Please help me in sorting out this problem I will be very grateful. Thanks in advance. We have E2K with SP3 and W2K with SP3 Regards, Irf. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BCC emails
Thanks Chris, can you tell me where can I get help/ procedure to do this. Or is there a easy way of doing it. Thanks Regards, Irf. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Re: BCC emails Sure, you'll just need to write a categorizer event sink. Course it will prevent you from receiving messages just like this one. Enjoy. From: Exchange List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 09:34:41 +0500 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: BCC emails Dear List, Is there a way to block the bcc mails on server level or is there any software any procedure to do that. Love u all, Irf. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BCC emails
Thanks. Irf. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 2:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: BCC emails MSDN and the Exchange SDK are places to start if you'd like to do it yourself. Sure there are plenty of developers out there who'd be happy to take on such a project. From: Exchange List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 11:15:12 +0500 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: BCC emails Thanks Chris, can you tell me where can I get help/ procedure to do this. Or is there a easy way of doing it. Thanks Regards, Irf. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:Wednesday, August 06, 2003 9:52 AM To:Exchange Discussions Subject:Re: BCC emails Sure, you'll just need to write a categorizer event sink. Course it will prevent you from receiving messages just like this one. Enjoy. From: Exchange List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 09:34:41 +0500 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: BCC emails Dear List, Is there a way to block the bcc mails on server level or is there any software any procedure to do that. Love u all, Irf. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=?=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
BCC emails
Dear List, Is there a way to block the bcc mails on server level or is there any software any procedure to do that. Love u all, Irf. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
msx55 migration to AD
Hi all, We are going to migrate our NT4 domain to w2kad. the new domain will have a different NETBIOS domain name. We understand that we need to migrate user/password using ADMTv2. Could you please give us some considerations when migrating our exchange servers (how to migrate the servername?)? we have msx55 running on w2k and running on NT4 members and on NT4 BDCS. thx, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: msx55 migration to AD
thanks, but my question was referred on how to migrate the actual MSX55 server and keep it as the msx55 server in the AD domain. that msx55 is a production box with 1000 mailboxes in. thx -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 12:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: msx55 migration to AD Doesnt the documentation spell all that out? I think you can automatically move the Exch service accounts except the System Attendant. - Original Message - From: Microsoft Exchange List Server [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 2:59 PM Subject: msx55 migration to AD Hi all, We are going to migrate our NT4 domain to w2kad. the new domain will have a different NETBIOS domain name. We understand that we need to migrate user/password using ADMTv2. Could you please give us some considerations when migrating our exchange servers (how to migrate the servername?)? we have msx55 running on w2k and running on NT4 members and on NT4 BDCS. thx, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: msx55 migration to AD
Thanks for the information , I did consider that in the beginning then I switch my mind to the ADMTv2 as itis supposse to move servernames, it looks easier than creating a new box. Do you have any bad experience moving msx55 using ADMTv2 ? Also on step number1 I think a trsurelation is needed to join the site from a different domain? thx -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 1:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: msx55 migration to AD I recommend that you don't move the server and instead use http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxa.htm to move everything to a new server in the new domain. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Microsoft Exchange List Server Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 1:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: msx55 migration to AD thanks, but my question was referred on how to migrate the actual MSX55 server and keep it as the msx55 server in the AD domain. that msx55 is a production box with 1000 mailboxes in. thx -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 12:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: msx55 migration to AD Doesnt the documentation spell all that out? I think you can automatically move the Exch service accounts except the System Attendant. - Original Message - From: Microsoft Exchange List Server [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 2:59 PM Subject: msx55 migration to AD Hi all, We are going to migrate our NT4 domain to w2kad. the new domain will have a different NETBIOS domain name. We understand that we need to migrate user/password using ADMTv2. Could you please give us some considerations when migrating our exchange servers (how to migrate the servername?)? we have msx55 running on w2k and running on NT4 members and on NT4 BDCS. thx, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ADMT to migrate MSX55 box to AD
Hi all Is it possible to move an operational MSX55 from NT4 domain to a W2K-AD domain (different NETBIOS domain name than NT4) using ADMT? * assuming cases where: MSX55 currently lives in a NT4 member or NT4BDC or W2k member of the source NT4 domain and also target on AD native and target on AD mixed mode. If yes, Are the primary NT accounts of the MSX55's mailboxes will be changed automatically by ADMT to reflect the new domain? or do we need to change the primary-nt account manually for each mailbox (to reflect the new domain) any other changes needed after done the migration ? *this is an operaytional MSX55 with 1000 mailboxes in. thx _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA 55 owa was unable to get to your inbox
