RE: Urgent Confidential

2003-08-27 Thread Kretche, Peter
Actually it was David Hannum, not W.C. Fields and not P.T. Barnum who
said it.  But who's really keeping track. 




Thank you,
Pete Kretche
MCP, A+
Network Systems Administrator
UW - Green Bay
920.465.5014
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Creativity is allowing yourself to make mistakes. Art is knowing which
ones to keep. - Scott Adams


-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Urgent  Confidential

As W.C. Fields once said there's a sucker born every minute.

 --
 From: Bob Sadler
 Reply To: Exchange Discussions
 Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 11:15 AM
 To:   Exchange Discussions
 Subject:  RE: Urgent  Confidential
 
 Really?  I can't believe that!  I mean you have to believe there are 
 hundreds of banks with this very problem!  Who in their right mind 
 would not take advantage to get all that money!  You could be richer 
 then Bill Gates in no time!
 
 
 
 Bob Sadler
 City of Leawood, KS, USA
 WAN/Internet Specialist
 913-339-6700 x194
 
 Get a Life!  Get TWO!  Play Second Life!
 http://secondlife.com/ss/?u=b4ebbfdd6af98a027fa7e89a86c55a68
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 11:06 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Urgent  Confidential
 
 
 There was an article a few months back in a local newspaper about some

 people who reacted on a similar mail, they turn out to request headed 
 paper, bank account numbers, swift codes etc... In the end their 
 savings account was empty, and not the other way around... K/
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: woensdag 27 augustus 2003 18:03
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Urgent  Confidential
 
 
 Hundreds?
 
 Wow!  You could rolling in the cash if you just respond!*
 
 
 
 Bob Sadler
 City of Leawood, KS, USA
 WAN/Internet Specialist
 913-339-6700 x194
 
 Get a Life!  Get TWO!  Play Second Life!
 http://secondlife.com/ss/?u=b4ebbfdd6af98a027fa7e89a86c55a68
 
 *Note - I'm being factitious of course -Original Message-
 From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:57 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Urgent  Confidential
 
 
 We get hundreds of those every day. How did he get on this list? Did
he
 subscribe?
 
 Kind regards, 
 Kim Schotanus
 ===
 Kim Schotanus
 Information Systems Manager
  
 INTAS
 Avenue des Arts 58
 B-1000 Brussels
 Belgium
  
 T. +32 2 549 01 11
 F. +32 2 549 01 56
  
 ===
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: woensdag 27 augustus 2003 16:08
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Urgent  Confidential
 
 
 Onuigbo is my new buddy. Always wanted a lawyer friend called Onuigbo
 
 From: Bob Sadler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: Urgent  Confidential
 Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 09:04:26 -0500
 
 WOW!  25 Million Dollars!  SIGN ME UP NOW!
 
 
 
 Bob Sadler
 City of Leawood, KS, USA
 WAN/Internet Specialist
 913-339-6700 x194
 
 Get a Life!  Get TWO!  Play Second Life!
 http://secondlife.com/ss/?u=b4ebbfdd6af98a027fa7e89a86c55a68
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Baldwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 9:03 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Urgent  Confidential
 
 
 Dear Sir/Madam,
 
 I am Mr. Onuigbo Baldwin Gozie, Bank Manager of Diamond Bank, Lagos
 Branch. I have urgent and very confidential business proposition for
you
 Mr. Barry Kelly made a numbered time (Fixed) deposited for twelve
 calendar months, valued at US$25,000,000.00 (Twenty-five Million
 Dollars) in my branch. Upon maturity, I sent a routine notification to
 his forwarding address but got no reply. After a month, we sent a
 reminder and finally we discovered from his contract employers,
Nigerian
 National Petroleum Corporation that Mr. Barry Kelly died from an
 automobile accident. On further investigation, I found out that he did
 not leave a WILL and all attempts to trace his next of kin were
 fruitless. I therefore made further investigation and discovered that
 Mr. Barry Kelly did not declare any next of kin in all his official
 documents, including his Bank Deposit paperwork. This sum of
 US$25,000,000.00 is still sitting in the Bank and the interest is
being
 rolled over with the principal sum at the end of each year. No one
will
 come forward to claim it. According to the Nigerian Law, at the
 expiration of 6{Six} years, the money will revert to the ownership of
 the Nigerian Government if nobody applies to claim the funds
 Consequently, my proposal is that I will like you as a foreigner to
 stand in as the next of kin to Mr. Barry Kelly so that the fruits of
 this 

