SIS ?

2003-10-10 Thread Tony Hlabse
If a user has a message with an attachment on it that he forwards to other 
users, he then moves the message that has the attachment to a PST efectively 
removing it from the Exchange DB. Do all of the recipients of the forwarded 
email have an instance or does Exchange somehow keep a copy of the 
attachment.

_
Need more e-mail storage? Get 10MB with Hotmail Extra Storage.   
http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: SIS ?

2003-10-10 Thread Bridges, Samantha
The .pst file would get a copy of the attachment from Exchange.  The
rest of the users who received a forwarded copy will still reference the
single instance storage for the attachment on the Exchange server.

Exchange will still retain a copy (SIS) for the other users who remain
on the Exchange server.

Hope this helps.

Samantha

-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 8:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SIS ?


If a user has a message with an attachment on it that he forwards to
other 
users, he then moves the message that has the attachment to a PST
efectively 
removing it from the Exchange DB. Do all of the recipients of the
forwarded 
email have an instance or does Exchange somehow keep a copy of the 
attachment.

_
Need more e-mail storage? Get 10MB with Hotmail Extra Storage.   
http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: SIS ?

2003-10-10 Thread Tony Hlabse
That's what I thought. Thanks for verifying for me. Because other messages 
refer to an object it never gets truly deleted from the DB.

From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: SIS ?
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 08:49:40 -0400
The .pst file would get a copy of the attachment from Exchange.  The
rest of the users who received a forwarded copy will still reference the
single instance storage for the attachment on the Exchange server.
Exchange will still retain a copy (SIS) for the other users who remain
on the Exchange server.
Hope this helps.

Samantha

-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 8:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SIS ?
If a user has a message with an attachment on it that he forwards to
other
users, he then moves the message that has the attachment to a PST
efectively
removing it from the Exchange DB. Do all of the recipients of the
forwarded
email have an instance or does Exchange somehow keep a copy of the
attachment.
_
Need more e-mail storage? Get 10MB with Hotmail Extra Storage.
http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es
_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Get a FREE computer virus scan online from McAfee. 
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: SIS ?

2003-10-10 Thread Exchange Discussion List
Well, it will eventually get deleted from the database, if all of the folks
who received a copy either delete the message or move it to a PST.  But the
original object in the store will remain until ALL instances of it are
removed.

Make sense?

-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 8:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SIS ?

That's what I thought. Thanks for verifying for me. Because other messages 
refer to an object it never gets truly deleted from the DB.


From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: SIS ?
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 08:49:40 -0400

The .pst file would get a copy of the attachment from Exchange.  The
rest of the users who received a forwarded copy will still reference the
single instance storage for the attachment on the Exchange server.

Exchange will still retain a copy (SIS) for the other users who remain
on the Exchange server.

Hope this helps.

Samantha

-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 8:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SIS ?


If a user has a message with an attachment on it that he forwards to
other
users, he then moves the message that has the attachment to a PST
efectively
removing it from the Exchange DB. Do all of the recipients of the
forwarded
email have an instance or does Exchange somehow keep a copy of the
attachment.

_
Need more e-mail storage? Get 10MB with Hotmail Extra Storage.
http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=;
lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Get a FREE computer virus scan online from McAfee. 
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: Change to different organization without losing SIS??

2002-11-07 Thread Chris Scharff
Tools | Move Mailbox  The Move Server Wizard. Using the tools mentioned, I
don't believe there is any way to maintain SIS when moving between orgs. 3rd
party tools such as those from NetIQ might maintain SIS, they however aren't
free.

-Original Message-
From: Petri
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 11/6/2002 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: Change to different organization without losing SIS??


You can read Q175481. SIS should be still existing in there.

 From what I understand of the Move Server Wizard and exmerge we
would lose
 SIS (Single Instance Storage) if we used the wizard (or any other
method??)
 to change our organization. (??)  We are currently running Exchange
5.5 and
 our parent company (which we may need to change our organization to
someday)
 is also running 5.5 today.  Maybe we need to force everyone to remove
their
 mail from the server (to those robust PST files) before attempting a
 changeover?
 
 Tom

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Change to different organization without losing SIS??

2002-11-06 Thread Petri

You can read Q175481. SIS should be still existing in there.

 From what I understand of the Move Server Wizard and exmerge we would lose
 SIS (Single Instance Storage) if we used the wizard (or any other method??)
 to change our organization. (??)  We are currently running Exchange 5.5 and
 our parent company (which we may need to change our organization to someday)
 is also running 5.5 today.  Maybe we need to force everyone to remove their
 mail from the server (to those robust PST files) before attempting a
 changeover?
 
 Tom

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Change to different organization without losing SIS??

2002-11-05 Thread Alverson, Tom
From what I understand of the Move Server Wizard and exmerge we would lose
SIS (Single Instance Storage) if we used the wizard (or any other method??)
to change our organization. (??)  We are currently running Exchange 5.5 and
our parent company (which we may need to change our organization to someday)
is also running 5.5 today.  Maybe we need to force everyone to remove their
mail from the server (to those robust PST files) before attempting a
changeover?