Hi all MSX55+SP4 1org,1site users report that they get owa was unable to get to your inbox when they try to access their mail via OWA. Curious thing is that same OWA worked before and without any intervention that same owa works afterand then someother day stop to work..and so on. It Is failing in a random way I have applied Microsoft solution on K248081 still same probelm any ideas thx, -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 9:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Multiple domains. on the General page, there is a button called [Filter rules] you could just ignore that button. -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Multiple domains. Im at a loss again here. I create the new recipient Policy, I call it something. I then proceed to enter the address space, which is @kwikform.co.uk in the Email Addresses tab. That tells exchange to accept @kwikform.co.uk emails. I don't see any other tab apart from filter users, is that what you mean? Im using exchange 2000. -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 16:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Multiple domains. leave it blank. Or create a query that won't find anyone. -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 11:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Multiple domains. Please point me in the right direction if you could, after I have made the Policy, what says who it applies to? -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003 15:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Multiple domains. The recipient policy doesn't have to apply to anybody (much less everybody) - they just need to BE there. Make a recipient policy that applies to nobody that has all those domains. Get rid of the connector. Problem solved. They'll bounce properly at that point. -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, June 16, 2003 5:11 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Multiple domains. Subject: Multiple domains. Okay, weve got more than one local domain on the exchange server, only one domain is actually used for the servers, i.e. the active directory, the other domains are just legacy internet domains with the MX record set as our exchange server. To allow delivery of emails to people in the exchange organisation you can either use recipient policies with the desired domain, or alternatively add a new connector, add the address space and tick allow relaying to these domains. We have gone for the latter option as we do not want legacy email addresses created automatically within the domain, we only want people who we manually create email addresses to receive email from the legacy domain. However, the problem is we are now getting a large mail queue for the legacy domains as the server is attempting to relay the messages to the end user but the email address does not exist within our organisation. That is people are trying to send emails, i.e. spammers to email addresses that previously existed and the server is continually trying to relay that email back to itself and were getting all sorts of delay notifications etc. What I was wondering is how I can tell the server to realise that the email address doesn't exist and bounce it away ? Or perhaps im going about this whole thing the wrong way, maybe someone can enlighten me :) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Sending-Receiving Limit
No restriction applied on smtp virtual server. Only applied on Global Setting. -Original Message- From: Scott Pease [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Sending-Receiving Limit Check the size limit on your SMTP connector(s) for your routing group SMTP virtual server on their mailbox server? -Original Message- From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2003 12:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Dear list, I have applied a global limit of 2 MB on sending and receiving message size. One of the user wants to receive 5 MB of mail from Internet, I have increase the receive limit of that particular user by taking user property, but it is not working. What can be the problem. Help in this regard is requested. Thanks Regards, Irf. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sending-Receiving Limit
Thanks for the article. Here is my scenario. Example 2 In this example, the following size limits have been configured: * The global setting is set to 2 MB. * * * The user mailbox setting is set to 3 MB. But incoming mails greater than 2 MB never come to mailbox whose incoming limit is 3 MB. Why is this happening. Regards, irf. -Original Message- From: Scott Pease [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Sending-Receiving Limit You might also want to check Q322679, gives info on where to set the limits and what effect each has on your organization http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q322679gssnb=1 -Original Message- From: Scott Pease Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Check the size limit on your SMTP connector(s) for your routing group SMTP virtual server on their mailbox server? -Original Message- From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2003 12:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Dear list, I have applied a global limit of 2 MB on sending and receiving message size. One of the user wants to receive 5 MB of mail from Internet, I have increase the receive limit of that particular user by taking user property, but it is not working. What can be the problem. Help in this regard is requested. Thanks Regards, Irf. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sending-Receiving Limit
I am sorry for not mentioning the version I am using exchange 2000, windows 2000. Regards, irf -Original Message- From: Darryl Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2003 11:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Sending-Receiving Limit Exch 5.5 or 2000? Or are you using some other piece of software? D. -Original Message- From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 10:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sending-Receiving Limit Dear list, I have applied a global limit of 2 MB on sending and receiving message size. One of the user wants to receive 5 MB of mail from Internet, I have increase the receive limit of that particular user by taking user property, but it is not working. What can be the problem. Help in this regard is requested. Thanks Regards, Irf. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Del Items Recovery- Public Folder failure
Hello, OS: W2K SP3 + Security Hot fixes E2K SP3 + 03/03 Store Roll-up Recovering a Public Folder with Recover Deleted Items results in the error: Outlook was unable to recover some or all of the items in this folder. Make sure you have the required permissions to recover items in this folder, and try again. If the problem persists, contact your administrator. Sadly, I am the Administrator. This 1 PF is 3 levels down, messages in it, but no sub-folders. The user that deleted it has Owner rights for the folder it was deleted from and the deleted folder itself. As do Email Admins. The Owner that deleted it gets the same error I do when they try to recover it (I turned dumpster always on for them). The behavior is you can see the folder to recover, it lets you start recovery, you can see the folder appear and messages then start to appear in it (if you're watching from a different Outlook client), and then right at the end you get the above error and it vanishes from the PF structure. It is then in Recover Deleted Items again and ready for another try. What I've done: -I have tested creating, deleting, and recovering other folders with similar Rights, (and ones not similar) etc... and all works fine. -I have run isinteg -s ... -fix -test alltests against the PF store. -I have turned off Virus scanning (Trend Scanmail). -I've searched Google Groups, and it looks like the last couple months there are a quite a few Admins in the same boat as me. The only happy endings I found were one that ran isinteg, and one that just kept trying and trying and finally it worked (feel the power of Admin). One thing that comes to mind is that this PF was probably created back in the Exchange 5.5 days and was on a server upgraded in place to E2K. Any tips? Thanks, Brent _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rehome 10,000 PFs.