Message filter in Exchange 2000

2002-12-19 Thread Kretche, Peter
I am quite familiar with Q258696 about modifying global settings in Exchange 2000 and 
have read the section on Creating a Message Filter List.  In that section it gives 
the following examples on adding filters.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*@ domain.com
user@*. domain.com
*@*. domain.com

I want to do a different filter and it hasn't work and I'm wondering if anyone can 
explain why or how I would set this type of filter up.

*@bounce.*.*

If anyone has any insight into this, I would greatly appreciate it.


-
Thank you,
Pete Kretche
MCP, A+
Network Systems Administrator
University of Wisconsin - Green Bay
(920) 465-5014
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Must be Fri 13th

2002-12-13 Thread Kretche, Peter
I vote server.  But doing both wouldn't hurt.

-Original Message-
From: Don Couch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 3:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Must be Fri 13th


To all:

Is it me? Or is it my stupid head cold?

I, for the life of me, by reading this KDB article, can not determine whether my 
server machine or client machine needs to be upgraded.

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;305596

The situation:

Workstation: Windows 2000 SP1 running Outlook 2000 SR1 outside the network.
Server: Windows 2000 Server SP2, Exchange 2000 SP2

I try to hook up to the server from outside the network (all traffic from specific IP 
is passed through the FW). I can connect but I get the following when Outlook runs:

Unable to expand the folder. The set of folders could not be opened. The information 
store could not be opened. 

I checked the above article and am not sure which to upgrade (DON'T want to upgrade 
the server as of yet).

If you feel up to it, I appreciate your comments.

Aloha,

Don Couch
Systems Administrator
808-891-7915
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Pacific Disaster Center/East West Center
590 Lipoa Parkway Suite 259
Kihei, HI. 96753

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Microsoft's goof making my life miserable

2002-10-16 Thread Kretche, Peter

In the glory days of Exchange 5.5 there was a reg hack one could do to limit the total 
number of recipients in a message without having an adverse effect on Distribution 
Lists being in the message.  Now with Exchange 2000 and AD, every recipient in a DL is 
counted towards the total recipient count.  This is quite troublesome when we have 
several large distribution lists.  Has anyone found a workaround to this or is this 
something we have to live with?

-
Thank you,
Pete Kretche
MCP, A+
Network Systems Administrator
University of Wisconsin - Green Bay
(920) 465-5014
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Maximum Recipients per Message Limit.

2002-10-16 Thread Kretche, Peter

In the glory days of Exchange 5.5 there was a reg hack one could do to limit the total 
number of recipients in a message without having an adverse effect on Distribution 
Lists being in the message.  Now with Exchange 2000 and AD, every recipient in a DL is 
counted towards the total recipient count.  This is quite troublesome when we have 
several large distribution lists.  Is there a workaround to this or is this something 
we have to live with?

-
Thank you,
Pete Kretche
MCP, A+
Network Systems Administrator
University of Wisconsin - Green Bay
(920) 465-5014
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Event ID 8213

2002-10-15 Thread Kretche, Peter

I've been getting a repeating error message in my Eventlog on my Exchange 2000 SP3 
server that us running the RUS.  The following error message comes up once very 25 
minutes:

Event Type: Error
Event Source:   MSExchangeFBPublish
Event Category: General 
Event ID:   8213
Date:   10/15/2002
Time:   8:31:31 AM
User:   N/A
Computer:   MSA
Description:
System Attendant Service failed to create session for virtual machine MSA. The error 
number is 0x80044501. 

For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. 

I found Q296151 and tried doing the fix in the article however, it has not taken care 
of the error.  I find steps 9-11 a bit confusing though, and maybe I'm not setting the 
security correctly.  Does anyone have any insight to this error or maybe help me 
interpret the fix from PSS?