Tom

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Change to different organization without losing SIS??

2002-11-05 Thread Greg Deckler
If you go the PST route, you are still breaking SIS, you have just made it
the user's problem.

You are correct that this is a big problem of email migrations. If you are
extremely concerned about this, then you are really limiting your options
as far as migration is concerned.

I would like to ask why you believe that the Move Server Wizard breaks
SIS. I have never found anything in the documentation or in the way that
it works that would suggest that it breaks SIS. Also, from my own
knowledge of the Move Server Wizard, it does not make a lot of sense that
it would break SIS, just from knowing how it operates. I am not going to
definitively state that it does not break SIS, because I honestly do not
use it that often. However, if you could provide me with the source of
your information it would be beneficial because the Move Server Wizard is
your best bet for preserving SIS. If it will not do it, then you are
pretty much up a creek as far as non-third party tools are concerned
because EXMERGE and the Exchange Migration Wizard will almost certainly
break SIS.

 From what I understand of the Move Server Wizard and exmerge we would lose
 SIS (Single Instance Storage) if we used the wizard (or any other method??)
 to change our organization. (??)  We are currently running Exchange 5.5 and
 our parent company (which we may need to change our organization to someday)
 is also running 5.5 today.  Maybe we need to force everyone to remove their
 mail from the server (to those robust PST files) before attempting a
 changeover?
 
 Tom

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Change to different organization without losing SIS??

2002-11-05 Thread Tony Hlabse
What is your question then?

- Original Message -
From: Alverson, Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 4:02 PM
Subject: Change to different organization without losing SIS??


 From what I understand of the Move Server Wizard and exmerge we would
lose
 SIS (Single Instance Storage) if we used the wizard (or any other
method??)
 to change our organization. (??)  We are currently running Exchange 5.5
and
 our parent company (which we may need to change our organization to
someday)
 is also running 5.5 today.  Maybe we need to force everyone to remove
their
 mail from the server (to those robust PST files) before attempting a
 changeover?

 Tom

 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: SIS and English

2002-10-09 Thread Roger Seielstad

Actually, it's the average number of references per message in the store,
and therefore you can extrapolate the amount of storage space saved by SIS.

Therefore, stores with an SIS of 3 mean an average of 3 references per
message. I find it rare to see SISs less than 2, unless there is very little
intraoffice email exchanged.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA


 -Original Message-
 From: Gary Barnett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 5:54 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: SIS and English
 
 
 Sounds to me that if x messages exist in the store and y messages are
 duplicates, then the ratio can be expressed as a percentage 
 of messages that
 are singly stored.
 
 Note that the number of bytes saved is not included in the 
 calculation, hence
 the result says nothing about the number of bytes saved.
 
 I suppose you are supposed to assume that all the dups are copies of
 forwarded jokes, MP3 and other large attachments, rather than 
 500 copies of
 To the loser who stole my pen, please return it, ASAP!
 
 --Gary
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 2:36 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: SIS and English
 
 
 First, cool subject :-)
 
 Ex5.5, perfmon on MSexchangeIS private.
 I look at the Single Instance Storage Ratio counter and 
 wonder: Does the
 word ratio means like the English ratio word, or it means 
 actually how
 much data I save because I am using SIS?
 
 Idiot Question? Look at :Q160178
 
 ==
 ==
 
 Single Instance Ratio:
 
 The ratio between the total number of message references and 
 the total number
 of messages stored in the information store. This ratio 
 indicates the amount
 of storage saved by single instance storage.
 ==
 ==
 =
 
 The first sentence talks about ratio, which means some kind 
 of mathematical
 relation. The second sentence talks about a permanent number 
 - amount of
 storage.
 
 Well?!
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: SIS and English

2002-10-09 Thread Ed Crowley

The customer with whom I am working at present has a SIS of 6 to 7 on
each of four primary mailbox servers, and they don't even attempt to
collect workgroups onto the same server.

Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Technical Consultant
hp Services
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 5:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SIS and English


Actually, it's the average number of references per message in the
store, and therefore you can extrapolate the amount of storage space
saved by SIS.

Therefore, stores with an SIS of 3 mean an average of 3 references per
message. I find it rare to see SISs less than 2, unless there is very
little intraoffice email exchanged.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA


 -Original Message-
 From: Gary Barnett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 5:54 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: SIS and English
 
 
 Sounds to me that if x messages exist in the store and y messages are 
 duplicates, then the ratio can be expressed as a percentage of 
 messages that are singly stored.
 
 Note that the number of bytes saved is not included in the
 calculation, hence
 the result says nothing about the number of bytes saved.
 
 I suppose you are supposed to assume that all the dups are copies of 
 forwarded jokes, MP3 and other large attachments, rather than 500 
 copies of To the loser who stole my pen, please return it, ASAP!
 