Hi all, MSX55+sp4 Is there anyway to rehome at once all the public folders, distribution lists and custom recipients? thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: rehome 10,000 PFs.
thanks for the information -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 10:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: rehome 10,000 PFs. Also be aware of the load you be placing on your servers. If the servers are in the same site then it will be better, though not much, with all the replication messages going from the source to the target server. This operation you are planning will generate a ton of them so you might want to do this on a weekend. If you are going from one site to another I hope you have the bandwidth for this - you will need it - this all depends on the total amoutn of data being moved too, of course. We have one customer who has only about 1100 PF's and when they replicate it really drags the mail flow to a crawl even with T1's in place. Regards. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Roger Seielstad Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 12:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: rehome 10,000 PFs. Custom recipients and distribution lists are not homed to a server, rather they are homed to an Exchange site (or fully contained in AD if its E2k, which I'm guessing it isn't). Public Folders allow for propagation of changes down a tree. Select the top level folder via Exchange Admin and change the home server property (as well as any replicas that need to be added or removed) and then select the check box on the first screen that says (something to the effect of) Propagate Changes to Subfolders. When you hit OK, you'll get prompted for which properties should be propagated - make sure Home Server (and replicas, if you changed those) are checked and hit OK. Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Microsoft Exchange List Server [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 1:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: rehome 10,000 PFs. Hi all, MSX55+sp4 Is there anyway to rehome at once all the public folders, distribution lists and custom recipients? thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MSX2000 restore
Hi all, MSX2000+SP3 I am using the following article http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;297289 I have got this error when starting the RESTORE The Specified computer is not a microsoft exchange server or its microsoft exchange services are not started Yes the services are started any ideas , could the problem be that we have the tape device on another server different than MSX2000? thanks, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
exchange2000 restore
Hi all, MSX2000+SP3 I am using the following article http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;297289 I have got this error when starting the RESTORE (using NTBACKUP from a server different than the exchange server), for the restore I have selected logfiles+mailbox store+public folder store. Unable to create the log path. Check to make sure that it is a valid path. for sure I am using a valid path, I have tried both a *valid* path on the computer where the tape device is and a *valid* path on the exchange server none of these work. any ideas? thanks, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MSX2000 restore
Hi all, MSX2000+SP3 I am using the following article http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;297289 I have got this error when starting the RESTORE The Specified computer is not a microsft exchange server or its microsoft exchange services are not started yes the services are started any ideas thanks, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Second SMTP
Thanks for prompt reply Chris, here are the articles, MS. Article no. Q317680 Q288756. I know that there are no. of 3rd party software. My management does not want to invest money on this, because they think this can be done without purchasing 3rd party software. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 7:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Re: Second SMTP What article is this? There are a number of 3rd party products which provide disclaimers without requiring a port change. What is it about this implementation which requires a non standard implementation? On 3/27/03 1:14, Exchange List [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For disclaimer MS gave some articles which I followed exactly, in one the article they wrote the procedure to add second smtp and change the port in outbound connection of default smtp to 26. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:Wednesday, March 26, 2003 8:57 PM To:Exchange Discussions Subject:Re: Second SMTP No idea, if you turn up protocol logging does it show any errors? Why port 26 again? On 3/26/03 0:29, Exchange List [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No. Let me refresh the scenario again. I have configured default smtp virtual server to send all outbound mails on port TCP 26, I have created a second smtp and configured it on TCP port 26, now everything is working fine except when a user of server A send the message to server B user, the recipient received blank email. It works fine when I delete the second smtp and bring back the default smtp on its original configuration. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:Tuesday, March 25, 2003 3:02 PM To:Exchange Discussions Subject:Re: Second SMTP If you remove the second virtual server, does the problem persist? On 3/25/03 0:17, Exchange List [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No Chris it is not working without disclaimer as well I have checked it. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:Monday, March 24, 2003 9:04 PM To:Exchange Discussions Subject:Re: Second SMTP Does it work correctly when you uninstall the disclaimer event sinks you have installed? On 3/24/03 0:15, Exchange List [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear List, I have created Second SMTP virtual server on Server A, The problem I am facing is when a user of Server A sends a message to Server B user it is received blank, what could be the problem? Configuration details:- Server A: Root Domain Windows 2000 sp3 Exchange 2000 sp2 Default SMTP Server Second SMTP Server Server B: Domain controller of server A. Exchange 2000 sp2 Windows 2000 sp3 Any help in this regard is highly appreciated. Please feel free to ask any question. Thanks in advance Regards, Irf _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto
RE: Full mailbox rights Send on Behalf
Hello, E2K, W2K SP3 + security fixes That use to work for us too! But last weekend I applied the Store Roll-up Hot fix for E2K post-SP3, and many W2K OS fixes, and we've started getting the same behavior as you see. What Exchange and OS level are you at? Brent -Original Message- From: Erik L. Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 9:28 AM Posted To: MS Exchange List Conversation: Full mailbox rights Send on Behalf Subject: Full mailbox rights Send on Behalf Hi, I have a few users who map to a single mailbox. With that said I have granted them 'Full mailbox rights' to that mailbox however when they send mail as that mailbox they are told they 'do not have permissions' I then went and gave them 'send on behalf' rights and that resolved it. I was under the impression users with 'Full Mailbox Rights' actually would be able to send as that mailbox/user. Could someone enlighten me on this one please? Thanks, Erik L. Vesneski Sr. Systems Specialist ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-685-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full mailbox rights Send on Behalf
Hello, The follow-up replier experiencing similar problems: E2K SP3 + Store Roll-Up Hot fix 811853 W2K SP3 + All Critical Security hotfixes Prior to the above patches and fixes being applied: Users that had FULL Mailbox Access given to them for another Mailbox were able to SEND AS that other Mailbox. That is, change the FROM of an outgoing Email to be that of the other Mailbox. This no longer works for them. We were previously at: E2K SP3 W2K SP2 Since Erik posted on it first, he gets to call PSS first. :-) Please share if you're given a fix ... as nothing is posted in the Public Knowledge Base yet. Thanks, Brent -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 11:39 AM Posted To: MS Exchange List Conversation: Full mailbox rights Send on Behalf Subject: Re: Full mailbox rights Send on Behalf Are they supposed to have send as or send on behalf of rights? If it's the former, do they have that right granted explicitly? On 3/26/03 11:28, Erik L. Vesneski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have a few users who map to a single mailbox. With that said I have granted them 'Full mailbox rights' to that mailbox however when they send mail as that mailbox they are told they 'do not have permissions' I then went and gave them 'send on behalf' rights and that resolved it. I was under the impression users with 'Full Mailbox Rights' actually would be able to send as that mailbox/user. Could someone enlighten me on this one please? Thanks, Erik L. Vesneski Sr. Systems Specialist ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-685-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Second SMTP
For disclaimer MS gave some articles which I followed exactly, in one the article they wrote the procedure to add second smtp and change the port in outbound connection of default smtp to 26. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 8:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Re: Second SMTP No idea, if you turn up protocol logging does it show any errors? Why port 26 again? On 3/26/03 0:29, Exchange List [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No. Let me refresh the scenario again. I have configured default smtp virtual server to send all outbound mails on port TCP 26, I have created a second smtp and configured it on TCP port 26, now everything is working fine except when a user of server A send the message to server B user, the recipient received blank email. It works fine when I delete the second smtp and bring back the default smtp on its original configuration. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:Tuesday, March 25, 2003 3:02 PM To:Exchange Discussions Subject:Re: Second SMTP If you remove the second virtual server, does the problem persist? On 3/25/03 0:17, Exchange List [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No Chris it is not working without disclaimer as well I have checked it. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:Monday, March 24, 2003 9:04 PM To:Exchange Discussions Subject:Re: Second SMTP Does it work correctly when you uninstall the disclaimer event sinks you have installed? On 3/24/03 0:15, Exchange List [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear List, I have created Second SMTP virtual server on Server A, The problem I am facing is when a user of Server A sends a message to Server B user it is received blank, what could be the problem? Configuration details:- Server A: Root Domain Windows 2000 sp3 Exchange 2000 sp2 Default SMTP Server Second SMTP Server Server B: Domain controller of server A. Exchange 2000 sp2 Windows 2000 sp3 Any help in this regard is highly appreciated. Please feel free to ask any question. Thanks in advance Regards, Irf _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Second SMTP
