Once I had a hairy migration from 5.5 to 2000.
I could not do an in-place migration because 5.5 server was the only one
that the organization had.
when I installed a new Exchange 2000 server and joined it to the existing
5.5 org, everything seemed to work fine, but in the end the 5.5 server was
not available in the Servers container on the Ex2K side, and vice versa -
the Ex2K server was not visible from the Ex5.5 side.
I finally quit tryin to join a 2000 server to existing 5.5 org. Instead I
installed a dummy 5.5 server into the same 5.5 org and joined the site. That
worked out well. Then I did an in-place upgrade of the dummy 5.5 server to
Ex2K. It worked. Then I installed a real Ex2K server into the org, moved all
the users over, then killed the original 5.5 server and then killed the
dummy Ex2K server.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 1:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: replication issue
Looks like a name resolution error. When you added the 2nd server into the
existing site, didnt you get some error messages?
Try adding the names of the other Exch server into each respective server's
hosts files.
RPCPing is also your friend.
- Original Message -
From: dave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:37 PM
Subject: replication issue
Situation: Exchange 5.5 sp4 running on NT4 (sp6a). System needs replaced.
Built 2000 server installed Exchange 5.5 into the site. Site will not
replicate so I can't move mailboxes. Errors are:
Event ID: 1059
Source: MSExchangeDS
Description:
Internal error: The directory replication agent (DRA) call returned error
22.
Event ID: 1083
Source: MSExchangeDS
Description:
Replication warning: The directory replication agent (DRA) couldn't
synchronize naming context /o='ORG'/ou='SITE' with naming context on
directory 'FIRST-SERVER'.
Nothing on Microsoft support is giving any clues to the issue except that
DRA error 22 is a JET error.
I have removed the added server, cleared its existance, and re-installed.
outcome = identical issues.
Thoughts?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