-
Thank you,
Pete Kretche
MCP, A+
Network Systems Administrator
University of Wisconsin - Green Bay
(920) 465-5014
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Event ID 8213

2002-10-15 Thread Kretche, Peter

I've been getting a repeating error message in my Eventlog on my Exchange 2000 SP3 
server that us running the RUS.  The following error message comes up once very 25 
minutes:

Event Type: Error
Event Source:   MSExchangeFBPublish
Event Category: General 
Event ID:   8213
Date:   10/15/2002
Time:   8:31:31 AM
User:   N/A
Computer:   MSA
Description:
System Attendant Service failed to create session for virtual machine MSA. The error 
number is 0x80044501. 

For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. 

I found Q296151 and tried doing the fix in the article however, it has not taken care 
of the error.  I find steps 9-11 a bit confusing though, and maybe I'm not setting the 
security correctly.  Does anyone have any insight to this error or maybe help me 
interpret the fix from PSS?

-
Thank you,
Pete Kretche
MCP, A+
Network Systems Administrator
University of Wisconsin - Green Bay
(920) 465-5014
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Resolve hidden users

2002-09-23 Thread Kretche, Peter

In Exchange 5.5 it was possible to resolve a hidden user based on the Distinguished 
Name.  Is it possible to do something similar with Exchange 2000?  We have students 
who for one reason or another do not want to have their e-mail address published in 
the GAL.  So far, I've only found articles talking about how Outlook resolves the user 
name based on the GAL.  If anyone out there in Guru Land has some ideas or 
suggestions, I'm all ears.

-
Thank you,
Pete Kretche
MCP, A+
Network Systems Administrator
University of Wisconsin - Green Bay
(920) 465-5014
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Resolve hidden users

2002-09-23 Thread Kretche, Peter

In Exchange 5.5 it was possible to resolve a hidden user based on the Distinguished 
Name.  Is it possible to do something similar with Exchange 2000?  We have students 
who for one reason or another do not want to have their e-mail address published in 
the GAL.  So far, I've only found articles talking about how Outlook resolves the user 
name based on the GAL.  If anyone out there in Guru Land has some ideas or 
suggestions, I'm all ears.

-
Thank you,
Pete Kretche
MCP, A+
Network Systems Administrator
University of Wisconsin - Green Bay
(920) 465-5014
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Resolve hidden users

2002-09-23 Thread Kretche, Peter

Actually I'm trying to resolve the mailbox when the user opens Outlook.  In the past 
we would put the Distinguished Name in the Mailbox: box in setting up the profile.  
Then by clicking Check Name, the name would resolve to the user's mailbox.  Now that 
doesn't work and I was wondering if anyone found a workaround for this.

-Pete

-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users


You mean when you type an address in the to field and the LDAP querrie
comes up with who it is for? 

--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
What are you on about mate?


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kretche, Peter
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 6:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Resolve hidden users


In Exchange 5.5 it was possible to resolve a hidden user based on the
Distinguished Name.  Is it possible to do something similar with
Exchange 2000?  We have students who for one reason or another do not
want to have their e-mail address published in the GAL.  So far, I've
only found articles talking about how Outlook resolves the user name
based on the GAL.  If anyone out there in Guru Land has some ideas or
suggestions, I'm all ears.

-
Thank you,
Pete Kretche
MCP, A+
Network Systems Administrator
University of Wisconsin - Green Bay
(920) 465-5014
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Resolve hidden users

2002-09-23 Thread Kretche, Peter

Not really an option for 300 users and mandatory profiles.  Thought about doing it 
though.

-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users


Unhide the mailbox and then do it.  Then hide it again.

-Original Message-
From: Kretche, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 10:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users


Actually I'm trying to resolve the mailbox when the user opens Outlook.
In the past we would put the Distinguished Name in the Mailbox: box in
setting up the profile.  Then by clicking Check Name, the name would
resolve to the user's mailbox.  Now that doesn't work and I was
wondering if anyone found a workaround for this.

-Pete

-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users


You mean when you type an address in the to field and the LDAP querrie
comes up with who it is for? 

--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
What are you on about mate?


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kretche, Peter
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 6:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Resolve hidden users


In Exchange 5.5 it was possible to resolve a hidden user based on the
Distinguished Name.  Is it possible to do something similar with
Exchange 2000?  We have students who for one reason or another do not
want to have their e-mail address published in the GAL.  So far, I've
only found articles talking about how Outlook resolves the user name
based on the GAL.  If anyone out there in Guru Land has some ideas or
suggestions, I'm all ears.