No even the attachments are not been received. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 5:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Second SMTP Do you by any chance get an attachment on the recipient end when you send a message? -- From: Exchange List Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 00:15 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Second SMTP It was working before but when I created second smtp which I will use for outbound mails, the message received by the user on server b gets blank message, yes message was typed in the message body. We are using Outlook 2000. Regards, irf -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 5:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Second SMTP Some questions: 1) Was this working before you added the second SMTP Virtual Server? 2) What client are you using to send the email? 3) By blank are you talking about the message body of the email? If so, was anything typed into it in the first place? Regards. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Exchange List Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 00:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Second SMTP Dear List, I have created Second SMTP virtual server on Server A, The problem I am facing is when a user of Server A sends a message to Server B user it is received blank, what could be the problem? Configuration details:- Server A: Root Domain Windows 2000 sp3 Exchange 2000 sp2 Default SMTP Server Second SMTP Server Server B: Domain controller of City A. Exchange 2000 sp2 Windows 2000 sp3 Any help in this regard is highly appreciated. Please feel free to ask any question. Thanks in advance Regards, Irf _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Second SMTP
No. Let me refresh the scenario again. I have configured default smtp virtual server to send all outbound mails on port TCP 26, I have created a second smtp and configured it on TCP port 26, now everything is working fine except when a user of server A send the message to server B user, the recipient received blank email. It works fine when I delete the second smtp and bring back the default smtp on its original configuration. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 3:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Re: Second SMTP If you remove the second virtual server, does the problem persist? On 3/25/03 0:17, Exchange List [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No Chris it is not working without disclaimer as well I have checked it. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:Monday, March 24, 2003 9:04 PM To:Exchange Discussions Subject:Re: Second SMTP Does it work correctly when you uninstall the disclaimer event sinks you have installed? On 3/24/03 0:15, Exchange List [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear List, I have created Second SMTP virtual server on Server A, The problem I am facing is when a user of Server A sends a message to Server B user it is received blank, what could be the problem? Configuration details:- Server A: Root Domain Windows 2000 sp3 Exchange 2000 sp2 Default SMTP Server Second SMTP Server Server B: Domain controller of server A. Exchange 2000 sp2 Windows 2000 sp3 Any help in this regard is highly appreciated. Please feel free to ask any question. Thanks in advance Regards, Irf _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Second SMTP
It was working before but when I created second smtp which I will use for outbound mails, the message received by the user on server b gets blank message, yes message was typed in the message body. We are using Outlook 2000. Regards, irf -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 5:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Second SMTP Some questions: 1) Was this working before you added the second SMTP Virtual Server? 2) What client are you using to send the email? 3) By blank are you talking about the message body of the email? If so, was anything typed into it in the first place? Regards. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Exchange List Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 00:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Second SMTP Dear List, I have created Second SMTP virtual server on Server A, The problem I am facing is when a user of Server A sends a message to Server B user it is received blank, what could be the problem? Configuration details:- Server A: Root Domain Windows 2000 sp3 Exchange 2000 sp2 Default SMTP Server Second SMTP Server Server B: Domain controller of City A. Exchange 2000 sp2 Windows 2000 sp3 Any help in this regard is highly appreciated. Please feel free to ask any question. Thanks in advance Regards, Irf _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Second SMTP
No Chris it is not working without disclaimer as well I have checked it. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 9:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Re: Second SMTP Does it work correctly when you uninstall the disclaimer event sinks you have installed? On 3/24/03 0:15, Exchange List [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear List, I have created Second SMTP virtual server on Server A, The problem I am facing is when a user of Server A sends a message to Server B user it is received blank, what could be the problem? Configuration details:- Server A: Root Domain Windows 2000 sp3 Exchange 2000 sp2 Default SMTP Server Second SMTP Server Server B: Domain controller of City A. Exchange 2000 sp2 Windows 2000 sp3 Any help in this regard is highly appreciated. Please feel free to ask any question. Thanks in advance Regards, Irf _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Second SMTP
Dear List, I have created Second SMTP virtual server on Server A, The problem I am facing is when a user of Server A sends a message to Server B user it is received blank, what could be the problem? Configuration details:- Server A: Root Domain Windows 2000 sp3 Exchange 2000 sp2 Default SMTP Server Second SMTP Server Server B: Domain controller of City A. Exchange 2000 sp2 Windows 2000 sp3 Any help in this regard is highly appreciated. Please feel free to ask any question. Thanks in advance Regards, Irf _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Disclaimer
Dear List, I have implemented disclaimer by using MS. Article no. Q317680 Q288756, The problem I am facing is when a user of City A sends a message to City B user it is received blank with disclaimer only, what could be the problem? Configuration details:- City A: Root Domain Windows 2000 sp3 Exchange 2000 sp2 Disclaimer script. City B: Domain controller of City A. Exchange 2000 sp2 Windows 2000 sp3 Any help in this regard is highly appreciated. Please feel free to ask any question. Regards, Irf _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations.....
