Problem with server reply in Rules Wizard

2003-09-23 Thread Alex Alborzfard
I set up a rule to have server reply using a specific message,
but although the condition is met, nothing happens. 
I I read somewhere that there's a 32K size limit with RPC packets, 
which is I think what this is, but I checked the size of the reply and it
would be only 535 Bytes.
Before doing this, I had tried (unsuccessfully) a server-side Auto-Reply
script (from CDOlive), but that didn't work either.

I have EX5.5, on NT 4 SP6.

Thanks

--Alex Alborzfard


-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 10:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Slooww OST sync over dialup


Nope - you want to use IP all the time..

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


 -Original Message-
 From: Rob Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 10:10 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Slooww OST sync over dialup
 
 
 Although when back in the office, plugged into the LAN, would
 you not want to use RPC?
 
 
 Regards,
 
 Rob Ellis
 IT Manager
 Samsara Group plc 
 Tel 023 9224 7979 
 Mob 07974 111867
 MCP BEng(hons)
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 23 September 2003 14:59
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Slooww OST sync over dialup
 
 
 Actually, remove everything but ncacn_ip_tcp
 
 That is, unless your'e running IPX/SPX or VNS across your
 dial up. Named
 pipes and RPC are pretty horrific, too.
 
 --
 Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
 Sr. Systems Administrator
 Inovis Inc.
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Rob Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 9:49 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Slooww OST sync over dialup
  
  
  
  Set HKLM\software\microsoft\exchange\exchange
  provider\rpc_binding_order
  
  To
  
  ncacn_ip_tcp,ncalrpc,ncacn_spx,ncacn_np,netbios,ncacn_vns_spp
  
  
  In actual fact, yours will have 'ncalrpc' listed first.  Move
  it along a bit.
  
  
  
  Regards,
  
  Rob Ellis
  IT Manager
  Samsara Group plc 
  Tel 023 9224 7979 
  Mob 07974 111867
  MCP BEng(hons)
  
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: 23 September 2003 14:46
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Slooww OST sync over dialup
  
  
  Does anyone know any reg hacks to speed up RPC over dialup?
  
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Tony Hlabse
  Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 10:29 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  
  
  What?
  
  
  From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: RE: Slooww OST sync over dialup
  Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 09:23:22 -0400
  
  Well it's over dialup and we don't pass anything other than
  IP over it so I 
  don't think it's that.  We can try it though.
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Ellis
  Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 8:38 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  
  RPC Binding order in the registry?
  
  
  Regards,
  
  Rob Ellis
  IT Manager
  Samsara Group plc
  Tel 023 9224 7979
  Mob 07974 111867
  MCP BEng(hons)
  
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: 22 September 2003 13:27
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: Slooww OST sync over dialup
  
  
  I think I have asked this before but didn't really get any
  responses.  We 
  have reps in the field that sync their Outlook 2002 clients 
  to an OST over 
  dialup.  For some reason it is very slow.  Now when they 
 sync it over
  broadband it takes about 30 seconds.  When they sync it over
  dialup even 
  after a full sync of their mailbox is done over broadband or 
  lan line, it 
  takes about 2 hours.  This doesn't make sense.  I know the 
  connection is 
  faster but I don't think that's it.  They don't have anything 
  to sync.  I 
  have changed the server timeout to 120 seconds with no luck.  
  Is there like 
  a reg key or something that I can change to make this faster. 
   We need to 
  stick to OST files because we have public folders and 
  calendars that need to 
  be online.  We are also using EX2000 SP3 if that matters but 
  I think this is 
  more Outlook than Exchange.
  
  Thanks,
   
  Alex
  
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Web Interface:
  http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget
  ext_mode=lang=english
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  

Re: Problem with server reply in Rules Wizard

2003-09-23 Thread Tony Hlabse
It's not the size of one rule but all of them. Is there more than one rule 
setup?



From: Alex Alborzfard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Problem with server reply in Rules Wizard
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 10:23:53 -0400
I set up a rule to have server reply using a specific message,
but although the condition is met, nothing happens.
I I read somewhere that there's a 32K size limit with RPC packets,
which is I think what this is, but I checked the size of the reply and it
would be only 535 Bytes.
Before doing this, I had tried (unsuccessfully) a server-side Auto-Reply
script (from CDOlive), but that didn't work either.
I have EX5.5, on NT 4 SP6.

Thanks

--Alex Alborzfard

-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 10:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Slooww OST sync over dialup
Nope - you want to use IP all the time..

