RE: Nimda
Hope this helps ... I can't even got on long enough to run anything. Depending upon what you're trying to run, you might be able to make use of Task Scheduler (or Schedule if your running NT4) to submit a job to run on your server. How do you find the machine that's affecting the rest of the network? If the .eml files are being dropped onto NTFS partitions, check to see who the Owner of the file is via the security properties. ... Joe -Original Message- From: Mike Omilian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Nimda I got nailed too. Not from an e-mail - I currently block all exe's. We must have gotten it from an infected web page. I already applied the patch for Code Red last month but my problem is a little bigger: I can't log onto the server without getting a Dr Watson error for explorer.exe. The server runs ok, but after I log on and the desktop comes up it generates the error. I can't even got on long enough to run anything. I did get the patch applied for the Transversal vulnerability, but I'm not sure if that helped. Now our network seems to be slowing down and people are having printing troubles too. Some people can't get their Outlook open - not enough system resources. . . We're all up to date with Virus software for Nimda, but the .eml files are still being created - but not on every machine. Wierd. How do you find the machine that's affecting the rest of the network? What virus software is everyone using for their NT servers (not for Exchange, but NT)? Any help would be GREATLY appreciated. Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email communication is intended as a private communication for the sole use of the primary addressee and those individuals listed for copies in the original message. The information contained in this email is private and confidential and if you are not an intended recipient you are hereby notified that copying, forwarding or other dissemination or distribution of this communication by any means is prohibited. If you are not specifically authorized to receive this email and if you believe that you received it in error please notify the original sender immediately. We honour similar requests relating to the privacy of email communications. Cette communication par courrier électronique est une communication privée à l'usage exclusif du destinataire principal ainsi que des personnes dont les noms figurent en copie. Les renseignements contenus dans ce courriel sont confidentiels et si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, vous êtes avisé, par les présentes que toute reproduction, tout transfert ou toute autre forme de diffusion de cette communication par quelque moyen que ce soit est interdit. Si vous n'êtes pas spécifiquement autorisé à recevoir ce courriel ou si vous croyez l'avoir reçu par erreur, veuillez en aviser l'expéditeur original immédiatement. Nous respectons les demandes similaires qui touchent la confidentialité des communications par courrier électronique. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Has anyone else encountered this?
Yeah, I know ... I used to design and build applications systems and would always keep Bullet-proofing in mind :) ... In any case, the problem has now gotten worse. Either the on-site technician or the client or possibly MSX has now screwed up what was originally functioning when I first posted this thread. Now the client can't display their own contacts and does not View menu does not even show a menu entry for Current View. I tried setting the contacts folder properties to the same as on my personal mailbox but still no go. ... Joe -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anyone else encountered this? How long have you been doing tech support? You should know that users will find a way! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Wong, Joe Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 9:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anyone else encountered this? That's always a possibilty; however, I tried to set up a filter with the same criteria on another mailbox and I try as I might, I couldn't fool Outlook into using a filter of Date Received on or after mm/dd/yy. ... Joe -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anyone else encountered this? Are you sure it was corruption and not user error? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Wong, Joe Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 7:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Has anyone else encountered this? I had encountered a client's mailbox which I believe had a corrupt Address Cards View Setting. The initial symptoms were that Outlook complained that it Could not access the folder, when a client (Mrs-X) tried to view the contacts folder for another mailbox to which she had been given permissions (Mr-Y). The client's view (Mrs-X) was set to Phone List and it would not even display her own contacts under the Address Cards view (it complained saying Outlook cannot display this view). Further investigation showed that there was a Advanced Contacts Filter in place on her Address Cards view; but the strange thing here, was that the criteria contained Date Received on or after mm/dd/yy. After removing the filter, everything functioned normally. Has anyone else seen this type of corruption (by the way, we're running MSX5.5 SP4)? ... Joe This email communication is intended as a private communication for the sole use of the primary addressee and those individuals listed for copies in the original message. The information contained in this email is private and confidential and if you are not an intended recipient you are hereby notified that copying, forwarding or other dissemination or distribution of this communication by any means is prohibited. If you are not specifically authorized to receive this email and if you believe that you received it in error please notify the original sender immediately. We honour similar requests relating to the privacy of email communications. Cette communication par courrier électronique est une communication privée à l'usage exclusif du destinataire principal ainsi que des personnes dont les noms figurent en copie. Les renseignements contenus dans ce courriel sont confidentiels et si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, vous êtes avisé, par les présentes que toute reproduction, tout transfert ou toute autre forme de diffusion de cette communication par quelque moyen que ce soit est interdit. Si vous n'êtes pas spécifiquement autorisé à recevoir ce courriel ou si vous croyez l'avoir reçu par erreur, veuillez en aviser l'expéditeur original immédiatement. Nous respectons les demandes similaires qui touchent la confidentialité des communications par courrier électronique. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email communication is intended as a private communication for the sole use
RE: Has anyone else encountered this?