I would recommend MX Logic's MX Spam Guard service. http://www.mxlogic.com In MX Logic lab tests the service catches 98.5% of spam with a false positive rate of 0.4% vs. Trend ScanMail eManager at 38% and false positve rate of 0.5%. Plus, administration of releasing quarantined false positives can be pushed to the users. The service starts at $0.75 per mailbox per month. I love ScanMail, but why pay for something like the eManager plug-in that doesn't work? Phil Isika -Original Message- From: Erik L. Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 5:48 PM Posted To: Swynk Conversation: SPAM blockin software recommendations. Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations. The best one I use was MailMarshall which was picked up by NetIQ. The app was awesome. Very good. Erik L. Vesneski Sr. Systems Specialist www.pmigroup.com Ph#: 925-685-6161 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 2:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations. I think you should check into TrendMicros' IMSS product if you're using Trend eManager. I think Messaglabs skyscan is one of the best service out there to catch spam, but it's costly and it catches too much until you customize it fit into your environment. I am implementing IMSS now, but I think it works, but not the best stuff out there. Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Dugas Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 8:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SPAM blockin software recommendations. Good Morning, I am currently using Trend eManager to block SPAM(in trial version still), it is not appearing to be very effective. What are some other options for blocking SPAM? Thanks in advance. Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Move MSX2000 server and keep the same name
Hi all Does anyone know if this method work? to move an exchange2000 to a new hardware and keep the same name http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;297289 any comments? thanks, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
move server keep same name
Hi all Does anyone try this method? to move an exchange2000 to a new hardware and keep the same name http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;297289 any comments? thanks, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Email Size Restriction
Dear list, I have single forest in which one root domain and 2 DC each one is running e2k, the 2 DC's are spread geographically, we have 128K of bandwidth which connects our DC's to the root domain. As we have a limited bandwidth my management wants that users belongs to DC1 site should unable to send mails heavier than 200k to users belong to root domain or to DC2 users, but can send mails locally to their users of any size. How can I achieve this task, any help in this regard is really appreciated. Thanks in advance Regards, Irf. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Out of topic -movetree
Hi All yes I have read Q238394, I am trying to move 500 users from one domain to another , I am getting an error that indicates that the source can not be verified /sdn CN=user1,OU=Users,DC=domain,DC=COM Do you know how to use movetree to move *some* users out of the default *Users* container from one domain to the *Users* container in another domain , in the same forest. Thanks, ER _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Out of topic -movetree
Hi Ed, yes we tested that possibility and it did work, the situation here is that the client who is going to do that does not want to go that way. so we are exploring the way of avoiding the intermmediate step, do you think is this a movetree.exe limitation, so far *Users* does not seem to be an OU, is movetree.exe moving OUs only? thanks, -er -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Out of topic -movetree Why don't you move the users you want to move into another OU and move that? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Microsoft Exchange List Server Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 8:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Out of topic -movetree Hi All yes I have read Q238394, I am trying to move 500 users from one domain to another , I am getting an error that indicates that the source can not be verified /sdn CN=user1,OU=Users,DC=domain,DC=COM Do you know how to use movetree to move *some* users out of the default *Users* container from one domain to the *Users* container in another domain , in the same forest. Thanks, ER _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Out of topic -movetree
lazy guys. ? the reson they gave us is *we do not want to modify anything or create anything just move the users* do you know if ADMT.exe will do the job and preserve the passwords? =er -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 9:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Out of topic -movetree And the client doesn't want to go that way exactly why? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Microsoft Exchange List Server Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Out of topic -movetree Hi Ed, yes we tested that possibility and it did work, the situation here is that the client who is going to do that does not want to go that way. so we are exploring the way of avoiding the intermmediate step, do you think is this a movetree.exe limitation, so far *Users* does not seem to be an OU, is movetree.exe moving OUs only? thanks, -er -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Out of topic -movetree Why don't you move the users you want to move into another OU and move that? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Microsoft Exchange List Server Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 8:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Out of topic -movetree Hi All yes I have read Q238394, I am trying to move 500 users from one domain to another , I am getting an error that indicates that the source can not be verified /sdn CN=user1,OU=Users,DC=domain,DC=COM Do you know how to use movetree to move *some* users out of the default *Users* container from one domain to the *Users* container in another domain , in the same forest. Thanks, ER _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange2000 to a new server
MSX2000+SP3 1forest,1Org We have bought a new server to move and preserve the name of our current exchange2000 server. Will be enough to obtain an exchange bakcup of the original server, then remove it from the domain, re-add to the domain and perform an exchange2000 restore over it..to make it operational in the new box? any other considerations? thanks, =er _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange2000 to a new server