-
Thank you,
Pete Kretche
MCP, A+
Network Systems Administrator
University of Wisconsin - Green Bay
(920) 465-5014
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Resolve hidden users

2002-09-23 Thread Kretche, Peter

You are correct with your first statement.  We are trying to resolve a hidden user 
during the profile set up.  All other users resolve just fine.

-Original Message-
From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users


Your trying to resolve a hidden user. Is that the situation or is this now
another problem?


-Original Message-
From: Kretche, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users


Actually I'm trying to resolve the mailbox when the user opens 
Outlook.  In the past we would put the Distinguished Name in 
the Mailbox: box in setting up the profile.  Then by clicking 
Check Name, the name would resolve to the user's mailbox.  
Now that doesn't work and I was wondering if anyone found a 
workaround for this.

-Pete

-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users


You mean when you type an address in the to field and the LDAP querrie
comes up with who it is for? 

--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
What are you on about mate?


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kretche, Peter
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 6:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Resolve hidden users


In Exchange 5.5 it was possible to resolve a hidden user based on the
Distinguished Name.  Is it possible to do something similar with
Exchange 2000?  We have students who for one reason or another do not
want to have their e-mail address published in the GAL.  So far, I've
only found articles talking about how Outlook resolves the user name
based on the GAL.  If anyone out there in Guru Land has some ideas or
suggestions, I'm all ears.

-
Thank you,
Pete Kretche
MCP, A+
Network Systems Administrator
University of Wisconsin - Green Bay
(920) 465-5014
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Resolve hidden users

2002-09-23 Thread Kretche, Peter

That doesn't seem to work either.  According to Q253828, the Recipient Update Service 
uses the msExchHideFromAddressLists attribute to build address lists and if this is 
set to TRUE, then it's not in an address book and then it can't be resolved.  Ah 
well, I may just have to accept defeat on this one.

-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 3:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users


So have you tried the LegacyExchangeDN yet?

-Original Message-
From: Kretche, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 12:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users


You are correct with your first statement.  We are trying to resolve a hidden user 
during the profile set up.  All other users resolve just fine.

-Original Message-
From: EXTERN Hlabse Tony (Tek Systems;RBNA/CIT1)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users


Your trying to resolve a hidden user. Is that the situation or is this now
another problem?


-Original Message-
From: Kretche, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users


Actually I'm trying to resolve the mailbox when the user opens 
Outlook.  In the past we would put the Distinguished Name in 
the Mailbox: box in setting up the profile.  Then by clicking 
Check Name, the name would resolve to the user's mailbox.  
Now that doesn't work and I was wondering if anyone found a 
workaround for this.

-Pete

-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users


You mean when you type an address in the to field and the LDAP querrie
comes up with who it is for? 

--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
What are you on about mate?


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kretche, Peter
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 6:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Resolve hidden users


In Exchange 5.5 it was possible to resolve a hidden user based on the
Distinguished Name.  Is it possible to do something similar with
Exchange 2000?  We have students who for one reason or another do not
want to have their e-mail address published in the GAL.  So far, I've
only found articles talking about how Outlook resolves the user name
based on the GAL.  If anyone out there in Guru Land has some ideas or
suggestions, I'm all ears.

-
Thank you,
Pete Kretche
MCP, A+
Network Systems Administrator
University of Wisconsin - Green Bay
(920) 465-5014
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: SPYWARE called WINWHATWHERE is not detected by ANTI-VIRUS

2002-07-25 Thread Kretche, Peter

http://www.anti-keyloggers.com/

-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 10:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPYWARE called WINWHATWHERE is not detected by ANTI-VIRUS


Too small, ever since HIPPA started gearing up our blocking list has grown
to 78 items :o

-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 9:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SPYWARE called WINWHATWHERE is not detected by ANTI-VIRUS

Reason Number 3842 to use The Blackstone Blocking list.  Or at least .exe
man!