Oopps .. this should make for a better read on the second last paragraph. Now the client can't even display the contents of her own Contacts folder. When she attempts to view the folder, Outlook reports back saying Unable to display the folder and the View menu does not show the usual menu entry for setting the Current View options. ... Joe -Original Message- From: Wong, Joe Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anyone else encountered this? Yeah, I know ... I used to design and build applications systems and would always keep Bullet-proofing in mind :) ... In any case, the problem has now gotten worse. Either the on-site technician or the client or possibly MSX has now screwed up what was originally functioning when I first posted this thread. Now the client can't display their own contacts and does not View menu does not even show a menu entry for Current View. I tried setting the contacts folder properties to the same as on my personal mailbox but still no go. ... Joe -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anyone else encountered this? How long have you been doing tech support? You should know that users will find a way! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Wong, Joe Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 9:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anyone else encountered this? That's always a possibilty; however, I tried to set up a filter with the same criteria on another mailbox and I try as I might, I couldn't fool Outlook into using a filter of Date Received on or after mm/dd/yy. ... Joe -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anyone else encountered this? Are you sure it was corruption and not user error? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Wong, Joe Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 7:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Has anyone else encountered this? I had encountered a client's mailbox which I believe had a corrupt Address Cards View Setting. The initial symptoms were that Outlook complained that it Could not access the folder, when a client (Mrs-X) tried to view the contacts folder for another mailbox to which she had been given permissions (Mr-Y). The client's view (Mrs-X) was set to Phone List and it would not even display her own contacts under the Address Cards view (it complained saying Outlook cannot display this view). Further investigation showed that there was a Advanced Contacts Filter in place on her Address Cards view; but the strange thing here, was that the criteria contained Date Received on or after mm/dd/yy. After removing the filter, everything functioned normally. Has anyone else seen this type of corruption (by the way, we're running MSX5.5 SP4)? ... Joe This email communication is intended as a private communication for the sole use of the primary addressee and those individuals listed for copies in the original message. The information contained in this email is private and confidential and if you are not an intended recipient you are hereby notified that copying, forwarding or other dissemination or distribution of this communication by any means is prohibited. If you are not specifically authorized to receive this email and if you believe that you received it in error please notify the original sender immediately. We honour similar requests relating to the privacy of email communications. Cette communication par courrier électronique est une communication privée à l'usage exclusif du destinataire principal ainsi que des personnes dont les noms figurent en copie. Les renseignements contenus dans ce courriel sont confidentiels et si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, vous êtes avisé, par les présentes que toute reproduction, tout transfert ou toute autre forme de diffusion de cette communication par quelque moyen que ce soit est interdit. Si vous n'êtes pas spécifiquement autorisé à recevoir ce courriel ou si vous croyez l'avoir reçu par erreur, veuillez en aviser l'expéditeur original immédiatement. Nous respectons les demandes similaires qui touchent la confidentialité des communications par courrier électronique. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe
RE: Has anyone else encountered this?