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
 -Original Message-
 From: Rob Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 10:10 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Slooww OST sync over dialup


 Although when back in the office, plugged into the LAN, would
 you not want to use RPC?


 Regards,

 Rob Ellis
 IT Manager
 Samsara Group plc
 Tel 023 9224 7979
 Mob 07974 111867
 MCP BEng(hons)



 -Original Message-
 From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 23 September 2003 14:59
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Slooww OST sync over dialup


 Actually, remove everything but ncacn_ip_tcp

 That is, unless your'e running IPX/SPX or VNS across your
 dial up. Named
 pipes and RPC are pretty horrific, too.

 --
 Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
 Sr. Systems Administrator
 Inovis Inc.


  -Original Message-
  From: Rob Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 9:49 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Slooww OST sync over dialup
 
 
 
  Set HKLM\software\microsoft\exchange\exchange
  provider\rpc_binding_order
 
  To
 
  ncacn_ip_tcp,ncalrpc,ncacn_spx,ncacn_np,netbios,ncacn_vns_spp
 
 
  In actual fact, yours will have 'ncalrpc' listed first.  Move
  it along a bit.
 
 
 
  Regards,
 
  Rob Ellis
  IT Manager
  Samsara Group plc
  Tel 023 9224 7979
  Mob 07974 111867
  MCP BEng(hons)
 
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: 23 September 2003 14:46
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Slooww OST sync over dialup
 
 
  Does anyone know any reg hacks to speed up RPC over dialup?
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
 Tony Hlabse
  Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 10:29 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
 
 
  What?
 
 
  From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: RE: Slooww OST sync over dialup
  Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 09:23:22 -0400
 
  Well it's over dialup and we don't pass anything other than
  IP over it so I
  don't think it's that.  We can try it though.
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Ellis
  Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 8:38 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
 
  RPC Binding order in the registry?
 
 
  Regards,
 
  Rob Ellis
  IT Manager
  Samsara Group plc
  Tel 023 9224 7979
  Mob 07974 111867
  MCP BEng(hons)
 
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: 22 September 2003 13:27
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: Slooww OST sync over dialup
 
 
  I think I have asked this before but didn't really get any
  responses.  We
  have reps in the field that sync their Outlook 2002 clients
  to an OST over
  dialup.  For some reason it is very slow.  Now when they
 sync it over
  broadband it takes about 30 seconds.  When they sync it over
  dialup even
  after a full sync of their mailbox is done over broadband or
  lan line, it
  takes about 2 hours.  This doesn't make sense.  I know the
  connection is
  faster but I don't think that's it.  They don't have anything
  to sync.  I
  have changed the server timeout to 120 seconds with no luck.
  Is there like
  a reg key or something that I can change to make this faster.
   We need to
  stick to OST files because we have public folders and
  calendars that need to
  be online.  We are also using EX2000 SP3 if that matters but
  I think this is
  more Outlook than Exchange.
 
  Thanks,
   
  Alex
 
 
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Web

RE: Problem with server reply in Rules Wizard

2003-09-23 Thread Alex Alborzfard
No there's only 1 rule. This is a brand new mailbox.

-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 10:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Problem with server reply in Rules Wizard


It's not the size of one rule but all of them. Is there more than one rule 
setup?



From: Alex Alborzfard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Problem with server reply in Rules Wizard
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 10:23:53 -0400

I set up a rule to have server reply using a specific message, but although
the condition is met, nothing happens. I I read somewhere that there's a 32K
size limit with RPC packets, which is I think what this is, but I checked
the size of the reply and it would be only 535 Bytes. Before doing this, I
had tried (unsuccessfully) a server-side Auto-Reply script (from CDOlive),
but that didn't work either.

I have EX5.5, on NT 4 SP6.

Thanks

--Alex Alborzfard


-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 10:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Slooww OST sync over dialup


Nope - you want to use IP all the time..

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


  -Original Message-
  From: Rob Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 10:10 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Slooww OST sync over dialup
 
 
  Although when back in the office, plugged into the LAN, would   you not
want to use RPC?   Regards, Rob Ellis   IT Manager   Samsara
Group plc   Tel 023 9224 7979   Mob 07974 111867   MCP BEng(hons)
   -Original Message-   From: Roger Seielstad
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: 23 September 2003 14:59
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: Slooww OST sync over dialup
 
 
  Actually, remove everything but ncacn_ip_tcp
 
  That is, unless your'e running IPX/SPX or VNS across your
  dial up. Named
  pipes and RPC are pretty horrific, too.
 