-Original Message-
From: Muqeem Syed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 8:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SPYWARE called WINWHATWHERE is not detected by ANTI-VIRUS


Dear All,
Has anyone come across a spyware called winwhatwhere it was mailed to a
user here and he opened it... 
It was programmed to capture the keystrokes for all passwords... and
e-mailed as an attachment... 
Is there any reputable anti-virus that can actually detect such malicious
spywares ... we have norton for exchange, and desktops and file and prin
servers... it failed to detect it... furthermore when contacted we were
informed that since it is a spyware... norton is designed to ignore such
programmed.. like SPYWARE.. since it doesnt want the unsuspecting users to
panic unneccessarily I did read about a software called bodetect that
claims to stop this kind of programme and infact zonealarm informs the
user ... anytime that this winwhatwhere attemtps to connect to the hotmail
server on port 25 to stealthly send the email attachment and inform that a
programmed was attempting to make an outgoing connection on port 25... ..
but other than this personal firewall... are you folks aware of any software
that can actually detect all spywares
In case any one of you is interested.. just go to www.winwhatwhere.com

regards

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Scripting account creation

2002-07-05 Thread Kretche, Peter

I'm trying to edit our user creation script to build Exchange 2000 accounts
and I'm having some difficulty with CDOEXM.  I keep getting the error There
is no such object on the server. when I use the following code:

set objmailbox = usr
objmailbox.createmailbox LDAP://ADMINT/CN=Mailbox Store (MST),cn=First
Storage Group,cn=InformationStore,cn=MST,cn=servers,cn=First Administrative
Group,cn=Administrative Groups,cn=UW-Green Bay,cn=Microsoft
Exchange,cn=services,cn=configuration,cn=uwgb,cn=edu

This is a test domain, ADMINT is my DC and GC, MST is my Exchange Server.
If anyone has any insight into this error, I would appreciate your thoughts.
I've tried msdn.microsoft.com but the example scripts don't help (most have
typos that make it even harder to decipher).

-
Thank you,
Pete Kretche
MCP, A+
Network Systems Administrator
University of Wisconsin - Green Bay
(920) 465-5014
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Exchange 5.5 to 2000 upgrade issue.

2002-06-25 Thread Kretche, Peter

Recently we began our Exchange 5.5 to 2000 upgrade and an issue has come up
that wasn't discovered in testing.  We have several users with hidden
mailboxes for one reason or another.  Most just want privacy and don't want
their information available.  Anyhow, under Exchange 5.5 with MAPI clients
(Outlook 9x/2000/XP) we were able to resolve those hidden mailboxes by using
Distinguished Name in a .prf file (i.e.
/o=uwgreenbay/ou=uwgb/cn=recipients/cn=kretchep).  However, we are finding
when trying to resolve a name to an Exchange 2000 server using Distinguished
Name in a profile, it does not work if the user is hidden.  Has anyone found
a way to resolve hidden mailboxes in Exchange 2000 or is this an issue that
can not be worked around?
 
-
Thank you,
Pete Kretche
MCP, A+
Network Systems Administrator
University of Wisconsin - Green Bay
(920) 465-5014
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 upgrade issue.

2002-06-25 Thread Kretche, Peter

Ok, that attribute has the data I need, but how do I get the Outlook client
to read it?

-
Thank you,
Pete Kretche
MCP, A+
Network Systems Administrator
University of Wisconsin - Green Bay
(920) 465-5014
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 3:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 upgrade issue.

Typing is bad today: legacyExchangeDN

-Original Message-
From: Exchange 
Posted At: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 3:27 PM
Posted To: Exchange
Conversation: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 upgrade issue.
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 upgrade issue.

Try the legacyExchnageDN.

-Original Message-
From: Kretche, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 2:41 PM
Posted To: Exchange
Conversation: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 upgrade issue.
Subject: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 upgrade issue.

Recently we began our Exchange 5.5 to 2000 upgrade and an issue has come up
that wasn't discovered in testing.  We have several users with hidden
mailboxes for one reason or another.  Most just want privacy and don't want
their information available.  Anyhow, under Exchange 5.5 with MAPI clients
(Outlook 9x/2000/XP) we were able to resolve those hidden mailboxes by using
Distinguished Name in a .prf file (i.e.
/o=uwgreenbay/ou=uwgb/cn=recipients/cn=kretchep).  However, we are finding
when trying to resolve a name to an Exchange 2000 server using Distinguished
Name in a profile, it does not work if the user is hidden.  Has anyone found
a way to resolve hidden mailboxes in Exchange 2000 or is this an issue that
can not be worked around?
 