Hi, Those steps seems to be ok if the servername will be different, in this case the server name must stay the same because this client routes their emails trhough another company and that *other* company uses the long email address to route the messages, and because the clients *wants* to keep it the same to avoid modifying the LMHOST files on remote dialers. Do you know of a set of instructions to do the move server to a new one and keep the same name? thanks, -ER -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 10:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2000 to a new server Always the easiest way to do this is http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxa.htm. Why do you feel you must retain the old server name? That is seldom if ever really necessary. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Microsoft Exchange List Server Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 9:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange2000 to a new server MSX2000+SP3 1forest,1Org We have bought a new server to move and preserve the name of our current exchange2000 server. Will be enough to obtain an exchange bakcup of the original server, then remove it from the domain, re-add to the domain and perform an exchange2000 restore over it..to make it operational in the new box? any other considerations? thanks, =er _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Deleting or moving system mailboxes
MSX2000+SP3
1ORG
Inside the first storage group we have created a second mailbox store
and moved all the mailboxes inside this one, so far there are three
mailboxes
pending to be moved but these ones do not have an associate NTaccount
how can we move these accounts before deleting the first mailbox store?
SystemMailbox{A9F54B99-6088-4CAA-8590-7C6614B818A1}
System Attendant
SMTP (SERVERNAME-{A9F54B99-6088-4CAA-8590-7C6614B818A1})
*we know we can move System Attendant using Q262892
*in the second mailbox store SystemMailbox and SMTP mailboxes do exist but
with differente hexadecimal numbers.
thanks,
-er
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Single instance storage anyway to revert?
Hi, Thanks for the info, yes I use move mailbox process from active directory users computers. Yes the final database in size is samller that the original, but some individual mailboxes are triple in size. -er -Original Message- From: McBee, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 12:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Single instance storage anyway to revert? Hu I am resaonbly sure that this should NOT have happened. UNLESS you used ExMerge to move the mail out to a PST and then imported it back in. How did you move the mailboxes? If you use the Move option in Exchange Tasks to move a mailbox, Single Instance Store is preserved. And even if it was not, then the size of the store would grow, not the actual mailbox. There is a 3rd party (C2C's MaxCompression) that will go through the store and compress attachments provided the attachment is only associated with one message. Jim McBee -Original Message- From: Microsoft Exchange List Server [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, February 14, 2003 8:18 PM Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List Conversation: Single instance storage anyway to revert? Subject: Single instance storage anyway to revert? MSX2000+SP3 1forest After moving from one mailbox store to a second (same server) all the mailboxes arrved to the new store with sizes at least twiece bigger as in the original, anyway to reduce or compress or set back to original size the mailbox sizes in the new store? Thanks, -er _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Single instance storage anyway to revert?
MSX2000+SP3 1forest After moving from one mailbox store to a second (same server) all the mailboxes arrved to the new store with sizes at least twiece bigger as in the original, anyway to reduce or compress or set back to original size the mailbox sizes in the new store? Thanks, -er _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
KMS
Dear All, is their any best practice articles on deploying KMS (E2K). Regards, Irf. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
servername limited same as in 55?
MSX2000+sp3 1 Org Hi All We have two exchange servers in our organization A B, we are going to rehome everything from server A to B (mailboxes, public folder, systems folders, dls) once rehomed can we just rename the servername fom B to A and expect exchange2000 to work? we remember that In 5.5 the servername should not be rename it. rgds, -er _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: servername limited same as in 55?
Aha! no this is not a DC, hence if i run DCPROMO on that box I will avoid that problem? Please do you have a Q-article as a reference Rgds, ER -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 2:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: servername limited same as in 55? Yes, unless it's a DC. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Microsoft Exchange List Server Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 3:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: servername limited same as in 55? MSX2000+sp3 1 Org Hi All We have two exchange servers in our organization A B, we are going to rehome everything from server A to B (mailboxes, public folder, systems folders, dls) once rehomed can we just rename the servername fom B to A and expect exchange2000 to work? we remember that In 5.5 the servername should not be rename it. rgds, -er _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
how to prevent logon during move mailbox
MSX2000+SP3 1 forest Do we have any Qarticle explaining how to prevent logon during an exchage 2000 move mailbox process? I have tried the article below it does work for msx2000 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;218920 thanks, -er _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: how to prevent logon during move mailbox
yes from MSX2000 to MSX2000 thansk, -er -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 3:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: how to prevent logon during move mailbox From Exchange 2000 to Exchange 2000? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Microsoft Exchange List Server Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: how to prevent logon during move mailbox MSX2000+SP3 1 forest Do we have any Qarticle explaining how to prevent logon during an exchage 2000 move mailbox process? I have tried the article below it does work for msx2000 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;218920 thanks, -er _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
replace MSX2000 with new HW.