Actually, in my tests to see what was going on, I was doing this with a newly created profile on my workstation. Here's another stupid thing ... After I called our email administrators to ask if they had made any changes, between the yesterday morning when it was working (as tested by myself with a profile on my pc) and early this morning when it was failing (once again tested by myself). They said they didn't change anything and while speaking with them, I went in with a profile pointing to Mrs-X and tried accessing the contacts folder - got the message Unable to display the folder again - and then I tried Open other User's Folder and told it to open Mrs-X's contacts which I was already trying to view. Here's where the stupid part comes ine ... I was able to access her contacts folder by doing that, and after I closed off that window, and then tried opening the Contacts folder via the button on the Outlook Shortcuts, everything was back to normal (i.e. I nolonger received the Unable to display the folder message and the View dropdown now shows the Current View menu entry. !!!Go figure!!! :-( At this point, it now works Ok and I had the client re-test (she's happy now - while I'm still confused); and in the meantime, I've asked the email admins to carefully coordinate and log their maintenance activities when dealing with this specific mailbox (at least over the next couple of weeks). From my perspective, with the original filter configuration showing an invalid field and my dogged attempts (on my own mailbox), at trying to recreate a bad filter failing; I was thinking that the filter entry might have been related to a misplaced record pointer within the MSX database (i.e. that bad filter may have originally been associated with a different view such as a Inbox View and the MSX database pointers/indexes got mixed up causing it to be associated with a Contacts View). ... Joe -Original Message- From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anyone else encountered this? Have you had her try to log into her mailbox from a different machine and perform the same steps? Maybe the profile is hosed. Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Wong, Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 12:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anyone else encountered this? Oopps .. this should make for a better read on the second last paragraph. Now the client can't even display the contents of her own Contacts folder. When she attempts to view the folder, Outlook reports back saying Unable to display the folder and the View menu does not show the usual menu entry for setting the Current View options. ... Joe -Original Message- From: Wong, Joe Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anyone else encountered this? Yeah, I know ... I used to design and build applications systems and would always keep Bullet-proofing in mind :) ... In any case, the problem has now gotten worse. Either the on-site technician or the client or possibly MSX has now screwed up what was originally functioning when I first posted this thread. Now the client can't display their own contacts and does not View menu does not even show a menu entry for Current View. I tried setting the contacts folder properties to the same as on my personal mailbox but still no go. ... Joe -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anyone else encountered this? How long have you been doing tech support? You should know that users will find a way! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Wong, Joe Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 9:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anyone else encountered this? That's always a possibilty; however, I tried to set up a filter with the same criteria on another mailbox and I try as I might, I couldn't fool Outlook into using a filter of Date Received on or after mm/dd/yy. ... Joe -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Has anyone else encountered this? Are you sure it was corruption and not user error? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Wong, Joe Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 7:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Has anyone else encountered this? I had encountered
Has anyone else encountered this?
I had encountered a client's mailbox which I believe had a corrupt Address Cards View Setting. The initial symptoms were that Outlook complained that it Could not access the folder, when a client (Mrs-X) tried to view the contacts folder for another mailbox to which she had been given permissions (Mr-Y). The client's view (Mrs-X) was set to Phone List and it would not even display her own contacts under the Address Cards view (it complained saying Outlook cannot display this view). Further investigation showed that there was a Advanced Contacts Filter in place on her Address Cards view; but the strange thing here, was that the criteria contained Date Received on or after mm/dd/yy. After removing the filter, everything functioned normally. Has anyone else seen this type of corruption (by the way, we're running MSX5.5 SP4)? ... Joe This email communication is intended as a private communication for the sole use of the primary addressee and those individuals listed for copies in the original message. The information contained in this email is private and confidential and if you are not an intended recipient you are hereby notified that copying, forwarding or other dissemination or distribution of this communication by any means is prohibited. If you are not specifically authorized to receive this email and if you believe that you received it in error please notify the original sender immediately. We honour similar requests relating to the privacy of email communications. Cette communication par courrier électronique est une communication privée à l'usage exclusif du destinataire principal ainsi que des personnes dont les noms figurent en copie. Les renseignements contenus dans ce courriel sont confidentiels et si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, vous êtes avisé, par les présentes que toute reproduction, tout transfert ou toute autre forme de diffusion de cette communication par quelque moyen que ce soit est interdit. Si vous n'êtes pas spécifiquement autorisé à recevoir ce courriel ou si vous croyez l'avoir reçu par erreur, veuillez en aviser l'expéditeur original immédiatement. Nous respectons les demandes similaires qui touchent la confidentialité des communications par courrier électronique. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Returned messages ... what could be wrong?