  --
  Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
  Sr. Systems Administrator
  Inovis Inc.
 
 
   -Original Message-
   From: Rob Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 9:49 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Slooww OST sync over dialup
  
  
  
   Set HKLM\software\microsoft\exchange\exchange
   provider\rpc_binding_order
  
   To
  
   ncacn_ip_tcp,ncalrpc,ncacn_spx,ncacn_np,netbios,ncacn_vns_spp
  
  
   In actual fact, yours will have 'ncalrpc' listed first.  Moveit
along a bit. Regards,   Rob EllisIT
ManagerSamsara Group plcTel 023 9224 7979Mob 07974 111867
  MCP BEng(hons) -Original Message-From:
Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: 23 September 2003 14:46
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: RE: Slooww OST sync over dialup
  
  
   Does anyone know any reg hacks to speed up RPC over dialup?  
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of   Tony
HlabseSent: Monday, September 22, 2003 10:29 AMTo: Exchange
Discussions  What?  From: Gonzalez, Alex
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Reply-To: Exchange Discussions
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: Exchange Discussions
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: Slooww OST sync over
dialupDate: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 09:23:22 -0400   Well it's over
dialup and we don't pass anything other thanIP over it so Idon't
think it's that.  We can try it though.  -Original
Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Ellis  
 Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 8:38 AMTo: Exchange Discussions  
RPC Binding order in the registry?  Regards,  
Rob EllisIT ManagerSamsara Group plcTel 023 9224 7979   
Mob 07974 111867MCP BEng(hons) -Original
Message-From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: 22 September 2003 13:27
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: Slooww OST sync over dialup
  
  
   I think I have asked this before but didn't really get any   
responses.  Wehave reps in the field that sync their Outlook 2002
clientsto an OST overdialup.  For some reason it is very slow.
Now when they   sync it overbroadband it takes about 30 seconds.
When they sync it overdialup evenafter a full sync of their
mailbox is done over broadband orlan line, ittakes about 2
hours.  This doesn't make sense.  I know theconnection isfaster
but I don't think that's it.  They don't have anythingto sync.  I   
have changed the server timeout to 120 seconds with no luck.Is there
likea reg key or something that I can change

RE: Problem with server reply in Rules Wizard

2003-09-23 Thread Arlo Clizer
Do you have automatic replies to the internet enabled on your server?

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 7:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Problem with server reply in Rules Wizard

I set up a rule to have server reply using a specific message,
but although the condition is met, nothing happens. 
I I read somewhere that there's a 32K size limit with RPC packets, 
which is I think what this is, but I checked the size of the reply and it
would be only 535 Bytes.
Before doing this, I had tried (unsuccessfully) a server-side Auto-Reply
script (from CDOlive), but that didn't work either.

I have EX5.5, on NT 4 SP6.

Thanks

--Alex Alborzfard



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Problem with server reply in Rules Wizard

2003-09-23 Thread Alex Alborzfard
No but I enabled it, restarted IMS and still not getting the reply.

-Original Message-
From: Arlo Clizer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 10:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problem with server reply in Rules Wizard


Do you have automatic replies to the internet enabled on your server?

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 7:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Problem with server reply in Rules Wizard

I set up a rule to have server reply using a specific message, but although
the condition is met, nothing happens. 
I I read somewhere that there's a 32K size limit with RPC packets, 
which is I think what this is, but I checked the size of the reply and it
would be only 535 Bytes. Before doing this, I had tried (unsuccessfully) a
server-side Auto-Reply script (from CDOlive), but that didn't work either.

I have EX5.5, on NT 4 SP6.

Thanks

--Alex Alborzfard



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Problem with server reply in Rules Wizard

2003-09-23 Thread Alex Alborzfard
Got the reply just now. Apparently there was some delay with Yahoo.
Thanks for your help!
Btw the server-side script is still not working.

--Alex Alborzfard

-Original Message-
From: Arlo Clizer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 10:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problem with server reply in Rules Wizard


Do you have automatic replies to the internet enabled on your server?

-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 7:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Problem with server reply in Rules Wizard

I set up a rule to have server reply using a specific message, but although
the condition is met, nothing happens. 
I I read somewhere that there's a 32K size limit with RPC packets, 
which is I think what this is, but I checked the size of the reply and it
would be only 535 Bytes. Before doing this, I had tried (unsuccessfully) a
server-side Auto-Reply script (from CDOlive), but that didn't work either.

I have EX5.5, on NT 4 SP6.

Thanks

--Alex Alborzfard



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]