-
Thank you,
Pete Kretche
MCP, A+
Network Systems Administrator
University of Wisconsin - Green Bay
(920) 465-5014
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Outlook and Mandatory Profiles

2001-11-19 Thread Kretche, Peter

Colin-
We use oProfile (included in Office 2000) to keep user settings.  The only 2
settings we can't keep is the mounting of additional mailboxes, and the
adding of shortcuts to the shortcut bar.  By the way, if anyone knows a fix
for this, I would appreciate it.  OProfile will create a .ops file ~800K in
size.  Hopefully your users have storage space on a server for this file, or
point it to the floppy drive and have the users carry a settings disk that
is read on logon.

Pete

-Original Message-
From: Colin J Revell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 11:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook and Mandatory Profiles


Thanks for that, I have altered the profgen switches ( remover the -U)
and now I can get the name to stick, I just need to work out how to get
the users changes to stick.

My original note for this was 

2. Customisations to Outlook (i.e. Outlook Shortcut Bar, and Views) are
not retained when a users closes Outlook


Colin

-Original Message-
From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19 November 2001 17:26
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook and Mandatory Profiles


I misinterpreted the profile thing; too many profiles - one for 2000,
one
for Outlook ;-)

www.slipstick.com may have some answers for q1 - With the standard check
names I don't believe that you can do it, however.

If you update an existing profile rather than replace one, you should be
able to use the settings that reside on the remote drive. From distant
memory, this is an option on profgen or modprof, but I haven't got my
docs
to hand at the moment.

Tris
-
Deputy Systems  Network Manager
Cranfield University at Silsoe

-Original Message-
From: Colin J Revell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 19 November 2001 16:21
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook and Mandatory Profiles

The problem is that we have a large number of software titles, and the
software has to be changed often. I have over 1500 students that would
need to have their profiles adjusted to contain new shortcuts etc. I
have also been experiencing problems with profiles getting too big and
then  corrupting. This is instantly fixed with the mandatory profile.


Colin

-
Colin J Revell
B.Sc.(Hons) PGCE MCSE MCP+I
Information Systems Manager,
Oakham School



-Original Message-
From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19 November 2001 15:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook and Mandatory Profiles


You could use policies to restrict the majority of the settings that
users
play around with. This would then do away with the need to run profgen
every
time they log on. Of course, you will still get the error once when they
log
on for the first time, but this is a necessary evil, I feel.

An ADM file for the Outlook customisation settings in HKCU would do the
trick and then added to the student GPO.

Tris
-
Deputy Systems  Network Manager
Cranfield University at Silsoe

-Original Message-
From: Colin J Revell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 19 November 2001 14:36
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook and Mandatory Profiles

I am running a Windows 2000 native mode network with Exchange 2000. All
user workstations are Windows 2000 Pro. All users run a common mandatory
profile, with folder redirection set up for My Documents, AppData and
Desktop, that sends these items to their home directory. Each user has a
copy of Default.PRF in their home directory that is used to configure
Outlook 2000 as their mail client this is set up at logon using the
profgen util. I need to continue to use mandatory profiles as the pupils
have a tendency to adjust their settings.

I have 2 problems; 

1. Users who have logon initials that are similar to others (ie JW is
similar to JWP) have to choose their mailbox name every time they go in
to Outlook. Users with unique logon IDs do not have a problem.  I need
to get it to remember their mailbox name, once they have picked it from
the list the first time. I have already tried editing the Default.PRF in
the users home dir and replacing the initials with their full mailbox
name, but this has no benefit. I had always assumed that all this
information was kept in the application data folder.

2. Customisations to Outlook (i.e. Outlook Shortcut Bar, and Views) are
not retained when a users closes Outlook. 

Thanks for any help,

-
Colin J Revell
B.Sc.(Hons) PGCE MCSE(NT4) MCSE(Win2K) MCP+I
Information Systems Manager,
Oakham School, ICT Centre,
Ashwell Road, Oakham, Rutland. LE15 6QG.

The opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the individual and
not necessarily of Oakham School. Oakham School does not guarantee that
this e-mail has not been tampered with. Please be aware that messages
sent over the Internet may not be secure and should not be seen as
forming a legally binding contract unless otherwise stated. Without
Prejudice.