Does this happen when she replies to messages sent to her from those two mailboxes? -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Returned messages ... what could be wrong? These are valid IDs and are used by everyone... Mike Mitchell eMAIL Systems Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 -Original Message- From: Vans Evers, Frank W. SAIC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 12:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Returned messages ... what could be wrong? It looks like you tried to send a email to security and signons and those are not valid IDs. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 1:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Returned messages ... what could be wrong? Where do I begin to look to see what is happening here. I haven't a clue OUTLOOK 98/exchange 5.5 SP3... This user can send days upon without problems and then all of the sudden she gets two or three of these returned messages. Please help us. Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: RE: Info Security New Access Sent: 8/30/2001 11:33 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: SECURITY on 8/30/2001 11:35 AM The message was undelivered because the specified recipient postal address was incorrect MSEXCH:MSExchangeIS:Alverno:ONTEXIND01 SIGNONS on 8/30/2001 11:35 AM The message was undelivered because the specified recipient postal address was incorrect MSEXCH:MSExchangeIS:Alverno:ONTEXIND01 Regards, Mike Mitchell eMAIL Systems Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email communication is intended as a private communication for the sole use of the primary addressee and those individuals listed for copies in the original message. The information contained in this email is private and confidential and if you are not an intended recipient you are hereby notified that copying, forwarding or other dissemination or distribution of this communication by any means is prohibited. If you are not specifically authorized to receive this email and if you believe that you received it in error please notify the original sender immediately. We honour similar requests relating to the privacy of email communications. Cette communication par courrier électronique est une communication privée à l'usage exclusif du destinataire principal ainsi que des personnes dont les noms figurent en copie. Les renseignements contenus dans ce courriel sont confidentiels et si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, vous êtes avisé, par les présentes que toute reproduction, tout transfert ou toute autre forme de diffusion de cette communication par quelque moyen que ce soit est interdit. Si vous n'êtes pas spécifiquement autorisé à recevoir ce courriel ou si vous croyez l'avoir reçu par erreur, veuillez en aviser l'expéditeur original immédiatement. Nous respectons les demandes similaires qui touchent la confidentialité des communications par courrier électronique. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Using imsext.dll but looking for an alternative or some sugge stio ns
Hi Peter, Thanks for the suggestion. Do you know if it is possible to specify the complete smtp address in the IMS's Address Space (I was under the impression that it only handled domains)? If it can't be set up for specific smtp addresses (e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED]), then this presents a problem, as our security legal depts want the disclaimer to appear on all emails which do not have the specific requirement of leaving it off, and other emails to a specific domain or even the same address within the domain are supposed to have the disclaimer message turned on. Then again, even if it can be config'd for specific smtp addresses, legal/security may only want them to avoid the disclaimer on the specific emails with the requirement. So I'm in need of a solution which can be manually turned off at will by the sender, on a email by email basis; and then there is the possibility that security/legal may ask for it to only be capable of being overridden for specific sender's mailboxes. ... Joe -Original Message- From: Peter Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 5:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using imsext.dll but looking for an alternative or some sugge stio ns Hi Joe You could create another Exchange server with an IMS that is dedicated to those domains and addresses that have issues with the disclaimer and not run the disclaimer on those machines. Regards Peter Johnson -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 August 2001 13:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using imsext.dll but looking for an alternative or some sugge stio ns In the FAQ. (we've used Mimesweeper for SMTP to good effect for this) -Original Message- From: Wong, Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 August 2001 19:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Using imsext.dll but looking for an alternative or some suggestio ns Good morning to some and good afternoon to the others ... I'm assuming of course that you do go to sleep some time. 8-) We recently implemented the IMSEXT.DLL, in order to throw in the disclaimers which our security and legal departments were looking for. However, this is now causing issues on emails which MUST have only specific text in the body as they tend to