MSX2000+SP3, Native mode 1 ORG Native W2K-AD We currently operate with 1 MSX2000 we are buying two new servers and we want to discard the current one (called serverA), the MSX2000 servers are member servers (no DNS, no GC) Server A is the first and unique MSX2000 in the Org. have you ever done something similar to this? for sure tape backups will be prepared. 1) Wait for the two new servers (B C), load Windows2000+ all necessary patches 2) ADD server *B* to AD, install Exchange2000, prepare server *C* offline and name it *A* 2) Move the maiboxes from *A* to server *B* 3) Disconnect *A* from the domain (remove that computername from the AD, disconnect lan cable) 4) ADD *A* to the Active Directory, install exchange2000 5) Move the mailboxes back from server *B* to new *A* -special interest in point 5 is B going to recognize the new A and viceversa? note: we are doing the move mailbox because there is a corruption (checksum error) on the currentdatabase, this checksum error is not causing any problem to the users but the backup does not finish. we are buying two new servers because we are going to install -later- the Legato co-standby solution. Rgds, -er _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automatic template response
MSx55+SP4 Do you know what do I need to configure to allow an automatic reply (with a template) for each message received by one of our mailboxes. We tried outofoffice rules and rules but we got a subject like out of office with the first one and the rules only work if the client is open. Rgds, -er _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: user object deleted mailbox still there
Problem solved thanks to the brilliant 100% technical idea of Chris on involving the janitor -er -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 1:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: user object deleted mailbox still there Perhaps if you print out the article and pay the janitor to read it to you slowly. On 1/24/03 11:21, Microsoft Exchange List Server [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: HI this is what the article says and what we have done, This also means that if you mistakenly delete a mail-enabled user account, you can recreate that user object, and then reconnect that mailbox during the mailbox retention period. results: after recreating the userobject the reconnect mailbox is not available is gray-out -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 10:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: user object deleted mailbox still there What have you still not done so far? Apparently it's type in the magical search term I mentioned previously and actually read the KB articles which come up. The /very first one/ addresses this issue. /spoon feeding On 1/23/03 23:32, Microsoft Exchange List Server [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The reconnect option is gray-out on themailbox..the purge option too the mailbox does not have the red cross We have recreated the ntuser still can not delete the mailbox..what we want is to delete the mailbox seems that MSX2000 does not like deleting the user first... -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 9:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: user object deleted mailbox still there What have you tried so far? Apparently not typing the magical search terms reconnect mailbox into support.microsoft.com. On 1/23/03 23:07, Microsoft Exchange List Server [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: MSX2000+SP3 W2K-AD (1forest) we have deleted the user but not the mailbox, how can we deleted the mailbox? we have recreated the user but there is nothing evident to recconnect it to the existent mailbox thanks, -er _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: user object deleted mailbox still there
HI this is what the article says and what we have done, This also means that if you mistakenly delete a mail-enabled user account, you can recreate that user object, and then reconnect that mailbox during the mailbox retention period. results: after recreating the userobject the reconnect mailbox is not available is gray-out -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 10:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: user object deleted mailbox still there What have you still not done so far? Apparently it's type in the magical search term I mentioned previously and actually read the KB articles which come up. The /very first one/ addresses this issue. /spoon feeding On 1/23/03 23:32, Microsoft Exchange List Server [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The reconnect option is gray-out on themailbox..the purge option too the mailbox does not have the red cross We have recreated the ntuser still can not delete the mailbox..what we want is to delete the mailbox seems that MSX2000 does not like deleting the user first... -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 9:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: user object deleted mailbox still there What have you tried so far? Apparently not typing the magical search terms reconnect mailbox into support.microsoft.com. On 1/23/03 23:07, Microsoft Exchange List Server [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: MSX2000+SP3 W2K-AD (1forest) we have deleted the user but not the mailbox, how can we deleted the mailbox? we have recreated the user but there is nothing evident to recconnect it to the existent mailbox thanks, -er _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ntbackup - msx2000
MSX2000+SP3 1 forest 1 MSX organization HI all We have been told by HP that ntbackup does not support DLT7* backup devices. Could you recommend another tape device to obtain an Exchange backup using ntbackup? Is it posiible to perform the ntbackup from a different server? Our backupexec is saying *could not verified corrupt file* and the logs are not flushed Thanks, -er _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