 --Gary
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 2:36 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: SIS and English
 
 
 First, cool subject :-)
 
 Ex5.5, perfmon on MSexchangeIS private.
 I look at the Single Instance Storage Ratio counter and
 wonder: Does the
 word ratio means like the English ratio word, or it means 
 actually how
 much data I save because I am using SIS?
 
 Idiot Question? Look at :Q160178
 
 ==
 ==
 
 Single Instance Ratio:
 
 The ratio between the total number of message references and
 the total number
 of messages stored in the information store. This ratio 
 indicates the amount
 of storage saved by single instance storage.
 ==
 ==
 =
 
 The first sentence talks about ratio, which means some kind
 of mathematical
 relation. The second sentence talks about a permanent number 
 - amount of
 storage.
 
 Well?!
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: SIS and English

2002-10-09 Thread Roger Seielstad

Prior to my last migration, I was seeing an SIS of 5-6 for most servers in a
similar configuration, as well.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA


 -Original Message-
 From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 1:20 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: SIS and English
 
 
 The customer with whom I am working at present has a SIS of 6 to 7 on
 each of four primary mailbox servers, and they don't even attempt to
 collect workgroups onto the same server.
 
 Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
 Technical Consultant
 hp Services
 There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral 
 problems.
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of 
 Roger Seielstad
 Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 5:53 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: SIS and English
 
 
 Actually, it's the average number of references per message in the
 store, and therefore you can extrapolate the amount of storage space
 saved by SIS.
 
 Therefore, stores with an SIS of 3 mean an average of 3 references per
 message. I find it rare to see SISs less than 2, unless there is very
 little intraoffice email exchanged.
 
 --
 Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
 Sr. Systems Administrator
 Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
 Atlanta, GA
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Gary Barnett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 5:54 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: SIS and English
  
  
  Sounds to me that if x messages exist in the store and y 
 messages are 
  duplicates, then the ratio can be expressed as a percentage of 
  messages that are singly stored.
  
  Note that the number of bytes saved is not included in the
  calculation, hence
  the result says nothing about the number of bytes saved.
  
  I suppose you are supposed to assume that all the dups are 
 copies of 
  forwarded jokes, MP3 and other large attachments, rather than 500 
  copies of To the loser who stole my pen, please return it, ASAP!
  
  --Gary
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 2:36 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: SIS and English
  
  
  First, cool subject :-)
  
  Ex5.5, perfmon on MSexchangeIS private.
  I look at the Single Instance Storage Ratio counter and
  wonder: Does the
  word ratio means like the English ratio word, or it means 
  actually how
  much data I save because I am using SIS?
  
  Idiot Question? Look at :Q160178
  
  ==
  ==
  
  Single Instance Ratio:
  
  The ratio between the total number of message references and
  the total number
  of messages stored in the information store. This ratio 
  indicates the amount
  of storage saved by single instance storage.
  ==
  ==
  =
  
  The first sentence talks about ratio, which means some kind
  of mathematical
  relation. The second sentence talks about a permanent number 
  - amount of
  storage.
  
  Well?!
  
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



SIS and English

2002-10-08 Thread Mark Hanji

First, cool subject :-)

Ex5.5, perfmon on MSexchangeIS private.
I look at the Single Instance Storage Ratio counter and wonder:
Does the word ratio means like the English ratio word, or it means
actually how much data I save because I am using SIS?

Idiot Question? Look at :Q160178



Single Instance Ratio:

The ratio between the total number of message references and the total
number of messages stored in the information store.
This ratio indicates the amount of storage saved by single instance storage.

=

The first sentence talks about ratio, which means some kind of mathematical
relation.
The second sentence talks about a permanent number - amount of storage.

Well?!


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: SIS and English

2002-10-08 Thread Gary Barnett

Sounds to me that if x messages exist in the store and y messages are
duplicates, then the ratio can be expressed as a percentage of messages that
are singly stored.

Note that the number of bytes saved is not included in the calculation, hence
the result says nothing about the number of bytes saved.

I suppose you are supposed to assume that all the dups are copies of
forwarded jokes, MP3 and other large attachments, rather than 500 copies of
To the loser who stole my pen, please return it, ASAP!

--Gary


-Original Message-
From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 2:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SIS and English


First, cool subject :-)

Ex5.5, perfmon on MSexchangeIS private.
I look at the Single Instance Storage Ratio counter and wonder: Does the
word ratio means like the English ratio word, or it means actually how
much data I save because I am using SIS?

Idiot Question? Look at :Q160178



Single Instance Ratio:

The ratio between the total number of message references and the total number
of messages stored in the information store. This ratio indicates the amount
of storage saved by single instance storage.

=

The first sentence talks about ratio, which means some kind of mathematical
relation. The second sentence talks about a permanent number - amount of
storage.

Well?!


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]