ignore it or choke on it when they see disclaimer text as well. How are other people handling issues such as sending an unsubscribe message to a list when the unsubscribe message is only supposed to have a specific subject line and absolutely nothing in the message body? Does anyone know of any alternative products or settings I can use on IMSEXT.DLL or Exchange; which would let the clients override the dislaimer text on an email by email basis, or with the ability to override the auto-disclaimer for specific mailboxes? This requirement also extends to emails relayed off of our IMS (from behind our firewall of course). TIA ... Joe This email communication is intended as a private communication for the sole use of the primary addressee and those individuals listed for copies in the original message. The information contained in this email is private and confidential and If you are not an intended recipient you are hereby notified that copying, forwarding or other dissemination or distribution of this communication by any means is prohibited. If you are not specifically authorized to receive this email and if you believe that you received it in error please notify the original sender immediately. We honour similar requests relating to the privacy of email communications. Cette communication par courrier électronique est une communication privée à l'usage exclusif du destinataire principal ainsi que des personnes dont les noms figurent en copie. Les renseignements contenus dans ce courriel sont confidentiels et si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, vous êtes avisé, par les présentes que toute reproduction, transfert ou autre forme de diffusion de cette communication par quelque moyen que ce soit est interdite. Si vous n'êtes pas spécifiquement autorisé à recevoir ce courriel ou si vous croyez l'avoir reçu par erreur, veuillez en aviser l'expéditeur original immédiatement. Nous respectons les demandes similaires qui touchent la confidentialité des communications par courrier électronique. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use or disclose the information in any way, and notify me immediately. The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC, unless specifically stated
RE: Haiku Has Returned
As it is Friday I will make my first attempt to help Haiku live -Original Message- From: Ryan Malayter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Has Returned Servers are humming Management vacationing Now I go golfing -Original Message- From: Greg M. Hess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Has Returned Ben said pagan word In truth? First I thought absurd pagan word I heard g. -Original Message- From: LBWL.GWIA.[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri 8/17/2001 11:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: RE: Haiku Has Returned In short - it is a paganistic ritual (Oh sorry, thinking of the wrong thing). Seriously though, it is just a ritual that the list had been doing for a long time on Fridays. Haiku is a form of writing where there are 3 lines, each having a certain number of syllables. Specifically, 5, 7, 5. If you want to read more about it, check in the archives. I'm pathetic at these types of writing so I won't even attempt to do it. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Has Returned Can someone explain to me what Haiku Friday is? John Bowles Exchange Administrator NT Server Workstation Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Walden H. Leverich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Has Returned Tinki Winki knows I hear LaLa is his friend TeleTubbies rule! -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Has Returned I'm glad it's Friday Now we can play with answers Where is lala land? Bob -Original Message- From: Brad Roland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Hi, Ron we did that and it accepts the message. no mailbox is created and when we track the message we get an NDR generated. and the message goes to lala land. thanks -Original Message- From: Crumbaker, Ron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Do a Send Mail from AD to all of the users. This will populate your Exchange with the users from AD. Thank you, Ron Crumbaker, MCP Network Specialist [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPD, Inc. -An Employee Owned Company Office 270-685-6381 Fax 270-685-6212 -Original Message- From: Brad Roland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 We are trying to do a move mailbox upgrade. our current system is windows 2000 with exchange 5.5 we have a new system with windows 2000 and we installed exchange 2000 in the prescribed manner for the move mailbox method. on the new server we did forestprep domainprep installed adc installed exchange 2000. now the new server does not see any logons or mailboxes of our users. they show up in AD users and groups but not in exchange system manager. and when I try to move mail box on the new server all that shows up in the exchange tasks is create mailbox establish e-mail address enable IM. and on the old server all that shows up is delete mailbox. When I create a mailbox on new machine I can login to it but messages are sent to NDR (non deliverable). I am at a loss as to why this is happening should I uninstall and try again??? -- Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
