RE: Why move to E2K

2002-09-30 Thread Andrey Fyodorov

Do you have a failover for your CTO?

-Original Message-
From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 3:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Why move to E2K


I have been asked by our CTO to justify why we should go to E2K and spend
$2.00 as result of the move on new real time mirroring software. I have
gathered the usual MS stuff but would you have any compelling reason that I
could also add or point me to other resources.

Thanks

the extra 20 grand comes as a result of Double Take (which unfortunately we
already own) not supporting E2K like Exch 5.5 (if you look at their site
they never mention this) and thus the need to go to NSI Geo Cluster (another
crap, pardon my english) as our CTO wants an automatic failover just in case
there is no one around.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Why move to E2K

2002-09-27 Thread William Lefkovics

Did you want justifications for IT or reasons it will help your
business?  Are you looking for a way to justify it so you can use it or
are there actual business needs that E2K provides?

The efforts in your justification may well point to it being
unnecessary.

William


To save time:

From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 1:37 PM
Subject: Re: Why go to E2k

My justifications:

Information store can be split a different HDs. thus corruption doesnot
mean probable loss of all of the days' emails or downtime for everyone.
 
Exchange 2000 with Microsoft Windows 2000 has a single, enterprise
directory, the Microsoft Active Directory directory service, for all
file, print, application, user, and other messaging objects. 

When Microsoft Office documents are stored in Exchange 2000, Office
users can take advantage of the power of Outlook to view, sort, search,
and manage documents with the same tools they currently use for their
messages, calendars, and contacts. 

Tightly integrated instant messaging, chat, multimedia conferencing, and
mobile services 

Enhanced functionality for Microsoft Internet Explorer users When
accessed through Internet Explorer , Outlook Web Access closely
resembles the full client interface (see Figure 1). Outlook Web Access
is also more efficient for Internet Explorer users because it does not
require communication with the Outlook Web Access server for every mouse
click in the interface 

support for embedded items  Outlook Web Access now supports embedded
items such as messages, appointments, and meeting requests, as well as
contacts and posts. 

Support for public folders that contain contact and calendar items 

AD and Exchange can now be managed thru a single interface.


however I am afraid this might not be enough!



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of M2web
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 12:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Why move to E2K


I have been asked by our CTO to justify why we should go to E2K and
spend $2.00 as result of the move on new real time mirroring
software. I have gathered the usual MS stuff but would you have any
compelling reason that I could also add or point me to other resources.

Thanks

the extra 20 grand comes as a result of Double Take (which unfortunately
we already own) not supporting E2K like Exch 5.5 (if you look at their
site they never mention this) and thus the need to go to NSI Geo Cluster
(another crap, pardon my english) as our CTO wants an automatic failover
just in case there is no one around.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Why move to E2K

2002-09-27 Thread Webb, Andy

We don't know anything about how your organization uses Exchange, so
there's no way to offer any constructive information about the ROI of
upgrading.

Certainly having an additional $20K to overcome will make the return
harder to achieve.

===
Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED]  www.swinc.com
Simpler-Webb, Inc.   Austin, TX512-322-0071
=== 

-Original Message-
From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Friday, September 27, 2002 2:56 PM
Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
Conversation: Why move to E2K
Subject: Why move to E2K


I have been asked by our CTO to justify why we should go to E2K and
spend $2.00 as result of the move on new real time mirroring
software. I have gathered the usual MS stuff but would you have any
compelling reason that I could also add or point me to other resources.

Thanks

the extra 20 grand comes as a result of Double Take (which unfortunately
we already own) not supporting E2K like Exch 5.5 (if you look at their
site they never mention this) and thus the need to go to NSI Geo Cluster
(another crap, pardon my english) as our CTO wants an automatic failover
just in case there is no one around.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]